TY - GEN A1 - Kühne, Franziska A1 - Maas, Jana A1 - Wiesenthal, Sophia A1 - Weck, Florian T1 - Supervision in der Verhaltenstherapie T1 - Supervision in behavioral therapy BT - ein Scoping Review zur Identifikation von Forschungszielen BT - a scoping review for identification of research objectives T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - Theoretischer Hintergrund:Supervision spielt eine zentrale Rolle zum Wissens- und Kompetenzerwerb sowie in der Qualitätssicherung. Fragestellung:Ziel war es, den aktuellen Forschungsstand zur Supervision im Rahmen der kognitiven Verhaltenstherapie abzubilden, um daraus Schlussfolgerungen für die zukünftige Forschung abzuleiten. Methode:Zur Evidenzsynthese wurde ein Scoping Review durchgeführt, das die Darstellung zentraler Konzepte, aktueller Evidenz und möglicher Forschungsbedarfe ermöglichte. Neben einer systematischen Literaturrecherche wurden Vorwärts- und Rückwärtssuchstrategien eingesetzt. Ergebnisse:Eingeschlossen wurden zwölf Publikationen basierend auf zehn empirischen Studien. Alle Studien beschrieben Ausbildungssettings, aber nur wenige untersuchten übende Interventionen (z. B. Rollenspiele). Häufig wurden Effekte subjektiv erfasst, die methodische Qualität der Begleitstudien variierte. Schlussfolgerungen:Notwendig sind weitere methodisch hochwertige Studien, experimentell orientiert oder in der klinischen Praxis, die die Supervisionsforschung bereichern können. N2 - Background:Supervision plays a central role for the acquisition of therapeutic knowledge and competence and for quality control. Objective:The study aimed at mapping the current evidence regarding cognitive–behavioral supervision, and drawing conclusions for future research. Method:For evidence synthesis, we conducted a scoping review to outline key concepts, the current evidence, and potential gaps in research. In addition to a systematic literature search, forward and backward search strategies were implemented. Results:We included 12 publications on 10 empirical studies. All studies referred to education and training, but only a few examined exercises (e. g., role plays). Mostly, outcomes were evaluated subjectively, and study quality varied. Conclusion:Further methodologically sound studies, experimentally oriented or in clinical care, may support research. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe - 540 KW - klinische Supervision KW - Review KW - Übersichtsarbeit KW - kognitive Verhaltenstherapie KW - Psychotherapie Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-426943 IS - 540 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kühne, Franziska A1 - Maas, Jana A1 - Wiesenthal, Sophia A1 - Weck, Florian T1 - Supervision in der Verhaltenstherapie T1 - Supervision in behavioral therapy BT - ein Scoping Review zur Identifikation von Forschungszielen BT - a scoping review for identification of research objectives JF - Zeitschrift für klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie : Forschung und Praxis N2 - Theoretischer Hintergrund:Supervision spielt eine zentrale Rolle zum Wissens- und Kompetenzerwerb sowie in der Qualitätssicherung. Fragestellung:Ziel war es, den aktuellen Forschungsstand zur Supervision im Rahmen der kognitiven Verhaltenstherapie abzubilden, um daraus Schlussfolgerungen für die zukünftige Forschung abzuleiten. Methode:Zur Evidenzsynthese wurde ein Scoping Review durchgeführt, das die Darstellung zentraler Konzepte, aktueller Evidenz und möglicher Forschungsbedarfe ermöglichte. Neben einer systematischen Literaturrecherche wurden Vorwärts- und Rückwärtssuchstrategien eingesetzt. Ergebnisse:Eingeschlossen wurden zwölf Publikationen basierend auf zehn empirischen Studien. Alle Studien beschrieben Ausbildungssettings, aber nur wenige untersuchten übende Interventionen (z. B. Rollenspiele). Häufig wurden Effekte subjektiv erfasst, die methodische Qualität der Begleitstudien variierte. Schlussfolgerungen:Notwendig sind weitere methodisch hochwertige Studien, experimentell orientiert oder in der klinischen Praxis, die die Supervisionsforschung bereichern können. N2 - Background:Supervision plays a central role for the acquisition of therapeutic knowledge and competence and for quality control. Objective:The study aimed at mapping the current evidence regarding cognitive–behavioral supervision, and drawing conclusions for future research. Method:For evidence synthesis, we conducted a scoping review to outline key concepts, the current evidence, and potential gaps in research. In addition to a systematic literature search, forward and backward search strategies were implemented. Results:We included 12 publications on 10 empirical studies. All studies referred to education and training, but only a few examined exercises (e. g., role plays). Mostly, outcomes were evaluated subjectively, and study quality varied. Conclusion:Further methodologically sound studies, experimentally oriented or in clinical care, may support research. KW - clinical supervision KW - review KW - scoping study KW - cognitive behavioral therapy KW - psychotherapy KW - klinische Supervision KW - Übersichtsarbeit KW - kognitive Verhaltenstheraphie KW - Psychoterapie Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443/a000414 SN - 1616-3443 SN - 2190-6297 VL - 46 IS - 2 SP - 73 EP - 82 PB - Hogrefe CY - Göttingen ER - TY - GEN A1 - Kühne, Franziska A1 - Maas, Jana A1 - Wiesenthal, Sophia A1 - Weck, Florian T1 - Empirical research in clinical supervision BT - a systematic review and suggestions for future studies T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - Background: Although clinical supervision is considered to be a major component of the development and maintenance of psychotherapeutic competencies, and despite an increase in supervision research, the empirical evidence on the topic remains sparse. Methods: Because most previous reviews lack methodological rigor, we aimed to review the status and quality of the empirical literature on clinical supervision, and to provide suggestions for future research. MEDLINE, PsycInfo and the Web of Science Core Collection were searched and the review was conducted according to current guidelines. From the review results, we derived suggestions for future research on clinical supervision. Results: The systematic literature search identified 19 publications from 15 empirical studies. Taking into account the review results, the following suggestions for further research emerged: Supervision research would benefit from proper descriptions of how studies are conducted according to current guidelines, more methodologically rigorous empirical studies, the investigation of active supervision interventions, from taking diverse outcome domains into account, and from investigating supervision from a meta-theoretical perspective. Conclusions: In all, the systematic review supported the notion that supervision research often lags behind psychotherapy research in general. Still, the results offer detailed starting points for further supervision research. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe - 580 KW - Supervision KW - Clinical supervision KW - Systematic review KW - Evidence-based psychotherapy Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-438721 SN - 1866-8364 IS - 580 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kühne, Franziska A1 - Maas, Jana A1 - Wiesenthal, Sophia A1 - Weck, Florian T1 - Empirical research in clinical supervision BT - a systematic review and suggestions for future studies JF - BMC Psychology N2 - Background: Although clinical supervision is considered to be a major component of the development and maintenance of psychotherapeutic competencies, and despite an increase in supervision research, the empirical evidence on the topic remains sparse. Methods: Because most previous reviews lack methodological rigor, we aimed to review the status and quality of the empirical literature on clinical supervision, and to provide suggestions for future research. MEDLINE, PsycInfo and the Web of Science Core Collection were searched and the review was conducted according to current guidelines. From the review results, we derived suggestions for future research on clinical supervision. Results: The systematic literature search identified 19 publications from 15 empirical studies. Taking into account the review results, the following suggestions for further research emerged: Supervision research would benefit from proper descriptions of how studies are conducted according to current guidelines, more methodologically rigorous empirical studies, the investigation of active supervision interventions, from taking diverse outcome domains into account, and from investigating supervision from a meta-theoretical perspective. Conclusions: In all, the systematic review supported the notion that supervision research often lags behind psychotherapy research in general. Still, the results offer detailed starting points for further supervision research. KW - Supervision KW - Clinical supervision KW - Systematic review KW - Evidence-based psychotherapy Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-019-0327-7 SN - 2050-7283 VL - 7 PB - BioMed Central CY - London ER -