Response to engeser (2012) on the nature of flow experience
- Engeser (2012) argued that the experience of flow is multifaceted and can only be measured validly by taking into account all relevant components. Although the possibility that flow includes several components cannot be excluded, there is weak evidence for Engeser's proposition. In support of a unidimensional interpretation of flow, theoretical, methodological, and empirical arguments are presented.
| Author details: | Ulrich SchiefeleORCiDGND |
|---|---|
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.2466/04.PR0.112.2.529-532 |
| ISSN: | 0033-2941 |
| Title of parent work (English): | Psychological reports |
| Publisher: | Sage Publ. |
| Place of publishing: | Missoula |
| Publication type: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Year of first publication: | 2013 |
| Publication year: | 2013 |
| Release date: | 2017/03/26 |
| Volume: | 112 |
| Issue: | 2 |
| Number of pages: | 4 |
| First page: | 529 |
| Last Page: | 532 |
| Organizational units: | Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften / Department Psychologie |
| Peer review: | Referiert |
| Institution name at the time of the publication: | Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Psychologie |
