TY - JOUR A1 - Delgrande, James Patrick A1 - Liu, Daphne H. A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Thiele, Sven T1 - COBA 2.0 : a consistency-based belief change system Y1 - 2006 UR - http://www2.in.tu-clausthal.de/~tmbehrens/NMR_Proc_TR4.pdf ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Nicolas, Pascal A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - Un cadre général pour l'interrogation automatique en logiques des défauts Y1 - 1998 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lindauer, Marius A1 - Hoos, Holger H. A1 - Hutter, Frank A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - An automatically configured algorithm selector JF - The journal of artificial intelligence research N2 - Algorithm selection (AS) techniques - which involve choosing from a set of algorithms the one expected to solve a given problem instance most efficiently - have substantially improved the state of the art in solving many prominent AI problems, such as SAT, CSP, ASP, MAXSAT and QBF. Although several AS procedures have been introduced, not too surprisingly, none of them dominates all others across all AS scenarios. Furthermore, these procedures have parameters whose optimal values vary across AS scenarios. This holds specifically for the machine learning techniques that form the core of current AS procedures, and for their hyperparameters. Therefore, to successfully apply AS to new problems, algorithms and benchmark sets, two questions need to be answered: (i) how to select an AS approach and (ii) how to set its parameters effectively. We address both of these problems simultaneously by using automated algorithm configuration. Specifically, we demonstrate that we can automatically configure claspfolio 2, which implements a large variety of different AS approaches and their respective parameters in a single, highly-parameterized algorithm framework. Our approach, dubbed AutoFolio, allows researchers and practitioners across a broad range of applications to exploit the combined power of many different AS methods. We demonstrate AutoFolio can significantly improve the performance of claspfolio 2 on 8 out of the 13 scenarios from the Algorithm Selection Library, leads to new state-of-the-art algorithm selectors for 7 of these scenarios, and matches state-of-the-art performance (statistically) on all other scenarios. Compared to the best single algorithm for each AS scenario, AutoFolio achieves average speedup factors between 1.3 and 15.4. Y1 - 2015 SN - 1076-9757 SN - 1943-5037 VL - 53 SP - 745 EP - 778 PB - AI Access Foundation CY - Marina del Rey ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hoos, Holger A1 - Lindauer, Marius A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - claspfolio 2 BT - advances in algorithm selection for answer set programming JF - Theory and practice of logic programming N2 - Building on the award-winning, portfolio-based ASP solver claspfolio, we present claspfolio 2, a modular and open solver architecture that integrates several different portfolio-based algorithm selection approaches and techniques. The claspfolio 2 solver framework supports various feature generators, solver selection approaches, solver portfolios, as well as solver-schedule-based pre-solving techniques. The default configuration of claspfolio 2 relies on a light-weight version of the ASP solver clasp to generate static and dynamic instance features. The flexible open design of claspfolio 2 is a distinguishing factor even beyond ASP. As such, it provides a unique framework for comparing and combining existing portfolio-based algorithm selection approaches and techniques in a single, unified framework. Taking advantage of this, we conducted an extensive experimental study to assess the impact of different feature sets, selection approaches and base solver portfolios. In addition to gaining substantial insights into the utility of the various approaches and techniques, we identified a default configuration of claspfolio 2 that achieves substantial performance gains not only over clasp's default configuration and the earlier version of claspfolio, but also over manually tuned configurations of clasp. Y1 - 2014 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068414000210 SN - 1471-0684 SN - 1475-3081 VL - 14 SP - 569 EP - 585 PB - Cambridge Univ. Press CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Tran, Son Cao A1 - Pontelli, Enrico A1 - Balduccini, Marcello A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - Answer set planning BT - a survey JF - Theory and practice of logic programming N2 - Answer Set Planning refers to the use of Answer Set Programming (ASP) to compute plans, that is, solutions to planning problems, that transform a given state of the world to another state. The development of efficient and scalable answer set solvers has provided a significant boost to the development of ASP-based planning systems. This paper surveys the progress made during the last two and a half decades in the area of answer set planning, from its foundations to its use in challenging planning domains. The survey explores the advantages and disadvantages of answer set planning. It also discusses typical applications of answer set planning and presents a set of challenges for future research. KW - planning KW - knowledge representation and reasoning KW - logic programming Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068422000072 SN - 1471-0684 SN - 1475-3081 PB - Cambridge University Press CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Brain, Martin A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Pührer, Jörg A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Tompits, Hans A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - Debugging ASP programs by means of ASP Y1 - 2007 SN - 978-3-540- 72199-4 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Mileo, Alessandra A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Merico, Davide A1 - Bisiani, Roberto T1 - Knowledge-based multi-criteria optimization to support indoor positioning JF - Annals of mathematics and artificial intelligence N2 - Indoor position estimation constitutes a central task in home-based assisted living environments. Such environments often rely on a heterogeneous collection of low-cost sensors whose diversity and lack of precision has to be compensated by advanced techniques for localization and tracking. Although there are well established quantitative methods in robotics and neighboring fields for addressing these problems, they lack advanced knowledge representation and reasoning capacities. Such capabilities are not only useful in dealing with heterogeneous and incomplete information but moreover they allow for a better inclusion of semantic information and more general homecare and patient-related knowledge. We address this problem and investigate how state-of-the-art localization and tracking methods can be combined with Answer Set Programming, as a popular knowledge representation and reasoning formalism. We report upon a case-study and provide a first experimental evaluation of knowledge-based position estimation both in a simulated as well as in a real setting. KW - Knowledge representation KW - Answer Set Programming KW - Wireless Sensor Networks KW - Localization KW - Tracking Y1 - 2011 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-011-9241-2 SN - 1012-2443 SN - 1573-7470 VL - 62 IS - 3-4 SP - 345 EP - 370 PB - Springer CY - Dordrecht ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Fandiño, Jorge A1 - Lifschitz, Vladimir A1 - Lühne, Patrick A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - Verifying tight logic programs with Anthem and Vampire JF - Theory and practice of logic programming N2 - This paper continues the line of research aimed at investigating the relationship between logic programs and first-order theories. We extend the definition of program completion to programs with input and output in a subset of the input language of the ASP grounder gringo, study the relationship between stable models and completion in this context, and describe preliminary experiments with the use of two software tools, anthem and vampire, for verifying the correctness of programs with input and output. Proofs of theorems are based on a lemma that relates the semantics of programs studied in this paper to stable models of first-order formulas. Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068420000344 SN - 1471-0684 SN - 1475-3081 VL - 20 IS - 5 SP - 735 EP - 750 PB - Cambridge Univ. Press CY - Cambridge [u.a.] ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Delgrande, James Patrick A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - A consistency-based model for belief change: preliminary report Y1 - 2000 UR - http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cs.AI/0003052 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Delgrande, James Patrick A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - The role of default logic in knowledge representation Y1 - 2000 SN - 0-7923-7224-7 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Delgrande, James Patrick A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - How to reason credulously and skeptically within a single extension Y1 - 2001 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Wang, Kewen T1 - A comparative study of logic programs with preference Y1 - 2001 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Delgrande, James Patrick A1 - Lang, Jérôme A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - Belief change based on global minimisation Y1 - 2007 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Durzinsky, Markus A1 - Marwan, Wolfgang A1 - Ostrowski, Max A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Wagler, Annegret T1 - Automatic network reconstruction using ASP JF - Theory and practice of logic programming N2 - Building biological models by inferring functional dependencies from experimental data is an important issue in Molecular Biology. To relieve the biologist from this traditionally manual process, various approaches have been proposed to increase the degree of automation. However, available approaches often yield a single model only, rely on specific assumptions, and/or use dedicated, heuristic algorithms that are intolerant to changing circumstances or requirements in the view of the rapid progress made in Biotechnology. Our aim is to provide a declarative solution to the problem by appeal to Answer Set Programming (ASP) overcoming these difficulties. We build upon an existing approach to Automatic Network Reconstruction proposed by part of the authors. This approach has firm mathematical foundations and is well suited for ASP due to its combinatorial flavor providing a characterization of all models explaining a set of experiments. The usage of ASP has several benefits over the existing heuristic algorithms. First, it is declarative and thus transparent for biological experts. Second, it is elaboration tolerant and thus allows for an easy exploration and incorporation of biological constraints. Third, it allows for exploring the entire space of possible models. Finally, our approach offers an excellent performance, matching existing, special-purpose systems. Y1 - 2011 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068411000287 SN - 1471-0684 VL - 11 SP - 749 EP - 766 PB - Cambridge Univ. Press CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - Tableau calculi for logic programs under answer set semantics JF - ACM transactions on computational logic N2 - We introduce formal proof systems based on tableau methods for analyzing computations in Answer Set Programming (ASP). Our approach furnishes fine-grained instruments for characterizing operations as well as strategies of ASP solvers. The granularity is detailed enough to capture a variety of propagation and choice methods of algorithms used for ASP solving, also incorporating SAT-based and conflict-driven learning approaches to some extent. This provides us with a uniform setting for identifying and comparing fundamental properties of ASP solving approaches. In particular, we investigate their proof complexities and show that the run-times of best-case computations can vary exponentially between different existing ASP solvers. Apart from providing a framework for comparing ASP solving approaches, our characterizations also contribute to their understanding by pinning down the constitutive atomic operations. Furthermore, our framework is flexible enough to integrate new inference patterns, and so to study their relation to existing ones. To this end, we generalize our approach and provide an extensible basis aiming at a modular incorporation of additional language constructs. This is exemplified by augmenting our basic tableau methods with cardinality constraints and disjunctions. KW - Theory KW - Answer Set Programming KW - tableau calculi KW - proof complexity Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1145/2480759.2480767 SN - 1529-3785 VL - 14 IS - 2 PB - Association for Computing Machinery CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Ostrowski, Max A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - ASP modulo CSP The clingcon system JF - Theory and practice of logic programming N2 - We present the hybrid ASP solver clingcon, combining the simple modeling language and the high performance Boolean solving capacities of Answer Set Programming (ASP) with techniques for using non-Boolean constraints from the area of Constraint Programming (CP). The new clingcon system features an extended syntax supporting global constraints and optimize statements for constraint variables. The major technical innovation improves the interaction between ASP and CP solver through elaborated learning techniques based on irreducible inconsistent sets. A broad empirical evaluation shows that these techniques yield a performance improvement of an order of magnitude. Y1 - 2012 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068412000142 SN - 1471-0684 VL - 12 SP - 485 EP - 503 PB - Cambridge Univ. Press CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Brewka, Gerhard A1 - Ellmauthaler, Stefan A1 - Kern-Isberner, Gabriele A1 - Obermeier, Philipp A1 - Ostrowski, Max A1 - Romero, Javier A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Schieweck, Steffen T1 - Advanced solving technology for dynamic and reactive applications JF - Künstliche Intelligenz Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-018-0538-8 SN - 0933-1875 SN - 1610-1987 VL - 32 IS - 2-3 SP - 199 EP - 200 PB - Springer CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Thiele, Sven T1 - GrinGo : a new grounder for answer set programming Y1 - 2007 SN - 978-3-540- 72199-4 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Besnard, Philippe A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - An approach to context-based default reasoning Y1 - 1995 SN - 0169-2968 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Dimopoulos, Yannis A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Lühne, Patrick A1 - Romero Davila, Javier A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - plasp 3 BT - Towards Effective ASP Planning JF - Theory and practice of logic programming N2 - We describe the new version of the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL)-to-Answer Set Programming (ASP) translator plasp. First, it widens the range of accepted PDDL features. Second, it contains novel planning encodings, some inspired by Satisfiability Testing (SAT) planning and others exploiting ASP features such as well-foundedness. All of them are designed for handling multivalued fluents in order to capture both PDDL as well as SAS planning formats. Third, enabled by multishot ASP solving, it offers advanced planning algorithms also borrowed from SAT planning. As a result, plasp provides us with an ASP-based framework for studying a variety of planning techniques in a uniform setting. Finally, we demonstrate in an empirical analysis that these techniques have a significant impact on the performance of ASP planning. KW - knowledge representation and nonmonotonic reasoning KW - technical notes and rapid communications KW - answer set programming KW - automated planning KW - action and change Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068418000583 SN - 1471-0684 SN - 1475-3081 VL - 19 IS - 3 SP - 477 EP - 504 PB - Cambridge Univ. Press CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kaminski, Roland A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Siegel, Anne A1 - Videla, Santiago T1 - Minimal intervention strategies in logical signaling networks with ASP JF - Theory and practice of logic programming N2 - Proposing relevant perturbations to biological signaling networks is central to many problems in biology and medicine because it allows for enabling or disabling certain biological outcomes. In contrast to quantitative methods that permit fine-grained (kinetic) analysis, qualitative approaches allow for addressing large-scale networks. This is accomplished by more abstract representations such as logical networks. We elaborate upon such a qualitative approach aiming at the computation of minimal interventions in logical signaling networks relying on Kleene's three-valued logic and fixpoint semantics. We address this problem within answer set programming and show that it greatly outperforms previous work using dedicated algorithms. Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068413000422 SN - 1471-0684 VL - 13 SP - 675 EP - 690 PB - Cambridge Univ. Press CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Brüning, Stefan A1 - Nicolas, Pascal T1 - XRay : a prolog technology theorem prover for default reasoning: a system description Y1 - 1996 SN - 3-540-61511-3 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Besnard, Philippe A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - A simple signed system for paraconsistent reasoning Y1 - 1996 SN - 3-540-61630-6 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Tompits, Hans A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - Alternative characterizations for program equivalence under aswer-set semantics : a preliminary report Y1 - 2007 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Obermeier, Philipp A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Ratsch-Heitmann, Michel A1 - Runge, Mario T1 - Routing driverless transport vehicles in car assembly with answer set programming JF - Theory and practice of logic programming N2 - Automated storage and retrieval systems are principal components of modern production and warehouse facilities. In particular, automated guided vehicles nowadays substitute human-operated pallet trucks in transporting production materials between storage locations and assembly stations. While low-level control systems take care of navigating such driverless vehicles along programmed routes and avoid collisions even under unforeseen circumstances, in the common case of multiple vehicles sharing the same operation area, the problem remains how to set up routes such that a collection of transport tasks is accomplished most effectively. We address this prevalent problem in the context of car assembly at Mercedes-Benz Ludwigsfelde GmbH, a large-scale producer of commercial vehicles, where routes for automated guided vehicles used in the production process have traditionally been hand-coded by human engineers. Such adhoc methods may suffice as long as a running production process remains in place, while any change in the factory layout or production targets necessitates tedious manual reconfiguration, not to mention the missing portability between different production plants. Unlike this, we propose a declarative approach based on Answer Set Programming to optimize the routes taken by automated guided vehicles for accomplishing transport tasks. The advantages include a transparent and executable problem formalization, provable optimality of routes relative to objective criteria, as well as elaboration tolerance towards particular factory layouts and production targets. Moreover, we demonstrate that our approach is efficient enough to deal with the transport tasks evolving in realistic production processes at the car factory of Mercedes-Benz Ludwigsfelde GmbH. KW - automated guided vehicle routing KW - car assembly operations KW - answer set programming Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068418000182 SN - 1471-0684 SN - 1475-3081 VL - 18 IS - 3-4 SP - 520 EP - 534 PB - Cambridge Univ. Press CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lindauer, Marius A1 - Hoos, Holger A1 - Leyton-Brown, Kevin A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - Automatic construction of parallel portfolios via algorithm configuration JF - Artificial intelligence N2 - Since 2004, increases in computational power described by Moore's law have substantially been realized in the form of additional cores rather than through faster clock speeds. To make effective use of modern hardware when solving hard computational problems, it is therefore necessary to employ parallel solution strategies. In this work, we demonstrate how effective parallel solvers for propositional satisfiability (SAT), one of the most widely studied NP-complete problems, can be produced automatically from any existing sequential, highly parametric SAT solver. Our Automatic Construction of Parallel Portfolios (ACPP) approach uses an automatic algorithm configuration procedure to identify a set of configurations that perform well when executed in parallel. Applied to two prominent SAT solvers, Lingeling and clasp, our ACPP procedure identified 8-core solvers that significantly outperformed their sequential counterparts on a diverse set of instances from the application and hard combinatorial category of the 2012 SAT Challenge. We further extended our ACPP approach to produce parallel portfolio solvers consisting of several different solvers by combining their configuration spaces. Applied to the component solvers of the 2012 SAT Challenge gold medal winning SAT Solver pfolioUZK, our ACPP procedures produced a significantly better-performing parallel SAT solver. KW - Algorithm configuration KW - Parallel SAT solving KW - Algorithm portfolios KW - Programming by optimization KW - Automated parallelization Y1 - 2016 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2016.05.004 SN - 0004-3702 SN - 1872-7921 VL - 244 SP - 272 EP - 290 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Kaminski, Roland A1 - Kaufmann, Benjamin A1 - Lühne, Patrick A1 - Obermeier, Philipp A1 - Ostrowski, Max A1 - Romero Davila, Javier A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Schellhorn, Sebastian A1 - Wanko, Philipp T1 - The Potsdam Answer Set Solving Collection 5.0 JF - Künstliche Intelligenz N2 - The Potsdam answer set solving collection, or Potassco for short, bundles various tools implementing and/or applying answer set programming. The article at hand succeeds an earlier description of the Potassco project published in Gebser et al. (AI Commun 24(2):107-124, 2011). Hence, we concentrate in what follows on the major features of the most recent, fifth generation of the ASP system clingo and highlight some recent resulting application systems. Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-018-0528-x SN - 0933-1875 SN - 1610-1987 VL - 32 IS - 2-3 SP - 181 EP - 182 PB - Springer CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Kaufmann, Benjamin A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - Conflict-driven answer set solving: From theory to practice JF - Artificial intelligence N2 - We introduce an approach to computing answer sets of logic programs, based on concepts successfully applied in Satisfiability (SAT) checking. The idea is to view inferences in Answer Set Programming (ASP) as unit propagation on nogoods. This provides us with a uniform constraint-based framework capturing diverse inferences encountered in ASP solving. Moreover, our approach allows us to apply advanced solving techniques from the area of SAT. As a result, we present the first full-fledged algorithmic framework for native conflict-driven ASP solving. Our approach is implemented in the ASP solver clasp that has demonstrated its competitiveness and versatility by winning first places at various solver contests. KW - Answer set programming KW - Logic programming KW - Nonmonotonic reasoning Y1 - 2012 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.04.001 SN - 0004-3702 VL - 187 IS - 8 SP - 52 EP - 89 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Besnard, Philippe A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Tompits, Hans A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - Paraconsistent reasoning via quantified boolean formulas Y1 - 2002 SN - 3-540-44190-5 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Kaufmann, Benjamin A1 - Neumann, André A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - Clasp : a conflict-driven answer set solver Y1 - 2007 SN - 978-3-540- 72199-4 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Brain, Martin A1 - Faber, Wolfgang A1 - Maratea, Marco A1 - Polleres, Axel A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Schindlauer, Roman T1 - What should an ASP solver output? : a multiple position paper Y1 - 2007 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Thielscher, Michael A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - Default reasoning by deductive planning Y1 - 1995 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Banbara, Mutsunori A1 - Soh, Takehide A1 - Tamura, Naoyuki A1 - Inoue, Katsumi A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - Answer set programming as a modeling language for course timetabling JF - Theory and practice of logic programming N2 - The course timetabling problem can be generally defined as the task of assigning a number of lectures to a limited set of timeslots and rooms, subject to a given set of hard and soft constraints. The modeling language for course timetabling is required to be expressive enough to specify a wide variety of soft constraints and objective functions. Furthermore, the resulting encoding is required to be extensible for capturing new constraints and for switching them between hard and soft, and to be flexible enough to deal with different formulations. In this paper, we propose to make effective use of ASP as a modeling language for course timetabling. We show that our ASP-based approach can naturally satisfy the above requirements, through an ASP encoding of the curriculum-based course timetabling problem proposed in the third track of the second international timetabling competition (ITC-2007). Our encoding is compact and human-readable, since each constraint is individually expressed by either one or two rules. Each hard constraint is expressed by using integrity constraints and aggregates of ASP. Each soft constraint S is expressed by rules in which the head is the form of penalty (S, V, C), and a violation V and its penalty cost C are detected and calculated respectively in the body. We carried out experiments on four different benchmark sets with five different formulations. We succeeded either in improving the bounds or producing the same bounds for many combinations of problem instances and formulations, compared with the previous best known bounds. KW - answer set programming KW - educational timetabling KW - course timetabling Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068413000495 SN - 1471-0684 VL - 13 IS - 2 SP - 783 EP - 798 PB - Cambridge Univ. Press CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Sabuncu, Orkunt A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - An incremental answer set programming based system for finite model computation JF - AI communications : AICOM ; the European journal on artificial intelligence N2 - We address the problem of Finite Model Computation (FMC) of first-order theories and show that FMC can efficiently and transparently be solved by taking advantage of a recent extension of Answer Set Programming (ASP), called incremental Answer Set Programming (iASP). The idea is to use the incremental parameter in iASP programs to account for the domain size of a model. The FMC problem is then successively addressed for increasing domain sizes until an answer set, representing a finite model of the original first-order theory, is found. We implemented a system based on the iASP solver iClingo and demonstrate its competitiveness by showing that it slightly outperforms the winner of the FNT division of CADE's 2009 Automated Theorem Proving (ATP) competition on the respective benchmark collection. KW - Incremental answer set programming KW - finite model computation Y1 - 2011 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-2011-0496 SN - 0921-7126 VL - 24 IS - 2 SP - 195 EP - 212 PB - IOS Press CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - GEN A1 - Lifschitz, Vladimir A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - Interview with Vladimir Lifschitz T2 - Künstliche Intelligenz N2 - This interview with Vladimir Lifschitz was conducted by Torsten Schaub at the University of Texas at Austin in August 2017. The question set was compiled by Torsten Schaub and Stefan Woltran. Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-018-0552-x SN - 0933-1875 SN - 1610-1987 VL - 32 IS - 2-3 SP - 213 EP - 218 PB - Springer CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Delgrande, James Patrick A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Tompits, Hans T1 - A Preference-Based Framework for Updating logic Programs : preliminary reports Y1 - 2006 UR - http://www.easychair.org/FLoC-06/PREFS-preproceedings.pdf ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Linke, Thomas A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - An approach to query-answering in Reiter's default logic and the underlying existence of extensions problem. Y1 - 1998 SN - 3-540-65141-1 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Hinrichs, Henrik A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Thiele, Sven T1 - xpanda: a (simple) preprocessor for adding multi-valued propositions to ASP N2 - We introduce a simple approach extending the input language of Answer Set Programming (ASP) systems by multi-valued propositions. Our approach is implemented as a (prototypical) preprocessor translating logic programs with multi-valued propositions into logic programs with Boolean propositions only. Our translation is modular and heavily benefits from the expressive input language of ASP. The resulting approach, along with its implementation, allows for solving interesting constraint satisfaction problems in ASP, showing a good performance. Y1 - 2010 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-41466 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Cabalar, Pedro A1 - Dieguez, Martin A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Schuhmann, Anna T1 - Towards metric temporal answer set programming JF - Theory and practice of logic programming N2 - We elaborate upon the theoretical foundations of a metric temporal extension of Answer Set Programming. In analogy to previous extensions of ASP with constructs from Linear Temporal and Dynamic Logic, we accomplish this in the setting of the logic of Here-and-There and its non-monotonic extension, called Equilibrium Logic. More precisely, we develop our logic on the same semantic underpinnings as its predecessors and thus use a simple time domain of bounded time steps. This allows us to compare all variants in a uniform framework and ultimately combine them in a common implementation. Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068420000307 SN - 1471-0684 SN - 1475-3081 VL - 20 IS - 5 SP - 783 EP - 798 PB - Cambridge Univ. Press CY - Cambridge [u.a.] ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Pearce, David A1 - Sarsakov, Vladimir A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Tompits, Hans A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - A polynomial translation of logic programs with nested expressions into disjunctive logic programs Y1 - 2002 SN - 3-540-43930-7 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Anger, Christian A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Janhunen, Tomi A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - What's a head without a body? Y1 - 2006 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Mileo, Alessandra A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - Qualitative constraint enforcement in advanced policy specification Y1 - 2007 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Delgrande, James Patrick A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - Expressing default logic variants in default logic N2 - Reiter's default logic is one of the best known and most studied of the approaches to nonmonotonic reasoning. Several variants of default logic have subsequently been proposed to give systems with properties differing from the original. In this paper, we examine the relationship between default logic and its major variants. We accomplish this by translating a default theory under a variant interpretation into a second default theory, under the original Reiter semantics, wherein the variant interpretation is respected. That is, in each case we show that, given an extension of a translated theory, one may extract an extension of the original variant default logic theory. We show how constrained, rational, justified, and cumulative default logic can be expressed in Reiter's default logic. As well, we show how Reiter's default logic can be expressed in rational default logic. From this, we suggest that any such variant can be similarly treated. Consequently, we provide a unification of default logics, showing how the original formulation of default logic may express its variants. Moreover, the translations clearly express the relationships between alternative approaches to default logic. The translations themselves are shown to generally have good properties. Thus, in at least a theoretical sense, we show that these variants are in a sense superfluous, in that for any of these variants of default logic, we can exactly mimic the behaviour of a variant in standard default logic. As well, the translations lend insight into means of classifying the expressive power of default logic variants; specifically we suggest that the property of semi-monotonicity represents a division with respect to expressibility, whereas regularity and cumulativity do not Y1 - 2005 SN - 0955-792X ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Delgrande, James Patrick A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - Reasoning with sets of preferences in default logic N2 - We present a general approach for representing and reasoning with sets of defaults in default logic, focusing on reasoning about preferences among sets of defaults. First, we consider how to control the application of a set of defaults so that either all apply (if possible) or none do (if not). From this, an approach to dealing with preferences among sets of default rules is developed. We begin with an ordered default theory, consisting of a standard default theory, but with possible preferences on sets of rules. This theory is transformed into a second, standard default theory wherein the preferences are respected. The approach differs from other work, in that we obtain standard default theories and do not rely on prioritized versions of default logic. In practical terms this means we can immediately use existing default logic theorem provers for an implementation. Also, we directly generate just those extensions containing the most preferred applied rules; in contrast, most previous approaches generate all extensions, then select the most preferred. In a major application of the approach, we show how semimonotonic default theories can be encoded so that reasoning can be carried out at the object level. With this, we can reason about default extensions from within the framework of a standard default logic. Hence one can encode notions such as skeptical and credulous conclusions, and can reason about such conclusions within a single extension Y1 - 2004 SN - 0824-7935 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Delgrande, James Patrick A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Tompits, Hans A1 - Wang, Kewen T1 - A classification and survey of preference handling approchaches in nonmonotonic reasoning N2 - In recent years, there has been a large amount of disparate work concerning the representation and reasoning with qualitative preferential information by means of approaches to nonmonotonic reasoning. Given the variety of underlying systems, assumptions, motivations, and intuitions, it is difficult to compare or relate one approach with another. Here, we present an overview and classification for approaches to dealing with preference. A set of criteria for classifying approaches is given, followed by a set of desiderata that an approach might be expected to satisfy. A comprehensive set of approaches is subsequently given and classified with respect to these sets of underlying principles Y1 - 2004 SN - 0824-7935 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Borchert, P. A1 - Anger, Christian A1 - Schaub, Torsten A1 - Truszczynski, M. T1 - Towards systematic benchmarking in answer set programming : the dagstuhl initiative Y1 - 2004 SN - 3-540- 20721-x ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Delgrande, James Patrick A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - Consistency-based approaches to merging knowledge based : preliminary report Y1 - 2004 UR - http://www.pims.math.ca/science/2004/NMR/papers/paper17.pdf SN - 92-990021-0-X ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Konczak, Kathrin A1 - Linke, Thomas A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - Graphs and cologings for answer set programming : adridged report Y1 - 2004 SN - 3-540- 20721-x ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Flöter, André A1 - Selbig, Joachim A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - Finding metabolic pathways in decision forests Y1 - 2004 SN - 3-540-23221-4 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Boesel, Andreas A1 - Linke, Thomas A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - Profiling answer set programming : the visualization component of the noMoRe System Y1 - 2004 SN - 3-540-23242-7 ER -