TY - JOUR A1 - Juchler, Ingo T1 - Von Menschen und anderen Tieren im Berliner Tiergarten JF - Atopien im Politischen : Politische Bildung nach dem Ende der Zukunft Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-8376-5201-7 SP - 105 EP - 132 PB - Transcript CY - Bielefeld ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Reutter, Werner T1 - Landesverfassungsgerichtsbarkeit T3 - Brennpunkt Politik Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-17-040172-3 SN - 978-3-17-040174-7 SN - 978-3-17-040173-0 PB - Kohlhammer CY - Stuttgart ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Ren, Haiyan A1 - Ette, Ottmar T1 - China und Humboldt JF - China und Deutschland in einer turbulenten Welt : 50 Jahre diplomatische Beziehungen Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-949887-01-7 SP - 233 EP - 239 PB - WeltTrends CY - Potsdam ER - TY - THES A1 - Molinengo, Giulia T1 - The micropolitics of collaborative governance T1 - Die Mikropolitik von „collaborative governance“ BT - a power-sensitive and process-oriented perspective BT - eine machtsensitive und prozessorientierte Perspektive N2 - Why do exercises in collaborative governance often witness more impasse than advantage? This cumulative dissertation undertakes a micro-level analysis of collaborative governance to tackle this research puzzle. It situates micropolitics at the very center of analysis: a wide range of activities, interventions, and tactics used by actors – be they conveners, facilitators, or participants – to shape the collaborative exercise. It is by focusing on these daily minutiae, and on the consequences that they bring along, the study argues, that we can better understand why and how collaboration can become stuck or unproductive. To do so, the foundational part of this dissertation (Article 1) uses power as a sensitizing concept to investigate the micro-dynamics that shape collaboration. It develops an analytical approach to advance the study of collaborative governance at the empirical level under a power-sensitive and process-oriented perspective. The subsequent articles follow the dissertation's red thread of investigating the micropolitics of collaborative governance by showing facilitation artefacts' interrelatedness and contribution to the potential success or failure of collaborative arrangements (Article 2); and by examining the specialized knowledge, skills and practices mobilized when designing a collaborative process (Article 3). The work is based on an abductive research approach, tacking back and forth between empirical data and theory, and offers a repertoire of concepts – from analytical terms (designed and emerging interaction orders, flows of power, arenas for power), to facilitation practices (scripting, situating, and supervising) and types of knowledge (process expertise) – to illustrate and study the detailed and constant work (and rework) that surrounds collaborative arrangements. These concepts sharpen the way researchers can look at, observe, and understand collaborative processes at a micro level. The thesis thereby elucidates the subtleties of power, which may be overlooked if we focus only on outcomes rather than the processes that engender them, and supports efforts to identify potential sources of impasse. N2 - Warum führen Prozesse der collaborative governance oft eher in die Sackgasse als zum Erfolg? Die vorliegende kumulative Dissertation geht dieses Problem an, indem sie die Mikroebene von collaborative governance analysiert. Untersuchungsgegenstand ist die Mikropolitik, verstanden als weites Spektrum an Aktivitäten, Interventionen und Taktiken, mit denen beteiligte Akteure – seien es VeranstalterInnen, ModeratorInnen oder TeilnehmerInnen – kollaborative Prozesse gestalten. Es ist dieser Fokus auf alltägliche Handlungen und ihre Auswirkungen, so argumentiert die Arbeit, der ein besseres Verständnis ermöglicht, wann und warum kollaborative Prozesse unproduktiv werden. Um dies zu erreichen, verwendet der grundlegende Teil der Dissertation (Artikel 1) Macht als sensibilisierenden Begriff, um die Mikrodynamiken zu untersuchen, welche collaborative governance prägen. Der Artikel entwickelt ein Analysemodell, um die empirische Untersuchung der collaborative governance aus einer machtsensiblen und prozessorientierten Perspektive zu ermöglichen. Die weiteren Artikel folgen dem roten Faden der Dissertation und untersuchen die Mikropolitik der collaborative governance, indem sie die Wechselwirkungen und den Beitrag von Moderationsgegenständen zum potenziellen Erfolg oder Misserfolg kollaborativer Prozesse aufzeigen (Artikel 2), sowie die speziellen Kenntnisse, Fähigkeiten und Praktiken untersuchen, die bei der Gestaltung eines Beteiligungsprozesses mobilisiert werden (Artikel 3). Die Arbeit basiert auf einem abduktiven Forschungsansatz, bewegt sich zwischen empirischen Daten und Theorie hin und her, und entwickelt ein Repertoire an Begriffen und Konzepten - von analytischen Begriffen (designed and emerging interaction orders, flows of power, arenas for power) bis hin zu Moderationspraktiken (scripting, situating, und supervising) und Wissensarten (Prozessexpertise) - um die minutiösen und kontinuierlichen Gestaltungen (und Umgestaltungen) von kollaborativen Prozessen zu veranschaulichen und untersuchen. Diese Begriffe und Konzepte erlauben ForscherInnen, ihren Blick auf die Mikroebene von kollaborativen Prozessen zu schärfen. Die Dissertation verdeutlicht damit die Feinheiten von Macht, welche bei einem Fokus auf Ergebnisse statt auf die ihnen vorgelagerten Prozesse oft übersehen werden, und unterstützt die Bemühungen, potenzielle Quellen von collaborative impasse zu identifizieren. KW - collaborative governance KW - micropolitics KW - facilitation KW - power KW - process design KW - artefacts KW - process expertise KW - Artefakte KW - Moderation KW - Mikropolitik KW - Macht KW - Prozessgestaltung KW - Prozessexpertise Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-577123 ER - TY - BOOK ED - Mackert, Jürgen ED - Wolf, Hannah ED - Turner, Bryan S. T1 - Postcolonial and settler colonial contexts T3 - The condition of democracy N2 - Classical liberal democratic theory has provided crucial ideas for a still dominant and hegemonic discourse that rests on ideological conceptions of freedom, equality, peacefulness, inclusive democratic participation, and tolerance. While this may have held some truth for citizens in Western liberal-capitalist societies, such liberal ideals have never been realized in colonial, postcolonial and settler colonial contexts. Liberal democracies are not simply forms of rule in domestic national contexts but also geo-political actors. As such, they have been the drivers of processes of global oppression, colonizing and occupying countries and people, appropriating indigenous land, annihilating people with eliminatory politics right up to genocides. There can be no doubt that the West – with its civilizational Judeo-Christian idea and divine mission ‘to subdue the world’ – has destroyed other civilizations, countries, trading systems, and traditional ways of life and is responsible for the death of hundreds of millions of human beings in the course of colonizing the world from its Empires of trade through colonialism to settler colonialism and today’s politics of regime change. The book discusses the settler colonial regime that Israel has established in Palestine while still claiming to be a democracy. It discusses the failures of liberal democracy to overcome the structural and racist inequalities in post-Apartheid South Africa, and it presents hopeful outlooks on new ideas and forms of democracy in social movements in the MENA region. Y1 - 2021 SN - 978-0-367-74538-7 SN - 978-1-003-15838-7 U6 - https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003158387 VL - 3 PB - Routledge CY - London ER - TY - BOOK ED - Mackert, Jürgen ED - Wolf, Hannah ED - Turner, Bryan S. T1 - Contesting citizenship T3 - The condition of democracy N2 - Democracy and citizenship are conceptually and empirically contested. Against the backdrop of recent and current profound transformations in and of democratic societies, this volume presents and discusses acute contestations, within and beyond national borders and boundaries. Democracy’s crucial relationships, between state and citizenry as well as amongst citizens, are rearranged and re-ordered in various spheres and arenas, impacting on core democratic principles such as accountability, legitimacy, participation and trust. This volume addresses these refigurations by bringing together empirical analyses and conceptual considerations regarding the access to and exclusion from citizenship rights in the face of migration regulation and institutional transformation, and the role of violence in maintaining or undermining social order. With its critical reflection on the consequences and repercussions of such processes for citizens’ everyday lives and for the meaning of citizenship altogether, this book transgresses disciplinary boundaries and puts into dialogue the perspectives of political theory and sociology. Y1 - 2021 SN - 978-0-367-74536-3 SN - 978-1-00-315837-0 U6 - https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003158370 VL - 2 PB - Routledge CY - London ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin A1 - Shepherd, Laura J. T1 - Introduction BT - gender and the governance of terrorism and violent extremism JF - Critical studies on terrorism N2 - Several global governance initiatives launched in recent years have explicitly sought to integrate concern for gender equality and gendered harms into efforts to counter terrorism and violent extremism (CT/CVE). As a result, commitments to gender-sensitivity and gender equality in international and regional CT/CVE initiatives, in national action plans, and at the level of civil society programming, have become a common aspect of the multilevel governance of terrorism and violent extremism. In light of these developments, aspects of our own research have turned in the past years to explore how concerns about gender are being incorporated in the governance of (counter-)terrorism and violent extremism, and how this development has affected (gendered) practices and power relations in counterterrorism policymaking and implementation. We were inspired by the growing literature on gender and CT/CVE, and critical scholarship on terrorism and political violence, to bring together a collection of new research addressing these questions. KW - P/CVE KW - terrorism KW - counterterrorism KW - gender Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2022.2101535 SN - 1753-9153 SN - 1753-9161 VL - 15 IS - 3 SP - 523 EP - 532 PB - Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group CY - Abingdon ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Demmke, Christoph T1 - The Legitimacy of civil services in the 21 st century JF - The Oxford encyclopedia of public administration ; Vol 2 Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-0-19-762812-6 SN - 978-0-19-086639-6 SP - 928 EP - 944 PB - Oxford Univ. Press CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Heinzel, Mirko Noa T1 - Mediating power? BT - Delegation, pooling and leadership selection at international organisations JF - The British journal of politics & international relations : BJPIR N2 - The selection of the executive heads of international organisations represents a key decision in the politics of international organisations. However, we know little about what dynamics influence this selection. The article focuses on the nationality of selected executive heads. It argues that institutional design impacts the factors that influence leadership selection by shaping the costs and benefits of attaining the position for member states’ nationals. The argument is tested with novel data on the nationality of individuals in charge of 69 international organisation bureaucracies between 1970 and 2017. Two findings stand out: first, powerful countries are more able to secure positions in international organisations in which executive heads are voted in by majority voting. Second, less consistent evidence implies that powerful countries secure more positions when bureaucracies are authoritative. The findings have implications for debates on international cooperation by illustrating how power and institutions interact in the selection of international organisation executive heads. KW - decision-making KW - delegation KW - executive head KW - institutional design KW - international organisations KW - pooling KW - selection Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148121992761 SN - 1467-856X SN - 1369-1481 VL - 24 IS - 1 SP - 153 EP - 170 PB - Sage CY - London ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Juchler, Ingo T1 - „…die im Dunkeln sieht man nicht“ BT - zur Mensch-Tier-Beziehung in der politischen Bildung T2 - Standortbestimmung Politische Bildung Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-7344-1352-0 SN - 978-3-7344-1353-7 U6 - https://doi.org/10.46499/1900 SP - 163 EP - 175 PB - Wochenschau Wissenschaft CY - Frankfurt am Main ER - TY - THES A1 - Heuberger, Moritz T1 - Coordinating digital government T1 - Die Koordination der digitalen Verwaltung BT - explaining coordination challenges regarding the digital transformation of public administration in a federal context BT - Erläuterung der Koordinationsherausforderungen bei der digitalen Transformation der öffentlichen Verwaltung im föderalen Kontext N2 - This thesis is analyzing multiple coordination challenges which arise with the digital transformation of public administration in federal systems, illustrated by four case studies in Germany. I make various observations within a multi-level system and provide an in-depth analysis. Theoretical explanations from both federalism research and neo-institutionalism are utilized to explain the findings of the empirical driven work. The four articles evince a holistic picture of the German case and elucidate its role as a digital government laggard. Their foci range from macro, over meso to micro level of public administration, differentiating between the governance and the tool dimension of digital government. The first article shows how multi-level negotiations lead to expensive but eventually satisfying solutions for the involved actors, creating a subtle balance between centralization and decentralization. The second article identifies legal, technical, and organizational barriers for cross-organizational service provision, highlighting the importance of inter-organizational and inter-disciplinary exchange and both a common language and trust. Institutional change and its effects on the micro level, on citizens and the employees in local one-stop shops, mark the focus of the third article, bridging the gap between reforms and the administrative reality on the local level. The fourth article looks at the citizens’ perspective on digital government reforms, their expectations, use and satisfaction. In this vein, this thesis provides a detailed account of the importance of understanding the digital divide and therefore the necessity of reaching out to different recipients of digital government reforms. I draw conclusions from the factors identified as causes for Germany’s shortcomings for other federal systems where feasible and derive reform potential therefrom. This allows to gain a new perspective on digital government and its coordination challenges in federal contexts. N2 - Die vorliegende Arbeit analysiert die vielfältigen Koordinationsherausforderungen, vor welchen die öffentliche Verwaltung im Zuge der digitalen Transformation steht. Dabei werden im Speziellen Herausforderungen in föderalen Systemen anhand von vier Fallstudien in Deutschland betrachtet. Theoretische Erklärungen, sowohl aus der Föderalismusforschung als auch aus dem Neo-Institutionalismus, werden herangezogen, um die Ergebnisse der empirisch getriebenen Arbeit zu erklären. Die vier Artikel zeichnen ein umfassendes Bild des deutschen Falls und beleuchten Gründe für Deutschlands Nachholbedarf im Bereich der digitalen Verwaltung. Die Schwerpunkte der Untersuchungen sind dabei verteilt: Von Makro- über die Meso- bis zur Mikroebene der öffentlichen Verwaltung, wobei zwischen der Governance- und der instrumentellen Dimension von digitaler Verwaltung unterschieden wird. Der erste Artikel zeigt, wie Verhandlungen im Mehrebenensystem zu kostspieligen, aber letztendlich zufriedenstellenden Lösungen für die beteiligten Akteure führen und ein subtiles Gleichgewicht zwischen Zentralisierung und Dezentralisierung geschaffen wird. Im zweiten Artikel werden rechtliche, technische und organisatorische Hindernisse für die organisationsübergreifende Erbringung von Dienstleistungen diskutiert und die Bedeutung des interorganisatorischen und interdisziplinären Austauschs betont. Vor allem wird dabei die Notwendigkeit eines gemeinsamen Verständnisses und von gegenseitigem Vertrauen herausgearbeitet. Der institutionelle Wandel und seine Auswirkungen auf die Mikroebene, auf die Bürger*innen und die Mitarbeitenden in Bürgerämtern, stehen im Mittelpunkt des dritten Artikels, der die Kluft zwischen den Reformen und der Verwaltungsrealität auf kommunaler Ebene aufzeigt. Der vierte Artikel befasst sich mit der Sicht der Bürger*innen auf die digitalen Reformen der öffentlichen Verwaltung, ihren Erwartungen, ihrer Nutzung und ihrer Zufriedenheit. Im Zuge dessen wird in dieser Arbeit ausführlich dargelegt, wie wichtig das Bewusstsein für den Digital Divide ist, um die verschiedenen Adressat*innen von digitalen Verwaltungsreformen zu erreichen. Die identifizierten Faktoren für die Defizite in Deutschland lassen sich bis zu einem gewissen Grad auf andere föderale Systeme generalisieren und aus den Ergebnissen können Reformpotenziale abgeleitet werden - was eine neue Perspektive auf die Debatte rund um die digitale Verwaltung und die damit zusammenhängenden Herausforderungen für die Koordination in föderalen Kontexten ermöglicht. KW - digital government KW - e-government KW - federalism KW - institutional reform KW - multi-level governance KW - public management KW - e-services KW - digitale Verwaltung KW - e-government KW - e-services KW - Föderalismus KW - institutional reform KW - Mehrebenen-System KW - Public Management Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-562691 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Ganghof, Steffen ED - Tausendpfund, Markus T1 - Typen von Forschungsdesigns T2 - Forschungsstrategien in den Sozialwissenschaften N2 - Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschungsdesigns umfassen alle wesentlichen Entscheidungen, die im Forschungsprozess getroffen werden müssen. Der Beitrag unterscheidet drei rundlegende Typen von Forschungsdesigns: x-zentriert, y-zentriert und kontrastiv. Das x-zentrierte Design versucht einen theoretisch spezifizierten kausalen Effekt zu identifizieren und dessen Größe möglichst genau und ohne Verzerrungen zu schätzen. Das y-zentrierte Design versucht mehrere komplementäre Theorien über kausale Effekte so zu kombinieren, dass bestimmte Phänomene möglichst gut erklärt werden. Das kontrastive Design vergleicht die Erklärungskraft von zwei oder mehr konkurrierenden Theorien. Die Unterscheidung der drei Typen ist für qualitative Fallstudien ebenso relevant wie für Experimente oder statistische Studien mit Beobachtungsdaten. Der Beitrag grenzt die drei Typen voneinander ab, erklärt ihre jeweiligen Annahmen und diskutiert ihre Vor- und Nachteile sowie die Möglichkeiten und Grenzen ihrer Kombination. Daneben diskutiert er den Unterschied zwischen Modellen und Theorien sowie die Bedeutung des Sparsamkeitsprinzips bei der Entwicklung und Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Theorien und Erklärungen. Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-658-36971-2 SN - 978-3-658-36972-9 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36972-9_11 SP - 257 EP - 286 PB - Springer VS CY - Wiesbaden ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Fruhstorfer, Anna A1 - Hudson, Alexander T1 - Majorities for minorities BT - Participatory constitution making and the protection of minority rights JF - Political research quarterly : PRQ ; official journal of Western Political Science Association, Pacific Northwest Political Science Association, Southern California Political Science Association, Northern California Political Science Association N2 - Does the process of making a constitution affect the expansiveness of rights protections in the constitution? In particular, is more participation in constitution-making processes better for minority rights protections? While the process of constitution making and its impact on various outcomes have received significant attention, little is known about the impact public participation or deliberation in this process has on the scope and content of minority rights. Using a wide variety of data to empirically assess the relationship between constitution-making processes and the protection of rights for minorities, we find a positive relationship between participatory drafting processes and the inclusion of minority protections in constitutions under some conditions. The article's findings have important implications for understanding political representation and lend support to core arguments about the role of the public in constitutional design. KW - constitution-making KW - human rights KW - minority rights KW - direct democracy KW - public participation Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920984246 SN - 1065-9129 SN - 1938-274X VL - 75 IS - 1 SP - 103 EP - 117 PB - Sage Publ. CY - Thousand Oaks ER - TY - BOOK ED - Mackert, Jürgen ED - Wolf, Hannah ED - Turner, Bryan S. T1 - Neoliberal politics and sociological perspectives T3 - The condition of democracy N2 - Democracy and citizenship are conceptually and empirically contested. Against the backdrop of recent and current profound transformations in and of democratic societies, this volume presents and discusses acute contestations, within and beyond national borders and boundaries. Democracy's crucial relationships, between state and citizenry as well as amongst citizens, are rearranged and re-ordered in various spheres and arenas, impacting on core democratic principles such as accountability, legitimacy, participation and trust. This volume addresses these refigurations by bringing together empirical analyses and conceptual considerations regarding the access to and exclusion from citizenship rights in the face of migration regulation and institutional transformation, and the role of violence in maintaining or undermining social order. With its critical reflection on the consequences and repercussions of such processes for citizens' everyday lives and for the meaning of citizenship altogether, this book transgresses disciplinary boundaries and puts into dialogue the perspectives of political theory and sociology KW - Demokratie KW - Neoliberalismus KW - Soziologie KW - Aufsatzsammlung Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-1-00-040191-2 SN - 978-1-00-315836-3 SN - 978-0-367-74535-6 VL - 1 PB - Routledge CY - London ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Fleischer, Julia A1 - Bezes, Philippe A1 - James, Oliver A1 - Yesilkagit, Kutsal T1 - The politics of government reorganization in Western Europe JF - Governance : an international journal of policy and administration and institutions N2 - The reorganization of governments is crucial for parties to express their policy preferences once they reach office. Yet these activities are not confined to the direct aftermath of general elections or to wide-ranging structural reforms. Instead, governments reorganize and adjust their machinery of government all the time. This paper aims to assess these structural choices with a particular focus at the core of the state, comparing four Western European democracies (Germany, France, the Netherlands, and United Kingdom) from 1980 to 2013. Our empirical analysis shows that stronger shifts in cabinets' ideological profiles in the short- and long-term as well as the units' proximity to political executives yield significant effects. In contrast, Conservative governments, commonly regarded as key promoters of reorganizing governments, are not significant for the likelihood of structural change. We discuss the effects of this politics of government reorganization for different research debates assessing the inner workings of governments. Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12670 SN - 0952-1895 SN - 1468-0491 VL - 36 IS - 1 SP - 255 EP - 274 PB - Wiley CY - Hoboken ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Juchler, Ingo T1 - Rezension zu: Massing, Peter: Politische Bildung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland : Grundlagen - Kontroversen - Perspektiven. - Frankfurt am Main : Wochenschau Verlag, 2021. - 141 S. - ISBN: 978-3-8252-5720-0 JF - Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Gesellschaftswissenschaften Y1 - 2022 SN - 2191-0766 SN - 2749-487X VL - 13 IS - 2 SP - 146 EP - 148 PB - Wochenschau Verlag CY - Frankfurt am Main ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Angermann, Eric ED - Braungart, Wolfgang ED - Guerra, Gabriele ED - Ulbricht, Justus H. T1 - Peter Dudek und Michael Kühnen BT - ein Briefwechsel. Neonazistische Egodokumente als damalige und heutige Forschungsgrundlage T2 - Jugend ohne Sinn? eine Spurensuche zu Sinnfragen der jungen Generation 1945-1949 Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-8471-1508-3 U6 - https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737015080.361 SP - 361 EP - 366 PB - V&R unipress CY - Göttingen ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Botsch, Gideon T1 - Rechtsextremismus und "neuer Antisemitismus" JF - Das neue Unbehagen - Antisemitismus in Deutschland heute Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-7582-0358-9 SP - 21 EP - 38 PB - Olms CY - Hildesheim ET - 2. unveränderte ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Botsch, Gideon ED - Seefried, Elke T1 - Warten auf den Tag X BT - radikaler Nationalismus und extreme Rechte 1949-1989 T2 - Politische Zukünfte im 20. Jahrhundert Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-593-50958-7 SN - 978-3-593-43992-1 SN - 978-3-593-44978-4 SP - 197 EP - 217 PB - Campus Verlag CY - Frankfurt ; New York ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Botsch, Gideon ED - Dafinger, Johannes ED - Florin, Moritz T1 - Identifying extreme-right terrorism BT - concepts and misconceptions T2 - A transnational history of right-wing terrorism N2 - Extreme-right terrorism is a threat that is often underestimated by the public at large. As this paper argues, this is partly due to a concept of terrorism utilized by policymakers, intelligence agents, and police investigators that is based on experience of international terrorism perpetrated by leftists or jihadists as opposed to domestic extreme-right violence. This was one reason why investigators failed to identify the crimes committed by the National Socialist Underground (NSU) in Germany (2000–2011) as extreme-right terrorism, for example. While scholarly debate focused on the Red Army Faction and Al Qaeda, terrorist tendencies among those perpetrating racist and extreme-right violence tended to be disregarded. Influential researchers in the field of “extremism” denied that terrorist acts were committed by right-wingers. By mapping the specifics regarding the strategic use of violence, target selection, addressing of different audiences etc., this paper proposes a more accurate definition of extreme-right terrorism. In comparing it to other forms of terrorism, extreme-right terrorism is distinguished by its specific framework of ideologies and practices, with the underlying idea of an essential inequality that is compensated for through the affirmation of violence. It can be differentiated from other forms of extreme-right violence based on its use of strategic, premeditated and planned attacks against targets of a symbolic nature. Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-1-003-10525-1 SN - 978-0-367-61210-8 SN - 978-0-367-61336-5 U6 - https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003105251-17 SP - 241 EP - 257 PB - Routledge CY - London ; New York ER -