TY - JOUR A1 - Koch, Helvi A1 - Spörer, Nadine T1 - Students improve in reading comprehension by learning how to teach reading strategies BT - an evidence-based approach for teacher education JF - Psychology Learning and Teaching N2 - In this intervention study, we investigated how we could teach university students who were majoring in education to teach reading strategies. The goal of the study was to analyze whether and to what extent students would benefit from the intervention with respect to their own learning. Did their own reading skills improve after they attended the intervention? The sample consisted of n = 61 students who were assigned to one of two conditions: (a) an adaption of reciprocal teaching; and (b) a control group that was not taught how to teach reading strategies. The evidence-based teaching method used in the intervention condition consisted of three elements: modeling, scaffolding, and repeated practice. Training success was assessed in a pre-posttest control group design with standardized reading comprehension and reading speed tests. To compare the development of the students in the two conditions, repeated measures ANOVAs were used. At posttest, intervention students outperformed control students in reading comprehension as well as in reading speed. KW - Reading strategies KW - reciprocal teaching KW - teacher education Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725717700525 SN - 1475-7257 SN - 2057-3022 VL - 16 SP - 197 EP - 211 PB - Sage Publ. CY - London ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schünemann, Nina A1 - Spörer, Nadine A1 - Voellinger, Vanessa A. A1 - Brunstein, Joachim Clemens T1 - Peer feedback mediates the impact of self-regulation procedures on strategy use and reading comprehension in reciprocal teaching groups JF - Instructional Science N2 - The goal of this research was to highlight the role social regulatory processes play in making students’ teamwork in reciprocal teaching (RT) groups (a classroom activity in which students take the teacher’s role in small group reading sessions) effective. In addition to teamwork quality, we expected peer feedback to be a key factor in enhancing students’ reading comprehension achievements. Because previous research (Schünemann et al. in Contemp Educ Psychol 38:289–305, 2013) has shown that procedures of self-regulated learning (SRL) augment the effects of RT methods, we further assumed that such procedures would promote the quality of students’ collaborative efforts. In a cluster-randomized trial, students in 12 fifth-grade classes practiced a strategic approach to reading either in a RT condition or in a RT + SRL condition. In one of the 14 sessions, students’ interactive behavior was videotaped. Strategy use and reading comprehension were assessed at pretest, posttest, and maintenance. Performance differences between conditions were reliable only at maintenance. A multilevel mediation analysis showed that relative to RT students, RT + SRL students were better able to provide their teammates with informative feedback and organize their group work in a task-focused manner. Only feedback quality mediated the sustainability of treatment effects on strategy use and reading comprehension. In essence, this research suggests that effective reading comprehension trainings should integrate explicit instruction and practice in reading strategies, SRL, and focus on supportive peer processes in small groups with extensive instruction and practice in peer feedback. KW - Reading comprehension KW - Self-regulated learning KW - Co-regulation KW - Reading strategies KW - Feedback Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9409-1 SN - 0020-4277 SN - 1573-1952 VL - 45 SP - 395 EP - 415 PB - Springer CY - Dordrecht ER -