The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 6 of 12
Back to Result List

Evaluation of the Pose Tracking Performance of the Azure Kinect and Kinect v2 for Gait Analysis in Comparison with a Gold Standard

  • Gait analysis is an important tool for the early detection of neurological diseases and for the assessment of risk of falling in elderly people. The availability of low-cost camera hardware on the market today and recent advances in Machine Learning enable a wide range of clinical and health-related applications, such as patient monitoring or exercise recognition at home. In this study, we evaluated the motion tracking performance of the latest generation of the Microsoft Kinect camera, Azure Kinect, compared to its predecessor Kinect v2 in terms of treadmill walking using a gold standard Vicon multi-camera motion capturing system and the 39 marker Plug-in Gait model. Five young and healthy subjects walked on a treadmill at three different velocities while data were recorded simultaneously with all three camera systems. An easy-to-administer camera calibration method developed here was used to spatially align the 3D skeleton data from both Kinect cameras and the Vicon system. With this calibration, the spatial agreement of jointGait analysis is an important tool for the early detection of neurological diseases and for the assessment of risk of falling in elderly people. The availability of low-cost camera hardware on the market today and recent advances in Machine Learning enable a wide range of clinical and health-related applications, such as patient monitoring or exercise recognition at home. In this study, we evaluated the motion tracking performance of the latest generation of the Microsoft Kinect camera, Azure Kinect, compared to its predecessor Kinect v2 in terms of treadmill walking using a gold standard Vicon multi-camera motion capturing system and the 39 marker Plug-in Gait model. Five young and healthy subjects walked on a treadmill at three different velocities while data were recorded simultaneously with all three camera systems. An easy-to-administer camera calibration method developed here was used to spatially align the 3D skeleton data from both Kinect cameras and the Vicon system. With this calibration, the spatial agreement of joint positions between the two Kinect cameras and the reference system was evaluated. In addition, we compared the accuracy of certain spatio-temporal gait parameters, i.e., step length, step time, step width, and stride time calculated from the Kinect data, with the gold standard system. Our results showed that the improved hardware and the motion tracking algorithm of the Azure Kinect camera led to a significantly higher accuracy of the spatial gait parameters than the predecessor Kinect v2, while no significant differences were found between the temporal parameters. Furthermore, we explain in detail how this experimental setup could be used to continuously monitor the progress during gait rehabilitation in older people.show moreshow less

Download full text files

  • pde003.pdfeng
    (19509KB)

    SHA-1: 5b3422b1e53e6316cee5af899457384d4360f4bb

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Justin Amadeus AlbertORCiD, Victor Owolabi, Arnd GebelORCiD, Clemens Markus BrahmsORCiD, Urs GranacherORCiDGND, Bert ArnrichORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-484130
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-48413
Title of parent work (German):Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Reihe der Digital Engineering Fakultät
Subtitle (English):A Pilot Study
Publication series (Volume number):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Reihe der Digital Engineering Fakultät (3)
Publication type:Postprint
Language:English
Date of first publication:2020/11/24
Publication year:2020
Publishing institution:Universität Potsdam
Release date:2020/11/24
Tag:RGB-D cameras; digital health; evaluation; human motion; motion capture
Issue:3
Number of pages:24
Source:Sensors 20 (2020) 18, Art. 5104 DOI: 10.3390/s20185104
Organizational units:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften / Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften
Digital Engineering Fakultät / Hasso-Plattner-Institut für Digital Engineering GmbH
DDC classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 62 Ingenieurwissenschaften / 620 Ingenieurwissenschaften und zugeordnete Tätigkeiten
Peer review:Referiert
Publishing method:Open Access / Green Open-Access
License (German):License LogoCC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International
External remark:Bibliographieeintrag der Originalveröffentlichung/Quelle
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.