TY - JOUR A1 - Nowicki, Sophie A1 - Bindschadler, Robert A. A1 - Abe-Ouchi, Ayako A1 - Aschwanden, Andy A1 - Bueler, Ed A1 - Choi, Hyeungu A1 - Fastook, Jim A1 - Granzow, Glen A1 - Greve, Ralf A1 - Gutowski, Gail A1 - Herzfeld, Ute A1 - Jackson, Charles A1 - Johnson, Jesse A1 - Khroulev, Constantine A1 - Larour, Eric A1 - Levermann, Anders A1 - Lipscomb, William H. A1 - Martin, Maria A. A1 - Morlighem, Mathieu A1 - Parizek, Byron R. A1 - Pollard, David A1 - Price, Stephen F. A1 - Ren, Diandong A1 - Rignot, Eric A1 - Saito, Fuyuki A1 - Sato, Tatsuru A1 - Seddik, Hakime A1 - Seroussi, Helene A1 - Takahashi, Kunio A1 - Walker, Ryan A1 - Wang, Wei Li T1 - Insights into spatial sensitivities of ice mass response to environmental change from the SeaRISE ice sheet modeling project II Greenland JF - Journal of geophysical research : Earth surface N2 - The Sea-level Response to Ice Sheet Evolution (SeaRISE) effort explores the sensitivity of the current generation of ice sheet models to external forcing to gain insight into the potential future contribution to sea level from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. All participating models simulated the ice sheet response to three types of external forcings: a change in oceanic condition, a warmer atmospheric environment, and enhanced basal lubrication. Here an analysis of the spatial response of the Greenland ice sheet is presented, and the impact of model physics and spin-up on the projections is explored. Although the modeled responses are not always homogeneous, consistent spatial trends emerge from the ensemble analysis, indicating distinct vulnerabilities of the Greenland ice sheet. There are clear response patterns associated with each forcing, and a similar mass loss at the full ice sheet scale will result in different mass losses at the regional scale, as well as distinct thickness changes over the ice sheet. All forcings lead to an increased mass loss for the coming centuries, with increased basal lubrication and warmer ocean conditions affecting mainly outlet glaciers, while the impacts of atmospheric forcings affect the whole ice sheet. KW - Greenland KW - ice-sheet KW - sea-level KW - model KW - ensemble Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrf.20076 SN - 2169-9003 VL - 118 IS - 2 SP - 1025 EP - 1044 PB - American Geophysical Union CY - Washington ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Pattyn, Frank A1 - Perichon, Laura A1 - Durand, Gael A1 - Favier, Lionel A1 - Gagliardini, Olivier A1 - Hindmarsh, Richard C. A. A1 - Zwinger, Thomas A1 - Albrecht, Torsten A1 - Cornford, Stephen A1 - Docquier, David A1 - Furst, Johannes J. A1 - Goldberg, Daniel A1 - Gudmundsson, Gudmundur Hilmar A1 - Humbert, Angelika A1 - Huetten, Moritz A1 - Huybrechts, Philippe A1 - Jouvet, Guillaume A1 - Kleiner, Thomas A1 - Larour, Eric A1 - Martin, Daniel A1 - Morlighem, Mathieu A1 - Payne, Anthony J. A1 - Pollard, David A1 - Rueckamp, Martin A1 - Rybak, Oleg A1 - Seroussi, Helene A1 - Thoma, Malte A1 - Wilkens, Nina T1 - Grounding-line migration in plan-view marine ice-sheet models: results of the ice2sea MISMIP3d intercomparison JF - Journal of glaciology N2 - Predictions of marine ice-sheet behaviour require models able to simulate grounding-line migration. We present results of an intercomparison experiment for plan-view marine ice-sheet models. Verification is effected by comparison with approximate analytical solutions for flux across the grounding line using simplified geometrical configurations (no lateral variations, no buttressing effects from lateral drag). Perturbation experiments specifying spatial variation in basal sliding parameters permitted the evolution of curved grounding lines, generating buttressing effects. The experiments showed regions of compression and extensional flow across the grounding line, thereby invalidating the boundary layer theory. Steady-state grounding-line positions were found to be dependent on the level of physical model approximation. Resolving grounding lines requires inclusion of membrane stresses, a sufficiently small grid size (<500 m), or subgrid interpolation of the grounding line. The latter still requires nominal grid sizes of <5 km. For larger grid spacings, appropriate parameterizations for ice flux may be imposed at the grounding line, but the short-time transient behaviour is then incorrect and different from models that do not incorporate grounding-line parameterizations. The numerical error associated with predicting grounding-line motion can be reduced significantly below the errors associated with parameter ignorance and uncertainties in future scenarios. Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3189/2013JoG12J129 SN - 0022-1430 VL - 59 IS - 215 SP - 410 EP - 422 PB - International Glaciological Society CY - Cambridge ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Seroussi, Helene A1 - Nowicki, Sophie A1 - Payne, Antony J. A1 - Goelzer, Heiko A1 - Lipscomb, William H. A1 - Abe-Ouchi, Ayako A1 - Agosta, Cecile A1 - Albrecht, Torsten A1 - Asay-Davis, Xylar A1 - Barthel, Alice A1 - Calov, Reinhard A1 - Cullather, Richard A1 - Dumas, Christophe A1 - Galton-Fenzi, Benjamin K. A1 - Gladstone, Rupert A1 - Golledge, Nicholas R. A1 - Gregory, Jonathan M. A1 - Greve, Ralf A1 - Hattermann, Tore A1 - Hoffman, Matthew J. A1 - Humbert, Angelika A1 - Huybrechts, Philippe A1 - Jourdain, Nicolas C. A1 - Kleiner, Thomas A1 - Larour, Eric A1 - Leguy, Gunter R. A1 - Lowry, Daniel P. A1 - Little, Chistopher M. A1 - Morlighem, Mathieu A1 - Pattyn, Frank A1 - Pelle, Tyler A1 - Price, Stephen F. A1 - Quiquet, Aurelien A1 - Reese, Ronja A1 - Schlegel, Nicole-Jeanne A1 - Shepherd, Andrew A1 - Simon, Erika A1 - Smith, Robin S. A1 - Straneo, Fiammetta A1 - Sun, Sainan A1 - Trusel, Luke D. A1 - Van Breedam, Jonas A1 - van de Wal, Roderik S. W. A1 - Winkelmann, Ricarda A1 - Zhao, Chen A1 - Zhang, Tong A1 - Zwinger, Thomas T1 - ISMIP6 Antarctica BT - a multi-model ensemble of the Antarctic ice sheet evolution over the 21st century JF - The Cryosphere : TC ; an interactive open access journal of the European Geosciences Union N2 - Ice flow models of the Antarctic ice sheet are commonly used to simulate its future evolution in response to different climate scenarios and assess the mass loss that would contribute to future sea level rise. However, there is currently no consensus on estimates of the future mass balance of the ice sheet, primarily because of differences in the representation of physical processes, forcings employed and initial states of ice sheet models. This study presents results from ice flow model simulations from 13 international groups focusing on the evolution of the Antarctic ice sheet during the period 2015-2100 as part of the Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison for CMIP6 (ISMIP6). They are forced with outputs from a subset of models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5), representative of the spread in climate model results. Simulations of the Antarctic ice sheet contribution to sea level rise in response to increased warming during this period varies between 7:8 and 30.0 cm of sea level equivalent (SLE) under Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 scenario forcing. These numbers are relative to a control experiment with constant climate conditions and should therefore be added to the mass loss contribution under climate conditions similar to present-day conditions over the same period. The simulated evolution of the West Antarctic ice sheet varies widely among models, with an overall mass loss, up to 18.0 cm SLE, in response to changes in oceanic conditions. East Antarctica mass change varies between 6 :1 and 8.3 cm SLE in the simulations, with a significant increase in surface mass balance outweighing the increased ice discharge under most RCP 8.5 scenario forcings. The inclusion of ice shelf collapse, here assumed to be caused by large amounts of liquid water ponding at the surface of ice shelves, yields an additional simulated mass loss of 28mm compared to simulations without ice shelf collapse. The largest sources of uncertainty come from the climate forcing, the ocean-induced melt rates, the calibration of these melt rates based on oceanic conditions taken outside of ice shelf cavities and the ice sheet dynamic response to these oceanic changes. Results under RCP 2.6 scenario based on two CMIP5 climate models show an additional mass loss of 0 and 3 cm of SLE on average compared to simulations done under present-day conditions for the two CMIP5 forcings used and display limited mass gain in East Antarctica. Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3033-2020 SN - 1994-0416 SN - 1994-0424 VL - 14 IS - 9 SP - 3033 EP - 3070 PB - Copernicus CY - Göttingen ER -