Analytic Kantianism

  • Wilfrid Sellars and John McDowell can both be read as proponents of Analytic Kantianism. However, their accounts differ in important detail. In particular, McDowell has criticized Sellars’s account of sensory consciousness in a number of papers (most notably in LFI and SC), both as a reading of Kant and on its systematic merits. The present paper offers a detailed analysis of this criticism and a defense of Sellars’s position against the background of a methodology of transcendental philosophy.

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Johannes HaagORCiDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1092766
ISSN:2386-7655
Title of parent work (English):Con-textos kantianos : international journal of philosophy
Subtitle (English):Sellars and McDowell on Sensory Consciousness
Publisher:Instituto de Filosofía del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
Place of publishing:Madrid
Publication type:Article
Language:English
Date of first publication:2017/12/05
Completion year:2017
Release date:2021/10/13
Tag:Kant; McDowell; Sellars; Transcendental Philosophy; intuition; judgment; perception
Number of pages:24
First page:18
Last Page:41
Organizational units:Philosophische Fakultät / Institut für Philosophie
DDC classification:1 Philosophie und Psychologie / 10 Philosophie / 100 Philosophie und Psychologie
Peer review:Referiert
Publishing method:DOAJ gelistet
License (German):License LogoCC BY - Namensnennung, 4.0 International