• Treffer 84 von 204
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Hegemonialmächte im Vorderen und Mittleren Orient : die Dritte Partei in internationalen Konflikten

Hegemons in the Near and Middle East : the Third Party in International Conflicts

  • During the last five decades hegemons played an important role in de-escalating international conflicts in the subregion defined as the core of Oriens Islamicus. Statistical analysis of large datasets shows that half of all conflicts remained without any interference from the hegemonial powers at all - both on global scale and in the subregion. In all other cases however, hegemons (especially super-powers in the role of patrons) tended more often to act as (power-) mediators when their client-state was engaged in conflict with a client of the opposing superpower in Oriens Islamicus than they did on global scale. They did this in their own interest in order to avoid direct involvement, i.e. possible danger of a nuclear escalation. In contrast to conventional mediation theory they were more effective in conflict de-escalation than other mediators, especially in conflicts between Israel and its Arab neighbours. The end of bipolarity in the international system also brought this mechanism of de-escalation to an end. It leaves theDuring the last five decades hegemons played an important role in de-escalating international conflicts in the subregion defined as the core of Oriens Islamicus. Statistical analysis of large datasets shows that half of all conflicts remained without any interference from the hegemonial powers at all - both on global scale and in the subregion. In all other cases however, hegemons (especially super-powers in the role of patrons) tended more often to act as (power-) mediators when their client-state was engaged in conflict with a client of the opposing superpower in Oriens Islamicus than they did on global scale. They did this in their own interest in order to avoid direct involvement, i.e. possible danger of a nuclear escalation. In contrast to conventional mediation theory they were more effective in conflict de-escalation than other mediators, especially in conflicts between Israel and its Arab neighbours. The end of bipolarity in the international system also brought this mechanism of de-escalation to an end. It leaves the hegemon(s) as a potentially powerful third party on the one hand, but on the other their inclination to become involved in regional conflict remains rather diminished as long as the basic national interests in the area are not at stake.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Bernhard J. Trautner
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-7998
Publikationstyp:Postprint
Sprache:Deutsch
Erscheinungsjahr:1997
Veröffentlichende Institution:Universität Potsdam
Datum der Freischaltung:09.08.2006
Quelle:WeltTrends : Zeitschrift für internationale Politik und vergleichende Studien. - 16 (1997). - S. 7 - 42
RVK - Regensburger Verbundklassifikation:MA 8157
Organisationseinheiten:Extern / Extern
DDC-Klassifikation:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 32 Politikwissenschaft / 320 Politikwissenschaft
Sammlung(en):Universität Potsdam / Zeitschriften / WeltTrends : Zeitschrift für internationale Politik, ISSN 0944-8101 / Naher Osten - Region im Wandel? 16 (1997)
Externe Anmerkung:erschienen in: WeltTrends : Zeitschrift für internationale Politik und vergleichende Studien. - 16 (1997)
WeltTrends erscheint im Universitätsverlag Potsdam
Abowünsche und Bestellungen von Einzelheften bitte per Mail an den Universitätsverlag: ubpub@rz.uni-potsdam.de
Einzelheft: 12,00 € (ermäßigt: 5,00 €)
Jahresabo: 40,00 € (ermäßigt: 25,00 €)
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.