@phdthesis{Awad2010,
  author    = {Awad, Ahmed Mahmoud Hany Aly},
  title     = {A compliance management framework for business process models},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-49222},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Companies develop process models to explicitly describe their business operations. In the same time, business operations, business processes, must adhere to various types of compliance requirements. Regulations, e.g., Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, internal policies, best practices are just a few sources of compliance requirements. In some cases, non-adherence to compliance requirements makes the organization subject to legal punishment. In other cases, non-adherence to compliance leads to loss of competitive advantage and thus loss of market share. Unlike the classical domain-independent behavioral correctness of business processes, compliance requirements are domain-specific. Moreover, compliance requirements change over time. New requirements might appear due to change in laws and adoption of new policies. Compliance requirements are offered or enforced by different entities that have different objectives behind these requirements. Finally, compliance requirements might affect different aspects of business processes, e.g., control flow and data flow. As a result, it is infeasible to hard-code compliance checks in tools. Rather, a repeatable process of modeling compliance rules and checking them against business processes automatically is needed. This thesis provides a formal approach to support process design-time compliance checking. Using visual patterns, it is possible to model compliance requirements concerning control flow, data flow and conditional flow rules. Each pattern is mapped into a temporal logic formula. The thesis addresses the problem of consistency checking among various compliance requirements, as they might stem from divergent sources. Also, the thesis contributes to automatically check compliance requirements against process models using model checking. We show that extra domain knowledge, other than expressed in compliance rules, is needed to reach correct decisions. In case of violations, we are able to provide a useful feedback to the user. The feedback is in the form of parts of the process model whose execution causes the violation. In some cases, our approach is capable of providing automated remedy of the violation.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{RolfBergesHubwieseretal.2010,
  author    = {Rolf, Arno and Berges, Marc and Hubwieser, Peter and Kehrer, Timo and Kelter, Udo and Romeike, Ralf and Frenkel, Marcus and Karsten, Weicker and Reinhardt, Wolfgang and Mascher, Michael and G{\"u}l, Senol and Magenheim, Johannes and Raimer, Stephan and Diethelm, Ira and D{\"u}nnebier, Malte and Gabor, Kiss and Susanne, Boll and Rolf, Meinhardt and Gronewold, Sabine and Krekeler, Larissa and Jahnke, Isa and Haertel, Tobias and Mattick, Volker and Lettow, Karsten and Hafer, J{\"o}rg and Ludwig, Joachim and Schumann, Marlen and Laroque, Christoph and Schulte, Jonas and Urban, Diana},
  title     = {HDI2010 - Tagungsband der 4. Fachtagung zur "Hochschuldidaktik Informatik"},
  editor    = {Engbring, Dieter and Keil, Reinhard and Magenheim, Johannes and Selke, Harald},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-100-4},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-49167},
  pages     = {105},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Mit der 4. Tagung zur Hochschuldidaktik Informatik wird eine Reihe fortgesetzt, die ihren Anfang 1998 in Stuttgart unter der {\"U}berschrift „Informatik und Ausbildung" genommen hat. Seither dienen diese Tagungen den Lehrenden im Bereich der Hochschulinformatik als Forum der Information und des Diskurses {\"u}ber aktuelle didaktische und bildungspolitische Entwicklungen im Bereich der Informatikausbildung. Aktuell z{\"a}hlen dazu insbesondere Fragen der Bildungsrelevanz informatischer Inhalte und der Herausforderung durch eine st{\"a}rkere Kompetenzorientierung in der Informatik. Die eingereichten Beitr{\"a}ge zur HDI 2010 in Paderborn veranschaulichen unterschiedliche Bem{\"u}hungen, sich mit relevanten Problemen der Informatikdidaktik an Hochschulen in Deutschland (und z. T. auch im Ausland) auseinanderzusetzen. Aus der Breite des Spektrums der Einreichungen ergaben sich zugleich Probleme bei der Begutachtung. Letztlich konnten von den zahlreichen Einreichungen nur drei die Gutachter so {\"u}berzeugen, dass sie uneingeschr{\"a}nkt in ihrer Langfassung akzeptiert wurden. Neun weitere Einreichungen waren trotz Kritik {\"u}berwiegend positiv begutachtet worden, so dass wir diese als Kurzfassung bzw. Diskussionspapier in die Tagung aufgenommen haben.},
  language  = {de}
}
@phdthesis{Ishebabi2010,
  author    = {Ishebabi, Harold},
  title     = {Architecture synthesis for adaptive multiprocessor systems on chip},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-41316},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {This thesis presents methods for automated synthesis of flexible chip multiprocessor systems from parallel programs targeted at FPGAs to exploit both task-level parallelism and architecture customization. Automated synthesis is necessitated by the complexity of the design space. A detailed description of the design space is provided in order to determine which parameters should be modeled to facilitate automated synthesis by optimizing a cost function, the emphasis being placed on inclusive modeling of parameters from application, architectural and physical subspaces, as well as their joint coverage in order to avoid pre-constraining the design space. Given a parallel program and a set of an IP library, the automated synthesis problem is to simultaneously (i) select processors (ii) map and schedule tasks to them, and (iii) select one or several networks for inter-task communications such that design constraints and optimization objectives are met. The research objective in this thesis is to find a suitable model for automated synthesis, and to evaluate methods of using the model for architectural optimizations. Our contributions are a holistic approach for the design of such systems, corresponding models to facilitate automated synthesis, evaluation of optimization methods using state of the art integer linear and answer set programming, as well as the development of synthesis heuristics to solve runtime challenges.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{GeskeGoltz2010,
  author    = {Geske, Ulrich and Goltz, Hans-Joachim},
  title     = {Efficiency of difference-list programming},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-41563},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {The difference-list technique is described in literature as effective method for extending lists to the right without using calls of append/3. There exist some proposals for automatic transformation of list programs into differencelist programs. However, we are interested in construction of difference-list programs by the programmer, avoiding the need of a transformation step. In [GG09] it was demonstrated, how left-recursive procedures with a dangling call of append/3 can be transformed into right-recursion using the unfolding technique. For simplification of writing difference-list programs using a new cons/2 procedure was introduced. In the present paper, we investigate how efficieny is influenced using cons/2. We measure the efficiency of procedures using accumulator technique, cons/2, DCG's, and difference lists and compute the resulting speedup in respect to the simple procedure definition using append/3. Four Prolog systems were investigated and we found different behaviour concerning the speedup by difference lists. A result of our investigations is, that an often advice given in the literature for avoiding calls append/3 could not be confirmed in this strong formulation.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{GebserHinrichsSchaubetal.2010,
  author    = {Gebser, Martin and Hinrichs, Henrik and Schaub, Torsten H. and Thiele, Sven},
  title     = {xpanda: a (simple) preprocessor for adding multi-valued propositions to ASP},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-41466},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {We introduce a simple approach extending the input language of Answer Set Programming (ASP) systems by multi-valued propositions. Our approach is implemented as a (prototypical) preprocessor translating logic programs with multi-valued propositions into logic programs with Boolean propositions only. Our translation is modular and heavily benefits from the expressive input language of ASP. The resulting approach, along with its implementation, allows for solving interesting constraint satisfaction problems in ASP, showing a good performance.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{GeskeWolf2010,
  author    = {Geske, Ulrich and Wolf, Armin},
  title     = {Preface},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-41401},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {The workshops on (constraint) logic programming (WLP) are the annual meeting of the Society of Logic Programming (GLP e.V.) and bring together researchers interested in logic programming, constraint programming, and related areas like databases, artificial intelligence and operations research. In this decade, previous workshops took place in Dresden (2008), W{\"u}rzburg (2007), Vienna (2006), Ulm (2005), Potsdam (2004), Dresden (2002), Kiel (2001), and W{\"u}rzburg (2000). Contributions to workshops deal with all theoretical, experimental, and application aspects of constraint programming (CP) and logic programming (LP), including foundations of constraint/ logic programming. Some of the special topics are constraint solving and optimization, extensions of functional logic programming, deductive databases, data mining, nonmonotonic reasoning, , interaction of CP/LP with other formalisms like agents, XML, JAVA, program analysis, program transformation, program verification, meta programming, parallelism and concurrency, answer set programming, implementation and software techniques (e.g., types, modularity, design patterns), applications (e.g., in production, environment, education, internet), constraint/logic programming for semantic web systems and applications, reasoning on the semantic web, data modelling for the web, semistructured data, and web query languages.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{OPUS4-3955,
  title     = {Proceedings of the 23rd Workshop on (Constraint) Logic Programming 2009},
  editor    = {Geske, Ulrich and Wolf, Armin},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-026-7},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-37977},
  pages     = {187},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {The workshops on (constraint) logic programming (WLP) are the annual meeting of the Society of Logic Programming (GLP e.V.) and bring together researchers interested in logic programming, constraint programming, and related areas like databases, artificial intelligence and operations research. The 23rd WLP was held in Potsdam at September 15 - 16, 2009. The topics of the presentations of WLP2009 were grouped into the major areas: Databases, Answer Set Programming, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming as well as Constraints and Constraint Handling Rules.},
  language  = {en}
}