@article{WrightWachs2022,
  author    = {Wright, Michelle F. and Wachs, Sebastian},
  title     = {Self-isolation and adolescents' friendship quality: moderation of technology use for friendship maintenance},
  series = {Youth and Society},
  volume    = {55},
  journal   = {Youth and Society},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Sage Publications},
  address   = {Thousand Oaks},
  issn      = {0044-118X},
  doi       = {10.1177/0044118X221080484},
  pages     = {673 -- 685},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The purpose of the present study was to investigate the moderating effect of technology use for friendship maintenance in the associations between self-isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic and friendship quality, measured 6 months later (Time 2). Participants were 1,567 seventh and eighth graders (51\% female; 51\% white; M-age = 13.47) from the United States. They completed questionnaires on friendship quality at Time 1, and self-isolation during COVID-19 and technology use for friendship maintenance and friendship quality at Time 2. The findings revealed that self-isolation during COVID-19 was related positively to technology use for friendship maintenance and negatively to Time 2 friendship quality. Higher technology use for friendship maintenance buffered against the negative impacts on friendship quality associated with self-isolation during COVID-19, while lower technology use had the opposite effects on Time 2 friendship quality.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Gaertner2018,
  author    = {G{\"a}rtner, Ursula},
  title     = {nempe exemplis discimus},
  series = {Antike Erz{\"a}hl- und Deutungsmuster : Zwischen Exemplarit{\"a}t und Transformation},
  volume    = {374},
  journal   = {Antike Erz{\"a}hl- und Deutungsmuster : Zwischen Exemplarit{\"a}t und Transformation},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-11-061251-6},
  issn      = {1616-0452},
  doi       = {10.1515/9783110612516-022},
  pages     = {455 -- 472},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {'Tradition' and 'example' are key concepts of the ancient fable. The fable has not only developed a literary tradition of its own, but from the beginning, it was also used as a rhetorical device, the exemplum. A diachronic overview of the genre and especially the use of the fable as exemplum reveals that Phaedrus adapts these terms in a new and ingenious way. In a case study of fable 3.9 this paper demonstrates how the fable finds its place in the literary tradition of the motif, how Socrates is presented as a model for the poet's persona and how an intricate network of inter- and intratextual references is established between Socrates, Aesop, Phaedrus, and his potential successors. The subtle irony of the poet is particularly evident in the gradual development of the poet's persona into a caricature, but the message of the fable itself remains unaffected: the value of true friendship.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HoffmannWilbertLehoferetal.2020,
  author    = {Hoffmann, Lisa and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Lehofer, Mike and Schwab, Susanne},
  title     = {Are we good friends?},
  series = {European Journal of Special Needs Education},
  volume    = {36},
  journal   = {European Journal of Special Needs Education},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Taylor \& Francis},
  address   = {London},
  pages     = {16},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Empirical studies already examined various facets of the friendship construct. Building on this, the present study examines the questions of how the number of friendships and their quality differ between students with and without SEN and whether a homophily-effect can be identified. The sample consists of 455 fourth-graders from 28 inclusive classes in Austria. The results indicate that students with SEN have fewer friends than students without SEN. Furthermore, students without SEN preferred peers without SEN as a friend. This homophily-effect was shown for students with SEN, too. However, students with and without SEN rated the quality of their friendships similarly and no interactions between the SEN status of oneself or of the friend was found for the quality of the friendship. The results show that, in the context of inclusion, the issue of friendship needs to be increasingly addressed to improve the situation of students with SEN.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{HoffmannWilbertLehoferetal.2021,
  author    = {Hoffmann, Lisa and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Lehofer, Mike and Schwab, Susanne},
  title     = {Are we good friends?},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {4},
  issn      = {1866-8364},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-52535},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-525351},
  pages     = {18},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Empirical studies already examined various facets of the friendship construct. Building on this, the present study examines the questions of how the number of friendships and their quality differ between students with and without SEN and whether a homophily-effect can be identified. The sample consists of 455 fourth-graders from 28 inclusive classes in Austria. The results indicate that students with SEN have fewer friends than students without SEN. Furthermore, students without SEN preferred peers without SEN as a friend. This homophily-effect was shown for students with SEN, too. However, students with and without SEN rated the quality of their friendships similarly and no interactions between the SEN status of oneself or of the friend was found for the quality of the friendship. The results show that, in the context of inclusion, the issue of friendship needs to be increasingly addressed to improve the situation of students with SEN.},
  language  = {en}
}