TY - GEN A1 - Banbara, Mutsunori A1 - Soh, Takehide A1 - Tamura, Naoyuki A1 - Inoue, Katsumi A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. T1 - Answer set programming as a modeling language for course timetabling T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - The course timetabling problem can be generally defined as the task of assigning a number of lectures to a limited set of timeslots and rooms, subject to a given set of hard and soft constraints. The modeling language for course timetabling is required to be expressive enough to specify a wide variety of soft constraints and objective functions. Furthermore, the resulting encoding is required to be extensible for capturing new constraints and for switching them between hard and soft, and to be flexible enough to deal with different formulations. In this paper, we propose to make effective use of ASP as a modeling language for course timetabling. We show that our ASP-based approach can naturally satisfy the above requirements, through an ASP encoding of the curriculum-based course timetabling problem proposed in the third track of the second international timetabling competition (ITC-2007). Our encoding is compact and human-readable, since each constraint is individually expressed by either one or two rules. Each hard constraint is expressed by using integrity constraints and aggregates of ASP. Each soft constraint S is expressed by rules in which the head is the form of penalty (S, V, C), and a violation V and its penalty cost C are detected and calculated respectively in the body. We carried out experiments on four different benchmark sets with five different formulations. We succeeded either in improving the bounds or producing the same bounds for many combinations of problem instances and formulations, compared with the previous best known bounds. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe - 594 KW - answer set programming KW - educational timetabling KW - course timetabling Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-415469 SN - 1866-8372 IS - 594 SP - 783 EP - 798 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Dimopoulos, Yannis A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Lühne, Patrick A1 - Romero Davila, Javier A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. T1 - plasp 3 BT - Towards Effective ASP Planning JF - Theory and practice of logic programming N2 - We describe the new version of the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL)-to-Answer Set Programming (ASP) translator plasp. First, it widens the range of accepted PDDL features. Second, it contains novel planning encodings, some inspired by Satisfiability Testing (SAT) planning and others exploiting ASP features such as well-foundedness. All of them are designed for handling multivalued fluents in order to capture both PDDL as well as SAS planning formats. Third, enabled by multishot ASP solving, it offers advanced planning algorithms also borrowed from SAT planning. As a result, plasp provides us with an ASP-based framework for studying a variety of planning techniques in a uniform setting. Finally, we demonstrate in an empirical analysis that these techniques have a significant impact on the performance of ASP planning. KW - knowledge representation and nonmonotonic reasoning KW - technical notes and rapid communications KW - answer set programming KW - automated planning KW - action and change Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068418000583 SN - 1471-0684 SN - 1475-3081 VL - 19 IS - 3 SP - 477 EP - 504 PB - Cambridge Univ. Press CY - New York ER - TY - GEN A1 - Dworschak, Steve A1 - Grell, Susanne A1 - Nikiforova, Victoria J. A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. A1 - Selbig, Joachim T1 - Modeling biological networks by action languages via answer set programming T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - We describe an approach to modeling biological networks by action languages via answer set programming. To this end, we propose an action language for modeling biological networks, building on previous work by Baral et al. We introduce its syntax and semantics along with a translation into answer set programming, an efficient Boolean Constraint Programming Paradigm. Finally, we describe one of its applications, namely, the sulfur starvation response-pathway of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana and sketch the functionality of our system and its usage. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe - 843 KW - biological network model KW - action language KW - answer set programming Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-429846 SN - 1866-8372 IS - 843 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fandinno, Jorge T1 - Founded (auto)epistemic equilibrium logic satisfies epistemic splitting T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - In a recent line of research, two familiar concepts from logic programming semantics (unfounded sets and splitting) were extrapolated to the case of epistemic logic programs. The property of epistemic splitting provides a natural and modular way to understand programs without epistemic cycles but, surprisingly, was only fulfilled by Gelfond's original semantics (G91), among the many proposals in the literature. On the other hand, G91 may suffer from a kind of self-supported, unfounded derivations when epistemic cycles come into play. Recently, the absence of these derivations was also formalised as a property of epistemic semantics called foundedness. Moreover, a first semantics proved to satisfy foundedness was also proposed, the so-called Founded Autoepistemic Equilibrium Logic (FAEEL). In this paper, we prove that FAEEL also satisfies the epistemic splitting property something that, together with foundedness, was not fulfilled by any other approach up to date. To prove this result, we provide an alternative characterisation of FAEEL as a combination of G91 with a simpler logic we called Founded Epistemic Equilibrium Logic (FEEL), which is somehow an extrapolation of the stable model semantics to the modal logic S5. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe - 1060 KW - answer set programming KW - epistemic specifications KW - epistemic logic programs Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-469685 SN - 1866-8372 IS - 1060 SP - 671 EP - 687 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Fandinno, Jorge A1 - Laferriere, Francois A1 - Romero, Javier A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. A1 - Son, Tran Cao T1 - Planning with incomplete information in quantified answer set programming JF - Theory and practice of logic programming N2 - We present a general approach to planning with incomplete information in Answer Set Programming (ASP). More precisely, we consider the problems of conformant and conditional planning with sensing actions and assumptions. We represent planning problems using a simple formalism where logic programs describe the transition function between states, the initial states and the goal states. For solving planning problems, we use Quantified Answer Set Programming (QASP), an extension of ASP with existential and universal quantifiers over atoms that is analogous to Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBFs). We define the language of quantified logic programs and use it to represent the solutions different variants of conformant and conditional planning. On the practical side, we present a translation-based QASP solver that converts quantified logic programs into QBFs and then executes a QBF solver, and we evaluate experimentally the approach on conformant and conditional planning benchmarks. KW - answer set programming KW - planning KW - quantified logics Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068421000259 SN - 1471-0684 SN - 1475-3081 VL - 21 IS - 5 SP - 663 EP - 679 PB - Cambridge University Press CY - Cambridge ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fichte, Johannes Klaus A1 - Truszczynski, Miroslaw A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - Dual-normal logic programs BT - the forgotten class T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - Disjunctive Answer Set Programming is a powerful declarative programming paradigm with complexity beyond NP. Identifying classes of programs for which the consistency problem is in NP is of interest from the theoretical standpoint and can potentially lead to improvements in the design of answer set programming solvers. One of such classes consists of dual-normal programs, where the number of positive body atoms in proper rules is at most one. Unlike other classes of programs, dual-normal programs have received little attention so far. In this paper we study this class. We relate dual-normal programs to propositional theories and to normal programs by presenting several inter-translations. With the translation from dual-normal to normal programs at hand, we introduce the novel class of body-cycle free programs, which are in many respects dual to head-cycle free programs. We establish the expressive power of dual-normal programs in terms of SE- and UE-models, and compare them to normal programs. We also discuss the complexity of deciding whether dual-normal programs are strongly and uniformly equivalent. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe - 585 KW - answer set programming KW - classes of logic programs KW - strong and uniform equivalence KW - propositional satisfiability Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-414490 SN - 1866-8372 IS - 585 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Kaminski, Roland A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. T1 - Complex optimization in answer set programming T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - Preference handling and optimization are indispensable means for addressing nontrivial applications in Answer Set Programming (ASP). However, their implementation becomes difficult whenever they bring about a significant increase in computational complexity. As a consequence, existing ASP systems do not offer complex optimization capacities, supporting, for instance, inclusion-based minimization or Pareto efficiency. Rather, such complex criteria are typically addressed by resorting to dedicated modeling techniques, like saturation. Unlike the ease of common ASP modeling, however, these techniques are rather involved and hardly usable by ASP laymen. We address this problem by developing a general implementation technique by means of meta-prpogramming, thus reusing existing ASP systems to capture various forms of qualitative preferences among answer sets. In this way, complex preferences and optimization capacities become readily available for ASP applications. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe - 554 KW - answer set programming KW - preference handling KW - complex optimization KW - meta-programming Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-412436 SN - 1866-8372 IS - 554 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. A1 - Thiele, Sven A1 - Veber, Philippe T1 - Detecting inconsistencies in large biological networks with answer set programming T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - We introduce an approach to detecting inconsistencies in large biological networks by using answer set programming. To this end, we build upon a recently proposed notion of consistency between biochemical/genetic reactions and high-throughput profiles of cell activity. We then present an approach based on answer set programming to check the consistency of large-scale data sets. Moreover, we extend this methodology to provide explanations for inconsistencies by determining minimal representations of conflicts. In practice, this can be used to identify unreliable data or to indicate missing reactions. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe - 561 KW - answer set programming KW - bioinformatics KW - consistency KW - diagnosis Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-412467 SN - 1866-8372 IS - 561 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Hoos, Holger A1 - Kaminski, Roland A1 - Lindauer, Marius A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. T1 - aspeed BT - solver scheduling via answer set programming T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - Although Boolean Constraint Technology has made tremendous progress over the last decade, the efficacy of state-of-the-art solvers is known to vary considerably across different types of problem instances, and is known to depend strongly on algorithm parameters. This problem was addressed by means of a simple, yet effective approach using handmade, uniform, and unordered schedules of multiple solvers in ppfolio, which showed very impressive performance in the 2011 Satisfiability Testing (SAT) Competition. Inspired by this, we take advantage of the modeling and solving capacities of Answer Set Programming (ASP) to automatically determine more refined, that is, nonuniform and ordered solver schedules from the existing benchmarking data. We begin by formulating the determination of such schedules as multi-criteria optimization problems and provide corresponding ASP encodings. The resulting encodings are easily customizable for different settings, and the computation of optimum schedules can mostly be done in the blink of an eye, even when dealing with large runtime data sets stemming from many solvers on hundreds to thousands of instances. Also, the fact that our approach can be customized easily enabled us to swiftly adapt it to generate parallel schedules for multi-processor machines. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe - 588 KW - algorithm schedules KW - answer set programming KW - portfolio-based solving Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-414743 SN - 1866-8372 IS - 588 ER - TY - THES A1 - Konczak, Kathrin T1 - Preferences in answer set programming T1 - Präferenzen in der Antwortmengenprogrammierung N2 - Answer Set Programming (ASP) emerged in the late 1990s as a new logic programming paradigm, having its roots in nonmonotonic reasoning, deductive databases, and logic programming with negation as failure. The basic idea of ASP is to represent a computational problem as a logic program whose answer sets correspond to solutions, and then to use an answer set solver for finding answer sets of the program. ASP is particularly suited for solving NP-complete search problems. Among these, we find applications to product configuration, diagnosis, and graph-theoretical problems, e.g. finding Hamiltonian cycles. On different lines of ASP research, many extensions of the basic formalism have been proposed. The most intensively studied one is the modelling of preferences in ASP. They constitute a natural and effective way of selecting preferred solutions among a plethora of solutions for a problem. For example, preferences have been successfully used for timetabling, auctioning, and product configuration. In this thesis, we concentrate on preferences within answer set programming. Among several formalisms and semantics for preference handling in ASP, we concentrate on ordered logic programs with the underlying D-, W-, and B-semantics. In this setting, preferences are defined among rules of a logic program. They select preferred answer sets among (standard) answer sets of the underlying logic program. Up to now, those preferred answer sets have been computed either via a compilation method or by meta-interpretation. Hence, the question comes up, whether and how preferences can be integrated into an existing ASP solver. To solve this question, we develop an operational graph-based framework for the computation of answer sets of logic programs. Then, we integrate preferences into this operational approach. We empirically observe that our integrative approach performs in most cases better than the compilation method or meta-interpretation. Another research issue in ASP are optimization methods that remove redundancies, as also found in database query optimizers. For these purposes, the rather recently suggested notion of strong equivalence for ASP can be used. If a program is strongly equivalent to a subprogram of itself, then one can always use the subprogram instead of the original program, a technique which serves as an effective optimization method. Up to now, strong equivalence has not been considered for logic programs with preferences. In this thesis, we tackle this issue and generalize the notion of strong equivalence to ordered logic programs. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for the strong equivalence of two ordered logic programs. Furthermore, we provide program transformations for ordered logic programs and show in how far preferences can be simplified. Finally, we present two new applications for preferences within answer set programming. First, we define new procedures for group decision making, which we apply to the problem of scheduling a group meeting. As a second new application, we reconstruct a linguistic problem appearing in German dialects within ASP. Regarding linguistic studies, there is an ongoing debate about how unique the rule systems of language are in human cognition. The reconstruction of grammatical regularities with tools from computer science has consequences for this debate: if grammars can be modelled this way, then they share core properties with other non-linguistic rule systems. N2 - Die Antwortmengenprogrammierung entwickelte sich in den späten 90er Jahren als neues Paradigma der logischen Programmierung und ist in den Gebieten des nicht-monotonen Schließens und der deduktiven Datenbanken verwurzelt. Dabei wird eine Problemstellung als logisches Programm repräsentiert, dessen Lösungen, die so genannten Antwortmengen, genau den Lösungen des ursprünglichen Problems entsprechen. Die Antwortmengenprogrammierung bildet ein geeignetes Fundament zur Repräsentation und zum Lösen von Entscheidungs- und Suchproblemen in der Komplexitätsklasse NP. Anwendungen finden wir unter anderem in der Produktkonfiguration, Diagnose und bei graphen-theoretischen Problemen, z.B. der Suche nach Hamiltonschen Kreisen. In den letzten Jahren wurden viele Erweiterungen der Antwortmengenprogrammierung betrachtet. Die am meisten untersuchte Erweiterung ist die Modellierung von Präferenzen. Diese bilden eine natürliche und effektive Möglichkeit, unter einer Vielzahl von Lösungen eines Problems bevorzugte Lösungen zu selektieren. Präferenzen finden beispielsweise in der Stundenplanung, bei Auktionen und bei Produktkonfigurationen ihre Anwendung. Der Schwerpunkt dieser Arbeit liegt in der Modellierung, Implementierung und Anwendung von Präferenzen in der Antwortmengenprogrammierung. Da es verschiedene Ansätze gibt, um Präferenzen darzustellen, konzentrieren wir uns auf geordnete logische Programme, wobei Präferenzen als partielle Ordnung der Regeln eines logischen Programms ausgedrückt werden. Dabei betrachten wir drei verschiedene Semantiken zur Interpretation dieser Präferenzen. Im Vorfeld wurden für diese Semantiken die bevorzugten Antwortmengen durch einen Compiler oder durch Meta-Interpretation berechnet. Da Präferenzen Lösungen selektieren, stellt sich die Frage, ob es möglich ist, diese direkt in den Berechnungsprozeß von präferenzierten Antwortmengen zu integrieren, so dass die bevorzugten Antwortmengen ohne Zwischenschritte berechnet werden können. Dazu entwickeln wir zuerst ein auf Graphen basierendes Gerüst zur Berechnung von Antwortmengen. Anschließend werden wir darin Präferenzen integrieren, so dass bevorzugte Antwortmengen ohne Compiler oder Meta-Interpretation berechnet werden. Es stellt sich heraus, dass die integrative Methode auf den meisten betrachteten Problemklassen wesentlich leistungsfähiger ist als der Compiler oder Meta-Interpretation. Ein weiterer Schwerpunkt dieser Arbeit liegt in der Frage, inwieweit sich geordnete logische Programme vereinfachen lassen. Dazu steht die Methodik der strengen Äquivalenz von logischen Programmen zur Verfügung. Wenn ein logisches Programm streng äquivalent zu einem seiner Teilprogramme ist, so kann man dieses durch das entsprechende Teilprogramm ersetzen, ohne dass sich die zugrunde liegende Semantik ändert. Bisher wurden strenge Äquivalenzen nicht für logische Programme mit Präferenzen untersucht. In dieser Arbeit definieren wir erstmalig strenge Äquivalenzen für geordnete logische Programme. Wir geben notwendige und hinreichende Bedingungen für die strenge Äquivalenz zweier geordneter logischer Programme an. Des Weiteren werden wir auch die Frage beantworten, inwieweit geordnete logische Programme und deren Präferenzstrukturen vereinfacht werden können. Abschließend präsentieren wir zwei neue Anwendungsbereiche von Präferenzen in der Antwortmengenprogrammierung. Zuerst definieren wir neue Prozeduren zur Entscheidungsfindung innerhalb von Gruppenprozessen. Diese integrieren wir anschließend in das Problem der Planung eines Treffens für eine Gruppe. Als zweite neue Anwendung rekonstruieren wir mit Hilfe der Antwortmengenprogrammierung eine linguistische Problemstellung, die in deutschen Dialekten auftritt. Momentan wird im Bereich der Linguistik darüber diskutiert, ob Regelsysteme von (menschlichen) Sprachen einzigartig sind oder nicht. Die Rekonstruktion von grammatikalischen Regularitäten mit Werkzeugen aus der Informatik erlaubt die Unterstützung der These, dass linguistische Regelsysteme Gemeinsamkeiten zu anderen nicht-linguistischen Regelsystemen besitzen. KW - Präferenzen KW - Antwortmengenprogrammierung KW - logische Programmierung KW - Künstliche Intelligenz KW - preferences KW - priorities KW - answer set programming KW - logic programming KW - artificial intelligence Y1 - 2007 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-12058 ER -