TY - JOUR A1 - Reichersdorfer, Johannes A1 - Christensen, Tom A1 - Vrangbaek, Karsten T1 - Accountability of immigration administration comparing crises in Norway, Denmark and Germany JF - International review of administrative sciences : an international journal of comparative public administration N2 - Accountability can be conceptualized as institutionalized mechanisms obliging actors to explain their conduct to different forums, which can pose questions and impose sanctions. This article analyses different crises' in immigration policies in Norway, Denmark and Germany along a descriptive framework of five different accountability types: political, administrative, legal, professional and social accountability. The exchanges of information, debate and their consequences between an actor and a forum are crucial to understanding how political-administrative action is carried out in critical situations. First, accountability dynamics emphasize conventional norms and values regarding policy change and, second, formal political responsibility does not necessarily lead to political consequences such as minister resignations in cases of misbehaviour. Consequences strongly depend on how accountability dynamics take place. KW - accountability dynamics KW - accountability mechanism KW - administration KW - asylum KW - civil service KW - immigration KW - minister responsibility KW - public administration Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313478251 SN - 0020-8523 VL - 79 IS - 2 SP - 271 EP - 291 PB - Sage Publ. CY - London ER -