The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 33 of 2352
Back to Result List

The impact of focus particles on the recognition and rejection of contrastive alternatives

  • The semantics of focus particles like only requires a set of alternatives (Rooth, 1992). In two experiments, we investigated the impact of such particles on the retrieval of alternatives that are mentioned in the prior context or unmentioned. The first experiment used a probe recognition task and showed that focus particles interfere with the recognition of mentioned alternatives and the rejection of unmentioned alternatives relative to a condition without a particle. A second lexical decision experiment demonstrated priming effects for mentioned and unmentioned alternatives (compared with an unrelated condition) while focus particles caused additional interference effects. Overall, our results indicate that focus particles trigger an active search for alternatives and lead to a competition between mentioned alternatives, unmentioned alternatives, and the focused element.

Download full text files

  • phr517.pdfeng
    (664KB)

    SHA-1: 38e0336cf9c10ffa4749851fde3abc85d1065ba1

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Nicole Gotzner, Isabell WartenburgerORCiDGND, Katharina SpalekORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-413420
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-41342
ISSN:1866-8364
Title of parent work (English):Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe
Publication series (Volume number):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe (517)
Publication type:Postprint
Language:English
Date of first publication:2019/02/04
Publication year:2016
Publishing institution:Universität Potsdam
Release date:2019/02/04
Tag:alternative-set semantics; competitive inhibition; focus particles; lexical decision task; probe recognition task
Issue:517
Number of pages:37
Source:Language and Cognition 8 (2016), pp. 59–95 DOI 10.1017/langcog.2015.25
Organizational units:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät
DDC classification:4 Sprache / 40 Sprache / 400 Sprache
Peer review:Referiert
Publishing method:Open Access
Grantor:Cambridge University Press (CUP)
License (German):License LogoKeine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.