TY - JOUR A1 - Prasse, Paul A1 - Knaebel, Rene A1 - Machlica, Lukas A1 - Pevny, Tomas A1 - Scheffer, Tobias T1 - Joint detection of malicious domains and infected clients JF - Machine learning N2 - Detection of malware-infected computers and detection of malicious web domains based on their encrypted HTTPS traffic are challenging problems, because only addresses, timestamps, and data volumes are observable. The detection problems are coupled, because infected clients tend to interact with malicious domains. Traffic data can be collected at a large scale, and antivirus tools can be used to identify infected clients in retrospect. Domains, by contrast, have to be labeled individually after forensic analysis. We explore transfer learning based on sluice networks; this allows the detection models to bootstrap each other. In a large-scale experimental study, we find that the model outperforms known reference models and detects previously unknown malware, previously unknown malware families, and previously unknown malicious domains. KW - Machine learning KW - Neural networks KW - Computer security KW - Traffic data KW - Https traffic Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-019-05789-z SN - 0885-6125 SN - 1573-0565 VL - 108 IS - 8-9 SP - 1353 EP - 1368 PB - Springer CY - Dordrecht ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Cabalar, Pedro A1 - Fandinno, Jorge A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. A1 - Schellhorn, Sebastian T1 - Gelfond-Zhang aggregates as propositional formulas JF - Artificial intelligence N2 - Answer Set Programming (ASP) has become a popular and widespread paradigm for practical Knowledge Representation thanks to its expressiveness and the available enhancements of its input language. One of such enhancements is the use of aggregates, for which different semantic proposals have been made. In this paper, we show that any ASP aggregate interpreted under Gelfond and Zhang's (GZ) semantics can be replaced (under strong equivalence) by a propositional formula. Restricted to the original GZ syntax, the resulting formula is reducible to a disjunction of conjunctions of literals but the formulation is still applicable even when the syntax is extended to allow for arbitrary formulas (including nested aggregates) in the condition. Once GZ-aggregates are represented as formulas, we establish a formal comparison (in terms of the logic of Here-and-There) to Ferraris' (F) aggregates, which are defined by a different formula translation involving nested implications. In particular, we prove that if we replace an F-aggregate by a GZ-aggregate in a rule head, we do not lose answer sets (although more can be gained). This extends the previously known result that the opposite happens in rule bodies, i.e., replacing a GZ-aggregate by an F-aggregate in the body may yield more answer sets. Finally, we characterize a class of aggregates for which GZ- and F-semantics coincide. KW - Aggregates KW - Answer Set Programming Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.10.007 SN - 0004-3702 SN - 1872-7921 VL - 274 SP - 26 EP - 43 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - THES A1 - Ashouri, Mohammadreza T1 - TrainTrap BT - a hybrid technique for vulnerability analysis in JAVA Y1 - 2020 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Aguado, Felicidad A1 - Cabalar, Pedro A1 - Fandiño, Jorge A1 - Pearce, David A1 - Perez, Gilberto A1 - Vidal-Peracho, Concepcion T1 - Revisiting Explicit Negation in Answer Set Programming JF - Theory and practice of logic programming KW - Answer set programming KW - Non-monotonic reasoning KW - Equilibrium logic KW - Explicit negation Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068419000267 SN - 1471-0684 SN - 1475-3081 VL - 19 IS - 5-6 SP - 908 EP - 924 PB - Cambridge Univ. Press CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Laskov, Pavel A1 - Gehl, Christian A1 - Krüger, Stefan A1 - Müller, Klaus-Robert T1 - Incremental support vector learning: analysis, implementation and applications JF - Journal of machine learning research N2 - Incremental Support Vector Machines (SVM) are instrumental in practical applications of online learning. This work focuses on the design and analysis of efficient incremental SVM learning, with the aim of providing a fast, numerically stable and robust implementation. A detailed analysis of convergence and of algorithmic complexity of incremental SVM learning is carried out. Based on this analysis, a new design of storage and numerical operations is proposed, which speeds up the training of an incremental SVM by a factor of 5 to 20. The performance of the new algorithm is demonstrated in two scenarios: learning with limited resources and active learning. Various applications of the algorithm, such as in drug discovery, online monitoring of industrial devices and and surveillance of network traffic, can be foreseen. KW - incremental SVM KW - online learning KW - drug discovery KW - intrusion detection Y1 - 2006 SN - 1532-4435 VL - 7 SP - 1909 EP - 1936 PB - MIT Press CY - Cambridge, Mass. ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Steuer, Ralf A1 - Humburg, Peter A1 - Selbig, Joachim T1 - Validation and functional annotation of expression-based clusters based on gene ontology JF - BMC bioinformatics N2 - Background: The biological interpretation of large-scale gene expression data is one of the paramount challenges in current bioinformatics. In particular, placing the results in the context of other available functional genomics data, such as existing bio-ontologies, has already provided substantial improvement for detecting and categorizing genes of interest. One common approach is to look for functional annotations that are significantly enriched within a group or cluster of genes, as compared to a reference group. Results: In this work, we suggest the information-theoretic concept of mutual information to investigate the relationship between groups of genes, as given by data-driven clustering, and their respective functional categories. Drawing upon related approaches (Gibbons and Roth, Genome Research 12: 1574-1581, 2002), we seek to quantify to what extent individual attributes are sufficient to characterize a given group or cluster of genes. Conclusion: We show that the mutual information provides a systematic framework to assess the relationship between groups or clusters of genes and their functional annotations in a quantitative way. Within this framework, the mutual information allows us to address and incorporate several important issues, such as the interdependence of functional annotations and combinatorial combinations of attributes. It thus supplements and extends the conventional search for overrepresented attributes within a group or cluster of genes. In particular taking combinations of attributes into account, the mutual information opens the way to uncover specific functional descriptions of a group of genes or clustering result. All datasets and functional annotations used in this study are publicly available. All scripts used in the analysis are provided as additional files. Y1 - 2006 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-380 SN - 1471-2105 VL - 7 IS - 380 PB - BioMed Central CY - London ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Kiy, Alexander A1 - Hafer, Jörg A1 - Schumann, Marlen A1 - Enke, Uta ED - Lucke, Ulrike ED - Schwill, Andreas ED - Zender, Raphael T1 - Digitale Teilnehmerzertifikate und Open Badges verbinden BT - Der E-Teaching-Badge T2 - DeLFI 2016 - Die 14. E-Learning Fachtagung Informatik 11.-14. September 2016 Potsdam N2 - Während Qualifikationen und Kompetenzen, die auf informellem Wege erworben werden, immer mehr Beachtung finden, stellt sowohl deren Darstellung als auch die Anerkennung ein meist unüberwindbares Hindernis für Ausstellende und Erwerbende dar. Vermehrt wird unterdessen von klassisch papiergebundenen auf digitale Teilnahmezertifikate umgestellt, um den Nachweis von Kompetenz- und Qualifikationserwerb zu vereinfachen. In diesem Zusammenhang kann die Verbindung von digitalen Teilnahmezertifikaten und Open Badges einen Mehrwert für die öffentliche Darstellung und Verifikation bieten. KW - Teilnehmerzertifikate KW - Peer-Review KW - Open Badges KW - Open Badge Infrastructure KW - OBI Y1 - 2016 UR - http://subs.emis.de/LNI/Proceedings/Proceedings262/article21.html SN - 978-3-88579-656-5 IS - P-262 SP - 285 EP - 287 PB - Gesellschaft für Informatik CY - Bonn ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Sarsakov, Vladimir A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. A1 - Tompits, Hans A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - A compiler for nested logic programming Y1 - 2004 SN - 3-540- 20721-x ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Linke, Thomas A1 - Tompits, Hans A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - On Acyclic and head-cycle free nested logic programs Y1 - 2004 SN - 3-540-22671-01 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Linke, Thomas A1 - Tompits, Hans A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - On acyclic and head-cycle free nested logic programs Y1 - 2004 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Delgrande, James Patrick A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. A1 - Tompits, Hans A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - On Computing belief change operations using quantifield boolean formulas N2 - In this paper, we show how an approach to belief revision and belief contraction can be axiomatized by means of quantified Boolean formulas. Specifically, we consider the approach of belief change scenarios, a general framework that has been introduced for expressing different forms of belief change. The essential idea is that for a belief change scenario (K, R, C), the set of formulas K, representing the knowledge base, is modified so that the sets of formulas R and C are respectively true in, and consistent with the result. By restricting the form of a belief change scenario, one obtains specific belief change operators including belief revision, contraction, update, and merging. For both the general approach and for specific operators, we give a quantified Boolean formula such that satisfying truth assignments to the free variables correspond to belief change extensions in the original approach. Hence, we reduce the problem of determining the results of a belief change operation to that of satisfiability. This approach has several benefits. First, it furnishes an axiomatic specification of belief change with respect to belief change scenarios. This then leads to further insight into the belief change framework. Second, this axiomatization allows us to identify strict complexity bounds for the considered reasoning tasks. Third, we have implemented these different forms of belief change by means of existing solvers for quantified Boolean formulas. As well, it appears that this approach may be straightforwardly applied to other specific approaches to belief change Y1 - 2004 SN - 0955-792X ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Delgrande, James Patrick A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. A1 - Tompits, Hans A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - On computing solutions to belief change scenarios Y1 - 2001 SN - 3-540- 42464-4 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Pearce, David A1 - Sarsakov, Vladimir A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. A1 - Tompits, Hans A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - A polynomial translation of logic programs with nested expressions into disjunctive logic programs Y1 - 2002 SN - 3-540-43930-7 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Besnard, Philippe A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. A1 - Tompits, Hans A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - Paraconsistent reasoning via quantified boolean formulas Y1 - 2002 SN - 3-540-44190-5 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Brain, Martin A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Pührer, Jörg A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. A1 - Tompits, Hans A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - "That is illogical, Captain!" : the debugging support tool spock for answer-set programs ; system description Y1 - 2007 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Pearce, David A1 - Sarsakov, Vladimir A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. A1 - Tompits, Hans A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - A polynomial translation of logic programs with nested expressions into disjunctive logic programs : preliminary report Y1 - 2002 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - Answer set programming unleashed! JF - Künstliche Intelligenz N2 - Answer Set Programming faces an increasing popularity for problem solving in various domains. While its modeling language allows us to express many complex problems in an easy way, its solving technology enables their effective resolution. In what follows, we detail some of the key factors of its success. Answer Set Programming [ASP; Brewka et al. Commun ACM 54(12):92–103, (2011)] is seeing a rapid proliferation in academia and industry due to its easy and flexible way to model and solve knowledge-intense combinatorial (optimization) problems. To this end, ASP offers a high-level modeling language paired with high-performance solving technology. As a result, ASP systems provide out-off-the-box, general-purpose search engines that allow for enumerating (optimal) solutions. They are represented as answer sets, each being a set of atoms representing a solution. The declarative approach of ASP allows a user to concentrate on a problem’s specification rather than the computational means to solve it. This makes ASP a prime candidate for rapid prototyping and an attractive tool for teaching key AI techniques since complex problems can be expressed in a succinct and elaboration tolerant way. This is eased by the tuning of ASP’s modeling language to knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR). The resulting impact is nicely reflected by a growing range of successful applications of ASP [Erdem et al. AI Mag 37(3):53–68, 2016; Falkner et al. Industrial applications of answer set programming. K++nstliche Intelligenz (2018)] Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-018-0550-z SN - 0933-1875 SN - 1610-1987 VL - 32 IS - 2-3 SP - 105 EP - 108 PB - Springer CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - GEN A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - Special issue on answer set programming T2 - Künstliche Intelligenz Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-018-0554-8 SN - 0933-1875 SN - 1610-1987 VL - 32 IS - 2-3 SP - 101 EP - 103 PB - Springer CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Besnard, Philippe A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. A1 - Tompits, Hans A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - Paraconsistent reasoning via quantified boolean formulas : Part II: Circumscribing inconsistent theories Y1 - 2003 SN - 3-540- 409494-5 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Delgrande, James A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. A1 - Tompits, Hans A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - A model-theoretic approach to belief change in answer set programming JF - ACM transactions on computational logic N2 - We address the problem of belief change in (nonmonotonic) logic programming under answer set semantics. Our formal techniques are analogous to those of distance-based belief revision in propositional logic. In particular, we build upon the model theory of logic programs furnished by SE interpretations, where an SE interpretation is a model of a logic program in the same way that a classical interpretation is a model of a propositional formula. Hence we extend techniques from the area of belief revision based on distance between models to belief change in logic programs. We first consider belief revision: for logic programs P and Q, the goal is to determine a program R that corresponds to the revision of P by Q, denoted P * Q. We investigate several operators, including (logic program) expansion and two revision operators based on the distance between the SE models of logic programs. It proves to be the case that expansion is an interesting operator in its own right, unlike in classical belief revision where it is relatively uninteresting. Expansion and revision are shown to satisfy a suite of interesting properties; in particular, our revision operators satisfy all or nearly all of the AGM postulates for revision. We next consider approaches for merging a set of logic programs, P-1,...,P-n. Again, our formal techniques are based on notions of relative distance between the SE models of the logic programs. Two approaches are examined. The first informally selects for each program P-i those models of P-i that vary the least from models of the other programs. The second approach informally selects those models of a program P-0 that are closest to the models of programs P-1,...,P-n. In this case, P-0 can be thought of as a set of database integrity constraints. We examine these operators with regards to how they satisfy relevant postulate sets. Last, we present encodings for computing the revision as well as the merging of logic programs within the same logic programming framework. This gives rise to a direct implementation of our approach in terms of off-the-shelf answer set solvers. These encodings also reflect the fact that our change operators do not increase the complexity of the base formalism. KW - Theory KW - Answer set programming KW - belief revision KW - belief merging KW - program encodings KW - strong equivalence Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1145/2480759.2480766 SN - 1529-3785 VL - 14 IS - 2 PB - Association for Computing Machinery CY - New York ER -