@article{Rothermel2022,
  author    = {Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin},
  title     = {Angriffe auf die Chancengleichheit},
  series = {Welt-Trends : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r internationale Politik},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {Welt-Trends : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r internationale Politik},
  number    = {185},
  publisher = {WeltTrends - Potsdamer Wissenschaftsverlag},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {0944-8101},
  pages     = {28 -- 33},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {„Gender-Ideologie" und „Gender-Wahn"- diese Begriffe entstammen einem antifeministischen Diskurs, der ohne Bedrohungsszenarien nicht funktioniert. Feministische Errungenschaften - wie die Ehe f{\"u}r alle - werden zur Ursache pers{\"o}nlicher Nachteile umgedeutet. Seine Vertreter*innen verbreiten ihre (oft gewaltvollen) Narrative sowohl auf der Straße als auch im Internet. Antifeministische Bewegungen weisen zudem vielf{\"a}ltige Querverbindungen mit konservativen, nationalistischen, fundamentalreligi{\"o}sen und faschistischen Diskursen auf.},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{RothermelKellyJasser2022,
  author    = {Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin and Kelly, Megan and Jasser, Greta},
  title     = {Of victims, mass murder, and "real men"},
  series = {Male supremacism in the United States},
  booktitle = {Male supremacism in the United States},
  editor    = {Carian, Emily K. and DiBranco, Alex and Ebin, Chelsea},
  publisher = {Routledge},
  address   = {London},
  isbn      = {9781003164722},
  doi       = {10.4324/9781003164722-9},
  pages     = {117 -- 141},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Over the last few decades, a network of misogynist blogs, websites, wikis, and forums has developed, where users share their bigoted, sexist, and toxic views of society in general and masculinity and femininity in particular. This chapter outlines conceptual framework of hegemonic and hybrid masculinity. It provides a brief overview of the historical development of the manosphere and its various configurations and present our analysis of the masculinities performed by the five groups of the manosphere. The concept of hegemonic masculinity was articulated by Connell and colleagues in the 1980s as "the pattern of practice that allowed men's dominance over women to continue." Prior to the advent of the manosphere, an online iteration of male supremacist mobilizations, both Men's Rights Activists and Pick-up artists developed as offline movements in the 1970s. MRAs perceive their respective societies as inherently stacked against men. This chapter analyses the masculinities of the manosphere and how they "repudiat[e] and reif[y]" hegemonic masculinity and male supremacism.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Rothermel2021,
  author    = {Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin},
  title     = {Gender at the crossroads},
  series = {Critical studies on terrorism},
  volume    = {15},
  journal   = {Critical studies on terrorism},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {London [u.a.]},
  issn      = {1753-9153},
  doi       = {10.1080/17539153.2021.1969061},
  pages     = {533 -- 558},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Since the early 2000s, the United Nations (UN) global counterterrorism architecture has seen significant changes towards increased multilateralism, a focus on prevention, and inter-institutional coordination across the UN's three pillars of work. Throughout this reform process, gender aspects have increasingly become presented as a "cross-cutting" theme. In this article, I investigate the role of gender in the UN's counterterrorism reform process at the humanitarian-development-peace nexus, or "triple nexus", from a feminist institutionalist perspective. I conduct a feminist discourse analysis of the counterterrorism discourses of three UN entities, which represent the different UN pillars of peace and security (DPO), development (UNDP), and humanitarianism and human rights (OHCHR). The article examines the role of gender in the inter-institutional reform process by focusing on the changes, overlaps and differences in the discursive production of gender in the entities' counterterrorism agendas over time and in two recent UN counterterrorism conferences. I find that gendered dynamics of nested newness and institutional layering have played an essential role both as a justification for the involvement of individual entities in counterterrorism and as a vehicle for inter-institutional cooperation and struggle for discursive power.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Rothermel2023,
  author    = {Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin},
  title     = {The role of evidence-based misogyny in antifeminist online communities of the 'manosphere'},
  series = {Big data \& society},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Big data \& society},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Sage},
  address   = {Thousand Oaks, Calif.},
  issn      = {2053-9517},
  doi       = {10.1177/20539517221145671},
  pages     = {1},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {In recent years, there have been a growing number of online and offline attacks linked to a loosely connected network of misogynist and antifeminist online communities called 'the manosphere'. Since 2016, the ideas spread among and by groups of the manosphere have also become more closely aligned with those of other Far-Right online networks. In this commentary, I explore the role of what I term 'evidence-based misogyny' for mobilization and radicalization into the antifeminist and misogynist subcultures of the manosphere. Evidence-based misogyny is a discursive strategy, whereby members of the manosphere refer to (and misinterpret) knowledge in the form of statistics, studies, news items and pop-culture and mimic accepted methods of knowledge presentation to support their essentializing, polarizing views about gender relations in society. Evidence-based misogyny is a core aspect for manosphere-related mobilization as it provides a false sense of authority and forges a collective identity, which is framed as a supposed 'alternative' to mainstream gender knowledge. Due to its core function to justify and confirm the misogynist sentiments of users, evidence-based misogyny serves as connector between the manosphere and both mainstream conservative as well as other Far-Right and conspiratorial discourses.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Rothermel2023,
  author    = {Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin},
  title     = {Gender at the crossroads},
  series = {Gender and the governance of terrorism and violent extremism},
  booktitle = {Gender and the governance of terrorism and violent extremism},
  editor    = {Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin and Shepherd, Laura J.},
  publisher = {Routledge},
  address   = {London},
  isbn      = {9781003381266},
  doi       = {10.4324/9781003381266-2},
  pages     = {11 -- 36},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Since the early 2000s, the United Nations (UN) global counterterrorism architecture has seen significant changes towards increased multilateralism, a focus on prevention, and inter-institutional coordination across the UN's three pillars of work. Throughout this reform process, gender aspects have increasingly become presented as a "cross-cutting" theme. In this article, I investigate the role of gender in the UN's counterterrorism reform process at the humanitarian-development-peace nexus, or "triple nexus", from a feminist institutionalist perspective. I conduct a feminist discourse analysis of the counterterrorism discourses of three UN entities, which represent the different UN pillars of peace and security (DPO), development (UNDP), and humanitarianism and human rights (OHCHR). The article examines the role of gender in the inter-institutional reform process by focusing on the changes, overlaps and differences in the discursive production of gender in the entities' counterterrorism agendas over time and in two recent UN counterterrorism conferences. I find that gendered dynamics of nested newness and institutional layering have played an essential role both as a justification for the involvement of individual entities in counterterrorism and as a vehicle for inter-institutional cooperation and struggle for discursive power.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Rothermel2023,
  author    = {Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin},
  title     = {Introduction},
  series = {Gender and the governance of terrorism and violent extremism},
  booktitle = {Gender and the governance of terrorism and violent extremism},
  editor    = {Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin and Shepherd, Laura J.},
  publisher = {Routledge},
  address   = {London},
  isbn      = {9781003381266},
  doi       = {10.4324/9781003381266-1},
  pages     = {10},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Several global governance initiatives launched in recent years have explicitly sought to integrate concern for gender equality and gendered harms into efforts to counter terrorism and violent extremism. As a result, commitments to gender-sensitivity and gender equality in international and regional counterterrorism and countering violent extremism (CT/CVE) initiatives, in national action plans, and at the level of civil society programming, have become a common aspect of the multilevel governance of terrorism and violent extremism. In light of these developments, aspects of our own research have turned in the past years to explore how concerns about gender are being incorporated in the governance of terrorism and violent extremism and how this development has affected (gendered) practices and power relations in CT policymaking and implementation. We were inspired by the growing literature on gender and CT/CVE, and critical scholarship on terrorism and political violence, to bring together a collection of new research addressing these questions.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{JasserKellyRothermel2020,
  author    = {Jasser, Greta and Kelly, Megan and Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin},
  title     = {Male supremacism and the Hanau terrorist attack},
  publisher = {International Centre for Counter-Terrorism (ICCT)},
  address   = {Den Haag},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Rothermel2022,
  author    = {Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin},
  title     = {What anti-gender and anti-vaccines politics have in common},
  publisher = {London School of Economics and Political Science},
  address   = {London},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Rothermel2022,
  author    = {Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin},
  title     = {The politics of fear},
  series = {WIIS Blog},
  journal   = {WIIS Blog},
  address   = {Women in International Security},
  pages     = {Washington DC},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{RothermelAsante2022,
  author    = {Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin and Asante, Doris},
  title     = {From victims to activists},
  series = {Australian outlook},
  journal   = {Australian outlook},
  publisher = {Australian Institute of International Affairs},
  address   = {Deakin ACT},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {For a long time, women were invisible in the policy responses to political violence and terrorism. Although the introduction of Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism (P/CVE) has helped improve the representation of women, there is still a long way to go.},
  language  = {en}
}