TY - JOUR A1 - Schünemann, Nina A1 - Spörer, Nadine A1 - Voellinger, Vanessa A. A1 - Brunstein, Joachim Clemens T1 - Peer feedback mediates the impact of self-regulation procedures on strategy use and reading comprehension in reciprocal teaching groups JF - Instructional Science N2 - The goal of this research was to highlight the role social regulatory processes play in making students’ teamwork in reciprocal teaching (RT) groups (a classroom activity in which students take the teacher’s role in small group reading sessions) effective. In addition to teamwork quality, we expected peer feedback to be a key factor in enhancing students’ reading comprehension achievements. Because previous research (Schünemann et al. in Contemp Educ Psychol 38:289–305, 2013) has shown that procedures of self-regulated learning (SRL) augment the effects of RT methods, we further assumed that such procedures would promote the quality of students’ collaborative efforts. In a cluster-randomized trial, students in 12 fifth-grade classes practiced a strategic approach to reading either in a RT condition or in a RT + SRL condition. In one of the 14 sessions, students’ interactive behavior was videotaped. Strategy use and reading comprehension were assessed at pretest, posttest, and maintenance. Performance differences between conditions were reliable only at maintenance. A multilevel mediation analysis showed that relative to RT students, RT + SRL students were better able to provide their teammates with informative feedback and organize their group work in a task-focused manner. Only feedback quality mediated the sustainability of treatment effects on strategy use and reading comprehension. In essence, this research suggests that effective reading comprehension trainings should integrate explicit instruction and practice in reading strategies, SRL, and focus on supportive peer processes in small groups with extensive instruction and practice in peer feedback. KW - Reading comprehension KW - Self-regulated learning KW - Co-regulation KW - Reading strategies KW - Feedback Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9409-1 SN - 0020-4277 SN - 1573-1952 VL - 45 SP - 395 EP - 415 PB - Springer CY - Dordrecht ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Spörer, Nadine A1 - Brunstein, Joachim Clemens A1 - Kieschke, Ulf T1 - Improving students' reading comprehension skills : effects of strategy instruction and reciprocal teaching N2 - The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of three different forms of strategy instruction on 210 elementary-school students' reading comprehension. Students were assigned to any one of three intervention conditions or to a traditional instruction condition (control condition). Training students were taught four reading strategies (summarizing, questioning, clarifying, predicting) and practiced these strategies in small groups (reciprocal teaching), pairs, or instructor-guided small groups. At both the post- and follow-up test the intervention students attained higher scores on an experiment-developed task of reading comprehension and strategy use than the control students who received traditional instruction. Furthermore, students who practiced reciprocal teaching in small groups outperformed use than the control students who received traditional instruction groups on a standardized reading comprehension test. Y1 - 2009 UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09594752 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.003 SN - 0959-4752 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schünemann, Nina A1 - Spörer, Nadine A1 - Brunstein, Joachim Clemens T1 - Integrating self-regulation in whole-class reciprocal teaching - a moderator-mediator analysis of incremental effects on fifth graders' reading comprehension JF - Contemporary educational psychology N2 - In this classroom intervention study, reciprocal teaching (RI) of reading strategies was combined with explicit instruction in self-regulated learning (SRL) to promote the reading comprehension of fifth-grade students (N = 306). Twelve intact classes were randomly assigned either to an RT + SRL condition or to an RI condition without explicit instruction in self-regulation. Three additional classes served as a no-treatment comparison group. Strategies instruction was delivered by trained assistants in conventional German language lessons. Students practiced the application of these strategies in small groups. Both at posttest and at maintenance (8 weeks after the intervention), students in the two intervention conditions (RT and RI + SRL) outperformed comparison students in measures of reading comprehension, strategy-related task performance, and self-efficacy for reading. Relative to RI students, students in the RI + SRL condition were better able to maintain training-induced performance gains over the follow-up interval. A moderated mediation analysis revealed that this difference in the sustainability of the two treatments was (a) mediated by the successful mastery of the learned strategies and (b) most evident among students with poor reading fluency skills. KW - Reciprocal teaching KW - Reading comprehension KW - Self-regulated learning KW - Reading fluency KW - Reading strategies Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.06.002 SN - 0361-476X SN - 1090-2384 VL - 38 IS - 4 SP - 289 EP - 305 PB - Elsevier CY - San Diego ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Brunstein, Joachim Clemens A1 - Spörer, Nadine T1 - Selbstgesteuertes Lernen Y1 - 2001 ER -