TY - JOUR A1 - Alerasoul, Sayed Alireza A1 - Tiberius, Victor A1 - Bouncken, Ricarda B. T1 - Entrepreneurship and innovation BT - the coevolution of two fields JF - Journal of small business strategy N2 - Both entrepreneurship and innovation play a key role for business growth and economic development and are conceptually highly intertwined. Both fields have received extensive attention that has resulted in a large number of publications. The aim of this work is to provide an overview on the coevolution of entrepreneurship and innovation over the last decades, with particular attention to recent research trends. To track the evolution at the intersection of both fields, we employ a bibliometric analysis, which allowed us to identify the key concepts, the backbone of research, and to provide a systematic classification of main research themes diagnosed including: 1) entrepreneurial innovation and digital transformation, 2) sustainable innovation and entrepreneurship, 3) product innovation and knowledge, 4) entrepreneurial orientation and leadership, and 5) regional entrepreneurship and innovation (innovative entrepreneurship and historical roots). The findings of this bibliometric review are reported in the form of a knowledge graph that represents the results obtained in terms of the knowledge base (key terms), knowledge domains, and knowledge evolution (themes and bursts), based on which themes for future research are suggested. KW - bibliometric analysis KW - literature review KW - innovation KW - entrepreneurship KW - knowledge graph Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.53703/001c.29968 SN - 1081-8510 SN - 2380-1751 VL - 32 IS - 2 PB - Middle Tennessee State University CY - Murfreesboro, TN ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Filser, Matthias A1 - Tiberius, Victor A1 - Kraus, Sascha A1 - Spitzer, Jonathan A1 - Kailer, Norbert A1 - Bouncken, Ricarda B. T1 - Sharing economy BT - a bibliometric analysis of the state of research JF - International journal of entrepreneurial venturing N2 - The sharing economy has received increased attention in entrepreneurship research, resulting in a complex research landscape that is hard to overlook. Using a bibliometric analysis, we aim to further synthesise the field by: 1) summarising the most important definitions given by extant literature to capture the common understanding of the sharing economy; 2) identifying three thematic clusters based on the top 20 most cited publications; 3) conducting a citation analysis to show interdependencies between all authors; and 4) identifying the research methods used in the SE publications. Our results show: 1) many definitions with different emphases; 2) conceptualisation, collaborative consumption/ownership and the disruptive character of the sharing economy as three dominant research clusters; 3) a fairly even citation practice allowing for unbiased future research; and 4) that conceptual publications and quantitative as well as qualitative studies are fairly evenly published. KW - bibliometrics KW - business models KW - citation analysis KW - collaborative consumption KW - disruption KW - literature review KW - regulations KW - sharing economy Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2020.112234 SN - 1742-5360 SN - 1742-5379 VL - 12 IS - 6 SP - 665 EP - 665 PB - Inderscience Enterprises CY - Genève ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Fredrich, Viktor A1 - Bouncken, Ricarda B. A1 - Tiberius, Victor T1 - Dyadic business model convergence or divergence in alliances? BT - a configurational approach JF - Journal of business research N2 - In this study, we contribute to the scholarly conversation on firm-level business model changes following a neoconfigurational approach. By exploring configurations of business model changes over time, we add the direction of business model changes—namely business model convergence or divergence—as a vital avenue to the business model innovation literature. We identify necessary business model convergence and divergence recipes in a sample of N = 217 strategic dyadic alliances. Firstly, technological proximity emerges as a single pre-condition to both converging and diverging business models. Secondly, business models between competitors either converge through complementarities or tend not to change relative to each other. Thirdly, equity participation enables business model divergence through co-specialization. We conclude with a discussion of business model trajectories and future research directions. Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.046 SN - 0148-2963 VL - 153 SP - 300 EP - 308 PB - Elsevier CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Glinyanova, Maria A1 - Bouncken, Ricarda B. A1 - Tiberius, Victor A1 - Cuenca Ballester, Antonio C. T1 - Five decades of corporate entrepreneurship research BT - Measuring and mapping the field JF - International entrepreneurship and management journal N2 - Research on corporate entrepreneurship—venturing activities by established corporations—has received increasing scholarly attention. We employ bibliometric methods to analyze the literature on corporate entrepreneurship published over the last five decades. Based on the results of citation and co-citation analyses, we reveal central works in the field and how they are interconnected. We investigate the underlying intellectual structure of the field. Our findings provide evidence of the growing maturity and interdisciplinarity of corporate entrepreneurship and provide insight into research themes. We find that resource-based view and its extensions still remain the predominant theoretical perspectives in the field. Drawing on these findings, we suggest directions for future research. KW - corporate entrepreneurship KW - bibliometric analysis KW - co-citation analysis Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00711-9 SN - 1554-7191 SN - 1555-1938 VL - 17 IS - 4 SP - 1731 EP - 1757 PB - Springer CY - Berlin ER -