@article{HeinzeFatfoutaSchroederAbe2020,
  author    = {Heinze, Peter Eric and Fatfouta, Ramzi and Schr{\"o}der-Abe, Michela},
  title     = {Validation of an implicit measure of antagonistic narcissism},
  series = {Journal of research in personality},
  volume    = {88},
  journal   = {Journal of research in personality},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {San Diego},
  issn      = {0092-6566},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103993},
  pages     = {12},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Narcissism has traditionally been assessed using explicit measures, yet contemporary measures are limited in their ability to capture people's automatic (i.e., implicit) self-evaluations. Here, we propose the antagonistic narcissism Implicit Association Test (AN-IAT). Three studies (N = 1082) using self-, informant-reports, and other implicit measures tested the psychometric properties of the AN-IAT. The AN-IAT showed high internal consistency and good temporal stability. The measure was positively associated with (antagonistic) narcissism, aggression, and lack of empathy, but unrelated to communal, pathological, and agentic narcissism as well as self-esteem. The AN-IAT predicted self- and informantratings of aggression and empathy beyond self-reports of antagonistic and agentic narcissism, and agreeableness. Together, the antagonistic narcissism IAT is a promising addition to the assessment of narcissism.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FatfoutaSchroederAbe2018,
  author    = {Fatfouta, Ramzi and Schr{\"o}der-Abe, Michela},
  title     = {Agentic to the core?},
  series = {Journal of research in personality},
  volume    = {74},
  journal   = {Journal of research in personality},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {San Diego},
  issn      = {0092-6566},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jrp.2018.02.006},
  pages     = {78 -- 82},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Researchers are still divided over whether narcissists possess positive or negative implicit self-views. Seemingly resolving this issue, Campbell et al. (2007) have demonstrated that narcissism is in fact related to higher implicit self-esteem as long as the implicit measure reflects agency. The present study used a large (N = 730) sample, carefully controlled stimuli, improved statistical analyses, and examined narcissism at the facet-level, but results did not replicate those of Campbell et al. In fact, the latent correlation between narcissism and implicit agency was close to zero, whereas the positive correlation between narcissism and explicit agency was replicated. We conclude that narcissists' implicit self-views may be more neutral than positive or may depend on other contextual factors.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FischerShaki2017,
  author    = {Fischer, Martin H. and Shaki, Samuel},
  title     = {Implicit Spatial-Numerical Associations: Negative Numbers and the Role of Counting Direction},
  series = {Journal of experimental psychology : Human perception and performance},
  volume    = {43},
  journal   = {Journal of experimental psychology : Human perception and performance},
  publisher = {American Psychological Association},
  address   = {Washington},
  issn      = {0096-1523},
  doi       = {10.1037/xhp0000369},
  pages     = {639 -- 643},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {It has been debated whether negative number concepts are cognitively represented on the same mental number line as positive number concepts. The present study reviews this debate and identifies limitations of previous studies. A method with nonspatial stimuli and responses is applied to overcome these limitations and to document a systematic implicit association of negative numbers with left space, thus indicating a leftward extension of the mental number line. Importantly, this result only held for left-to-right counting adults. Implications for the experiential basis of abstract conceptual knowledge are discussed.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{VianelloSchnabelSrirametal.2013,
  author    = {Vianello, Michelangelo and Schnabel, Konrad and Sriram, N. and Nosek, Brian},
  title     = {Gender differences in implicit and explicit personality traits},
  series = {Personality and individual differences : an international journal of research into the structure and development of personality, and the causation of individual differences},
  volume    = {55},
  journal   = {Personality and individual differences : an international journal of research into the structure and development of personality, and the causation of individual differences},
  number    = {8},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0191-8869},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.008},
  pages     = {994 -- 999},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {This article investigates gender differences in implicit and explicit measures of the Big Five traits of personality. In a high-powered study (N = 14,348), we replicated previous research showing that women report higher levels of Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion and Neuroticism. For implicit measures, gender differences were much smaller for all, and opposite in sign for Extraversion. Somewhat higher levels of implicit Neuroticism and Agreeableness were observed in women, and somewhat higher levels of implicit Extraversion and Openness were observed in men. There was no gender difference in implicit Conscientiousness. A possible explanation is that explicit self-concepts partly reflect social norms and self-expectations about gender roles, while implicit self-concepts may mostly reflect self-related experiences.},
  language  = {en}
}