The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 3 of 13157
Back to Result List

Derivational morphology in agrammatic aphasia

  • Although a relatively large number of studies on acquired language impairments have tested the case of derivational morphology, none of these have specifically investigated whether there are differences in how prefixed and suffixed derived words are impaired. Based on linguistic and psycholinguistic considerations on prefixed and suffixed derived words, differences in how these two types of derivations are processed, and consequently impaired, are predicted. In the present study, we investigated the errors produced in reading aloud simple, prefixed, and suffixed words by three German individuals with agrammatic aphasia (NN, LG, SA). We found that, while NN and LG produced similar numbers of errors with prefixed and suffixed words, SA showed a selective impairment for prefixed words. Furthermore, NN and SA produced more errors specifically involving the affix with prefixed words than with suffixed words. We discuss our findings in terms of relative position of stem and affix in prefixed and suffixed words, as well as in terms ofAlthough a relatively large number of studies on acquired language impairments have tested the case of derivational morphology, none of these have specifically investigated whether there are differences in how prefixed and suffixed derived words are impaired. Based on linguistic and psycholinguistic considerations on prefixed and suffixed derived words, differences in how these two types of derivations are processed, and consequently impaired, are predicted. In the present study, we investigated the errors produced in reading aloud simple, prefixed, and suffixed words by three German individuals with agrammatic aphasia (NN, LG, SA). We found that, while NN and LG produced similar numbers of errors with prefixed and suffixed words, SA showed a selective impairment for prefixed words. Furthermore, NN and SA produced more errors specifically involving the affix with prefixed words than with suffixed words. We discuss our findings in terms of relative position of stem and affix in prefixed and suffixed words, as well as in terms of specific properties of prefixes and suffixes.show moreshow less

Download full text files

  • phr648.pdfeng
    (1880KB)

    SHA-512:a24778e03665c746ddf8421dc47b33f176f297e4723ce7a4cbd53e77588463c629c88e59ed33cafea4bb90f1a0206e44b2c8bb131f873cb0ce758681fa178ecc

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Laura Anna CiaccioORCiD, Frank BurchertORCiDGND, Carlo Semenza
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-473995
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-47399
ISSN:1866-8364
Title of parent work (German):Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe
Subtitle (English):a comparison between prefixed and suffixed words
Publication type:Postprint
Language:English
Date of first publication:2020/08/05
Publication year:2020
Publishing institution:Universität Potsdam
Release date:2020/08/05
Tag:Broca’s aphasia; derivation; morphological decomposition; morphological errors; prefixes
Issue:648
Number of pages:17
Source:Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020) 1070 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01070
Organizational units:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften
DDC classification:1 Philosophie und Psychologie / 15 Psychologie / 150 Psychologie
Peer review:Referiert
Publishing method:Open Access / Green Open-Access
License (German):License LogoCC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International
External remark:Bibliographieeintrag der Originalveröffentlichung/Quelle
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.