TY  - JOUR
A1  - Jeltsch, Florian
A1  - Blaum, Niels
A1  - Brose, Ulrich
A1  - Chipperfield, Joseph D.
A1  - Clough, Yann
A1  - Farwig, Nina
A1  - Geissler, Katja
A1  - Graham, Catherine H.
A1  - Grimm, Volker
A1  - Hickler, Thomas
A1  - Huth, Andreas
A1  - May, Felix
A1  - Meyer, Katrin M.
A1  - Pagel, Jörn
A1  - Reineking, Björn
A1  - Rillig, Matthias C.
A1  - Shea, Katriona
A1  - Schurr, Frank Martin
A1  - Schroeder, Boris
A1  - Tielbörger, Katja
A1  - Weiss, Lina
A1  - Wiegand, Kerstin
A1  - Wiegand, Thorsten
A1  - Wirth, Christian
A1  - Zurell, Damaris
T1  - How can we bring together empiricists and modellers in functional biodiversity research?
JF  - Basic and applied ecology : Journal of the Gesellschaft für Ökologie
N2  - Improving our understanding of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and our capacity to inform ecosystem management requires an integrated framework for functional biodiversity research (FBR). However, adequate integration among empirical approaches (monitoring and experimental) and modelling has rarely been achieved in FBR. We offer an appraisal of the issues involved and chart a course towards enhanced integration. A major element of this path is the joint orientation towards the continuous refinement of a theoretical framework for FBR that links theory testing and generalization with applied research oriented towards the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. We further emphasize existing decision-making frameworks as suitable instruments to practically merge these different aims of FBR and bring them into application. This integrated framework requires joint research planning, and should improve communication and stimulate collaboration between modellers and empiricists, thereby overcoming existing reservations and prejudices. The implementation of this integrative research agenda for FBR requires an adaptation in most national and international funding schemes in order to accommodate such joint teams and their more complex structures and data needs.
KW  - Biodiversity theory
KW  - Biodiversity experiments
KW  - Conservation management
KW  - Decision-making
KW  - Ecosystem functions and services
KW  - Forecasting
KW  - Functional traits
KW  - Global change
KW  - Monitoring programmes
KW  - Interdisciplinarity
Y1  - 2013
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2013.01.001
SN  - 1439-1791
VL  - 14
IS  - 2
SP  - 93
EP  - 101
PB  - Elsevier
CY  - Jena
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Jeltsch, Florian
A1  - Bonte, Dries
A1  - Peer, Guy
A1  - Reineking, Björn
A1  - Leimgruber, Peter
A1  - Balkenhol, Niko
A1  - Schröder-Esselbach, Boris
A1  - Buchmann, Carsten M.
A1  - Müller, Thomas
A1  - Blaum, Niels
A1  - Zurell, Damaris
A1  - Böhning-Gaese, Katrin
A1  - Wiegand, Thorsten
A1  - Eccard, Jana
A1  - Hofer, Heribert
A1  - Reeg, Jette
A1  - Eggers, Ute
A1  - Bauer, Silke
T1  - Integrating movement ecology with biodiversity research - exploring new avenues to address spatiotemporal biodiversity dynamics
Y1  - 2013
UR  - http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/827/art%253A10.1186%252F2051-3933-1- 6.pdf?auth66=1394891271_f1a4cb74d6be42ee3f8872ef2ca22c24&ext=.pdf
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1186/2051-3933-1-6
ER  - 
TY  - GEN
A1  - Jeltsch, Florian
A1  - Bonte, Dries
A1  - Pe'er, Guy
A1  - Reineking, Björn
A1  - Leimgruber, Peter
A1  - Balkenhol, Niko
A1  - Schröder-Esselbach, Boris
A1  - Buchmann, Carsten M.
A1  - Müller, Thomas
A1  - Blaum, Niels
A1  - Zurell, Damaris
A1  - Böhning-Gaese, Katrin
A1  - Wiegand, Thorsten
A1  - Eccard, Jana
A1  - Hofer, Heribert
A1  - Reeg, Jette
A1  - Eggers, Ute
A1  - Bauer, Silke
T1  - Integrating movement ecology with biodiversity research
BT  - exploring new avenues to address spatiotemporal biodiversity dynamics
N2  - Movement of organisms is one of the key mechanisms shaping biodiversity, e.g. the distribution of genes, individuals and species in space and time. Recent technological and conceptual advances have improved our ability to assess the causes and consequences of individual movement, and led to the emergence of the new field of ‘movement ecology’. Here, we outline how movement ecology can contribute to the broad field of biodiversity research, i.e. the study of processes and patterns of life among and across different scales, from genes to ecosystems, and we propose a conceptual framework linking these hitherto largely separated fields of research. Our framework builds on the concept of movement ecology for individuals, and demonstrates its importance for linking individual organismal movement with biodiversity. First, organismal movements can provide ‘mobile links’ between habitats or ecosystems, thereby connecting resources, genes, and processes among otherwise separate locations. Understanding these mobile links and their impact on biodiversity will be facilitated by movement ecology, because mobile links can be created by different modes of movement (i.e., foraging, dispersal, migration) that relate to different spatiotemporal scales and have differential effects on biodiversity. Second, organismal movements can also mediate coexistence in communities, through ‘equalizing’ and ‘stabilizing’ mechanisms. This novel integrated framework provides a conceptual starting point for a better understanding of biodiversity dynamics in light of individual movement and space-use behavior across spatiotemporal scales. By illustrating this framework with examples, we argue that the integration of movement ecology and biodiversity research will also enhance our ability to conserve diversity at the genetic, species, and ecosystem levels.
T3  - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe - 401 
KW  - mobile links
KW  - species coexistence
KW  - community dynamics
KW  - biodiversity conservation
KW  - long distance movement
KW  - landscape genetics
KW  - individual based modeling
Y1  - 2017
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-401177
ER  -