TY - JOUR A1 - Haßler, Gerda T1 - A Fala : normalización tardía e identidad cultural Y1 - 2006 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Haßler, Gerda T1 - Acknowlegements Y1 - 2011 SN - 978-90-272-4606-6 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Haßler, Gerda T1 - Adverbal expression of aspectuality and interaction with perfective and imperfective verbs JF - Russian Grammar: System – Usus – Variation/Русская грамматика: Cистема – узус – варьирование N2 - This paper intends to explore the interaction between aspect and lexical means, in this case temporal adverbials, in the bounding of representations of situations. First, the theoretical basis is outlined, followed by the results of a corpus analysis of coccurrences with adverbs that limit situations. The term situation encompasses all representable processes, states, events, or actions. Finally, some theoretical conclusions are drawn concerning the cognitive category of bounding, using the example of aspectuality. The imperfective verb forms maintain their aspectuality in delimiting connections with adverbs, resulting in a complex, multi-dimensional aspectuality. In nongrammaticalized forms, such as lexical markers, the speaker is free to make a temporal localization or an aspectual perspective. Lexical expressions can make temporal and aspect markings even more precisely and clearly than tenses. They can also limit or extend situations and thus express aspect. Aspectuality thus presents itself as a compositional category, in which external bounding and the internal representation of a course of action or development can interact. N2 - Данная статья ставит своей целью исследовать взаимодействие между видом глагола и лексическими средствами, в данном случае временными наречиями, в ограни чении репрезентаций ситуаций. После изложения теоретических основ исследования приводятся результаты корпусного анализа совпадений грамматического вида с наречиями, ограничивающими ситуации. Термин “ситуация” в статье охватывает все репрезен- тируемые процессы, состояния, события или действия. В заключении делаются некоторые теоретические выводы относительно когнитивной категории ограничения на примере аспектуальности. Формы несовершенного вида сохраняют свою изначальную аспектуальность при разграничении связей с наречиями, что приводит к сложной, много-мерной аспектуальности. В неграмматикализованных формах, таких как лексические маркеры, говорящий свободен в выборе временной локализации или аспектуальной перспективы. Лексические средства могут выражать временные и видовые нюансы даже более точно и четко, чем времена. Они также могут ограничивать или расширять ситуации и, таким образом, выражать аспектуальность. Таким образом, аспектуальность представ- ляется как композиционная категория, в которой могут взаимодействовать внешнее ограничение и внутреннее представление развития действия. T2 - Адвербиальное выражение аспектуальности и его взаимодействие с глаголами совершенного и несовершенного вида Y1 - 2021 SN - 978-3-631-87748-7 SP - 219 EP - 234 PB - Lang CY - Berlin ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Haßler, Gerda T1 - Alarcos Llorach, Emilio (1922-1998) Y1 - 2006 SN - 0-08-044299-4 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Haßler, Gerda T1 - Analogy : the history of a concept and a term from the 17th to the 19th century Y1 - 2007 SN - 978-90-272-4603-5 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Haßler, Gerda ED - Rico, Christophe ED - Kirtchuk, Pablo T1 - Arbitrariness, Motivation and Value of the Linguistic Sign: Saussurean and Post-Saussurean Perspectives T2 - The Cours de Linguistique Générale Revisited: 1916–2016. Saussure et le Cours de linguistique générale cent ans après N2 - In 1916, three years after the death of Ferdinand de Saussure, the Cours de linguistique générale (CLG) was published in Geneva. This foundational work marked the beginning of a discipline that has profoundly influenced the development of the humanities ever since. What sources influenced the CLG? Do the main concepts of this seminal work have the same validity today as they did in 1916? How has the recent development of language sciences influenced its reception? How does this text account for meaning and communication within the context of speech (parole)? In order to explore these questions, one hundred years after the publication of Ferdinand de Saussure's seminal work on General Linguistics, Polis--The Jerusalem Institute of Languages and Humanities held an interdisciplinary conference that gathered 14 international specialists from various disciplines: general linguistics, pragmatics, philology, dialectology, translation studies, terminology, and philosophy. The first section of this work reassesses the sources and further influence of the CLG on modern linguistics. The book's second part discusses some of the main concepts and dichotomies of the CLG (constitution of the linguistic method, arbitrariness of sign, main dichotomies), under the light of both the original manuscripts and recent linguistic developments (influence of dialectology or translation studies). The third and last part handles the pragmatic and semantic dimensions of language, suggesting new avenues of reflection that could not yet have been fully taken into account within the CLG itself. Uniting 14 scholarly articles, together with an introduction, an index locorum and a collective bibliography, this volume hopes to encourage readers with its reappraisal and reinterpretation of Saussure's ground-breaking work and thus contribute to the future development of linguistics and humanities. Y1 - 2018 SN - 978-9-65769-811-2 SP - 61 EP - 87 PB - Polis Institute Press CY - Jerusalem ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Haßler, Gerda T1 - Aspectual periphrases in Romance languages in contact with the English progressive form T2 - Linguistic Hybridity. Contact-induced and cognitively motivated grammaticalization and lexicalization processes in Romance Languages Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-8253-4936-3 SN - 978-3-8253-8562-0 SP - 215 EP - 229 PB - Universitätsverlag Winter CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Haßler, Gerda T1 - Beauzée, Nicolas (1717-1789) Y1 - 2006 SN - 0-08-044299-4 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Haßler, Gerda ED - Brown, Keith T1 - Bello, Andrés (1781-1865) JF - Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics T2 - 14-Volume Set Y1 - 2006 SN - 0-08-044299-4 PB - Elsevier CY - Burlington ET - 2nd ed. ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Haßler, Gerda ED - Brown, Keith T1 - Brosses, Charles de (1709-1777) JF - Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics T2 - 14-Volume Set Y1 - 2006 SN - 0-08-044299-4 PB - Elsevier CY - Burlington ET - 2nd ed. ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Haßler, Gerda T1 - Butt, M. (Hrsg.), Time over matter: diachronic perspectives on morphosyntax; Stanford CSLI Publ., 2001 BT - Time over matter: diachronic perspectives on morphosyntax Y1 - 2002 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Haßler, Gerda T1 - Crosslinguistic and diachronic remarks on the grammaticalization of aspect in Romance languages : location and motion verbs Y1 - 2001 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Haßler, Gerda T1 - Degérando’s three prize essays and the shift in linguistic thought at the turn of the 19th century T2 - History of Linguistics 2014 : selected papers from the 13th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XIII), Vila Real, Portugal, 25–29 August 2014 (Studies in the History of the Language Sciences ; 126) N2 - Degérando started out from the views of the French ideologists on the relationship of language and thought, but increasingly distanced himself from them. This is already evident based on the choice of reference authors and also on the increasing emphasis on empirical research. His prize essays reflect the fundamental changes in linguistic thought during the late 18th century. He was successful in the competition of the Institut National (1797/1799) and with another essay at the Berlin Academy (1802). His main argument against Condillac and the ideologists is that empirical knowledge does not depend on signs. Therefore, the development of better languages will not improve this kind of human knowledge. Y1 - 2016 SN - 978-90-272-4617-2 SN - 0304-0720 SP - 149 EP - 160 PB - John Benjamins Publishing Company CY - Amsterdam, Philadelphia ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Haßler, Gerda T1 - Diversity of human languages and universals of thougth : an eigteenth-century debate in the Berlin Academy Y1 - 1999 SN - 90-272-4583-5 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Haßler, Gerda T1 - Epistemic modality and evidentiality and their determination on a deictic basis N2 - It has often been pointed out that there is some overlap between epistemic modality and evidentiality (Chafe & Nichols 1986, Cornillie 2007, De Haan 1999, Dendale & Tasmowski 2001, Plungian 2001, Squartini 2004). In this paper I would like to offer several reflections about the necessity of drawing a boundary between modality and evidentiality. Starting from the typological category of evidentiality - extended here for use in pragmatic studies - I will then explore demarcation problems in Romance languages, which lack grammaticalized forms for expressing evidentiality. The underlying premise of this paper is that evidentiality as marker of the origin of the speaker's knowledge stands in relation to the speaker's pragmatic stance. Because the perspective of the speaker is thus incorporated into the utterance, it seems appropriate to analyse the applicability of the deictic category. Finally, under the aspect of deixis, I shall attempt a demarcation between evidentiality and modality. Y1 - 2010 SN - 978-3-11-023433-6 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Haßler, Gerda T1 - Epistemic modality and evidentiality and their determination on a deictic basis : the case of Romance languages N2 - In recent years the category of evidentiality has come into use also for the description of Romance languages. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. In the following we will first describe the theoretical framework in which we use the category of evidentiality for the description of Romance languages. A key question to be elucidated here will be the determination of evidentiality as a deictic phenomenon. This will also be the basis for discussing the distinction between evidentiality and epistemic modality. Y1 - 2010 SN - 978-3-11-022396-5 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Haßler, Gerda T1 - Epistemic modality revisited: evidential functions of lexical and grammatical forms in Romance languages Y1 - 2003 SN - 80-8673221-5 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Haßler, Gerda T1 - Evidentiality and reported speech in Romance languages Y1 - 2002 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Haßler, Gerda T1 - Evidentiality and the expression of speaker's stance in Romance languages and German JF - Discourse studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk N2 - In recent years, the category of evidentiality has also come into use for the description of Romance languages and of German. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. We consider evidentiality to be a structural dimension of grammar, the values of which are expressed by types of constructions that code the source of information which a speaker imparts. If we look at the situation in Romance languages and in German, drawing a boundary between epistemic modality and evidentiality presents problems that are difficult to solve. Adding markers of the source of the speaker's knowledge often limits the degree of responsibility of the speaker for the content of the utterance. Evidential adverbs are a frequently used means of marking the source of the speaker's knowledge. The evidential meaning is generalised to marking any source of knowledge, what can be regarded as a result of a process of pragmaticalisation. The use of certain means which also carry out evidential markings can even contribute to the blurring of the different kinds of evidentiality. German also has modal verbs which in conjunction with the perfect tense of the verb have a predominantly evidential use (sollen and wollen). But even here the evidential marking is not without influence on the modality of the utterance. The Romance languages, however, do not have such specialised verbs for expressing evidentiality in certain contexts. To do this, they mark evidentiality - often context bound - by verb forms such as the conditional and the imperfect tense. This article shall contrast the different architectures used in expressing evidentiality in German and in the Romance languages. KW - Adverbs KW - evidentiality KW - modal verbs KW - modality KW - pragmaticalisation Y1 - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445614564522 SN - 1461-4456 SN - 1461-7080 VL - 17 IS - 2 SP - 182 EP - 209 PB - Sage Publ. CY - London ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Haßler, Gerda T1 - Evidentiality and the expression of speaker’s stance in Romance languages and German JF - Discourse Studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk N2 - In recent years, the category of evidentiality has also come into use for the description of Romance languages and of German. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. We consider evidentiality to be a structural dimension of grammar, the values of which are expressed by types of constructions that code the source of information which a speaker imparts. If we look at the situation in Romance languages and in German, drawing a boundary between epistemic modality and evidentiality presents problems that are difficult to solve. Adding markers of the source of the speaker’s knowledge often limits the degree of responsibility of the speaker for the content of the utterance. Evidential adverbs are a frequently used means of marking the source of the speaker’s knowledge. The evidential meaning is generalised to marking any source of knowledge, what can be regarded as a result of a process of pragmaticalisation. The use of certain means which also carry out evidential markings can even contribute to the blurring of the different kinds of evidentiality. German also has modal verbs which in conjunction with the perfect tense of the verb have a predominantly evidential use (sollen and wollen). But even here the evidential marking is not without influence on the modality of the utterance. The Romance languages, however, do not have such specialised verbs for expressing evidentiality in certain contexts. To do this, they mark evidentiality – often context bound – by verb forms such as the conditional and the imperfect tense. This article shall contrast the different architectures used in expressing evidentiality in German and in the Romance languages. KW - Adverbs KW - evidentiality KW - modal verbs KW - modality KW - pragmaticalisation Y1 - 2015 UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445614564522 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445614564522 SN - 1461-4456 SN - 1461-7080 VL - 17 IS - 2 SP - 182 EP - 209 PB - Sage Publications CY - London ER -