@misc{CsikszentmihalyiSchiefele1995, author = {Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly and Schiefele, Ulrich}, title = {Motivation and ability as factors in mathematics experience and achievement}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-33668}, year = {1995}, abstract = {This study examined relationships among interest, achievement motivation, mathematical ability, the quality of experience when doing mathematics, and mathematics achievement. One hundred eight freshmen and sophomores (41 males, 67 females) completed interest ratings, an achievement motivation questionnaire, and the Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test. These assessments were followed by 1 week of experience sampling. Mathematics grades were available from the year before the study started, from the same year, and from the following 3 years. In addition, a measure of the students' course level in mathematics was included. The results showed that quality of experience when doing mathematics was mainly related to interest. Grades and course level were most strongly predicted by level of ability. Interest was found to contribute significantly to the prediction of grades for the second year and to the prediction of course level. Quality of experience was significantly correlated with grades but not course level.}, language = {en} } @misc{CsikszentmihalyiSchiefele1992, author = {Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly and Schiefele, Ulrich}, title = {Arts education, human development, and the quality of experience}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-33547}, year = {1992}, abstract = {Content: Introduction: Do the Arts Really Matter? Aesthetic Cognition and Human Development The Significance of Arts in Everyday Life: Evidence from Case StudiesArts and Quality of Experience: A Systematic Analysis The Conditions of Optimal Experience The Representation of Experience in Personality Consequences for Teaching the Arts}, language = {en} } @misc{CsikszentmihalyiSchiefele1993, author = {Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly and Schiefele, Ulrich}, title = {Die Qualit{\"a}t des Erlebens und der Prozeß des Lernens}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-33578}, year = {1993}, abstract = {In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird argumentiert, daß das Erleben von „Flow" im Prozeß des Lernens f{\"u}r das Entstehen von intrinsischer Lernmotivation und f{\"u}r die kognitive Entwicklung der Sch{\"u}ler von entscheidender Bedeutung ist. Die FIow-Theorie von M. Csikszentmihalyi wird ausf{\"u}hrlich dargestellt und ihre Relevanz f{\"u}r den Lernprozeß erl{\"a}utert. Es werden zwei empirische Studien berichtet, die die Auswirkungen des Flow-Erlebens auf schulisches Lernen belegen. Schließlich wird der Versuch gemacht, Folgerungen f{\"u}r die p{\"a}dagogische Praxis abzuleiten.}, language = {de} } @misc{CsikszentmihalyiSchiefele1994, author = {Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly and Schiefele, Ulrich}, title = {Interest and the Quality of Experience in Classrooms}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-33647}, year = {1994}, abstract = {This study investigated the relation between interest in four different subject areas (mathematics, biology, English, history) and the quality of experience in class. The strength of interest as a predictor of experience was contrasted with that of achievement motivation and scholastic ability. A total of208 highly able freshmen and sophomores completed interest ratings, an achievement motivation questionnaire, and the Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT). These assessments were followed by one week of experience sampling. In addition, grades were available for the subject areas involved. The results showed that interest was a significant predictor of the experience of potency, intrinsic motivation, self-esteem, and perception of skill. Controlling for ability and achievement motivation did not decrease the strength of these relations. Achievement motivation and ability proved to be considerably weaker predictors of the quality of experience than was interest. In addition, interest contributed significantly to the prediction of grades in mathematics, biology, and history, but not English. The main results and some limitations of the study are discussed, and suggestions for future research are made.}, language = {en} } @article{EkatushabeKwarikundaMuwongeetal.2021, author = {Ekatushabe, Margaret and Kwarikunda, Diana and Muwonge, Charles Magoba and Ssenyonga, Joseph and Schiefele, Ulrich}, title = {Relations between perceived teacher's autonomy support, cognitive appraisals and boredom in physics learning among lower secondary school students}, series = {International journal of STEM education}, volume = {8}, journal = {International journal of STEM education}, number = {1}, publisher = {SpringerOpen}, address = {Berlin ; Heidelberg [u.a.]}, issn = {2196-7822}, doi = {10.1186/s40594-021-00272-5}, pages = {15}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Background Boredom during learning activities has the potential of impeding attention, motivation, learning and eventually achievement. Yet, research focusing on its possible antecedents seems to have received less attention especially within the physics domain. Based on assumptions of the Control Value Theory of Achievement Emotions (CVTAE), this study aimed at examining gender differences and structural relationships between students' reported perceived teacher autonomy support (PTAS), cognitive appraisals (self-efficacy and task value) and learning-related boredom in physics. A sample of 375 (56\% females) randomly selected 9(th) grade students (mean age = 15.03 years; SD = 1.02) from five secondary schools in Masaka district of Uganda took part in the study. Results Data collected from students' self-reports using standardised instruments revealed that higher levels of PTAS, self-efficacy, and task value were significantly associated with lower levels of boredom during physics learning. Females reported significantly greater task value for learning physics than the males. Self-efficacy (beta = - .10, p < .05) and task value (beta = - .09, p < .01) partially mediated the relationship between PTAS and boredom. PTAS showed significant direct negative contributions to boredom (beta = - .34, p < .001). Conclusion These findings provide support for theory and practice about the importance of promoting autonomy among students by adjusting instructional behaviours among teachers of physics. Teacher autonomy supportive behaviours influence formation of students' beliefs about ability, subjective value and learning-related boredom in physics. Implications and suggestions for further research are also discussed in this paper.}, language = {en} } @misc{GerickeSoemerSchiefele2022, author = {Gericke, Christian and Soemer, Alexander and Schiefele, Ulrich}, title = {Benefits of Mind Wandering for Learning in School Through Its Positive Effects on Creativity}, series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {835}, issn = {1866-8364}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-58873}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-588731}, pages = {11}, year = {2022}, abstract = {There is broad agreement among researchers to view mind wandering as an obstacle to learning because it draws attention away from learning tasks. Accordingly, empirical findings revealed negative correlations between the frequency of mind wandering during learning and various kinds of learning outcomes (e.g., text retention). However, a few studies have indicated positive effects of mind wandering on creativity in real-world learning environments. The present article reviews these studies and highlights potential benefits of mind wandering for learning mediated through creative processes. Furthermore, we propose various ways to promote useful mind wandering and, at the same time, minimize its negative impact on learning.}, language = {en} } @article{GerickeSoemerSchiefele2022, author = {Gericke, Christian and Soemer, Alexander and Schiefele, Ulrich}, title = {Benefits of Mind Wandering for Learning in School Through Its Positive Effects on Creativity}, series = {Frontiers in Education}, volume = {7}, journal = {Frontiers in Education}, publisher = {Frontiers Media SA}, address = {Lausanne, Schweiz}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2022.774731}, pages = {11}, year = {2022}, abstract = {There is broad agreement among researchers to view mind wandering as an obstacle to learning because it draws attention away from learning tasks. Accordingly, empirical findings revealed negative correlations between the frequency of mind wandering during learning and various kinds of learning outcomes (e.g., text retention). However, a few studies have indicated positive effects of mind wandering on creativity in real-world learning environments. The present article reviews these studies and highlights potential benefits of mind wandering for learning mediated through creative processes. Furthermore, we propose various ways to promote useful mind wandering and, at the same time, minimize its negative impact on learning.}, language = {en} } @article{HettingerLazaridesRubachetal.2021, author = {Hettinger, Katharina and Lazarides, Rebecca and Rubach, Charlott and Schiefele, Ulrich}, title = {Teacher classroom management self-efficacy}, series = {Teaching and teacher education : an international journal of research and studies}, volume = {103}, journal = {Teaching and teacher education : an international journal of research and studies}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0742-051X}, doi = {10.1016/j.tate.2021.103349}, pages = {10}, year = {2021}, abstract = {This study examined the relations between teacher-reported classroom management self-efficacy, stu-dent-reported teaching quality and students' enjoyment in mathematics. Data were collected from German ninth and tenth-grade students (N = 779) and their teachers (N = 40) at the beginning and the middle of the school year. Multilevel models showed that teachers' self-efficacy at time 1 significantly and positively related to class-level monitoring and relatedness at time 2. Class-level relatedness at time 2 was significantly and positively associated with enjoyment at time 2. Teacher-reported self-efficacy at time 1 was indirectly related to enjoyment at time 2 through relatedness at time 2.}, language = {en} } @misc{KrappSchiefeleSchreyer1993, author = {Krapp, Andreas and Schiefele, Ulrich and Schreyer, Inge}, title = {Metaanalyse des Zusammenhangs von Interesse und schulischer Leistung}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-33561}, year = {1993}, abstract = {Der Artikel berichtet von den Ergebnissen einer Metaanalyse des Zusammenhangs zwischen der Auspr{\"a}gung fachspezifischer Interessen und schulischer Leistung. Es konnten f{\"u}r den Zeitraum 1965—1990 21 relevante Untersuchungsberichte identifiziert werden, die insgesamt 127 voneinander unabh{\"a}ngige (d. h. auf verschiedenen Stichproben beruhende) Korrelationskoeffizienten berichten. Ungeachtet der Einfl{\"u}sse von Moderatorvariablen ergab sich f{\"u}r den Zusammenhang von Interesse und Leistung eine Durchschnittskorrelation von .30. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus zeigte sich, daß f{\"u}r Jungen signifikant h{\"o}here Interesse-Leistungs-Korrelationen bestehen als f{\"u}r M{\"a}dchen. Zwischen den verschiedenen F{\"a}chern ergaben sich teilweise ebenfalls signifikante Unterschiede. Dagegen war kein signifikanter Moderatoreffekt der Klassenstufe zu beobachten. Abschließend erfolgt eine Diskussion der Befunde auf dem Hintergrund interessentheoretischer und methodischer {\"U}berlegungen.}, language = {en} } @misc{KrappSchiefeleWildetal.1993, author = {Krapp, Andreas and Schiefele, Ulrich and Wild, Klaus Peter and Winteler, Adolf}, title = {Der „Fragebogen zum Studieninteresse" (FSI)}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-33601}, year = {1993}, abstract = {Die vorliegende Arbeit berichtet {\"u}ber die Entwicklung des „Fragebogen zum Studieninteresse" (FSI) und seine testtheoretische {\"U}berpr{\"u}fung. An der Untersuchung nahmen 298 Studenten verschiedener Studieng{\"a}nge teil. Ausgehend von einer 27 Items umfassenden Version verblieben aufgrund von Faktorenanalyse und Rasch- Skalierung 18 Items, die eine eindimensionale Skala bilden. Die interne Konsistenz (Alpha) des revidierten FSI betr{\"a}gt .90, die Test-Retest-Reliabilit{\"a}t .67 (Zeitspanne: 2 Jahre). Zur Pr{\"u}fung der Validit{\"a}t des revidierten FSI wurde eine Reihe weiterer Variablen erhoben (z.B. intrinsische motivationale Orientierung, T{\"a}tigkeitszentrierung, Extraversion, Verwendung von Lernstrategien, Studienleistung). Die Ergebnisse zeigen, daß der FSI in ausreichendem Maße konvergente, diskriminante und kriteriumsbezogene Validit{\"a}t besitzt.}, language = {de} }