TY - JOUR A1 - Urton, Karolina A1 - Wilbert, Jürgen A1 - Hennemann, Thomas T1 - Die Einstellung zur Integration und die Selbstwirksamkeit von Lehrkräften JF - Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht : Zeitschrift für Forschung und Praxis N2 - Die vorliegende Studie untersucht an einer Stichprobe integrativ tätiger Grundschullehrkräfte (N = 618) den Zusammenhang zwischen der individuellen und kollektiven Selbstwirksamkeit sowie den beruflichen Erfahrungen einerseits und der Einstellung zur Integration andererseits. Die Ergebnisse der Untersuchung zeigen, dass sich die Lehrerkollegien (N = 67) hinsichtlich der Einstellung zur Integration, der individuellen und kollektiven Selbstwirksamkeit sowie der beruflichen Erfahrung im Unterrichten von Kindern mit sonderpädagogischem Förderbedarf unterscheiden. Entsprechend unserer Annahmen zeigt sich in einer Mehrebenenanalyse eine bedeutsame Aufklärung der Varianz der Einstellung zur Integration durch die individuelle und kollektive Selbstwirksamkeit sowie die berufliche Erfahrung. KW - Attitudes towards inclusion KW - self-efficacy KW - collective efficacy KW - teaching experience Y1 - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.2378/peu2015.art09d SN - 0342-183X VL - 62 IS - 2 SP - 147 EP - 157 PB - Reinhardt CY - München ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kulawiak, Pawel R. A1 - Urton, Karolina A1 - Krull, Johanna A1 - Hennemann, Thomas A1 - Wilbert, Jürgen T1 - Internalizing Behavior of Sociometrically Neglected Students in Inclusive Primary Classrooms BT - A Methodological Issue? JF - frontiers in Education N2 - Internalizing problems in children belong to the category of special educational needs called emotional and behavioral difficulties. Recent decades have witnessed a critical discussion about whether children and adolescents experiencing internalizing problems are at risk of being sociometrically neglected (neither liked nor disliked by their peers). Previous studies have shown evidence both for and against the association between internalizing problems and neglected sociometric status. These contradictory results may be due to the following methodological aspects: (1) shortcomings of sociometric status classification methods (arbitrariness of the sociometric classification rules) and (2) different operationalizations of internalizing problems (broadband and narrowband dimensions of behavior). The aim of the present study is to investigate empirically whether and to what extent these methodological aspects lead to contradictory results on the internalizing behavior of neglected students. This question is investigated using a sample of students (N = 2334) in German inclusive primary schools. The systematic investigation presented here provides initial indications that the various methodological approaches can lead to conflicting results. The contradictory results are not only due to the application of different sociometric classification methods, but also to different operationalizations of internalizing behavior (narrowband and broadband scales). Earlier contradictory evidence on the internalizing behavior of neglected students must therefore be seen in a different light: the reasons for previously conflicting results may actually be methodological. Based on the results, conclusions are drawn as to how methodological aspects can be given more consideration in sociometric research on internalizing behavior. KW - special educational needs KW - inclusive education KW - social inclusion KW - sociometric status KW - sociometric neglect KW - internalizing behavior KW - broadband and narrowband dimensions of behavior Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00032 SN - 2504-284X VL - 5 PB - Frontiers Media CY - Lausanne ER - TY - GEN A1 - Kulawiak, Pawel R. A1 - Urton, Karolina A1 - Krull, Johanna A1 - Hennemann, Thomas A1 - Wilbert, Jürgen T1 - Internalizing Behavior of Sociometrically Neglected Students in Inclusive Primary Classrooms BT - A Methodological Issue? T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - Internalizing problems in children belong to the category of special educational needs called emotional and behavioral difficulties. Recent decades have witnessed a critical discussion about whether children and adolescents experiencing internalizing problems are at risk of being sociometrically neglected (neither liked nor disliked by their peers). Previous studies have shown evidence both for and against the association between internalizing problems and neglected sociometric status. These contradictory results may be due to the following methodological aspects: (1) shortcomings of sociometric status classification methods (arbitrariness of the sociometric classification rules) and (2) different operationalizations of internalizing problems (broadband and narrowband dimensions of behavior). The aim of the present study is to investigate empirically whether and to what extent these methodological aspects lead to contradictory results on the internalizing behavior of neglected students. This question is investigated using a sample of students (N = 2334) in German inclusive primary schools. The systematic investigation presented here provides initial indications that the various methodological approaches can lead to conflicting results. The contradictory results are not only due to the application of different sociometric classification methods, but also to different operationalizations of internalizing behavior (narrowband and broadband scales). Earlier contradictory evidence on the internalizing behavior of neglected students must therefore be seen in a different light: the reasons for previously conflicting results may actually be methodological. Based on the results, conclusions are drawn as to how methodological aspects can be given more consideration in sociometric research on internalizing behavior. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe - 652 KW - special educational needs KW - inclusive education KW - social inclusion KW - sociometric status KW - sociometric neglect KW - internalizing behavior KW - broadband and narrowband dimensions of behavior Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-474525 SN - 1866-8364 IS - 652 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Wilbert, Jürgen A1 - Urton, Karolina A1 - Krull, Johanna A1 - Kulawiak, Pawel R. A1 - Schwalbe, Anja A1 - Hennemann, Thomas T1 - Teachers' accuracy in estimating social inclusion of students with and without special educational needs JF - Frontiers in education N2 - It is unclear to what extent teachers can accurately assess the social inclusion of their students with and without SEN. The study aims to shed light on these desiderata. Students (N = 1.644) with SEN (learning, behavior, and language problems) and without SEN and their teachers (N = 79) participated in the study. Sociometric peer nominations, students' self-perceived social inclusion, and teachers' assessments regarding students' social inclusion and self-perceived social inclusion were administered. The results suggest that teachers are moderately accurate in identifying social acceptance and social rejection, while accuracy is low when assessing students' self-perceived social inclusion. That said, rating accuracy varied strongly between teachers, ranging from no agreement to a perfect concordance. Teachers seem to be more accurate in estimating the social acceptance of students with learning problems. The results emphasize the importance of differentiating between various social inclusion criteria (i.e., students' self-report vs. peer nominations) and accounting for inter-individual differences in teachers' rating accuracy. KW - judgement accuracy KW - social inclusion KW - special educational needs KW - teacher KW - inclusive education KW - sociometry Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.598330 SN - 2504-284X VL - 5 PB - Frontiers Media CY - Lausanne ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Krull, Johanna A1 - Wilbert, Jürgen A1 - Hennemann, Thomas T1 - Does social exclusion by classmates lead to behaviour problems and learning difficulties or vice versa? BT - a cross-lagged panel analysis JF - European journal of special needs education N2 - Social participation of pupils with special educational needs (SEN) is a central topic in the current inclusion debate. Numerous studies have shown that the risk of social exclusion is considerably higher for children with SEN compared to their peers without SEN, especially for pupils with behaviour problems (BP) or learning difficulties (LD). Since most of these studies are based on cross-sectional designs, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the direction of the effects. This leads to the question to what extent BP and LD have an impact on pupils’ social position in the class and, vice versa, to what extent the social position has an effect on the development of BP and LD. To address these questions, we analysed sociometric data of 1244 primary school children. È A cross-lagged panel analysis was conducted. The results indicate that BP and LD in 1st grade lead to significantly less social acceptance by peers in 2nd grade but do not predict significantly higher social rejection. A directed influence of LD or BP on a higher social rejection cannot be found. Conversely, neither social acceptance nor social rejection at 1st grade has an influence on the development of BP or LD at grade two. KW - Inclusive education KW - social exclusion KW - emotional behaviour disorders KW - learning disabilities KW - cross-lagged panel design KW - primary school Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2018.1424780 SN - 0885-6257 SN - 1469-591X VL - 33 IS - 2 SP - 235 EP - 253 PB - Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group CY - Abingdon ER -