@article{RieseVogelsangSchroederetal.2022,
  author    = {Riese, Josef and Vogelsang, Christoph and Schr{\"o}der, Jan and Borowski, Andreas and Kulgemeyer, Christoph and Reinhold, Peter and Schecker, Horst},
  title     = {The development of lesson planning skills in the subject of physics},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Springer VS/Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  issn      = {1434-663X},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11618-022-01112-0},
  pages     = {843 -- 867},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {One main goal of university teacher education is the first acquisition of skills for theory-driven lesson planning. According to models of teachers' professional competence, it is assumed that the acquired professional knowledge represents an essential basis for the development of planning skills. Learning opportunities to apply this professional knowledge often occur in school internships, usually in advanced semesters of teacher education programs. It is also assumed that practical experience within lesson planning supports the formation of professional knowledge. However, the relationship between the extent of professional knowledge and the development of skills to plan a lesson lacks evidence. There is a particular challenge in measuring lesson planning skills both authentically and standardized. To evaluate the mentioned relationship, a longitudinal pre-post-study with prospective physics-teachers (N = 68 in the longitudinal section) was conducted at four German universities. Pre-service physics teachers' skills to plan a lesson were assessed with a standardized performance assessment at the beginning and at the end of a longterm-internship. This assessment consists of planning a physics lesson, conveying Newton's third Law, in a simulated and standardized way with limited time. In addition, content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge has been assessed using standardized instruments. Furthermore, additional information about the internship and the amount of learning opportunities was collected at the end of the internship. During the internship, both lesson planning skills and all components of professional knowledge increased. Cross-Lagged-Panel-Analyses reveal that in particular pre-service teachers' pedagogical content knowledge as well as pedagogical knowledge at the beginning of the internship influences the development of lesson planning skills.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{WeissbachKulgemeyer2023,
  author    = {Weißbach, Anna and Kulgemeyer, Christoph},
  title     = {Physikunterricht reflektieren},
  series = {Reflexion in der Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung: Empirisch - Phasen{\"u}bergreifend - Interdisziplin{\"a}r (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 4)},
  journal   = {Reflexion in der Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung: Empirisch - Phasen{\"u}bergreifend - Interdisziplin{\"a}r (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 4)},
  number    = {4},
  editor    = {Mientus, Lukas and Klempin, Christiane and Nowak, Anna},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-566-8},
  issn      = {2626-3556},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-63143},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-631432},
  pages     = {241 -- 247},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Obwohl der Reflexion von Unterricht eine zentrale Bedeutung f{\"u}r Lehrkr{\"a}fte zukommt, ist die Reflexionsf{\"a}higkeit von Lehramtsstudierenden oftmals nur gering ausgepr{\"a}gt und wird auch in Praxisphasen nicht automatisch weiterentwickelt. Es besteht also bereits im Studium ein Bedarf, die Studierenden bei der Entwicklung dieser F{\"a}higkeit zu unterst{\"u}tzen. Hier soll die nachfolgend vorgestellte Lernumgebung ansetzen und eine systematische Erfassung, R{\"u}ckmeldung und F{\"o}rderung der Reflexionsf{\"a}higkeit erm{\"o}glichen. Die Lernumgebung ist f{\"u}r das Lehramtsstudium im Fach Physik entwickelt und besteht aus einem Diagnoseinstrument mit daran anschließendem Assessment-Feedback und F{\"o}rdermaterial. Erste Untersuchungen zur Validit{\"a}t zeigen, dass die Studierenden w{\"a}hrend der Bearbeitung des Diagnoseinstruments inhaltlich relevante {\"U}berlegungen anstellen sowie das erhaltene Assessment-Feedback inhaltlich sinnvoll interpretieren und auch dem F{\"o}rdermaterial einen Mehrwert f{\"u}r ihre Professionalisierung zusprechen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{MientusKlempinNowaketal.2023,
  author    = {Mientus, Lukas and Klempin, Christiane and Nowak, Anna and Wyss, Corinne and Aufschnaiter, Claudia von and Faix, Ann-Christin and te Poel, Kathrin and Wahbe, Nadia and Pieper, Martin and H{\"o}ller, Katharina and Kallenbach, Lea and F{\"o}rster, Magdalena and Redecker, Anke and Dick, Mirjam and Holle, J{\"o}rg and Schneider, Edina and Rehfeldt, Daniel and Brauns, Sarah and Abels, Simone and Ferencik-Lehmkuhl, Daria and Fr{\"a}nkel, Silvia and Frohn, Julia and Liebsch, Ann-Catherine and Pech, Detlef and Schreier, Pascal and Jessen, Moiken and Großmann, Uta and Skintey, Lesya and Voerkel, Paul and Vaz Ferreira, Mergenfel A. and Zimmermann, Jan-Simon and Buddeberg, Magdalena and Henke, Vanessa and Hornberg, Sabine and V{\"o}lschow, Yvette and Warrelmann, Julia-Nadine and Malek, Jennifer and Tinnefeld, Anja and Schmidt, Peggy and Bauer, Tobias and J{\"a}nisch, Christopher and Spitzer, Lisa and Franken, Nadine and Degeling, Maria and Preisfeld, Angelika and Meier, Jana and K{\"u}th, Simon and Scholl, Daniel and Vogelsang, Christoph and Watson, Christina and Weißbach, Anna and Kulgemeyer, Christoph and Oetken, Mandy and Gorski, Sebastian and Kubsch, Marcus and Sorge, Stefan and Wulff, Peter and Fellenz, Carolin D. and Schnell, Susanne and Larisch, Cathleen and Kaiser, Franz and Knott, Christina and Reimer, Stefanie and Stegm{\"u}ller, Nathalie and Boukray{\^a}a Trabelsi, Kathrin and Schißlbauer, Franziska and Lemberger, Lukas and Barth, Ulrike and Wiehl, Angelika and Rogge, Tim and B{\"o}hnke, Anja and Dietz, Dennis and Großmann, Leroy and Wienmeister, Annett and Zoppke, Till and Jiang, Lisa and Gr{\"u}nbauer, Stephanie and Ostersehlt, D{\"o}rte and Peukert, Sophia and Sch{\"a}fer, Christoph and L{\"o}big, Anna and Br{\"o}ll, Leena and Brandt, Birgit and Breuer, Meike and Dausend, Henriette and Krelle, Michael and Andersen, Gesine and Falke, Sascha and Kindermann-G{\"u}zel, Kristin and K{\"o}rner, Katrina and Lottermoser, Lisa-Marie and P{\"u}gner, Kati and Sonnenburg, Nadine and Akarsu, Selim and Rechl, Friederike and Gadinger, Laureen and Heinze, Lena and Wittmann, Eveline and Franke, Manuela and Lachmund, Anne-Marie and B{\"o}ttger, Julia and Hannover, Bettina and Behrendt, Renata and Conty, Valentina and Grundmann, Stephanie and Ghassemi, Novid and Opitz, Ben and Br{\"a}mer, Martin and Gasparjan, David and Sambanis, Michaela and K{\"o}ster, Hilde and L{\"u}cke, Martin and Nordmeier, Volkhard and Schaal, Sonja and Haberbosch, Maximilian and Meissner, Maren and Schaal, Steffen and Br{\"u}chner, Melanie and Riehle, Tamara and Leopold, Bengta Marie and Gerlach, Susanne and Rau-Patschke, Sarah and Skorsetz, Nina and Weber, Nadine and Damk{\"o}hler, Jens and Elsholz, Markus and Trefzger, Thomas and Lewek, Tobias and Borowski, Andreas},
  title     = {Reflexion in der Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung},
  series = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge f{\"u}r Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung und Bildungsforschung},
  journal   = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge f{\"u}r Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung und Bildungsforschung},
  number    = {4},
  editor    = {Mientus, Lukas and Klempin, Christiane and Nowak, Anna},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-566-8},
  issn      = {2626-3556},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-59171},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-591717},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {452},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Reflexion ist eine Schl{\"u}sselkategorie f{\"u}r die professionelle Entwicklung von Lehrkr{\"a}ften, welche als Ausbildungsziel in den Bildungsstandards f{\"u}r die Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung verankert ist. Eine Verstetigung universit{\"a}r gepr{\"a}gter Forschung und Modellierung in der praxisnahen Anwendung im schulischen Kontext bietet Potentiale nachhaltiger Professionalisierung. Die St{\"a}rkung reflexionsbezogener Kompetenzen durch Empirie und Anwendung scheint eine phasen{\"u}bergreifende Herausforderung der Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung zu sein, die es zu bew{\"a}ltigen gilt. Ziele des Tagungsbandes Reflexion in der Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung sind eine theoretische Sch{\"a}rfung des Konzeptes „Reflexive Professionalisierung" und der Austausch {\"u}ber Fragen der Einbettung wirksamer reflexionsbezogener Lerngelegenheiten in die Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung. Forschende und Lehrende der‚ drei Phasen (Studium, Referendariat sowie Fort- und Weiterbildung) der Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung stellen Lehrkonzepte und Forschungsprojekte zum Thema Reflexion in der Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung vor und diskutieren diese. Gemeinsam mit Teilnehmenden aller Phasen und von verschiedenen Standorten der Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung werden zuk{\"u}nftige Herausforderungen identifiziert und L{\"o}sungsans{\"a}tze herausgearbeitet.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KulgemeyerBorowskiBuschhueteretal.2020,
  author    = {Kulgemeyer, Christoph and Borowski, Andreas and Buschh{\"u}ter, David and Enkrott, Patrick and Kempin, Maren and Reinhold, Peter and Riese, Josef and Schecker, Horst and Schr{\"o}der, Jan and Vogelsang, Christoph},
  title     = {Professional knowledge affects action-related skills},
  series = {Journal of research in science teaching : the official journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching},
  volume    = {57},
  journal   = {Journal of research in science teaching : the official journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching},
  number    = {10},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {0022-4308},
  doi       = {10.1002/tea.21632},
  pages     = {1554 -- 1582},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Professional knowledge is an important source of science teachers' actions in the classroom (e.g., personal professional content knowledge [pedagogical content knowledge, PCK] is the source of enacted PCK in the refined consensus model [RCM] for PCK). However, the evidence for this claim is ambiguous at best. This study applied a cross-lagged panel design to examine the relationship between professional knowledge and actions in one particular instructional situation: explaining physics. Pre- and post a field experience (one semester), 47 preservice physics teachers from four different universities were tested for their content knowledge (CK), PCK, pedagogical knowledge (PK), and action-related skills in explaining physics. The study showed that joint professional knowledge (the weighted sum of CK, PCK, and PK scores) at the beginning of the field experience impacted the development of explaining skills during the field experience (beta = .38**). We interpret this as a particular relationship between professional knowledge and science teachers' action-related skills (enacted PCK): professional knowledge is necessary for the development of explaining skills. That is evidence that personal PCK affects enacted PCK. In addition, field experiences are often supposed to bridge the theory-practice gap by transforming professional knowledge into instructional practice. Our results suggest that for field experiences to be effective, preservice teachers should start with profound professional knowledge.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{VogelsangBorowskiBuschhueteretal.2019,
  author    = {Vogelsang, Christoph and Borowski, Andreas and Buschh{\"u}ter, David and Enkrott, Patrick and Kempin, Maren and Kulgemeyer, Christoph and Reinhold, Peter and Riese, Josef and Schecker, Horst and Schr{\"o}der, Jan},
  title     = {Entwicklung von Professionswissen und Unterrichtsperformanz im Lehramtsstudium Physik},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r P{\"a}dagogik},
  volume    = {65},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r P{\"a}dagogik},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Beltz},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  issn      = {0044-3247},
  pages     = {473 -- 491},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Angehende Physiklehrkr{\"a}fte sollen im Rahmen ihres Studiums fachliches und fachdidaktisches Wissen erwerben, welches die Gestaltung lernf{\"o}rderlichen Unterrichts erm{\"o}glicht. Es ist allerdings empirisch nur wenig gekl{\"a}rt, wie sich dieses Wissen im Laufe des Studiums entwickelt und ob es zur Ausbildung von Handlungsf{\"a}higkeiten beitr{\"a}gt. Um derartige Wirkungsaussagen treffen zu k{\"o}nnen, m{\"u}ssen Instrumente entwickelt werden, die eine valide Testwertinterpretation zulassen. In diesem Beitrag werden auf Basis von im Projekt Profile-P+ entwickelten Instrumenten Validit{\"a}tsanalysen zur l{\"a}ngsschnittlichen Entwicklung des Professionswissens von Physiklehramtsstudierenden im Verlauf des Bachelorstudiums und ihrer F{\"a}higkeiten zur Planung und Reflexion von Physikunterricht sowie zum Erkl{\"a}ren von physikalischen Sachverhalten vor und nach dem Praxissemester dargestellt. Neben Wissenstests kamen standardisierte Performanztests zum Einsatz. Die vorliegenden Ergebnisse sprechen daf{\"u}r, dass die erhobenen Messwerte im Sinne von Wirkungsaussagen interpretiert werden k{\"o}nnen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{RieseKulgemeyerZanderetal.2015,
  author    = {Riese, Josef and Kulgemeyer, Christoph and Zander, Simon and Borowski, Andreas and Fischer, Hans E. and Gramzow, Yvonne and Reinhold, Peter and Schecker, Horst and Tomczyszyn, Elisabeth},
  title     = {Modeling and Measurement of Professional Knowledge in Physics Teacher Training},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r P{\"a}dagogik},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r P{\"a}dagogik},
  publisher = {Beltz},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  issn      = {0044-3247},
  pages     = {55 -- 79},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {For improving teacher education, there has been an increasing interest in describing teachers' professional competencies and their development in the course of implementing educational programs. The focus of the present project is on modeling and measuring domain-specific and generic competencies that future physics teachers acquire during their university studies. The model comprises characteristics and relationships between physics content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and skills for explaining physics phenomena. Based on the model, assessment instruments were developed and applied as paper-and-pencil-tests and videotaped expert-novice dialogues for measuring the competencies in a large sample of physics student teachers. Trials and validation suggest that our instruments are valid in terms of content and construct validities.},
  language  = {de}
}