@article{Haenel2022,
  author    = {H{\"a}nel, Hilkje C.},
  title     = {Einleitung: Epistemische Ungerechtigkeiten},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r praktische Philosophie},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r praktische Philosophie},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Salzburg, Zentrum f{\"u}r Ethik und Armutsforschung},
  address   = {Salzburg},
  issn      = {2409-9961},
  doi       = {10.22613/zfpp/9.1.5},
  pages     = {141 -- 154},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Die Debatte um epistemische Ungerechtigkeit verbindet normative Gerechtigkeitstheorien mit erkenntnistheoretischen Theorien und stellt somit die Art von wichtigen Fragen, die in den letzten Jahren sowohl innerhalb als auch außerhalb der Wissenschaft internationale Aufmerksamkeit erfahren haben. Verwiesen sei hier etwa auf soziale Bewegungen wie \#MeToo und \#BlackLivesMatter zeigen. Theorien der epistemischen Ungerechtigkeit (sowie verwandte Theorien wie Epistemologie des Unwissens, feministische Erkenntnistheorie und Standpunkttheorie) k{\"o}nnen sowohl epistemische Praktiken analysieren und einen Beitrag zu Gerechtigkeitstheorien und sozialer Epistemologie liefern, als auch zu ad{\"a}quateren Verst{\"a}ndnissen von existierenden Ungerechtigkeiten beitragen. In dem hier vorliegenden Schwerpunkt werden Beitr{\"a}ge zu eben solchen bislang wenig erforschten Ungerechtigkeiten sowie neue Diskussionsbeitr{\"a}ge zur Debatte um epistemische Ungerechtigkeiten geliefert.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Boesch2017,
  author    = {B{\"o}sch, Frank},
  title     = {Taming Nuclear Power},
  series = {German history : the journal of the German History Societ},
  volume    = {35},
  journal   = {German history : the journal of the German History Societ},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0266-3554},
  doi       = {10.1093/gerhis/ghw143},
  pages     = {71 -- 95},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {In 2011 a broad majority in the German Federal Parliament voted to abandon nuclear energy. This article explores the origins of the change in attitude towards nuclear energy and argues that seven years before the Chernobyl disaster, the accident at the U.S. power plant Three Mile Island near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, in 1979, had a profound impact which nowadays seems to be largely forgotten in Europe. The article identifies the structural causes underlying the transnational reception of the Three Mile Island accident and explores international reactions, particularly in the Federal Republic of Germany. The accident near Harrisburg led to a loss of public confidence and created unease about nuclear expansion in many industrialized nations. Reactions to the accident can be understood as an attempt to tame nuclear energy both technically, by increasing safety measures and abandoning plans for new nuclear power stations, and politically, with a more critical appraisal of nuclear energy and with semantics that encouraged a long-term withdrawal from nuclear power. Critics were now also accepted as experts. Nuclear policy in all countries became closely dependent on public opinion, indicating a high level of political responsiveness. Various factors, however, including the contemporaneous oil crisis put the brakes on this critical approach to nuclear power, while safety improvements and the limited expansion of nuclear power created new confidence in the early 1980s.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Busch2005,
  author    = {Busch, Christoph},
  title     = {Rechtsradikale Vernetzung im Internet},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-9772},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {This article asks how the internet has been contributing to the trans-national networking of the radical right and whether the radical right has the capacity to act as a trans-national movement. Taking into account language difficulties, the ideological background of ultra- nationalism and internal disputes, the analysis shows that the radical right-wing transnational networking has hardly developed. Additionally, its internet users' potential is too low to contribute to a stronger trans-national alignment. The obstacles remain despite improved technological possibilities. This is proven by empirical examples of virtual trans-national networks.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Lee2005,
  author    = {Lee, Eun-Jeung},
  title     = {Internetmacht und soziale Bewegung in S{\"u}dkorea},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-8044},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {Beginning with the year 2000, the political society of South Korea has undergone a development towards more transparency. The increasing emergence of civil organizations as well as their new-orientation favoured the development of an alternative "online-public" which tries to mediate between the public's interests and the state. The influence of this online-public, who profits from the fast and various ways of communication via internet, is best shown by some successful examples of online-action in the economic and the political sector. This gives credence to Dick Morris' postulated rise of the internet to be the "fifth power" of the state.},
  language  = {de}
}