@misc{Hassler2005,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Dahmen, W. (Hrsg.), Gebrauchsgrammatik und Gelehrte Grammatik: franz{\"o}sische Sprachlehre und Grammatikographie zwischen Maas und Rhein vom 16. bis zum 19. Jahhundert; T{\"u}bingen, Narr, 2001},
  year      = {2005},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Hassler2016,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Analyse s{\´e}mantico-contrastive du r{\^o}le des adjectifs qualificatifs},
  series = {Sur les traces de l'adjectif (Cahiers du Laboratoire de recherche sur le langage ; 6)},
  booktitle = {Sur les traces de l'adjectif (Cahiers du Laboratoire de recherche sur le langage ; 6)},
  number    = {6},
  editor    = {Spitzl-Dupic, Friederike and Gregoire, Micha{\"e}l and Lebas-Frączak, Lidia},
  publisher = {Presses universtaires Blaise-Pascal},
  address   = {Clermont-Ferrand},
  isbn      = {978-2-84516-743-8},
  issn      = {1960-3479},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {27 -- 44},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {fr}
}
@incollection{HasslerBoehmHennemann2017,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda and B{\"o}hm, Ver{\´o}nica Julia and Hennemann, Anja},
  title     = {On the evidential use of English adverbials and their equivalents in Romance languages and Russian},
  series = {Evidentiality revisited : Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives (Pragmatics \& Beyond New Series ; 271)},
  volume    = {271},
  booktitle = {Evidentiality revisited : Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives (Pragmatics \& Beyond New Series ; 271)},
  editor    = {Mar{\´i}n Arrese, Juana I. and Haßler, Gerda and Carretero, Marta},
  publisher = {John Benjamins},
  address   = {Amsterdam, Philadelphia},
  isbn      = {9789027256768},
  issn      = {0922-842X},
  doi       = {10.1075/pbns.271.04boh},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {87 -- 104},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The present study investigates the use of equivalents of the English adverbials seemingly and apparently with a specific morphological structure in Romance languages and Russian, i.e. Spanish al parecer, Portuguese ao parecer and ao que parece, French avoir l'air de, Italian all'apparenza and in apparenza as well as Russian по-видимому. The underlying hypothesis is that the function and syntactic behaviour of these adverbial locutions are motivated by their morphological composition. It is to investigate whether the adverbials may be used sentence-initially, parenthetically, as an adverbial with broad or narrow scope or as a component of a modalised predication. The adverbial locutions are treated as means of expression where evidentiality and epistemic modality represent overlapping functional-semantic categories.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Hassler2015,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Wendy Ayres-Bennett; Magali Seijido: Bon usage et variation sociolinguistique. Perspectives diachroniques et traditions nationales / rezensiert von Gerda Haßler},
  series = {Historiographia Linguistica : international journal for the history of the language sciences},
  volume    = {42},
  journal   = {Historiographia Linguistica : international journal for the history of the language sciences},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {John Benjamins},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0302-5160},
  doi       = {10.1075/hl.42.1.11has},
  pages     = {173 -- 182},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Rezensiertes Werk: Wendy Ayres-Bennett; Magali Seijido: Bon usage et variation sociolinguistique. Perspectives diachroniques et traditions nationales, Lyon: {\´E}cole normale sup{\´e}rieure de Lyon 2013, 338 S.},
  language  = {fr}
}
@article{Hassler2015,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {'Communicating the past to the present'},
  series = {History and Philosophy of the Language Sciences},
  journal   = {History and Philosophy of the Language Sciences},
  editor    = {McElvenny, James},
  issn      = {2366-2409},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Hassler2010,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {La relation entre la philosophie du langage et la s{\´e}mantique chez Coseriu},
  series = {Eugenio Coseriu aujourd'hui : linguistique et philosophie du langage},
  booktitle = {Eugenio Coseriu aujourd'hui : linguistique et philosophie du langage},
  editor    = {G{\´e}rard, Christophe and Missire, R{\´e}gis},
  publisher = {Lambert-Lucas},
  address   = {Limoges},
  isbn      = {978-2-35935-114-9},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {21 -- 33},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {fr}
}
@article{Hassler2014,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Evidentiality and the expression of speaker's stance in Romance languages and German},
  series = {Discourse Studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {Discourse Studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Sage Publications},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1461-4456},
  doi       = {10.1177/1461445614564522},
  pages     = {182 -- 209},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {In recent years, the category of evidentiality has also come into use for the description of Romance languages and of German. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. We consider evidentiality to be a structural dimension of grammar, the values of which are expressed by types of constructions that code the source of information which a speaker imparts. If we look at the situation in Romance languages and in German, drawing a boundary between epistemic modality and evidentiality presents problems that are difficult to solve. Adding markers of the source of the speaker's knowledge often limits the degree of responsibility of the speaker for the content of the utterance. Evidential adverbs are a frequently used means of marking the source of the speaker's knowledge. The evidential meaning is generalised to marking any source of knowledge, what can be regarded as a result of a process of pragmaticalisation. The use of certain means which also carry out evidential markings can even contribute to the blurring of the different kinds of evidentiality. German also has modal verbs which in conjunction with the perfect tense of the verb have a predominantly evidential use (sollen and wollen). But even here the evidential marking is not without influence on the modality of the utterance. The Romance languages, however, do not have such specialised verbs for expressing evidentiality in certain contexts. To do this, they mark evidentiality - often context bound - by verb forms such as the conditional and the imperfect tense. This article shall contrast the different architectures used in expressing evidentiality in German and in the Romance languages.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{Hassler2016,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Temporalit{\"a}t, Aspektualit{\"a}t und Modalit{\"a}t in romanischen Sprachen},
  publisher = {de Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-11-031029-0},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {421},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {In dem Buch wird der Frage nachgegangen, wie die Kategorien Temporalit{\"a}t, Aspektualit{\"a}t und Modalit{\"a}t in den romanischen Sprachen gestaltet sind. Es werden Verben und ihre grammatischen Merkmale, jedoch auch andere sprachliche Mittel untersucht. Die Beschreibung erfolgt auf der Grundlage einer funktionalen Sicht der Grammatik, die Interaktion zwischen den Kategorien wird betrachtet und neue Forschungsans{\"a}tze werden ber{\"u}cksichtigt.},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Hassler2013,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Versteckte Modalit{\"a}t in romanischen Sprachen und im Deutschen},
  series = {Comparatio delectat II. Akten der VII. Internationalen Arbeitstagung zum romanisch-deutschen und innerromanischen Sprachvergleich Innsbruck, 6.-8. September 2012},
  volume    = {1},
  booktitle = {Comparatio delectat II. Akten der VII. Internationalen Arbeitstagung zum romanisch-deutschen und innerromanischen Sprachvergleich Innsbruck, 6.-8. September 2012},
  publisher = {Peter Lang},
  address   = {Frankfurt am Main},
  isbn      = {978-3-653-03201-7},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {In den romanischen Sprachen stehen Verbalmodi, Modalverben, Modaladverbien und Modalpartikeln zum Ausdruck von Modalit{\"a}t zur Verf{\"u}gung, die schon h{\"a}ufig mit dem Deutschen verglichen wurden. In diesem Beitrag soll es um Entsprechungen versteckter, sogenannter coverter Modalit{\"a}t gehen (vgl. Abraham / Leiss 2012, Haßler 2012). Zun{\"a}chst soll das Verst{\"a}ndnis von Modalit{\"a}t dargelegt werden, um dann ihre coverten Formen einzuordnen. Die gegenseitigen Entsprechungen werden an Beispielen analysiert und schließlich wird ein Vorschlag entwickelt, wie die Mittel der Modalisierung als sprachspezifisch und zu einem Kontinuum geh{\"o}rend beschrieben werden k{\"o}nnen.},
  language  = {de}
}