TY - JOUR A1 - Hofmann, Hannes A1 - Zimmermann, Günter A1 - Farkas, Márton Pál A1 - Huenges, Ernst A1 - Zang, Arno A1 - Leonhardt, Maria A1 - Kwiatek, Grzegorz A1 - Martinez-Garzon, Patricia A1 - Bohnhoff, Marco A1 - Min, Ki-Bok A1 - Fokker, Peter A1 - Westaway, Rob A1 - Bethmann, Falko A1 - Meier, Peter A1 - Yoon, Kern Shin A1 - Choi, JaiWon A1 - Lee, Tae Jong A1 - Kim, Kwang Yeom T1 - First field application of cyclic soft stimulation at the Pohang Enhanced Geothermal System site in Korea JF - Geophysical journal international N2 - Large-magnitude fluid-injection induced seismic events are a potential risk for geothermal energy developments worldwide. One potential risk mitigation measure is the application of cyclic injection schemes. After validation at small (laboratory) and meso (mine) scale, the concept has now been applied for the first time at field scale at the Pohang Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) site in Korea. From 7 August until 14 August 2017 a total of 1756 m(3) of surface water was injected into Pohang well PX-1 at flow rates between 1 and 10 l s(-1), with a maximum wellhead pressure (WHP) of 22.8 MPa, according to a site-specific cyclic soft stimulation schedule and traffic light system. A total of 52 induced microearthquakes were detected in real-time during and shortly after the injection, the largest of M-w 1.9. After that event a total of 1771 m(3) of water was produced back from the well over roughly 1 month, during which time no larger-magnitude seismic event was observed. The hydraulic data set exhibits pressure-dependent injectivity increase with fracture opening between 15 and 17 MPa WHP, but no significant permanent transmissivity increase was observed. The maximum magnitude of the induced seismicity during the stimulation period was below the target threshold of M-w 2.0 and additional knowledge about the stimulated reservoir was gained. Additionally, the technical feasibility of cyclic injection at field scale was evaluated. The major factors that limited the maximum earthquake magnitude are believed to be: limiting the injected net fluid volume, flowback after the occurrence of the largest induced seismic event, using a cyclic injection scheme, the application of a traffic light system, and including a priori information from previous investigations and operations in the treatment design. KW - Cyclic soft stimulation (CSS) KW - induced seismicity KW - risk mitigation KW - enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) KW - granite KW - Pohang (Korea) Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz058 SN - 0956-540X SN - 1365-246X VL - 217 IS - 2 SP - 926 EP - 949 PB - Oxford Univ. Press CY - Oxford ER -