@book{ChhibberCommanderEvansetal.1997,
  author    = {Chhibber, Ajay and Commander, Simon and Evans, Alison and Fuhr, Harald},
  title     = {World Development Report 1997 : the state in a changing world},
  publisher = {Oxford Uni. Press},
  address   = {New York},
  pages     = {265 S.},
  year      = {1997},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Fuhr2019,
  author    = {Fuhr, Harald},
  title     = {Verwaltung und Wicked Problems},
  series = {Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform},
  journal   = {Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform},
  edition   = {5., vollst{\"a}ndig {\"u}berarb. Aufl.},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  isbn      = {978-3-658-21562-0},
  pages     = {191 -- 200},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{FuhrLederer2009,
  author    = {Fuhr, Harald and Lederer, Markus},
  title     = {Varieties of carbon governance in newly industrializing},
  issn      = {1070-4965},
  year      = {2009},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{FuhrHickmannKern2017,
  author    = {Fuhr, Harald and Hickmann, Thomas and Kern, Kristine},
  title     = {The role of cities in multi-level climate governance},
  series = {Current opinion in environmental sustainability},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {Current opinion in environmental sustainability},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1877-3435},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.cosust.2017.10.006},
  pages     = {1 -- 6},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The past two decades have witnessed widespread scholarly interest in the role of cities in climate policy-making. This research has considerably improved our understanding of the local level in the global response to climate change. The present article synthesizes the literature on local climate policies with respect to the 1.5 degrees C target. While most studies have focused on pioneering cities and networks, we contend that the broader impacts of local climate actions and their relationship to regional, national, and international policy frameworks have not been studied in enough detail. Against this backdrop, we introduce the concept of upscaling and contend that local climate initiatives must go hand in hand with higher-level policies and be better integrated into the multi-level governance system.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Fuhr2021,
  author    = {Fuhr, Harald},
  title     = {The rise of the Global South and the rise in carbon emissions},
  series = {Third world quarterly},
  volume    = {42},
  journal   = {Third world quarterly},
  number    = {11},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {0143-6597},
  doi       = {10.1080/01436597.2021.1954901},
  pages     = {2724 -- 2746},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Jointly with the Global North, the rise of the Global South has come at a high cost to the environment. Driven by its high energy intensity and the use of fossil fuels, the South has contributed a significant portion of global emissions during the last 30 years, and is now contributing some 63\% of today's total GHG emissions (including land-use change and forestry). Similar to the Global North, the Global South's emissions are heavily concentrated: India and China alone account for some 60\% and the top 10 countries for some 78\% of the group's emissions, while some 120 countries account for only 22\%. Without highlighting such differences, it makes little sense to use the term 'Global South'. Its members are affected differently, and contribute differently to global climate change. They neither share a common view, nor do they pursue joint interests when it comes to international climate negotiations. Instead, they are organised into more than a dozen subgroups of the global climate regime. There is no single climate strategy for the Global South, and climate action will differ enormously from country to country. Furthermore, just and equitable transitions may be particularly challenging for some countries.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HeckeFuhrWolfs2021,
  author    = {Hecke, Steven van and Fuhr, Harald and Wolfs, Wouter},
  title     = {The politics of crisis management by regional and international organizations in fighting against a global pandemic},
  series = {International review of administrative sciences : an international journal of comparative public administration},
  volume    = {87},
  journal   = {International review of administrative sciences : an international journal of comparative public administration},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Sage},
  address   = {Los Angeles, Calif. [u.a.]},
  issn      = {0020-8523},
  doi       = {10.1177/0020852320984516},
  pages     = {672 -- 690},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Despite new challenges like climate change and digitalization, global and regional organizations recently went through turbulent times due to a lack of support from several of their member states. Next to this crisis of multilateralism, the COVID-19 pandemic now seems to question the added value of international organizations for addressing global governance issues more specifically. This article analyses this double challenge that several organizations are facing and compares their ways of managing the crisis by looking at their institutional and political context, their governance structure, and their behaviour during the pandemic until June 2020. More specifically, it will explain the different and fragmented responses of the World Health Organization, the European Union and the International Monetary Fund/World Bank. With the aim of understanding the old and new problems that these international organizations are trying to solve, this article argues that the level of autonomy vis-a-vis the member states is crucial for understanding the politics of crisis management. <br /> Points for practitioners <br /> As intergovernmental bodies, international organizations require authorization by their member states. Since they also need funding for their operations, different degrees of autonomy also matter for reacting to emerging challenges, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The potential for international organizations is limited, though through proactive and bold initiatives, they can seize the opportunity of the crisis and partly overcome institutional and political constraints.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Fuhr1998,
  author    = {Fuhr, Harald},
  title     = {Staatsreform und Verwaltungsmodernisierung : zur neuen Rolle des Staates in Lateinamerika = Reforma del Estado y modernizaci{\´o}n administrativa : acerca del nuevo papel del Estado en America Latina},
  year      = {1998},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{CampbellFuhr2004,
  author    = {Campbell, Tim and Fuhr, Harald},
  title     = {Selection of cases and methods},
  isbn      = {0-8213-5707-7},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Fuhr2020,
  author    = {Fuhr, Harald},
  title     = {Rezension zu: Geopolitical economy of energy and anvironment : China and the European Union / Hrsg.: Amineh, Mehdi Parvizi ; Yang, Guang. - Leiden: Brill, 2017. - ISBN: 978-90-04-27310-8},
  series = {Comparative sociology},
  volume    = {19},
  journal   = {Comparative sociology},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Brill},
  address   = {Leiden},
  issn      = {1569-1322},
  doi       = {10.1163/15691330-12341522},
  pages     = {151 -- 153},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{CampbellFuhr2004,
  author    = {Campbell, Tim and Fuhr, Harald},
  title     = {Research questions : inventing decentralized government},
  isbn      = {0-8213-5707-7},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {en}
}