TY - JOUR A1 - Luebbe, Alexander A1 - Weske, Mathias T1 - Bringing design thinking to business process modeling Y1 - 2011 SN - 978-3-642-13756-3 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Weidlich, Matthias A1 - Mendling, Jan A1 - Weske, Mathias T1 - Efficient consistency measurement based on behavioral profiles of process models JF - IEEE transactions on software engineering N2 - Engineering of process-driven business applications can be supported by process modeling efforts in order to bridge the gap between business requirements and system specifications. However, diverging purposes of business process modeling initiatives have led to significant problems in aligning related models at different abstract levels and different perspectives. Checking the consistency of such corresponding models is a major challenge for process modeling theory and practice. In this paper, we take the inappropriateness of existing strict notions of behavioral equivalence as a starting point. Our contribution is a concept called behavioral profile that captures the essential behavioral constraints of a process model. We show that these profiles can be computed efficiently, i.e., in cubic time for sound free-choice Petri nets w.r.t. their number of places and transitions. We use behavioral profiles for the definition of a formal notion of consistency which is less sensitive to model projections than common criteria of behavioral equivalence and allows for quantifying deviation in a metric way. The derivation of behavioral profiles and the calculation of a degree of consistency have been implemented to demonstrate the applicability of our approach. We also report the findings from checking consistency between partially overlapping models of the SAP reference model. KW - Process model analysis KW - process model alignment KW - behavioral abstraction KW - consistency checking KW - consistency measures Y1 - 2011 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2010.96 SN - 0098-5589 VL - 37 IS - 3 SP - 410 EP - 429 PB - Inst. of Electr. and Electronics Engineers CY - Los Alamitos ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Polyvyanyy, Artem A1 - Weidlich, Matthias A1 - Weske, Mathias T1 - Connectivity of workflow nets the foundations of stepwise verification JF - Acta informatica N2 - Behavioral models capture operational principles of real-world or designed systems. Formally, each behavioral model defines the state space of a system, i.e., its states and the principles of state transitions. Such a model is the basis for analysis of the system's properties. In practice, state spaces of systems are immense, which results in huge computational complexity for their analysis. Behavioral models are typically described as executable graphs, whose execution semantics encodes a state space. The structure theory of behavioral models studies the relations between the structure of a model and the properties of its state space. In this article, we use the connectivity property of graphs to achieve an efficient and extensive discovery of the compositional structure of behavioral models; behavioral models get stepwise decomposed into components with clear structural characteristics and inter-component relations. At each decomposition step, the discovered compositional structure of a model is used for reasoning on properties of the whole state space of the system. The approach is exemplified by means of a concrete behavioral model and verification criterion. That is, we analyze workflow nets, a well-established tool for modeling behavior of distributed systems, with respect to the soundness property, a basic correctness property of workflow nets. Stepwise verification allows the detection of violations of the soundness property by inspecting small portions of a model, thereby considerably reducing the amount of work to be done to perform soundness checks. Besides formal results, we also report on findings from applying our approach to an industry model collection. Y1 - 2011 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00236-011-0137-8 SN - 0001-5903 VL - 48 IS - 4 SP - 213 EP - 242 PB - Springer CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Decker, Gero A1 - Weske, Mathias T1 - Interaction-centric modeling of process choreographies JF - Information systems N2 - With the rise of electronic integration between organizations, the need for a precise specification of interaction behavior increases. Information systems, replacing interaction previously carried out by humans via phone, faxes and emails, require a precise specification for handling all possible situations. Such interaction behavior is described in process choreographies. While many proposals for choreography languages have already been made, most of them fall into the category of interconnection models, where the observable behavior of the different partners is described and then related via message flow. As this article will show, this modeling approach fails to support fundamental design principles of choreographies and typically leads to modeling errors. This motivates an alternative modeling style, namely interaction modeling, for overcoming these limitations. While the main concepts are independent of a concrete modeling language, iBPMN is introduced as novel interaction modeling language. Formal execution semantics are provided and a comprehensive toolset implementing the approach is presented. KW - Choreographies KW - B2B process integration KW - Interaction modeling KW - Business Process Modeling Notation Y1 - 2011 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2010.06.005 SN - 0306-4379 VL - 36 IS - 2 SP - 292 EP - 312 PB - Elsevier CY - Oxford ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Awad, Ahmed Mahmoud Hany Aly A1 - Weidlich, Matthias A1 - Weske, Mathias T1 - Visually specifying compliance rules and explaining their violations for business processes JF - Journal of visual languages and computing N2 - A business process is a set of steps designed to be executed in a certain order to achieve a business value. Such processes are often driven by and documented using process models. Nowadays, process models are also applied to drive process execution. Thus, correctness of business process models is a must. Much of the work has been devoted to check general, domain-independent correctness criteria, such as soundness. However, business processes must also adhere to and show compliance with various regulations and constraints, the so-called compliance requirements. These are domain-dependent requirements. In many situations, verifying compliance on a model level is of great value, since violations can be resolved in an early stage prior to execution. However, this calls for using formal verification techniques, e.g., model checking, that are too complex for business experts to apply. In this paper, we utilize a visual language. BPMN-Q to express compliance requirements visually in a way similar to that used by business experts to build process models. Still, using a pattern based approach, each BPMN-Qgraph has a formal temporal logic expression in computational tree logic (CTL). Moreover, the user is able to express constraints, i.e., compliance rules, regarding control flow and data flow aspects. In order to provide valuable feedback to a user in case of violations, we depend on temporal logic querying approaches as well as BPMN-Q to visually highlight paths in a process model whose execution causes violations. KW - Business process modeling KW - Compliance checking KW - Visual modeling KW - Anti-patterns Y1 - 2011 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2010.11.002 SN - 1045-926X VL - 22 IS - 1 SP - 30 EP - 55 PB - Elsevier CY - London ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Weidlich, Matthias A1 - Polyvyanyy, Artem A1 - Mendling, Jan A1 - Weske, Mathias T1 - Causal behavioural profiles - efficient computation, applications, and evaluation JF - Fundamenta informaticae N2 - Analysis of behavioural consistency is an important aspect of software engineering. In process and service management, consistency verification of behavioural models has manifold applications. For instance, a business process model used as system specification and a corresponding workflow model used as implementation have to be consistent. Another example would be the analysis to what degree a process log of executed business operations is consistent with the corresponding normative process model. Typically, existing notions of behaviour equivalence, such as bisimulation and trace equivalence, are applied as consistency notions. Still, these notions are exponential in computation and yield a Boolean result. In many cases, however, a quantification of behavioural deviation is needed along with concepts to isolate the source of deviation. In this article, we propose causal behavioural profiles as the basis for a consistency notion. These profiles capture essential behavioural information, such as order, exclusiveness, and causality between pairs of activities of a process model. Consistency based on these profiles is weaker than trace equivalence, but can be computed efficiently for a broad class of models. In this article, we introduce techniques for the computation of causal behavioural profiles using structural decomposition techniques for sound free-choice workflow systems if unstructured net fragments are acyclic or can be traced back to S-or T-nets. We also elaborate on the findings of applying our technique to three industry model collections. KW - Causal Behavioural Profiles KW - Formal Methods KW - Behavioural Abstraction KW - Structural Decomposition KW - Exclusiveness KW - Concurrency KW - Order Relations KW - Causality KW - Optionality Y1 - 2011 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3233/FI-2011-614 SN - 0169-2968 VL - 113 IS - 3-4 SP - 399 EP - 435 PB - IOS Press CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Weidlich, Matthias A1 - Polyvyanyy, Artem A1 - Desai, Nirmit A1 - Mendling, Jan A1 - Weske, Mathias T1 - Process compliance analysis based on behavioural profiles JF - Information systems N2 - Process compliance measurement is getting increasing attention in companies due to stricter legal requirements and market pressure for operational excellence. In order to judge on compliance of the business processing, the degree of behavioural deviation of a case, i.e., an observed execution sequence, is quantified with respect to a process model (referred to as fitness, or recall). Recently, different compliance measures have been proposed. Still, nearly all of them are grounded on state-based techniques and the trace equivalence criterion, in particular. As a consequence, these approaches have to deal with the state explosion problem. In this paper, we argue that a behavioural abstraction may be leveraged to measure the compliance of a process log - a collection of cases. To this end, we utilise causal behavioural profiles that capture the behavioural characteristics of process models and cases, and can be computed efficiently. We propose different compliance measures based on these profiles, discuss the impact of noise in process logs on our measures, and show how diagnostic information on non-compliance is derived. As a validation, we report on findings of applying our approach in a case study with an international service provider. KW - Process compliance KW - Compliance measurement KW - Log conformance KW - Root cause analysis Y1 - 2011 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2011.04.002 SN - 0306-4379 VL - 36 IS - 7 SP - 1009 EP - 1025 PB - Elsevier CY - Oxford ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Smirnov, Sergey A1 - Zamani Farahani, Armin A1 - Weske, Mathias T1 - State propagation in abstracted business processes N2 - Business process models are abstractions of concrete operational procedures that occur in the daily business of organizations. To cope with the complexity of these models, business process model abstraction has been introduced recently. Its goal is to derive from a detailed process model several abstract models that provide a high-level understanding of the process. While techniques for constructing abstract models are reported in the literature, little is known about the relationships between process instances and abstract models. In this paper we show how the state of an abstract activity can be calculated from the states of related, detailed process activities as they happen. The approach uses activity state propagation. With state uniqueness and state transition correctness we introduce formal properties that improve the understanding of state propagation. Algorithms to check these properties are devised. Finally, we use behavioral profiles to identify and classify behavioral inconsistencies in abstract process models that might occur, once activity state propagation is used. N2 - Geschäftsprozessmodelle sind Abstraktionen konkreter operationaler Vorgänge, die im täglichen Geschäftsablauf von Organisationen auftreten. Um die Komplexität solcher Modelle zu bewältigen, wurde die Geschäftsprozessmodelabstraktion eingeführt. Ziel ist dabei, von einem detaillierten Prozessmodel mehrere abstrakte Modelle abzuleiten, um so auf einer höheren Abstraktionsstufe ein Verständnis für den Prozess zu bekommen. Während viel in der Literatur über Techniken zur Konstruktion abstrakter Modelle berichtet wurde, ist wenig über die Beziehungen zwischen Prozessinstanzen und abstrakten Modellen bekannt. In dieser Arbeit zeigen wir, wie der Zustand einer abstrakten Aktivität aus den Zuständen ihrer entsprechenden detaillierten Prozessaktivitäten zur Laufzeit berechnet werden kann. Der Ansatz basiert dabei auf der Übertragung des Aktivitätszustands. Mit der Zustandseindeutigkeit und der Korrektheit der Zustandstransitionen führen wir formale Kriterien ein, die das Verständnis der Zustandsübertragung erleichtern. Zudem sind Algorithmen entwickelt worden, um diese Kriterien zu überprüfen. Außerdem nutzen wir Verhaltensprofile um Inkonsistenzen im Verhalten abstrakter Prozessmodelle zu identifizieren und zu klassifizieren, die auftreten können, wenn die Aktivitätszustände gemäß den Regeln abgebildet werden. T3 - Technische Berichte des Hasso-Plattner-Instituts für Digital Engineering an der Universität Potsdam - 47 KW - Abstraktion von Geschäftsprozessmodellen KW - Prozessinstanz KW - Propagation von Aktivitätsinstanzzuständen KW - business process model abstraction KW - process instance KW - activity instance state propagation Y1 - 2011 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-51480 SN - 978-3-86956-130-1 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER -