@article{FilserTiberiusKrausetal.2020,
  author    = {Filser, Matthias and Tiberius, Victor and Kraus, Sascha and Spitzer, Jonathan and Kailer, Norbert and Bouncken, Ricarda B.},
  title     = {Sharing economy},
  series = {International journal of entrepreneurial venturing},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {International journal of entrepreneurial venturing},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Inderscience Enterprises},
  address   = {Gen{\`e}ve},
  issn      = {1742-5360},
  doi       = {10.1504/IJEV.2020.112234},
  pages     = {665 -- 665},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The sharing economy has received increased attention in entrepreneurship research, resulting in a complex research landscape that is hard to overlook. Using a bibliometric analysis, we aim to further synthesise the field by: 1) summarising the most important definitions given by extant literature to capture the common understanding of the sharing economy; 2) identifying three thematic clusters based on the top 20 most cited publications; 3) conducting a citation analysis to show interdependencies between all authors; and 4) identifying the research methods used in the SE publications. Our results show: 1) many definitions with different emphases; 2) conceptualisation, collaborative consumption/ownership and the disruptive character of the sharing economy as three dominant research clusters; 3) a fairly even citation practice allowing for unbiased future research; and 4) that conceptual publications and quantitative as well as qualitative studies are fairly evenly published.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KrausLiKangetal.2020,
  author    = {Kraus, Sascha and Li, Hongbo and Kang, Qi and Westhead, Paul and Tiberius, Victor},
  title     = {The sharing economy},
  series = {International journal of entrepreneurial behavior \& research},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {International journal of entrepreneurial behavior \& research},
  number    = {8},
  publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
  address   = {Bingley},
  issn      = {1355-2554},
  doi       = {10.1108/IJEBR-06-2020-0438},
  pages     = {1769 -- 1786},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Purpose Quantitative bibliometric approaches were used to statistically and objectively explore patterns in the sharing economy literature. Design/methodology/approach Journal (co-)citation analysis, author (co-)citation analysis, institution citation and co-operation analysis, keyword co-occurrence analysis, document (co-)citation analysis and burst detection analysis were conducted based on a bibliometric data set relating to sharing economy publications. Findings Sharing economy research is multi- and interdisciplinary. Journals focused upon products liability, organizing framework, profile characteristics, diverse economies, consumption system and everyday life themes. Authors focused upon profile characteristics, sharing economy organization, social connections, first principle and diverse economy themes. No institution dominated the research field. Keyword co-occurrence analysis identified organizing framework, tourism industry, consumer behavior, food waste, generous exchange and quality cue as research themes. Document co-citation analysis found research themes relating to the tourism industry, exploring public acceptability, agri-food system, commercial orientation, products liability and social connection. Most cited authors, institutions and documents are reported. Research limitations/implications The study did not exclusively focus on publications in top-tier journals. Future studies could run analyses relating to top-tier journals alone, and then run analyses relating to less renowned journals alone. To address the potential fuzzy results concern, reviews could focus on business and/or management research alone. Longitudinal reviews conducted over several points in time are warranted. Future reviews could combine qualitative and quantitative approaches. Originality/value We contribute by analyzing information relating to the population of all sharing economy articles. In addition, we contribute by employing several quantitative bibliometric approaches that enable the identification of trends relating to the themes and patterns in the growing literature.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ReuschlTiberiusFilseretal.2021,
  author    = {Reuschl, Andreas and Tiberius, Victor and Filser, Matthias and Qiu, Yixin},
  title     = {Value configurations in sharing economy business models},
  series = {Review of managerial science},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Review of managerial science},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {1863-6683},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11846-020-00433-w},
  pages     = {89 -- 112},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The sharing economy gains momentum and develops a major economic impact on traditional markets and firms. However, only rudimentary theoretical and empirical insights exist on how sharing networks, i.e., focal firms, shared goods providers and customers, create and capture value in their sharing-based business models. We conduct a qualitative study to find key differences in sharing-based business models that are decisive for their value configurations. Our results show that (1) customization versus standardization of shared goods and (2) the centralization versus particularization of property rights over the shared goods are two important dimensions to distinguish value configurations. A second, quantitative study confirms the visibility and relevance of these dimensions to customers. We discuss strategic options for focal firms to design value configurations regarding the two dimensions to optimize value creation and value capture in sharing networks. Firms can use this two-dimensional search grid to explore untapped opportunities in the sharing economy.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Abramova2022,
  author    = {Abramova, Olga},
  title     = {No matter what the name, we're all the same?},
  series = {Electronic markets},
  volume    = {32},
  journal   = {Electronic markets},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Heidelberg},
  issn      = {1019-6781},
  doi       = {10.1007/s12525-021-00505-z},
  pages     = {1419 -- 1446},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Sharing marketplaces emerged as the new Holy Grail of value creation by enabling exchanges between strangers. Identity reveal, encouraged by platforms, cuts both ways: While inducing pre-transaction confidence, it is suspected of backfiring on the information senders with its discriminative potential. This study employs a discrete choice experiment to explore the role of names as signifiers of discriminative peculiarities and the importance of accompanying cues in peer choices of a ridesharing offer. We quantify users' preferences for quality signals in monetary terms and evidence comparative disadvantage of Middle Eastern descent male names for drivers and co-travelers. It translates into a lower willingness to accept and pay for an offer. Market simulations confirm the robustness of the findings. Further, we discover that females are choosier and include more signifiers of involuntary personal attributes in their decision-making. Price discounts and positive information only partly compensate for the initial disadvantage, and identity concealment is perceived negatively.},
  language  = {en}
}