TY - JOUR A1 - Busch, Verena A1 - Klaus, Valentin Helmut A1 - Schaefer, Deborah A1 - Prati, Daniel A1 - Boch, Steffen A1 - Müller, Jörg A1 - Chiste, Melanie A1 - Mody, Karsten A1 - Blüthgen, Nico A1 - Fischer, Markus A1 - Hölzel, Norbert A1 - Kleinebecker, Till T1 - Will I stay or will I go? Plant species-specific response and tolerance to high land-use intensity in temperate grassland ecosystems JF - Journal of vegetation science KW - community composition KW - ecological strategies KW - Ellenberg indicator values KW - land-use intensity niche KW - plant functional traits KW - species-specific niche breadth KW - species-specific niche optima KW - temperate grasslands KW - vegetation dynamics Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12749 SN - 1100-9233 SN - 1654-1103 VL - 30 IS - 4 SP - 674 EP - 686 PB - Wiley CY - Hoboken ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Plummer, Ashley A1 - Mugele, Hendrik A1 - Steffen, Kathrin A1 - Stoll, Josefine A1 - Mayer, Frank A1 - Müller, Juliane T1 - General versus sports-specific injury prevention programs in athletes BT - A systematic review on the effects on performance JF - PLoS ONE N2 - Introduction Injury prevention programs (IPPs) are an inherent part of training in recreational and professional sports. Providing performance-enhancing benefits in addition to injury prevention may help adjust coaches and athletes’ attitudes towards implementation of injury prevention into daily routine. Conventional thinking by players and coaches alike seems to suggest that IPPs need to be specific to one’s sport to allow for performance enhancement. The systematic literature review aims to firstly determine the IPPs nature of exercises and whether they are specific to the sport or based on general conditioning. Secondly, can they demonstrate whether general, sports-specific or even mixed IPPs improve key performance indicators with the aim to better facilitate long-term implementation of these programs? Methods PubMed and Web of Science were electronically searched throughout March 2018. The inclusion criteria were randomized control trials, publication dates between Jan 2006 and Feb 2018, athletes (11–45 years), injury prevention programs and included predefined performance measures that could be categorized into balance, power, strength, speed/agility and endurance. The methodological quality of included articles was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration assessment tools. Results Of 6619 initial findings, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. In addition, reference lists unearthed a further 6 studies, making a total of 28. Nine studies used sports specific IPPs, eleven general and eight mixed prevention strategies. Overall, general programs ranged from 29–57% in their effectiveness across performance outcomes. Mixed IPPs improved in 80% balance outcomes but only 20–44% in others. Sports-specific programs led to larger scale improvements in balance (66%), power (83%), strength (75%), and speed/agility (62%). Conclusion Sports-specific IPPs have the strongest influence on most performance indices based on the significant improvement versus control groups. Other factors such as intensity, technical execution and compliance should be accounted for in future investigations in addition to exercise modality. Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221346 SN - 1932-6203 VL - 14 IS - 8 PB - PLOS 1 CY - San Francisco ER - TY - GEN A1 - Plummer, Ashley A1 - Mugele, Hendrik A1 - Steffen, Kathrin A1 - Stoll, Josefine A1 - Mayer, Frank A1 - Müller, Juliane T1 - General versus sports-specific injury prevention programs in athletes BT - A systematic review on the effects on performance T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - Introduction Injury prevention programs (IPPs) are an inherent part of training in recreational and professional sports. Providing performance-enhancing benefits in addition to injury prevention may help adjust coaches and athletes’ attitudes towards implementation of injury prevention into daily routine. Conventional thinking by players and coaches alike seems to suggest that IPPs need to be specific to one’s sport to allow for performance enhancement. The systematic literature review aims to firstly determine the IPPs nature of exercises and whether they are specific to the sport or based on general conditioning. Secondly, can they demonstrate whether general, sports-specific or even mixed IPPs improve key performance indicators with the aim to better facilitate long-term implementation of these programs? Methods PubMed and Web of Science were electronically searched throughout March 2018. The inclusion criteria were randomized control trials, publication dates between Jan 2006 and Feb 2018, athletes (11–45 years), injury prevention programs and included predefined performance measures that could be categorized into balance, power, strength, speed/agility and endurance. The methodological quality of included articles was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration assessment tools. Results Of 6619 initial findings, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. In addition, reference lists unearthed a further 6 studies, making a total of 28. Nine studies used sports specific IPPs, eleven general and eight mixed prevention strategies. Overall, general programs ranged from 29–57% in their effectiveness across performance outcomes. Mixed IPPs improved in 80% balance outcomes but only 20–44% in others. Sports-specific programs led to larger scale improvements in balance (66%), power (83%), strength (75%), and speed/agility (62%). Conclusion Sports-specific IPPs have the strongest influence on most performance indices based on the significant improvement versus control groups. Other factors such as intensity, technical execution and compliance should be accounted for in future investigations in addition to exercise modality. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe - 591 Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-441131 SN - 1866-8364 IS - 591 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Appiah-Dwomoh, Edem Korkor A1 - Müller, Steffen A1 - Mayer, Frank T1 - Is there an association between variables of static and dynamic postural control in adolescent athletes with back pain? T1 - Gibt es einen Zusammenhang zwischen Variablen der statischen und dynamischen posturalen Kontrolle bei Nachwuchsathleten mit Rückenschmerzen? JF - German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research N2 - An association between static and dynamic postural control exists in adults with back pain. We aimed to determine whether this association also exists in adolescent athletes with the same condition. In all, 128 athletes with and without back pain performed three measurements of 15s of static (one-legged stance) and dynamic (star excursion balance test) postural control tests. All subjects and amatched subgroup of athletes with and without back pain were analyzed. The smallest center of pressure mediolateral and anterior-posterior displacements (mm) and normalized highest reach distance were the outcome measures. No association was found between variables of the static and dynamic tests for all subjects and the matched group with and without back pain. The control of static and dynamic posture in adolescent athletes with and without back pain might not be related. N2 - Bei Erwachsenen mit Rückenschmerzen besteht ein Zusammenhang zwischen statischer und dynamischer posturaler Kontrolle. Ziel der Studie war es zu untersuchen, ob dieser Zusammenhang auch bei Nachwuchsathleten mit Rückenschmerzen nachweisbar ist. Insgesamt 128 Nachwuchsathleten mit oder ohne Rückenschmerzen führten je 3 Messungen à 15 s eines statischen (einbeiniger Standtest) bzw. dynamischen („star excursion balance test“ [SEBT]) posturalen Kontrolltests durch. In die Auswertung wurden sowohl die gesamte Stichprobe als auch eine gematchte Untergruppe einbezogen. Zielparameter waren der kleinste mediolaterale und anterior-posteriore Schwankungsweg im Einbeinstand (mm) und die normierte maximal erreichte Distanz im SEBT. Es wurden keine Zusammenhänge zwischen Variablen der statischen und dynamischen Tests für alle Studienteilnehmer und der gematchten Untergruppe mit und ohne Rückenschmerzen festgestellt. Obwohl ein Zusammenhang zwischen statischer und dynamischer posturaler Kontrolle angenommen wird, konnte dieser bei Nachwuchsathleten mit oder ohne Rückenschmerzen nicht nachgewiesen werden. KW - Postural control KW - Adolescent athletes KW - Back pain KW - One-legged stance KW - Star excursion balance test KW - Posturale Kontrolle KW - Nachwuchsathleten KW - Rückenschmerzen KW - Einbeiniger Standtest Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-019-00573-6 SN - 2509-3142 SN - 2509-3150 VL - 49 IS - 2 SP - 150 EP - 155 PB - Springer CY - New York ER -