@article{Ehrentraut2011,
  author    = {Ehrentraut, Stefan},
  title     = {Perpetually temporary citizenship and ethnic Vietnamese in Cambodia},
  series = {Ethnic and racial studies},
  volume    = {34},
  journal   = {Ethnic and racial studies},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {0141-9870},
  doi       = {10.1080/01419870.2010.537359},
  pages     = {779 -- 798},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {There is a clear trend in Western democratic countries towards regularizing the status of long-term ethnic minority residents through the conferral of full and equal citizenship rights. Ethnic minorities who arrived as irregular or temporary migrants in the West are increasingly allowed to follow the immigrant path towards integration into the broader citizenry. This is largely due to recognition that the price of exclusion is not only unjust, but it increases the risk of racial tensions, criminality, and social violence. Investigating the relevance of these Western developments to Cambodia, this article focuses on Cambodia's ethnic Vietnamese minority. Despite residing in Cambodia for generations, ethnic Vietnamese have traditionally been regarded as 'foreign residents' and denied citizenship. Based on extensive field research, this article considers the history and reality of Cambodia's ethnic Vietnamese minority as well as the ethnically-exclusionary policies and practices of the state and Khmer majority towards them.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BindenagelŠehović2020,
  author    = {Bindenagel Šehović, Annamarie},
  title     = {Towards a new definition of health security},
  series = {Global public health : an international journal for research, policy and practice},
  volume    = {15},
  journal   = {Global public health : an international journal for research, policy and practice},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon, Oxfordshire},
  issn      = {1744-1692},
  doi       = {10.1080/17441692.2019.1634119},
  pages     = {1 -- 12},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {In recent years the framings of global health security have shifted while the structures governing global health have largely remained the same. One feature of the emerging re-ordering is the unresolved allocation of accountability between state and non-state actors. This brings to critical challenges to global health security to the fore. The first is that the consensus on the seeming shift from state to human security framing with regard to the global human right to health (security) risks losing its salience. Second, this conceptual challenge is mirrored on the operational level: if states and non-state actors do not assume responsibility for health security, who or what can guarantee health security? In order to address global health security against the backdrop of these twenty-first Century challenges, this article proceeds in three parts. First, it analyses the shortcomings of the current state-based World Health Organization (WHO) definition of health security. Second, taking into account the rising pressures posed to global health security and the inadequacy both of state-based and of ad hoc non-state responses, it proposes a new framing. Third, the article offers initial insights into the operational application of beyond state responses to (health) security challenges.},
  language  = {en}
}