@article{KraemerKaltschewZamirirad2013,
  author    = {Kr{\"a}mer, Raimund and Kaltschew, Kristian and Zamirirad, Azadeh},
  title     = {Opposition in autorit{\"a}ren Regimen},
  series = {WeltTrends-Papiere},
  journal   = {WeltTrends-Papiere},
  number    = {23},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1864-0656},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-65325},
  pages     = {18 -- 32},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Inhalt: 1. Fragestellungen und State of the Art 1.1 Forschungsfragen 1.2 {\"U}ber den Stand der Forschung 1.3 Opposition in autorit{\"a}ren Regimen - klassisch und aktuell 2. Analyseschritte 2.1 Opposition in politischen Systemen 2.2 Handlungsdimensionen der Opposition 2.3 Idealtypen der Opposition in autorit{\"a}ren Regimen 2.4 F{\"u}nf forschungsleitende Hypothesen 3. Literaturverzeichnis},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Kraemer2013,
  author    = {Kr{\"a}mer, Raimund},
  title     = {Autoritarismus im 21. Jahrhundert},
  series = {WeltTrends-Papiere},
  journal   = {WeltTrends-Papiere},
  number    = {23},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1864-0656},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-65312},
  pages     = {7 -- 17},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Inhalt: Mit Linz und Loewenstein - Zum Begriff des autorit{\"a}ren Regimes Von Wellen und blinden Flecken in der Komparatistik Autorit{\"a}re Regime im 21. Jahrhundert - Ein {\"U}berblick Schleichender Autoritarismus im Westen Autorit{\"a}re Wende des Kapitalismus?},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Yilmaz2018,
  author    = {Yilmaz, Zafer},
  title     = {Revising the culture of political protest after the gezi uprising in Turkey},
  series = {Mediterranean Quarterly},
  volume    = {29},
  journal   = {Mediterranean Quarterly},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Duke Univ. Press},
  address   = {Durham},
  issn      = {1047-4552},
  doi       = {10.1215/10474552-7003168},
  pages     = {55 -- 77},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {The Gezi uprising can be considered a crucial turning in Turkish politics. As a response to countrywide democratic protests, the Justice and Development Party (AKP) government revived the security state, escalated authoritarian tendencies, and started to organize a nationalist, Islamist, and conservative backlash. This essay argues that the Gezi Park protests revealed both the fragility of the AKP's hegemony and the limits of the dominant political group habitus, which were promoted by the party to consolidate political polarization in favor of the party's hegemony. Moreover, it is argued that the Gezi uprising transformed the culture of political protests in the country and paved the way for the emergence of affirmative resistance, radical imagination, and a new politics of desire and dignity against authoritarian and neoliberal policies.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HeinzelKoenigArchibugi2022,
  author    = {Heinzel, Mirko and Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias},
  title     = {Harmful side effects},
  series = {British journal of political science},
  volume    = {53},
  journal   = {British journal of political science},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
  address   = {Cambridge},
  issn      = {0007-1234},
  doi       = {10.1017/S0007123422000564},
  pages     = {1293 -- 1310},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Governments have increasingly adopted laws restricting the activities of international non-governmental organizations INGOs within their borders. Such laws are often intended to curb the ability of critical INGOs to discover and communicate government failures and abuses to domestic and international audiences. They can also have the unintended effect of reducing the presence and activities of INGOs working on health issues, and depriving local health workers and organizations of access to resources, knowledge and other forms of support. This study assesses whether legislative restrictions on INGOs are associated with fewer health INGOs in a wide range of countries and with the ability of those countries to mitigate disability-adjusted life years lost because of twenty-one disease categories between 1993 and 2017. The findings indicate that restrictive legislation hampered efforts by civil society to lighten the global burden of disease and had adverse side effects on the health of citizens worldwide.},
  language  = {en}
}