The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 10 of 2210
Back to Result List

Sentenza 238/2014 of the Italian Constitutional Court and the International Rule of Law

  • The German-Italian dispute over the scope of sovereign immunities and claims of reparations for war crimes committed by German armed forces during World War II in Italy is in many ways specific and historically contingent. At the same time, it touches upon a number of fundamental challenges which the international community has to address in the interest of furthering the international rule of law. In this working paper both authors address the question whether the current law of sovereign immunities should be changed or interpreted in a manner as to allow for exceptions from State immunities in cases of grave violations of human rights. While the first part of the paper focusses on the perspective of general international law the second part addresses the question through the lense of European law. Both authors agree that unilateral efforts to push for what many consider a progressive development of international law actually may entail adverse effects for the international rule of law and thus may even contribute to a broader crisisThe German-Italian dispute over the scope of sovereign immunities and claims of reparations for war crimes committed by German armed forces during World War II in Italy is in many ways specific and historically contingent. At the same time, it touches upon a number of fundamental challenges which the international community has to address in the interest of furthering the international rule of law. In this working paper both authors address the question whether the current law of sovereign immunities should be changed or interpreted in a manner as to allow for exceptions from State immunities in cases of grave violations of human rights. While the first part of the paper focusses on the perspective of general international law the second part addresses the question through the lense of European law. Both authors agree that unilateral efforts to push for what many consider a progressive development of international law actually may entail adverse effects for the international rule of law and thus may even contribute to a broader crisis of the international legal order.show moreshow less

Download full text files

  • SHA-1:7e11fb1dc5036b058f83261372693e021f9a115f

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Heike KriegerGND, Andreas ZimmermannORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-422140
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-42214
ISSN:2509-3770
ISSN:2509-3762
Title of parent work (English):KFG Working Paper Series
Publication series (Volume number):KFG Working Paper Series (15)
Publication type:Working Paper
Language:English
Date of first publication:2018/06/10
Publication year:2018
Publishing institution:Universität Potsdam
Release date:2019/01/09
Issue:15
Number of pages:30
Source:First publication of the paper: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3170914
RVK - Regensburg classification:PR 2210, PR 2558
Organizational units:Extern / Berlin Potsdam Research Group "The International Rule of Law - Rise or Decline?"
DDC classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 34 Recht / 340 Recht
Peer review:Nicht referiert
License (German):License LogoKeine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.