TY - THES A1 - Winkler, Katrin T1 - Demokratische Praxis und Pragmatismus BT - Partizipation und Repräsentation auf Bundes- und Berliner Landesebene T2 - Bürgergesellschaft und Demokratie N2 - Dass sich die repräsentative Demokratie in Deutschland im Wandel befindet, ist nicht neu und kaum umstritten. Herausforderungen im Kontext der Partizipation und Repräsentation rufen ihrerseits Probleme auf Seiten der Input-Legitimation hervor. Demgemäß ist das grundlegende demokratiepolitische Anliegen dieser Arbeit, am Beispiel der Bundes- und Berliner Landesebene darzustellen, wie der repräsentative Politikprozess partizipativer und dennoch effektiv gestaltet werden kann. Basierend auf der philosophischen Strömung des Pragmatismus verfolgt und diskutiert die Arbeit die Synthese aus der pragmatistischen Demokratiekonzeption von Archon Fung und dem empirischen Forschungsprogramm der kriterienbasierten Evaluation demokratischer Innovationen. Dabei wird das analytische Vorgehen Archon Fungs kritisch erweitert, um dem dieser Arbeit zugrunde liegenden Konzept einer komplexen Bürgergesellschaft – als normativer und praktischer Bezugspunkt – gerecht zu werden. Fungs Konzept wird demnach um die liberale Sphäre der Öffentlichkeit, mithin um die zivilgesellschaftlichen Handlungszusammenhänge ergänzt. Auf Grundlage der Diskussion von demokratischen Innovationen werden schließlich demokratie- und engagementpolitische Handlungsempfehlungen in der Dimension der Partizipation und in der Dimension der Repräsentation formuliert. Mithin verfolgt die Arbeit eine problem- und lösungsorientierte Ergänzung der repräsentativen Demokratie. Gleichwohl ist die Arbeit als eine pragmatistisch angeleitete Konzeptstudie für die Entwicklung einer beteiligungsorientierten Praxis in der repräsentativen Demokratie zu verstehen, die trotz ihres theoretischen Charakters ganz im Sinne des Pragmatismus die notwendige empirische Orientierung aufweist. Damit wird das zuweilen problematische Verhältnis zwischen Politischer Theorie und empirischer Demokratieforschung überwunden. N2 - The German system of representative democracy is in a modus of change – this is a well-known fact and hardly ever doubted: Challenges in terms of participation and representation lead to difficulties regarding input-legitimation. Hence, the purpose of this work is to demonstrate in which ways the representative policy process could be modified to become more participatory while not less effective looking at federal level and the Federal state level of Berlin. Based on the philosophy of pragmatism the book traces and discusses the synthesis of Archon Fung`s pragmatic conception of democracy and the empirical research program of criteria-based evaluation of democratic innovations. In the course of debate Archon Fung`s analytical approach is enhanced critically to conform to the underlying concept of a complex citizen society as the normative and practical reference point of this work. Fung`s concept is therefore supplemented with the topic of liberal public sphere as well as contexts of action in civil society. Based on the discussion of democratic innovations recommendations of democratic und civil action concerning the dimensions of participation and representation will be developed. Consequently this study pursues a problem-oriented and solution-focused addition to the theory of representative democracy. Nevertheless the work has to be seen as a pragmatically instructed concept study in order to advance the development of a participatory practice in representative democracy. Despite its theoretical character, the study possesses the indispensable empirical orientation in the sense of pragmatism. Thereby the occasionally problematic relation between political theory and empirical research on democracy is resolved. KW - Pragmatismus KW - Partizipation KW - Repräsentation KW - Zivilgesellschaft KW - Demokratietheorie KW - pragmatism KW - participation KW - representation KW - civil society KW - democratic theory Y1 - 2018 SN - 978-3-658-20667-3 VL - 2018 IS - 1 PB - Springer CY - Wiesbaden ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Weaver, Catherine A1 - Heinzel, Mirko A1 - Jorgensen, Samantha A1 - Flores, Joseph T1 - Bureaucratic representation in the IMF and the World Bank JF - Global perspectives N2 - The legitimacy and effectiveness of international organizations are often linked directly to issues of representation—not only on their high-level governing boards and in top leadership but also within their staff. This article explores two key questions of bureaucratic representation in the critical cases of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. First, we seek to unpack three essential dimensions of staff representation—nationality, education, and gender—to explain how representation may matter for international organizations. Second, we aim to describe the multiple dimensions of representation in the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank over the past twenty years by deploying a novel dataset on staff demographics, focusing on ranks with decision-making authority within the institutions. Our descriptive analysis reveals that the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank have made considerable efforts to diversify their bureaucracies. Nonetheless, representation remains uneven; for example, nationals from middle- and low-income countries, women, and staff without economics degrees from prominent US- or UK-based universities are less present in key leadership positions. These results may be well explained by the particular needs of the institutions’ technical mandates and limits in the supply of qualified staff and, as such, need not be seen as suboptimal. Nonetheless, perceived imbalances in representation may continue to pose external legitimation and operational challenges to the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank in a complex political environment where such multidimensional representation is important to sustaining the buy-in of donor and borrower countries alike. To this end, we recommend that the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank enhance their diversity and inclusion efforts by increasing transparency via reporting disaggregated data on workforce composition and introducing annual requirements to publish progress reports with management feedback to strengthen internal and external accountability. KW - representation KW - international bureaucracy KW - multilateralism KW - World Bank KW - IMF Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2022.39684 SN - 2575-7350 VL - 3 IS - 1 PB - University of California Press CY - Oakland, CA ER -