• search hit 16 of 27
Back to Result List

Has the armed conflict in Afghanistan affected the rules on the conduct of hostilities?

  • The armed conflict in Afghanistan since 2001 has raised manifold questions pertaining to the humanitarian rules relative to the conduct of hostilities. In Afghanistan, as is often the case in so-called asymmetric conflicts, the geographical and temporal boundaries of the battlefield, and the distinction between civilians and fighters, are increasingly blurred. As a result, the risks for both civilians and soldiers operating in Afghanistan are high. The objective of this article is to assess whether - and if so how much - the armed conflict in Afghanistan has affected the application and interpretation of the principles of distinction, proportionality, and precaution - principles that form the core of legal rules pertaining to the conduct of hostilities.

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Robin Geiss, Michael Siegrist
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383111000191
ISSN:1816-3831
Title of parent work (English):International review of the Red Cross : humanitarian debate: law, policy, action
Publisher:Cambridge Univ. Press
Place of publishing:Cambridge
Publication type:Article
Language:English
Year of first publication:2011
Publication year:2011
Release date:2017/03/26
Volume:93
Issue:881
Number of pages:36
First page:11
Last Page:46
Organizational units:Juristische Fakultät / Öffentliches Recht
Peer review:Referiert
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.