TY - JOUR A1 - Schöppe, Doreen A1 - Stadie, Nicole T1 - Multiple phonologische Verarbeitungsfähigkeiten von Kindern mit Entwicklungsdyslexie N2 - 1 Einleitung 2 Fragestellung 3 Methode 4 Ergebnisse und Diskussion 5 Literatur KW - Patholinguistik KW - Sprachtherapie KW - Dysphagie KW - Schluckstörung KW - Schlucktherapie KW - patholinguistics KW - speech/language therapy KW - dysphagia KW - swallowing disorders KW - dysphagia therapy Y1 - 2012 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-62587 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Seidl, Rainer Ottis A1 - Schultheiss, Corinna T1 - Evidenzbasierte Medizin in der Diagnostik und Therapie neurogener Schluckstörungen JF - Spektrum Patholinguistik N2 - 1. Einleitung 1.1 Schluckstörungen 1.2 Neurophysiologie des Schluckens 2. Diagnostik 2.1 Klinische Schluckuntersuchungen 2.2 Instrumentelle Schluckuntersuchungen 3. Therapie 3.1 Änderung der Nahrungskonsistenz 3.2 Fazilitationstechniken 3.3 Position und Manöver 3.4 Kombinierte Techniken 3.5 Zusammenfassung 4. Ausblick 5 Literatur KW - Patholinguistik KW - Sprachtherapie KW - Dysphagie KW - Schluckstörung KW - Schlucktherapie KW - patholinguistics KW - speech/language therapy KW - dysphagia KW - swallowing disorders KW - dysphagia therapy Y1 - 2012 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-62467 SN - 1866-9085 SN - 1866-9433 IS - 5 SP - 19 EP - 65 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Frank, Ulrike T1 - Wie viel Schlucken ist normal? BT - Normdaten in der Diagnostik und Therapie bei Dysphagie JF - Spektrum Patholinguistik N2 - 1 Einleitung 2 Das Problem der Messbarkeit: Welche Messgrößen kommen in Frage? 3 Wie oft Schlucken ist normal? Schluckfrequenz bei gesunden Erwachsenen 4 Wie viel Schlucken ist normal? Bolusvolumina bei gesunden Erwachsenen 5 Variabilität normaler Funktionen: Mögliche Gründe 6 Fazit 7 Literatur KW - Patholinguistik KW - Sprachtherapie KW - Dysphagie KW - Schluckstörung KW - Schlucktherapie KW - patholinguistics KW - speech/language therapy KW - dysphagia KW - swallowing disorders KW - dysphagia therapy Y1 - 2012 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-62474 SN - 1866-9085 SN - 1866-9433 IS - 5 SP - 67 EP - 79 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - GEN A1 - Jäckel, Annemarie A1 - Frank, Ulrike T1 - Effekte des Mendelsohn Manövers auf die Atem-Schluck-Koordination : eine Untersuchung der intra-individuellen Variation bei gesunden Erwachsenen N2 - 1 Einleitung 2 Fragestellungen 3 Methode 4 Ergebnisse und Diskussion 5 Literatur KW - Patholinguistik KW - Sprachtherapie KW - Dysphagie KW - Schluckstörung KW - Schlucktherapie KW - patholinguistics KW - speech/language therapy KW - dysphagia KW - swallowing disorders KW - dysphagia therapy Y1 - 2012 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-62491 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Schindler, Wencke A1 - Frank, Ulrike T1 - Wasserschlucktests in der klinischen Dysphagiediagnostik : Einzelschluckvolumen als Prädiktor für die sequentielle Schluckrate? KW - Patholinguistik KW - Sprachtherapie KW - Dysphagie KW - Schluckstörung KW - Schlucktherapie KW - patholinguistics KW - speech/language therapy KW - dysphagia KW - swallowing disorders KW - dysphagia therapy Y1 - 2012 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-62506 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Würzner, Kay-Michael A1 - Heister, Julian A1 - Schroeder, Sascha T1 - Altersgruppeneffekte in childLex JF - Spektrum Patholinguistik N2 - 1 Einleitung 2 Stand der Forschung 3 Methode 4 Analysen 5 Diskussion 6 Literatur KW - Patholinguistik KW - Sprachtherapie KW - Hörstörungen KW - Cochlea-Implantat KW - Hören KW - patholinguistics KW - speech/language therapy KW - hearing loss KW - cochlear implant KW - hearing Y1 - 2014 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-71490 SN - 1866-9085 SN - 1866-9433 IS - 7 SP - 123 EP - 131 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Endriss, Cornelia A1 - Hinterwimmer, Stefan T1 - The influence of tense in adverbial quantification JF - Interdisciplinary studies on information structure : ISIS ; working papers of the SFB 632 N2 - We argue that there is a crucial difference between determiner and adverbial quantification. Following Herburger [2000] and von Fintel [1994], we assume that determiner quantifiers quantify over individuals and adverbial quantifiers over eventualities. While it is usually assumed that the semantics of sentences with determiner quantifiers and those with adverbial quantifiers basically come out the same, we will show by way of new data that quantification over events is more restricted than quantification over individuals. This is because eventualities in contrast to individuals have to be located in time which is done using contextual information according to a pragmatic resolution strategy. If the contextual information and the tense information given in the respective sentence contradict each other, the sentence is uninterpretable. We conclude that this is the reason why in these cases adverbial quantification, i.e. quantification over eventualities, is impossible whereas quantification over individuals is fine. KW - Adverbial Quantification KW - Covert Variables KW - Domain Restriction KW - Quantificational Variability Y1 - 2004 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-8409 SN - 1866-4725 SN - 1614-4708 IS - 1 SP - 121 EP - 151 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Götze, Michael A1 - Weskott, Thomas A1 - Endriss, Cornelia A1 - Fiedler, Ines A1 - Hinterwimmer, Stefan A1 - Petrova, Svetlana A1 - Schwarz, Anne A1 - Skopeteas, Stavros A1 - Stoel, Ruben T1 - Information structure JF - Interdisciplinary studies on information structure : ISIS N2 - The guidelines for Information Structure include instructions for the annotation of Information Status (or ‘givenness’), Topic, and Focus, building upon a basic syntactic annotation of nominal phrases and sentences. A procedure for the annotation of these features is proposed. Y1 - 2007 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-22277 SN - 1614-4708 SN - 1866-4725 IS - 7 SP - 147 EP - 187 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Endriss, Cornelia A1 - Hinterwimmer, Stefan A1 - Skopeteas, Stavros T1 - Semantics JF - Interdisciplinary studies on information structure : ISIS N2 - The guidelines for semantics comprise a number of layers related to quantificational structures as well as some crucial semantic properties of NPs with respect to information structure: definiteness, countability, and animacy. Y1 - 2007 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-22265 SN - 1614-4708 SN - 1866-4725 IS - 7 SP - 135 EP - 145 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - THES A1 - Patterson, Clare T1 - The role of structural and discourse-level cues during pronoun resolution T1 - Zur Rolle von struktureller und diskursbasierter Information während der Pronomenverarbeitung N2 - Pronoun resolution normally takes place without conscious effort or awareness, yet the processes behind it are far from straightforward. A large number of cues and constraints have previously been recognised as playing a role in the identification and integration of potential antecedents, yet there is considerable debate over how these operate within the resolution process. The aim of this thesis is to investigate how the parser handles multiple antecedents in order to understand more about how certain information sources play a role during pronoun resolution. I consider how both structural information and information provided by the prior discourse is used during online processing. This is investigated through several eye tracking during reading experiments that are complemented by a number of offline questionnaire experiments. I begin by considering how condition B of the Binding Theory (Chomsky 1981; 1986) has been captured in pronoun processing models; some researchers have claimed that processing is faithful to syntactic constraints from the beginning of the search (e.g. Nicol and Swinney 1989), while others have claimed that potential antecedents which are ruled out on structural grounds nonetheless affect processing, because the parser must also pay attention to a potential antecedent’s features (e.g. Badecker and Straub 2002). My experimental findings demonstrate that the parser is sensitive to the subtle changes in syntactic configuration which either allow or disallow pronoun reference to a local antecedent, and indicate that the parser is normally faithful to condition B at all stages of processing. Secondly, I test the Primitives of Binding hypothesis proposed by Koornneef (2008) based on work by Reuland (2001), which is a modular approach to pronoun resolution in which variable binding (a semantic relationship between pronoun and antecedent) takes place before coreference. I demonstrate that a variable-binding (VB) antecedent is not systematically considered earlier than a coreference (CR) antecedent online. I then go on to explore whether these findings could be attributed to the linear order of the antecedents, and uncover a robust recency preference both online and offline. I consider what role the factor of recency plays in pronoun resolution and how it can be reconciled with the first-mention advantage (Gernsbacher and Hargreaves 1988; Arnold 2001; Arnold et al., 2007). Finally, I investigate how aspects of the prior discourse affect pronoun resolution. Prior discourse status clearly had an effect on pronoun resolution, but an antecedent’s appearance in the previous context was not always facilitative; I propose that this is due to the number of topic switches that a reader must make, leading to a lack of discourse coherence which has a detrimental effect on pronoun resolution. The sensitivity of the parser to structural cues does not entail that cue types can be easily separated into distinct sequential stages, and I therefore propose that the parser is structurally sensitive but not modular. Aspects of pronoun resolution can be captured within a parallel constraints model of pronoun resolution, however, such a model should be sensitive to the activation of potential antecedents based on discourse factors, and structural cues should be strongly weighted. N2 - Pronomenauflösung erfolgt normalerweise scheinbar mühelos und ohne bewusste Anstrengung. Jedoch ist die Verarbeitung von pronominalen Referenzen aus linguistischer Sicht ein hochkomplexer Prozess. Durch unterschiedliche wissenschaftliche Studien wurden bereits zahlreiche Faktoren ermittelt, die bei der Pronomenauflösung eine Rolle spielen, allerdings herrscht weitgehend noch keine Einigkeit darüber, wie genau diese Faktoren die Verarbeitung von Pronomen beeinflussen. Ziel dieser Dissertation ist es zu untersuchen, wie der Leser/Hörer mit Pronomen umgeht, denen mehrere Antezedenten zugeordnet werden können, um zu verstehen, welche Rolle bestimmte Informationsquellen in der Verarbeitung von Pronomen spielen. Besondere Beachtung findet dabei, wie strukturelle Eigenschaften sowie Informationen aus dem vorangegangenen Diskurs für die Suche nach einem passenden Antezedenten benutzt werden. Die angewandte Untersuchungsmethode der vorliegenden Dissertation ist Eye-tracking during reading, ergänzt mit verschiedenen offline-Fragebögen. Die Experimente erforschen die Rolle der folgenden Aspekte in der Verarbeitung von Pronomen: Prinzip B der Bindungstheorie (Chomsky 1981; 1986), Koreferenz und Variablenbindung laut der Primitives of Binding Hypothese (Reuland 2001, Koornneef 2008), Antezedentenreihenfolge im Satz, und Diskursstatus des Antezedents. Obwohl es zeigt sich, dass der Hörer/Leser sensibel für subtile Veränderungen in der syntaktischen Konfiguration ist, wie z.B. für die Reihenfolge der Antezedenten im Satz und für den Diskursstatus des Antezedenten, gibt es keinen Nachweis dafür, dass Variablenbindung zeitlich vor Koreferenz erfolgt. Einige Aspekte der Auflösung pronominaler Referenzen können in einem parallel constraints model erfasst werden, allerdings sollte so ein Modell strukturelle Informationen stark gewichten und sensitiv sein für die Aktivierung potenzieller Antezedenten aufgrund von Diskursfaktoren. KW - Pronomen KW - Anaphora KW - Psycholinguistik KW - Pronouns KW - anaphora KW - psycholinguistics KW - Binding Theory KW - Centering Theory Y1 - 2013 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-71280 ER -