The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 1 of 163
Back to Result List

Who makes the world?

  • In this essay, we consider the role of academics as change-makers. There is a long line of reflection about academics' sociopolitical role(s) in international relations (IR). Yet, our attempt differs from available considerations in two regards. First, we emphasize that academics are not a homogenous group. While some keep their distance from policymakers, others frequently provide policy advice. Hence, positions and possibilities of influence differ. Second, our argument is not oriented towards the past but the future. That is, we develop our reflections on academics as change-makers by outlining the vision of a 'FutureLab', an innovative, future forum that brings together different world-makers who are united in their attempt to improve 'the world'. Our vision accounts for current, perhaps alarming trends in academia, such as debates about the (in)ability to confront post-truth politics. Still, it is a (critically) optimistic one and can be read as an invitation for experimentation. Finally, we sympathize with voices demanding theIn this essay, we consider the role of academics as change-makers. There is a long line of reflection about academics' sociopolitical role(s) in international relations (IR). Yet, our attempt differs from available considerations in two regards. First, we emphasize that academics are not a homogenous group. While some keep their distance from policymakers, others frequently provide policy advice. Hence, positions and possibilities of influence differ. Second, our argument is not oriented towards the past but the future. That is, we develop our reflections on academics as change-makers by outlining the vision of a 'FutureLab', an innovative, future forum that brings together different world-makers who are united in their attempt to improve 'the world'. Our vision accounts for current, perhaps alarming trends in academia, such as debates about the (in)ability to confront post-truth politics. Still, it is a (critically) optimistic one and can be read as an invitation for experimentation. Finally, we sympathize with voices demanding the democratization of academia and find that further cross-disciplinary dialogues within academia and dialogues between different academics, civil society activists and policymakers may help in finding creditable solutions to problems such as climate change and populism.show moreshow less

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Leonie HolthausORCiDGND, Nils StockmannORCiDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825X20935246
ISSN:2336-825X
ISSN:2336-8268
Title of parent work (English):New perspectives
Subtitle (English):Academics and (un)cancelling the future
Publisher:Sage Publications
Place of publishing:Thousand Oaks, CA
Publication type:Article
Language:English
Date of first publication:2020/06/30
Publication year:2020
Release date:2024/01/11
Tag:multiplicity; policy; scholar-practitioners; transdisciplinarity; un-cancelling the future; world-makers
Volume:28
Issue:3
Number of pages:15
First page:413
Last Page:427
Funding institution:project on Arms Control and Emerging Technologies - German Federal; Foreign Office
Organizational units:Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät
Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Sozialwissenschaften / Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft
DDC classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 32 Politikwissenschaft / 320 Politikwissenschaft
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.