The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 5 of 11
Back to Result List

Prosodic boundary cues in German

  • This study investigates prosodic phrasing of bracketed lists in German. We analyze variation in pauses, phrase-final lengthening and f0 in speech production and how these cues affect boundary perception. In line with the literature, it was found that pauses are often used to signal intonation phrase boundaries, while final lengthening and f0 are employed across different levels of the prosodic hierarchy. Deviations from expectations based on the standard syntax-prosody mapping are interpreted in terms of task-specific effects. That is, we argue that speakers add/delete prosodic boundaries to enhance the phonological contrast between different bracketings in the experimental task. In perception, three experiments were run, in which we tested only single cues (but temporally distributed at different locations of the sentences). Results from identification tasks and reaction time measurements indicate that pauses lead to a more abrupt shift in listeners׳ prosodic judgments, while f0 and final lengthening are exploited in a more gradientThis study investigates prosodic phrasing of bracketed lists in German. We analyze variation in pauses, phrase-final lengthening and f0 in speech production and how these cues affect boundary perception. In line with the literature, it was found that pauses are often used to signal intonation phrase boundaries, while final lengthening and f0 are employed across different levels of the prosodic hierarchy. Deviations from expectations based on the standard syntax-prosody mapping are interpreted in terms of task-specific effects. That is, we argue that speakers add/delete prosodic boundaries to enhance the phonological contrast between different bracketings in the experimental task. In perception, three experiments were run, in which we tested only single cues (but temporally distributed at different locations of the sentences). Results from identification tasks and reaction time measurements indicate that pauses lead to a more abrupt shift in listeners׳ prosodic judgments, while f0 and final lengthening are exploited in a more gradient manner. Hence, pauses, final lengthening and f0 have an impact on boundary perception, though listeners show different sensitivity to the three acoustic cues.show moreshow less

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Caterina Petrone, Hubert Truckenbrodt, Caroline WellmannORCiD, Julia Holzgrefe-LangGND, Isabell WartenburgerORCiDGND, Barbara HöhleORCiDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.01.002
ISSN:0095-4470
Title of parent work (English):Journal of phonetics
Subtitle (English):evidence from the production and perception of bracketed lists
Publisher:Elsevier
Place of publishing:London
Publication type:Article
Language:English
Date of first publication:2017/02/11
Publication year:2017
Release date:2022/06/20
Tag:German; Pause; Perception; Phrase-final lengthening; Production; Prosodic boundary; f0 peaks
Volume:61
Number of pages:22
First page:71
Last Page:92
Organizational units:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften / Department Linguistik
DDC classification:4 Sprache / 41 Linguistik / 410 Linguistik
Peer review:Referiert
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.