@article{Rojahn2023,
  author    = {Rojahn, Marcel},
  title     = {Professionelle Personalzeiterfassung},
  series = {Factory Innovation : agil und smart mit Industrie 4.0},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {Factory Innovation : agil und smart mit Industrie 4.0},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {GITO mbH - Verlag f{\"u}r Industrielle Informationstechnik und Organisation},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2749-7593},
  pages     = {74 -- 74},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Der Einsatz digitaler Personalzeiterfassungssysteme bietet Unternehmen zahlreiche Vorteile, z. B. effizientere Lohn- und Gehaltsabrechnungen, mehr Transparenz und {\"U}bersicht {\"u}ber die Arbeitszeiten der Mitarbeiter sowie flexiblere Erfassungsm{\"o}glichkeiten. In der Testreihe werden neun L{\"o}sungen auf Funktionen, Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Kosten, Zuverl{\"a}ssigkeit, Kompatibilit{\"a}t, Implementierung und Barrierefreiheit getestet. Erfahren Sie, welche L{\"o}sungen am besten abschneiden und ob eine davon f{\"u}r Ihr Unternehmen geeignet ist.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{RojahnWeberGronau2023,
  author    = {Rojahn, Marcel and Weber, Edzard and Gronau, Norbert},
  title     = {Towards a standardization in scheduling models},
  series = {International journal of industrial and systems engineering},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {International journal of industrial and systems engineering},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Inderscience Enterprises},
  address   = {Gen{\`e}ve},
  issn      = {1748-5037},
  pages     = {401 -- 408},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Terminology is a critical instrument for each researcher. Different terminologies for the same research object may arise in different research communities. By this inconsistency, many synergistic effects get lost. Theories and models will be more understandable and reusable if a common terminology is applied. This paper examines the terminological (in)consistence for the research field of job-shop scheduling by a literature review. There is an enormous variety in the choice of terms and mathematical notation for the same concept. The comparability, reusability and combinability of scheduling methods is unnecessarily hampered by the arbitrary use of homonyms and synonyms. The acceptance in the community of used variables and notation forms is shown by means of a compliance quotient. This is proven by the evaluation of 240 scientific publications on planning methods.},
  language  = {en}
}