TY - GEN A1 - Stone, Kate A1 - Nicenboim, Bruno A1 - Vasishth, Shravan A1 - Rösler, Frank T1 - Understanding the effects of constraint and predictability in ERP T2 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - Intuitively, strongly constraining contexts should lead to stronger probabilistic representations of sentences in memory. Encountering unexpected words could therefore be expected to trigger costlier shifts in these representations than expected words. However, psycholinguistic measures commonly used to study probabilistic processing, such as the N400 event-related potential (ERP) component, are sensitive to word predictability but not to contextual constraint. Some research suggests that constraint-related processing cost may be measurable via an ERP positivity following the N400, known as the anterior post-N400 positivity (PNP). The PNP is argued to reflect update of a sentence representation and to be distinct from the posterior P600, which reflects conflict detection and reanalysis. However, constraint-related PNP findings are inconsistent. We sought to conceptually replicate Federmeier et al. (2007) and Kuperberg et al. (2020), who observed that the PNP, but not the N400 or the P600, was affected by constraint at unexpected but plausible words. Using a pre-registered design and statistical approach maximising power, we demonstrated a dissociated effect of predictability and constraint: strong evidence for predictability but not constraint in the N400 window, and strong evidence for constraint but not predictability in the later window. However, the constraint effect was consistent with a P600 and not a PNP, suggesting increased conflict between a strong representation and unexpected input rather than greater update of the representation. We conclude that either a simple strong/weak constraint design is not always sufficient to elicit the PNP, or that previous PNP constraint findings could be an artifact of smaller sample size. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe - 829 KW - N400 KW - anterior PNP KW - posterior P600 KW - probabilistic processing KW - constraint KW - predictability KW - entropy Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-587594 SN - 1866-8364 IS - 829 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Tan, Sarah A1 - Düring, Sarah A1 - Wilde, Alina A1 - Hamburger, Lara A1 - Fritzsche, Tom A1 - Felsing, Ulrike A1 - Lauer, Norina A1 - Corsten, Sabine A1 - Ostermann, Frank A1 - Nonn, Kerstin A1 - Nerz, Verena A1 - Neumann, Sandra A1 - Zauke, Svenja A1 - Sandrieser, Patricia A1 - Steinberg, Romy Simone A1 - Thurmann, Anika A1 - Dörr, Fiona A1 - Bilda, Kerstin A1 - Kluth, Alicia A1 - Lemire-Tremblay, Marilyne A1 - Jamey, Kevin A1 - Dalla Bella, Simone A1 - Falk, Simone A1 - Kleingünther, Constanze A1 - Gabler, Katrin A1 - Elligsen, Chiara A1 - Weiland, Katharina A1 - Wiehe, Lea A1 - Wahl, Michael A1 - Binczyk, Sarah A1 - Staebel, Cornelia A1 - Jung, Stefanie A1 - Eikerling, Maren A1 - Czok, Clara A1 - Sallat, Stephan A1 - Collasius, Valerie A1 - Grahovac, Tena ED - Tan, Sarah ED - Düring, Sarah ED - Wilde, Alina ED - Hamburger, Lara ED - Fritzsche, Tom T1 - Spektrum Patholinguistik Band 16. Schwerpunktthema: Schnittstelle Alltag: Transfer und Teilhabe in der Sprachtherapie N2 - Das 16. Herbsttreffen Patholinguistik mit dem Schwerpunktthema »Schnittstelle Alltag: Transfer und Teilhabe in der Sprachtherapie« fand am 19.11.2022 als Online-Veranstaltung statt. Das Herbsttreffen wird seit 2007 jährlich vom Verband für Patholinguistik e.V. (vpl), seit 2021 vom Deutschen Bundesverband für akademische Sprachtherapie und Logopädie (dbs) in Kooperation mit der Universität Potsdam durchgeführt. Der vorliegende Tagungsband beinhaltet die Vorträge zum Schwerpunktthema sowie die Posterpräsentationen zu weiteren Themen aus der sprachtherapeutischen Forschung und Praxis. N2 - The Sixteenth Autumn Meeting Patholinguistics with its main topic »Interface everyday life: Transfer and participation in speech/language therapy« took place online on the 19th of November 2022. This annual meeting has been organised since 2007 by the Association for Patholinguistics (vpl), since 2021 by the German Federal Association for Academic Speech/Language Therapy and Logopaedics (dbs) in cooperation with the University of Potsdam. The present proceedings feature the presentations on the main topic as well as articles from the poster session covering a broad range of areas in research and practice of speech/language therapy. T3 - Spektrum Patholinguistik - 16 KW - Patholinguistik KW - Sprachtherapie KW - Transfer KW - Teilhabe KW - patholinguistics KW - speech/language therapy KW - transfer KW - participation Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-590433 SN - 978-3-86956-559-0 SN - 1866-9433 SN - 1869-3822 IS - 16 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Düring, Sarah A1 - Lubitz, Anika A1 - Schnelle, Kirsten A1 - Klitsch, Julia A1 - Netzebandt, Jonka A1 - Fritzsche, Tom T1 - Interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit BT - Erfahrungen aus der Praxis und Perspektiven für die Zukunft JF - Spektrum Patholinguistik 15 Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-572386 SN - 978-3-86956-542-2 SN - 1866-9433 SN - 1866-9085 IS - 15 SP - 87 EP - 106 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Endriss, Cornelia A1 - Hinterwimmer, Stefan T1 - The influence of tense in adverbial quantification JF - Interdisciplinary studies on information structure : ISIS ; working papers of the SFB 632 N2 - We argue that there is a crucial difference between determiner and adverbial quantification. Following Herburger [2000] and von Fintel [1994], we assume that determiner quantifiers quantify over individuals and adverbial quantifiers over eventualities. While it is usually assumed that the semantics of sentences with determiner quantifiers and those with adverbial quantifiers basically come out the same, we will show by way of new data that quantification over events is more restricted than quantification over individuals. This is because eventualities in contrast to individuals have to be located in time which is done using contextual information according to a pragmatic resolution strategy. If the contextual information and the tense information given in the respective sentence contradict each other, the sentence is uninterpretable. We conclude that this is the reason why in these cases adverbial quantification, i.e. quantification over eventualities, is impossible whereas quantification over individuals is fine. KW - Adverbial Quantification KW - Covert Variables KW - Domain Restriction KW - Quantificational Variability Y1 - 2004 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-8409 SN - 1866-4725 SN - 1614-4708 IS - 1 SP - 121 EP - 151 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schmitz-Antonischki, Dorit A1 - Heide, Judith A1 - Netzebandt, Jonka T1 - Therapie von Wortabrufstörungen mit der App LingoTalk bei einer Patientin mit Aphasie BT - eine Therapiestudie JF - Spektrum Patholinguistik 15 Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-572433 SN - 978-3-86956-542-2 SN - 1866-9433 SN - 1866-9085 IS - 15 SP - 157 EP - 171 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Stone, Kate A1 - Nicenboim, Bruno A1 - Vasishth, Shravan A1 - Rösler, Frank T1 - Understanding the effects of constraint and predictability in ERP JF - Neurobiology of language N2 - Intuitively, strongly constraining contexts should lead to stronger probabilistic representations of sentences in memory. Encountering unexpected words could therefore be expected to trigger costlier shifts in these representations than expected words. However, psycholinguistic measures commonly used to study probabilistic processing, such as the N400 event-related potential (ERP) component, are sensitive to word predictability but not to contextual constraint. Some research suggests that constraint-related processing cost may be measurable via an ERP positivity following the N400, known as the anterior post-N400 positivity (PNP). The PNP is argued to reflect update of a sentence representation and to be distinct from the posterior P600, which reflects conflict detection and reanalysis. However, constraint-related PNP findings are inconsistent. We sought to conceptually replicate Federmeier et al. (2007) and Kuperberg et al. (2020), who observed that the PNP, but not the N400 or the P600, was affected by constraint at unexpected but plausible words. Using a pre-registered design and statistical approach maximising power, we demonstrated a dissociated effect of predictability and constraint: strong evidence for predictability but not constraint in the N400 window, and strong evidence for constraint but not predictability in the later window. However, the constraint effect was consistent with a P600 and not a PNP, suggesting increased conflict between a strong representation and unexpected input rather than greater update of the representation. We conclude that either a simple strong/weak constraint design is not always sufficient to elicit the PNP, or that previous PNP constraint findings could be an artifact of smaller sample size. KW - N400 KW - anterior PNP KW - posterior P600 KW - probabilistic processing KW - constraint KW - predictability KW - entropy Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00094 SN - 2641-4368 VL - 4 IS - 2 SP - 221 EP - 256 PB - MIT Press CY - Cambridge, MA, USA ER -