• Treffer 8 von 27
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Das tue ich nicht, weil es nicht Pflicht ist

  • Most arguments of Applied Ethics (e.g.slippery slope argument, argument of double effect) are well analyzed. An exception is the argument 'I do not do this because it is not my duty'. It makes sense to call the argument the 'argument of supererogation' (ASE): Since J. Urmson's essay Saints and Heroes of 1958, those actions are called 'supererogations' which (despite of their moral value) are not supposed to be duties. The argument is widely used not only in Applied Ethics, but also in ordinary moral everyday life. Nevertheless, there is a need of investigation because it has an indecency-problem. The argument is convincing if an actor does not want to risk his life. It seems indecent, however, if an actor refuses a simple favor or a service of friendship with the 'argument of super-erogation', although they both constitute no duties. This paper reconstructs the 'argument of supererogation' as a syllogism. It analyzes its formal structure by benefitting from current Anglo-American literature on supererogation. The overall aim of thisMost arguments of Applied Ethics (e.g.slippery slope argument, argument of double effect) are well analyzed. An exception is the argument 'I do not do this because it is not my duty'. It makes sense to call the argument the 'argument of supererogation' (ASE): Since J. Urmson's essay Saints and Heroes of 1958, those actions are called 'supererogations' which (despite of their moral value) are not supposed to be duties. The argument is widely used not only in Applied Ethics, but also in ordinary moral everyday life. Nevertheless, there is a need of investigation because it has an indecency-problem. The argument is convincing if an actor does not want to risk his life. It seems indecent, however, if an actor refuses a simple favor or a service of friendship with the 'argument of super-erogation', although they both constitute no duties. This paper reconstructs the 'argument of supererogation' as a syllogism. It analyzes its formal structure by benefitting from current Anglo-American literature on supererogation. The overall aim of this paper is to solve the problem of indecency.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Marie-Luise RatersORCiDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3196/004433020828856890
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Deutsch):Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung
Untertitel (Deutsch):das Argument der Supererogation und sein Unanständigkeitsproblem
Publikationstyp:Beitrag zu einer (nichtwissenschaftlichen) Zeitung oder Zeitschrift
Sprache:Deutsch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:01.03.2020
Erscheinungsjahr:2020
Datum der Freischaltung:17.02.2021
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:Ethics; Philosophy
Band:74
Ausgabe:1
Erste Seite:80
Letzte Seite:104
Organisationseinheiten:Philosophische Fakultät / Institut für Lebensgestaltung-Ethik-Religionskunde
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.