TY - CHAP A1 - Tanneberg, Dag T1 - Toward a theory of political repression T2 - The politics of repression under authoritarian rule : how steadfast is the Iron Throne? N2 - To ensure political survival, autocrats must prevent popular rebellion, and political repression is a means to that end. However, autocrats face threats from both the inside and the outside of the center of power. They must avoid popular rebellion and at the same time share power with strategic actors who enjoy incentive to challenge established power-sharing arrangements whenever repression is ordered. Can autocrats turn repression in a way that allows trading one threat off against the other? This chapter first argues that prior research offers scant insight on that question because it relies on umbrella concepts and questionable measurements of repression. Next, the chapter disaggregates repression into restrictions and violence and reflects on their drawbacks. Citizens adapt to the restriction of political civil liberties, and violence backfires against its originators. Hence, restrictions require enforcement, and violence requires moderation. When interpreted as complements, it becomes clear that restrictions and violence have the potential to compensate for their respective weaknesses. The complementarity between violence and restrictions turns political repression into a valuable addition to the authoritarian toolkit. The chapter concludes with an application of these ideas to the twin problems of authoritarian control and power-sharing. Y1 - 2020 SN - 978-3-030-35477-0 SN - 978-3-030-35476-3 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35477-0_2 SN - 2198-7289 SP - 9 EP - 41 PB - Springer CY - Cham ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Bindenagel Šehović, Annamarie T1 - Towards a new definition of health security BT - a three-part rationale for the twenty-first century JF - Global public health : an international journal for research, policy and practice N2 - In recent years the framings of global health security have shifted while the structures governing global health have largely remained the same. One feature of the emerging re-ordering is the unresolved allocation of accountability between state and non-state actors. This brings to critical challenges to global health security to the fore. The first is that the consensus on the seeming shift from state to human security framing with regard to the global human right to health (security) risks losing its salience. Second, this conceptual challenge is mirrored on the operational level: if states and non-state actors do not assume responsibility for health security, who or what can guarantee health security? In order to address global health security against the backdrop of these twenty-first Century challenges, this article proceeds in three parts. First, it analyses the shortcomings of the current state-based World Health Organization (WHO) definition of health security. Second, taking into account the rising pressures posed to global health security and the inadequacy both of state-based and of ad hoc non-state responses, it proposes a new framing. Third, the article offers initial insights into the operational application of beyond state responses to (health) security challenges. KW - health security KW - citizenship KW - borders KW - state security KW - responsibility Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2019.1634119 SN - 1744-1692 SN - 1744-1706 VL - 15 IS - 1 SP - 1 EP - 12 PB - Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group CY - Abingdon, Oxfordshire ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kuhlmann, Sabine A1 - Hellstrom, Mikael A1 - Ramberg, Ulf A1 - Reiter, Renate T1 - Tracing divergence in crisis governance BT - responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in France, Germany and Sweden compared JF - International review of administrative sciences : an international journal of comparative public administration N2 - This cross-country comparison of administrative responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in France, Germany and Sweden is aimed at exploring how institutional contexts and administrative cultures have shaped strategies of problem-solving and governance modes during the pandemic, and to what extent the crisis has been used for opportunity management. The article shows that in France, the central government reacted determinedly and hierarchically, with tough containment measures. By contrast, the response in Germany was characterized by an initial bottom-up approach that gave way to remarkable federal unity in the further course of the crisis, followed again by a return to regional variance and local discretion. In Sweden, there was a continuation of 'normal governance' and a strategy of relying on voluntary compliance largely based on recommendations and less - as in Germany and France - on a strategy of imposing legally binding regulations. The comparative analysis also reveals that relevant stakeholders in all three countries have used the crisis as an opportunity for changes in the institutional settings and administrative procedures. Points for practitioners COVID-19 has shown that national political and administrative standard operating procedures in preparation for crises are, at best, partially helpful. Notwithstanding the fact that dealing with the unpredictable is a necessary part of crisis management, a need to further improve the institutional preparedness for pandemic crises in all three countries examined here has also become clear. This should be done particularly by way of shifting resources to the health and care sectors, strengthening the decentralized management of health emergencies, stocking and/or self-producing protection material, assessing the effects of crisis measures, and opening the scientific discourse to broader arenas of experts. KW - administrative culture KW - containment KW - crisis KW - governance KW - multi-level system KW - policy advice KW - public health KW - window of opportunity Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852320979359 SN - 0020-8523 SN - 1461-7226 VL - 87 IS - 3 SP - 556 EP - 575 PB - Sage Publ. CY - London ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Grohmann, Nils-Hendrik T1 - Tracing the development of the proportionality analysis in relation to forced evictions under the ICESCR JF - Human rights law review N2 - Since 2013, the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights can examine individual communications under the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). This opens up the possibility to interpret Covenant provisions in a thorough manner. With regard to forced evictions and the right to housing under Article 11 ICESCR, one can discern a fast-developing approach concerning the proportionality analysis of evictions, entailing the establishment of specific criteria that may guide such analysis. This paper seeks to delineate these developments and will also shed light on possible general trends on the topic of limitations within the Committee’s emerging jurisprudence. In doing so, the paper will address if, and how, the developing proportionality analysis under the individual complaints procedure takes into consideration multi-discriminatory dimensions of State measures and how it specifically relates to or incorporates other ICESCR-concepts, such as minimum core obligations or the reasonableness review under Article 8(4) OP ICESCR. KW - discriminatory dimensions of forced evictions KW - reasonableness KW - proportionality analysis KW - forced evictions KW - right to housing KW - CESCR Committee Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngac025 SN - 1461-7781 SN - 1744-1021 VL - 22 IS - 3 SP - 1 EP - 24 PB - Oxford University Press CY - Oxford ER - TY - BOOK ED - Krieger, Heike ED - Liese, Andrea T1 - Tracing value change in the international legal order N2 - International law is constantly navigating the tension between preserving the status quo and adapting to new exigencies. But when and how do such adaptation processes give way to a more profound transformation, if not a crisis of international law? To address the question of how attacks on the international legal order are changing the value orientation of international law, this book brings together scholars of international law and international relations. By combining theoretical and methodological analyses with individual case studies, this book offers readers conceptualizations and tools to systematically examine value change and explore the drivers and mechanisms of these processes. These case studies scrutinize value change in the foundational norms of the post-1945 order and in norms representing the rise of the international legal order post-1990. They cover diverse issues: the prohibition of torture, the protection of women’s rights, the prohibition of the use of force, the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, sustainability norms, and accountability for core international crimes. The challenges to each norm, the reactions by norm defenders, and the fate of each norm are also studied. Combined, the analyses show that while a few norms have remained surprisingly robust, several are changing, either in substance or in legal or social validity. The book concludes by integrating the conceptual and empirical insights from this interdisciplinary exchange to assess and explain the ambiguous nature of value change in international law beyond the extremes of mere progress or decline. KW - international legal order KW - international relations KW - value change KW - norm change KW - legal change KW - metamorphosis of international law KW - contestation KW - international law Y1 - 2023 SN - 978-0-19-285583-1 SN - 978-0-19-266836-3 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192855831.001.0001 PB - Oxford University Press CY - Oxford ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Röthlisberger, Livia T1 - Transformative Justice in South Sudan BT - The Transformative Potential of a Contextualized Transitional Justice Process JF - Transitional Justice : Theoretical and Practical Approaches (Potsdamer Studien zu Staat, Recht und Politik ; 7) N2 - This chapter takes the ongoing conflict in South Sudan as a starting point for assessing the concept of transitional justice as such and its implementation in the country in particular. Following a brief description of the conflict and the peace processes, the author sheds light on the shortcomings of the established concept of transitional justice in the situation at hand. Then, the author outlines the alternate concept of transformational justice und takes a closer look at its implications on the situation in South Sudan. The author highlights existing initiatives of transformative justice and is very much in favour of their victim-centered approach. Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-570480 SN - 978-3-86956-473-9 SN - 1869-2443 SN - 1867-2663 IS - 7 SP - 167 EP - 191 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Mair, Theresa T1 - Transforming Transitional Justice to Address Colonial Crime BT - The Nama’s and Herero’s Claim for Justice for Germany’s Colonial Genocide in Namibia JF - Transitional Justice : Theoretical and Practical Approaches (Potsdamer Studien zu Staat, Recht und Politik ; 7) N2 - While the concept of transitional justice and its range of measures have gained importance on an international level to come to terms with major crimes of the past, colonial crimes and mass violence committed by Western actors have not been addressed by transitional justice so far. In this chapter, the Herero’s and Nama’s struggle for justice for the genocide on their ancestors by Germany from 1904 – 1908 and the arising challenges are set in relation to conceptual debates in the field of transitional justice. Building on current debates in the field, suggesting more structural and transformative conceptualizations of transitional justice and an approach ‘from below’, it is argued that decolonial activism of formerly colonized communities and transitional justice debates can inform each other in a dialogic and fruitful form to formulate suggestions for a process towards post-colonial justice. Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-570160 SN - 978-3-86956-473-9 SN - 1869-2443 SN - 1867-2663 IS - 7 SP - 73 EP - 109 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Weiß, Norman A1 - Verlaan, Stephanie A1 - Vasquez Carruthers, Juan Francisco A1 - Mair, Theresa A1 - Conner, Sean A1 - Maaser, Lucas A1 - Röthlisberger, Livia ED - Weiß, Norman T1 - Transitional Justice BT - Theoretical and Practical Approaches T3 - Potsdamer Studien zu Staat, Recht und Politik N2 - This publication deals with the topic of transitional justice. In six case studies, the authors link theoretical and practical implications in order to develop some innovative approaches. Their proposals might help to deal more effectively with the transition of societies, legal orders and political systems. Young academics from various backgrounds provide fresh insights and demonstrate the relevance of the topic. The chapters analyse transitions and conflicts in Sierra Leone, Argentina, Nicaragua, Nepal, and South Sudan as well as Germany’s colonial genocide in Namibia. Thus, the book provides the reader with new insights and contributes to the ongoing debate about transitional justice. N2 - Gegenstand dieser Publikation ist das Thema „Transitional Justice“. In sechs Fallstudien verknüpfen die Autoren theoretische und praktische Implikationen, um innovative Ansätze zu entwickeln. Ihre Vorschläge wollen dazu beitragen, den Übergangsprozess von Gesellschaften, Rechtsordnungen und politischen Systemen effektiver zu gestalten. Nachwuchswissenschaftler mit unterschiedlichem fachlichem Hintergrund geben hier neue Einblicke und zeigen die fortdauernde Relevanz des Themas. Die Kapitel analysieren Übergänge und Konflikte in Sierra Leone, Argentinien, Nicaragua, Nepal und Süd-Sudan sowie den kolonialen Völkermord in Namibia. So liefert das Buch dem Leser neue Erkenntnisse und trägt zur laufenden Debatte über das Thema „Transitional Justice“ bei. T3 - Potsdamer Studien zu Staat, Recht und Politik - 7 KW - transitional justice KW - transformation KW - transformative justice KW - reconciliation KW - political opportunism KW - Übergangsjustiz KW - Transformation KW - Versöhnung KW - Demokratisierung Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-431711 SN - 978-3-86956-473-9 SN - 1869-2443 SN - 1867-2663 IS - 7 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Maaser, Lucas T1 - Transitional Justice and Nonviolent Resistance BT - Mutually Reinforcing Frameworks for the Consolidation of Democracies? JF - Transitional Justice : Theoretical and Practical Approaches (Potsdamer Studien zu Staat, Recht und Politik ; 7) N2 - At different times and places, civic engagement in nonviolent resistance (NVR) has repeatedly shown to be an effective tool in times of conflict to initiate societal change from below. History teaches us that there have been successes (Mahatma Gandhi in India) and failures (the Tiananmen Square protests in China). Along with the recognition of the duality between transformative potential and stark consequences, the historical development of NVR was accompanied by the emergence of scholarly debate, fractured along disputes around purpose, character and effectivity of nonviolent actions taken by civil society stakeholders engaged in making their voices heard. One of the field’s current points of interest is the examination of the long-term effects of NVR movements resulting in societal transformation on the stability and adequacy of a subsequently altered or emerging democracy, suggesting that NVR contributes positively to the sustainable and representative design of an egalitarian governing system. The conclusion of the Nepalese civil war in 2006 should pose as an unambiguous example for the illustration of this phenomenon, but simultaneously raises the question why there was no successful implementation of a transitional process focusing on the needs of the victims. Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-570470 SN - 978-3-86956-473-9 SN - 1869-2443 SN - 1867-2663 IS - 7 SP - 139 EP - 165 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Francisco Vásquez Carruthers, Juan T1 - Transitional Justice and Political Opportunism JF - Transitional Justice : Theoretical and Practical Approaches (Potsdamer Studien zu Staat, Recht und Politik ; 7) N2 - This paper aims to contribute a different approach to transitional justice, one in which political decisions are rocketed to the forefront of the research. Theory asserts that, after a transition to democracy, it is the constituency who defines the direction a country will take. Therefore, pleasing them should be at the fore of the responses taken by those in power. However, reality distances itself from theory. History provides us with many examples of the contrary, which indicates that the politicization of transitional justice is an ever-present event. The first section will outline current definitions and obstacles faced by transitional justice, focusing on the implicit ties between them and the aforementioned politicization. An original categorization of Transitional Justice as a method of analysis will also be introduced, which I denominate Political Opportunism. The case of Argentina, a country that is usually described as a model to export but that after 35 years is still dealing with the consequences brought by the contradictions of using several methods of justice, will then be reinterpreted through this perspective. At the end of the paper, the inevitable question will be posed: can this new angle be exported and implemented in every transition? Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-570153 SN - 978-3-86956-473-9 SN - 1869-2443 SN - 1867-2663 IS - 7 SP - 39 EP - 71 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - THES A1 - Dribbisch, Katrin T1 - Translating innovation T1 - Translating Innovation BT - the adoption of Design Thinking in a Singaporean ministry BT - die Adoption von Design Thinking in einem Singapurer Ministerium N2 - This doctoral thesis studies the process of innovation adoption in public administrations, addressing the research question of how an innovation is translated to a local context. The study empirically explores Design Thinking as a new problem-solving approach introduced by a federal government organisation in Singapore. With a focus on user-centeredness, collaboration and iteration Design Thinking seems to offer a new way to engage recipients and other stakeholders of public services as well as to re-think the policy design process from a user’s point of view. Pioneered in the private sector, early adopters of the methodology include civil services in Australia, Denmark, the United Kingdom, the United States as well as Singapore. Hitherto, there is not much evidence on how and for which purposes Design Thinking is used in the public sector. For the purpose of this study, innovation adoption is framed in an institutionalist perspective addressing how concepts are translated to local contexts. The study rejects simplistic views of the innovation adoption process, in which an idea diffuses to another setting without adaptation. The translation perspective is fruitful because it captures the multidimensionality and ‘messiness’ of innovation adoption. More specifically, the overall research question addressed in this study is: How has Design Thinking been translated to the local context of the public sector organisation under investigation? And from a theoretical point of view: What can we learn from translation theory about innovation adoption processes? Moreover, there are only few empirical studies of organisations adopting Design Thinking and most of them focus on private organisations. We know very little about how Design Thinking is embedded in public sector organisations. This study therefore provides further empirical evidence of how Design Thinking is used in a public sector organisation, especially with regards to its application to policy work which has so far been under-researched. An exploratory single case study approach was chosen to provide an in-depth analysis of the innovation adoption process. Based on a purposive, theory-driven sampling approach, a Singaporean Ministry was selected because it represented an organisational setting in which Design Thinking had been embedded for several years, making it a relevant case with regard to the research question. Following a qualitative research design, 28 semi-structured interviews (45-100 minutes) with employees and managers were conducted. The interview data was triangulated with observations and documents, collected during a field research research stay in Singapore. The empirical study of innovation adoption in a single organisation focused on the intra-organisational perspective, with the aim to capture the variations of translation that occur during the adoption process. In so doing, this study opened the black box often assumed in implementation studies. Second, this research advances translation studies not only by showing variance, but also by deriving explanatory factors. The main differences in the translation of Design Thinking occurred between service delivery and policy divisions, as well as between the first adopter and the rest of the organisation. For the intra-organisational translation of Design Thinking in the Singaporean Ministry the following five factors played a role: task type, mode of adoption, type of expertise, sequence of adoption, and the adoption of similar practices. N2 - Die Dissertation untersucht den Prozess der Innovationsadoption in Verwaltungen, ausgehend von der Forschungsfrage, wie eine Innovation in den lokalen Kontext einer Organisation übersetzt wird. Empirisch untersucht die Arbeit, wie Design Thinking als neuer Problemlösungsansatz von einem Singapurer Ministerium eingeführt wurde. Mit einer am Nutzer orientierten, kollaborativen und iterativen Arbeitsweise verspricht Design Thinking eine neue Möglichkeit, Leistungsempfänger/innen und andere Stakeholder öffentlicher Dienstleistungen einzubinden sowie den Gesetzgebungsprozess ausgehend von der Nutzerperspektive neu zu gestalten. Dieser zunächst in Unternehmen eingeführte Innovationsansatz wurde in den vergangenen Jahren verstärkt von Verwaltungen weltweit aufgegriffen, zum Beispiel in Australien, Dänemark, Großbritannien, den USA und Singapur. Es existieren jedoch bisher nur wenige empirische Studien darüber, wie und für welche Zwecke Design Thinking im Verwaltungskontext zum Einsatz kommt. Die vorliegende Arbeit wählt eine Translationsperspektive zur Analyse des Innovation-Adoption-Prozesses. Der Translationsansatz im Sinne des skandinavischen Neo-Institutionalismus untersucht, wie Ideen in lokale Kontexte übersetzt werden. Die Studie grenzt sich damit von einem vereinfachten Verständnis des Innovation-Adoption-Prozesses ab und somit von der Vorstellung, dass eine Idee ohne Anpassung in einen neuen Kontext aufgenommen wird. Die Translationstheorie ermöglicht eine differenzierte Betrachtung des Innovation-Adoption-Prozesses, indem sie den Blick auf die Anpassungen und Veränderungen richtet. Die zentralen Forschungsfragen der Studie lauten: Erstens, wie wurde Design Thinking in den lokalen Kontext eines Singapurer Ministeriums übersetzt? Zweitens, was können wir von einem Translation-Theorieansatz über Innovation-Adoption-Prozesse lernen? Es gibt bisher wenige empirische Studien zur organisationalen Adoption von Design Thinking, von denen die meisten sich auf Unternehmen beziehen. Wir wissen wenig darüber, wie Design Thinking in öffentlichen Verwaltungen und Regierungsorganisationen eingebettet wird. Diese Untersuchung liefert deshalb empirische Evidenz, wie Design Thinking in einer öffentlichen Verwaltung eingesetzt wird, insbesondere in Bezug auf die Anwendung im Gesetzgebungsbereich, der in der bisherigen Forschung vernachlässigt wurde. Für die Analyse des Innovation-Adoption-Prozesses wurde ein exploratives Einzelfallstudiendesign gewählt. Basierend auf einem theoriegeleiteten Sampling-Ansatz wurde ein Singapurer Ministerium ausgewählt, das einen Organisationskontext bot, in dem Design Thinking vor einigen Jahren eingeführt und seitdem praktiziert wurde. Das Singapurer Ministerium stellt damit einen relevanten Fall für die Beantwortung der Forschungsfrage dar. Im Rahmen eines qualitativen Forschungsdesigns, wurden 28 semi-strukturierte Interviews (45 bis 100 Minuten) mit Mitarbeiter/innen und Führungskräften durchgeführt. Die Interviewdaten wurden mit Beobachtungen und Dokumenten trianguliert, die während eines mehrwöchigen Forschungsaufenthaltes in Singapur gesammelt wurden. Die empirische Untersuchung der Innovationsadoption in einer Einzelorganisation konzentriert sich auf eine intraorganisatorische Perspektive mit dem Ziel, die Variationen der Translation während des Adoptionsprozesses festzuhalten. Die Studie leistet damit einen Beitrag zur Öffnung der oft in Implementierungsstudien angenommenen Blackbox, weil sie den Blick darauf richtet, was nach der Einführungsentscheidung in der Organisation mit der Innovation geschieht. Zweitens, erweitert die vorliegende Studie die Translationsforschung, weil sie intraorganisatorische Varianz der Übersetzung nicht nur nachweisen, sondern auch erklären kann. Aus dem empirischen Material werden fünf Einflussfaktoren identifiziert, die die Unterschiede in der Übersetzung von Design Thinking innerhalb des Singapurer Ministeriums erklären können: 1) die Art der Aufgabe, 2) der Adoptionsmodus, 3) die Art der Expertise, 4) die zeitliche Abfolge der Adoption und 5) die Integration in die Organisation durch die Kombination mit komplementären Praktiken. Die Hauptunterschiede traten zwischen Service-Delivery- und Policy-Abteilungen auf sowie zwischen der der Abteilung, die Design Thinking zuerst einführte, und dem Rest der Organisation. KW - Design Thinking KW - innovation adoption KW - translation theory KW - public sector innovation KW - public management KW - Design Thinking KW - Innovation KW - Verwaltungsmodernisierung KW - Organizational innovation KW - Neo-institutionalismus Y1 - 2017 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-104719 ER - TY - THES A1 - Reiners, Nina T1 - Transnational lawmaking coalitions for human rights Y1 - 2017 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Mitra, Subrata T1 - Turning Aliens into Citizens BT - significance of the Indian Case* JF - WeltTrends-Papiere N2 - Inhalt: Empirical results of the survey ; A cumulative index of citizenship ; Jammu and Kashmir: Contesting “Indian” citizenship ; Conclusion KW - Politische Theorie KW - Migration KW - Integration KW - Bürgerschaft Y1 - 2011 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-63558 SN - 1864-0656 IS - 19 SP - 120 EP - 127 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Fleischer, Julia A1 - Buzogány, Aron T1 - Unboxing international public administrations BT - the politics of structural change in the UN system (1998–2019) JF - The American review of public administration N2 - Recent debates in international relations increasingly focus on bureaucratic apparatuses of international organizations and highlight their role, influence, and autonomy in global public policy. In this contribution we follow the recent call made by Moloney and Rosenbloom in this journal to make use of “public administrative theory and empirically based knowledge in analyzing the behavior of international and regional organizations” and offer a systematic analysis of the inner structures of these administrative bodies. Changes in these structures can reflect both the (re-)assignment of responsibilities, competencies, and expertise, but also the (re)allocation of resources, staff, and corresponding signalling of priorities. Based on organizational charts, we study structural changes within 46 international bureaucracies in the UN system. Tracing formal changes to all internal units over two decades, this contribution provides the first longitudinal assessment of structural change at the international level. We demonstrate that the inner structures of international bureaucracies in the UN system became more fragmented over time but also experienced considerable volatility with periods of structural growth and retrenchment. The analysis also suggests that IO's political features yield stronger explanatory power for explaining these structural changes than bureaucratic determinants. We conclude that the politics of structural change in international bureaucracies is a missing piece in the current debate on international public administrations that complements existing research perspectives by reiterating the importance of the political context of international bureaucracies as actors in global governance. KW - global public policy KW - international public administration KW - structural change Y1 - 2023 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740221136488 SN - 0275-0740 SN - 1552-3357 VL - 53 IS - 1 SP - 23 EP - 35 PB - Sage CY - Thousand Oaks, Calif. ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Dannemann, Udo ED - Fridrich, Christian ED - Hagedorn, Udo ED - Hedtke, Reinhold ED - Mittnik, Philipp ED - Tafner, Georg T1 - Understanding neoliberal subjectification BT - the contemporary homo economicus in the context of socio-economic education T2 - Economy, society and politics : socio-economic and political education in schools and universities N2 - The contribution explores how an understanding of neoliberal subjectification in socio-economic education can serve to counteract the trend marketisation of democracy. Drawing on Foucault’s lectures on biopolitics and Brown’s current analysis of neoliberalism, it lays out a sociological explanation that treats the idea of homo economicus as a structuring element of our society and outlines the threat this poses to the liberal democratic order. The second part of the contribution outlines – through immanent critique – an ideology-critical analytical competence that uses key problems to illuminate socially critical perspectives on social reality. The objective is to challenge some of the foundations of social order (Salomon, D. Kritische politische Bildung. Ein Versuch. In B. Widmaier & Overwien, B. (Hrsg.), Was heißt heute kritische politische Bildung? (S. 232–239). Wochenschau, 2013) in pursuit of the ultimate objective of an educated and assertive citizenry. Y1 - 2024 SN - 978-3-658-42524-1 SN - 978-3-658-42525-8 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42525-8_10 SP - 217 EP - 236 PB - Springer Fachmedien CY - Wiesbaden ER - TY - GEN A1 - Terhalle, Maximilian T1 - Understanding the limits of power BT - America’s Middle East experience T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - The main thread of this review article is to identify the reasons of how to account for the trajectory of American power in the region. Leaving behind the vast amount of highly politicised and hastily compiled volumes of recent years (notwithstanding valuable exceptions), the monographs composed by Lawrence Freedman, Trita Parsi and Oliver Roy attempt to subtly disentangle the intricacies of US involvement in the region from highly distinct perspectives. One caveat for International Relations theorists is that none of the aforementioned authors intends to provide theoretical frameworks for his examination. However, since IR theory has damagingly neglected history in the last decades, the works under review here, at least in part, compensate for this disciplinary and intellectual failure. In conclusion, Freedman’s in-depth approach as a diplomatic historian, with its under-lying reference to the various traditions in US foreign policy thinking, is most illuminating, while Parsi’s contestable account focuses too narrowly on the Iran-Israel relationship. Roy’s explications fail to show how and why the ‘ideological’ element in US foreign policy came to carry exceedingly more weight after 2001 than it did in the 1990s. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe - 102 Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-413722 SN - 1867-5808 IS - 102 SP - 631 EP - 640 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Seyfried, Markus A1 - Ansmann, Moritz T1 - Unfreezing higher education institutions? BT - understanding the introduction of quality management in teaching and learning in Germany JF - Higher Education N2 - Quality management (QM) in teaching and learning has strongly “infected” the higher education sector and spread around the world. It has almost everywhere become an integral part of higher education reforms. While existing research on QM mainly focuses on the national level from a macro-perspective, its introduction at the institutional level is only rarely analyzed. The present article addresses this research gap. Coming from the perspective of organization studies, it examines the factors that were crucial for the introduction of QM at higher education institutions in Germany. As the introduction of QM can be considered to be a process of organizational change, the article refers to Kurt Lewin’s seminal concept of “unfreezing” organizations as a theoretical starting point. Methodologically, a mixed methods approach is applied by combining qualitative data derived from interviews with institutional quality managers and quantitative data gathered from a nationwide survey. The results show that the introduction of QM is initiated by either internal or external processes. Furthermore, some institutions follow a rather voluntary approach of unfreezing, while others show modes of forced unfreezing. Consequently, the way how QM was introduced has important implications for its implementation. KW - Quality management KW - Organizational change KW - Higher education KW - Mixed methods Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0185-2 SN - 0018-1560 SN - 1573-174X VL - 75 IS - 6 SP - 1061 EP - 1076 PB - Springer CY - Dordrecht ER - TY - THES A1 - Elsässer, Joshua Philipp T1 - United Nations beyond the state? Interactions of intergovernmental treaty secretariats in global environmental governance N2 - Within the context of United Nations (UN) environmental institutions, it has become apparent that intergovernmental responses alone have been insufficient for dealing with pressing transboundary environmental problems. Diverging economic and political interests, as well as broader changes in power dynamics and norms within global (environmental) governance, have resulted in negotiation and implementation efforts by UN member states becoming stuck in institutional gridlock and inertia. These developments have sparked a renewed debate among scholars and practitioners about an imminent crisis of multilateralism, accompanied by calls for reforming UN environmental institutions. However, with the rise of transnational actors and institutions, states are not the only relevant actors in global environmental governance. In fact, the fragmented architectures of different policy domains are populated by a hybrid mix of state and non-state actors, as well as intergovernmental and transnational institutions. Therefore, coping with the complex challenges posed by severe and ecologically interdependent transboundary environmental problems requires global cooperation and careful management from actors beyond national governments. This thesis investigates the interactions of three intergovernmental UN treaty secretariats in global environmental governance. These are the secretariats of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Convention on Biological Diversity, and the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. While previous research has acknowledged the increasing autonomy and influence of treaty secretariats in global policy-making, little attention has been paid to their strategic interactions with non-state actors, such as non-governmental organizations, civil society actors, businesses, and transnational institutions and networks, or their coordination with other UN agencies. Through qualitative case-study research, this thesis explores the means and mechanisms of these interactions and investigates their consequences for enhancing the effectiveness and coherence of institutional responses to underlying and interdependent environmental issues. Following a new institutionalist ontology, the conceptual and theoretical framework of this study draws on global governance research, regime theory, and scholarship on international bureaucracies. From an actor-centered perspective on institutional interplay, the thesis employs concepts such as orchestration and interplay management to assess the interactions of and among treaty secretariats. The research methodology involves structured, focused comparison, and process-tracing techniques to analyze empirical data from diverse sources, including official documents, various secondary materials, semi-structured interviews with secretariat staff and policymakers, and observations at intergovernmental conferences. The main findings of this research demonstrate that secretariats employ tailored orchestration styles to manage or bypass national governments, thereby raising global ambition levels for addressing transboundary environmental problems. Additionally, they engage in joint interplay management to facilitate information sharing, strategize activities, and mobilize relevant actors, thereby improving coherence across UN environmental institutions. Treaty secretariats play a substantial role in influencing discourses and knowledge exchange with a wide range of actors. However, they face barriers, such as limited resources, mandates, varying leadership priorities, and degrees of politicization within institutional processes, which may hinder their impact. Nevertheless, the secretariats, together with non-state actors, have made progress in advancing norm-building processes, integrated policy-making, capacity building, and implementation efforts within and across framework conventions. Moreover, they utilize innovative means of coordination with actors beyond national governments, such as data-driven governance, to provide policy-relevant information for achieving overarching governance targets. Importantly, this research highlights the growing interactions between treaty secretariats and non-state actors, which not only shape policy outcomes but also have broader implications for the polity and politics of international institutions. The findings offer opportunities for rethinking collective agency and actor dynamics within UN entities, addressing gaps in institutionalist theory concerning the interaction of actors in inter-institutional spaces. Furthermore, the study addresses emerging challenges and trends in global environmental governance that are pertinent to future policy-making. These include reflections for the debate on reforming international institutions, the role of emerging powers in a changing international world order, and the convergence of public and private authority through new alliance-building and a division of labor between international bureaucracies and non-state actors in global environmental governance. N2 - Im Kontext internationaler Umweltinstitutionen unter den Vereinten Nationen (VN) ist deutlich geworden, dass allein zwischenstaatliche Verhandlungen für den Umgang mit dringenden grenzüberschreitenden Umweltproblemen unzureichend sind. Unterschiedliche wirtschaftliche und politische Interessen sowie umfassende Veränderungen in den Macht- und Normendynamiken der globalen (Umwelt-)Governance haben dazu geführt, dass die Verhandlungs- und Umsetzungsbemühungen der VN-Mitgliedstaaten häufig von institutionellen Blockaden und Trägheit geprägt sind. Diese Situation hat erneute Debatten unter Wissenschaftlern und Praktikern über die Krise des Multilateralismus ausgelöst, begleitet von Forderungen nach Reformen von VN-Umweltinstitutionen. Mit einem signifikanten Anstieg transnationaler Akteure und Institutionen sind jedoch nicht nur Staaten relevante Akteure in der globalen Umweltgovernance. Tatsächlich sind die Architekturen verschiedener Politikbereiche durch eine hochfragmentierte und hybride Mischung aus staatlichen und nichtstaatlichen Akteuren sowie zwischenstaatlichen und transnationalen Institutionen gekennzeichnet. Daher erfordert der Umgang mit den komplexen Herausforderungen grenzüberschreitender Umweltprobleme eine globale Zusammenarbeit und sorgfältiges Management auch durch Akteure jenseits nationaler Regierungen. Diese Arbeit untersucht die Interaktionen von drei intergouvernementaler VN-Vertragssekretariaten in der globalen Umweltgovernance. Dabei handelt es sich um die Vertragssekretariate der Klimarahmenkonvention, der Biodiversitätskonvention und der Wüstenkonvention im Rahmen der VN. Obwohl frühere Forschungen die zunehmende Autonomie, Handlungsfähigkeit und den Einfluss von Vertragssekretariaten in bestimmten Teilbereichen der internationalen Umweltpolitik anerkannt haben, wurde ihren strategischen Interaktionen mit nichtstaatlichen Akteuren wie Nichtregierungsorganisationen, zivilgesellschaftlichen Akteuren, Unternehmen und transnationalen Institutionen und Netzwerken sowie ihrer Koordination mit anderen VN-Sekretariaten bisher wenig Aufmerksamkeit geschenkt. Durch qualitative Fallstudien untersucht diese Arbeit die Mittel und Mechanismen dieser Interaktionen und ihre potenziellen Auswirkungen auf die Verbesserung der Effektivität und Kohärenz internationaler Institutionen hinsichtlich zugrunde liegender, interdependenter Umweltprobleme. Basierend auf einer (neo)institutionalistischen Ontologie stützt sich der konzeptionelle und theoretische Rahmen dieser Dissertation auf Forschung zur globalen Governance, der Regimetheorie und Studien zu internationalen Bürokratien. Aus einer akteurszentrierten Perspektive auf das Zusammenspiel internationaler Institutionen verwendet die Arbeit dabei Konzepte wie Orchestrierung und Interplay-Management, um die Interaktionen von und zwischen Vertragssekretariaten genauer zu erforschen. Die Untersuchungsmethodik umfasst sowohl Techniken der vergleichenden Analyse als auch Prozessanalyse, mittels derer empirische Daten aus verschiedenen Quellen, einschließlich offizieller Dokumente, verschiedener Sekundärmaterialien, semistrukturierter Interviews mit Sekretariatsmitarbeitern und politischen Entscheidungsträgern sowie Beobachtungen auf zwischenstaatlichen Konferenzen, ausgewertet wurden. Die Ergebnisse dieser Forschung zeigen, dass Vertragssekretariate spezifische Orchestrierungsstile verwenden, um Regierungshandeln in internationalen Institutionen zu lenken (oder zu umgehen) und folglich globale Ambitionen bezüglich des Umgangs mit grenzüberschreitenden Umweltproblemen zu erhöhen. Darüber hinaus betreiben Vertragssekretariate untereinander ein gemeinsames Interplay-Management, das den Austausch von Informationen, die strategische Planung von Aktivitäten und die gezielte Mobilisierung relevanter Akteure umfasst, um die Kohärenz zwischen VN-Umweltabkommen zu verbessern. Vertragssekretariate spielen eine bedeutende Rolle bei der Beeinflussung von Diskursen und dem Austausch von Wissen mit einer Vielzahl von Akteuren. Gerade durch das Zusammenspiel mit nichtstaatlichen Akteuren prägen sie Normbildungsprozesse, wirken bei der Gestaltung hin zu integrierten Politiken mit oder nehmen eine unterstützende Funktion beim Kapazitätsaufbau und den Umsetzungsbemühungen innerhalb und zwischen Rahmenübereinkommen ein. Darüber hinaus nutzen sie innovative Koordinationsmechanismen mit Akteuren jenseits nationaler Regierungen, wie beispielsweise die Generierung, Nutzung und Verbreitung von Daten, um politikrelevante Informationen für die Implementierung übergeordneter Governance-Ziele bereitzustellen. Allerdings stehen sie in ihren Interaktionen auch vor Hindernissen, wie beispielsweise dem Umgang mit begrenzten Ressourcen und Mandaten, unterschiedlichen Prioritäten der Exekutivkräfte und unterschiedlichen Politisierungsgraden von Umweltproblemen innerhalb internationaler Institutionen, die den Einfluss von Sekretariaten beeinträchtigen können. Bedeutsam ist, dass die zunehmende Verflechtung zwischen Sekretariaten und nichtstaatlichen Akteuren nicht nur auf politische Inhalte (Policy) wirkt, sondern auch weitreichende Auswirkungen auf die Strukturen (Polity) und Prozesse (Politics) internationaler Institutionen hat. Die Ergebnisse regen dazu an, über kollektive Handlungsfähigkeit und Akteursdynamiken innerhalb von VN-Entitäten nachzudenken und Lücken in der neo-institutionalistischen Theorie hinsichtlich der Interaktion von Akteuren in interinstitutionellen Räumen zu schließen. Darüber hinaus thematisiert die Studie Trends und Herausforderungen in der globalen Umweltgovernance, die für zukünftige Politikgestaltung relevant sein können. Dazu gehören Reflexionen über die Reform-Debatte internationaler Institutionen, die Rolle aufstrebender Mächte in einer sich verändernden internationalen Weltordnung sowie die Konvergenz öffentlicher und privater Autorität durch neue Allianzen zwischen internationalen Bürokratien und nichtstaatlichen Akteuren in der globalen Umweltgovernance. KW - international relations KW - global environmental politics KW - internationale Beziehungen KW - globale Umweltpolitik Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-621651 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hänel, Hilkje Charlotte A1 - Bratu, Christine T1 - Varieties of hermeneutical injustice BT - a blueprint JF - Moral philosophy and politics N2 - In this paper, we have two goals. First, we argue for a blueprint for hermeneutical injustice that allows us to schematize existing and discover new varieties of hermeneutical injustices. The underlying insight is that Fricker provides both a general concept of hermeneutical injustice and a specific conception thereof. By distinguishing between the general concept and its specific conceptions, we gain a fruitful tool to detect such injustices in our everyday lives. Second, we use this blueprint to provide a further example of hermeneutical injustice that draws our attention to yet another distinction: Some hermeneutical injustices result from a lack or distortion in the collective conceptual resource and some are due to problems in the application of existing concepts. We argue that to combat hermeneutical injustices, we have to make sure not only that individuals have accurate concepts at their disposal but that they have the capabilities to use these concepts adequately. KW - hermeneutical injustice KW - epistemic injustice KW - social epistemology KW - discrimination KW - hermeneutical capability Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2020-0007 SN - 2194-5616 SN - 2194-5624 VL - 8 IS - 2 SP - 331 EP - 350 PB - de Gruyter CY - Berlin ER - TY - GEN A1 - Bielawski, Martina A1 - Jurišić, J. A1 - Lenz, T. A1 - Maxian Rusche, T. A1 - Nippert, C. T1 - Via : communis Europa ; Europe's architecture in 2020 N2 - Forum: EU-Diplomatie im Jahre 2020 KW - Europäische Union KW - Europaidentität KW - Außenpolitik KW - Verteidigungspolitik KW - European Union KW - European identity KW - foreign policy KW - defence policy Y1 - 2006 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-48454 ER -