TY - JOUR A1 - Björk, Jennie A1 - Hölzle, Katharina A1 - Boer, Harry T1 - ‘What will we learn from the current crisis?’ JF - Creativity and innovation management Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12442 SN - 0963-1690 SN - 1467-8691 VL - 30 IS - 2 SP - 231 EP - 232 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Oxford [u.a.] ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Rose, Robert A1 - Groeger, Lars A1 - Hölzle, Katharina T1 - The Emergence of Shared Leadership in Innovation Labs JF - Frontiers in Psychology N2 - Implementing innovation laboratories to leverage intrapreneurship are an increasingly popular organizational practice. A typical feature in these creative environments are semi-autonomous teams in which multiple members collectively exert leadership influence, thereby challenging traditional command-and-control conceptions of leadership. An extensive body of research on the team-centric concept of shared leadership has recognized the potential for pluralized leadership structures in enhancing team effectiveness; however, little empirical work has been conducted in organizational contexts in which creativity is key. This study set out to explore antecedents of shared leadership and its influence on team creativity in an innovation lab. Building on extant shared leadership and innovation research, we propose antecedents customary to creative teamwork, that is, experimental culture, task reflexivity, and voice. Multisource data were collected from 104 team members and 49 evaluations of 29 coaches nested in 21 teams working in a prototypical innovation lab. We identify factors specific to creative teamwork that facilitate the emergence of shared leadership by providing room for experimentation, encouraging team members to speak up in the creative process, and cultivating a reflective application of entrepreneurial thinking. We provide specific exemplary activities for innovation lab teams to increase levels of shared leadership. KW - innovation laboratories KW - intrapreneurship KW - team creativity KW - shared leadership KW - social network analysis Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685167 SN - 1664-1078 VL - 12 SP - 1 EP - 13 PB - Frontiers in psychology CY - Lausanne, Schweiz ER - TY - GEN A1 - Rose, Robert A1 - Groeger, Lars A1 - Hölzle, Katharina T1 - The Emergence of Shared Leadership in Innovation Labs T2 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - Implementing innovation laboratories to leverage intrapreneurship are an increasingly popular organizational practice. A typical feature in these creative environments are semi-autonomous teams in which multiple members collectively exert leadership influence, thereby challenging traditional command-and-control conceptions of leadership. An extensive body of research on the team-centric concept of shared leadership has recognized the potential for pluralized leadership structures in enhancing team effectiveness; however, little empirical work has been conducted in organizational contexts in which creativity is key. This study set out to explore antecedents of shared leadership and its influence on team creativity in an innovation lab. Building on extant shared leadership and innovation research, we propose antecedents customary to creative teamwork, that is, experimental culture, task reflexivity, and voice. Multisource data were collected from 104 team members and 49 evaluations of 29 coaches nested in 21 teams working in a prototypical innovation lab. We identify factors specific to creative teamwork that facilitate the emergence of shared leadership by providing room for experimentation, encouraging team members to speak up in the creative process, and cultivating a reflective application of entrepreneurial thinking. We provide specific exemplary activities for innovation lab teams to increase levels of shared leadership. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe - 757 KW - innovation laboratories KW - intrapreneurship KW - team creativity KW - shared leadership KW - social network analysis Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-548724 SN - 1866-8364 SP - 1 EP - 13 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hölzle, Katharina A1 - Rhinow, Holger T1 - The Dilemmas of Design Thinking in Innovation Projects JF - Project Management Journal N2 - Organizations have discovered Design Thinking as a promising framework or language for innovation-focused project teamwork. The goal is to develop new products and services by being customer-centric and working iteratively and in an interdisciplinary way, using specific working principles and methods to create a common language among all stakeholders. The empirical results in this article show that Design Thinking teamwork is different from other forms of teamwork. The difference in Design Thinking team-based project work is that the teams go through a specific learning process that poses individual challenges but also provides the individual with experience-based learning. We show that teams going through this learning process repeatedly find themselves in seemingly insolvable conflicts-so called structural dilemmas-within the framework of project deadlines and under the influence of strategic guidelines of the organization. We explore these structural dilemmas and develop ways to overcome them. KW - Design Thinking KW - experience-based learning KW - project manager KW - project-based organization KW - innovation projects Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819853129 SN - 8756-9728 SN - 1938-9507 VL - 50 IS - 4 SP - 418 EP - 430 PB - Sage Publ. CY - Thousand Oaks ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Meinel, Christoph A1 - Döllner, Jürgen Roland Friedrich A1 - Weske, Mathias A1 - Polze, Andreas A1 - Hirschfeld, Robert A1 - Naumann, Felix A1 - Giese, Holger A1 - Baudisch, Patrick A1 - Friedrich, Tobias A1 - Böttinger, Erwin A1 - Lippert, Christoph A1 - Dörr, Christian A1 - Lehmann, Anja A1 - Renard, Bernhard A1 - Rabl, Tilmann A1 - Uebernickel, Falk A1 - Arnrich, Bert A1 - Hölzle, Katharina T1 - Proceedings of the HPI Research School on Service-oriented Systems Engineering 2020 Fall Retreat N2 - Design and Implementation of service-oriented architectures imposes a huge number of research questions from the fields of software engineering, system analysis and modeling, adaptability, and application integration. Component orientation and web services are two approaches for design and realization of complex web-based system. Both approaches allow for dynamic application adaptation as well as integration of enterprise application. Service-Oriented Systems Engineering represents a symbiosis of best practices in object-orientation, component-based development, distributed computing, and business process management. It provides integration of business and IT concerns. The annual Ph.D. Retreat of the Research School provides each member the opportunity to present his/her current state of their research and to give an outline of a prospective Ph.D. thesis. Due to the interdisciplinary structure of the research school, this technical report covers a wide range of topics. These include but are not limited to: Human Computer Interaction and Computer Vision as Service; Service-oriented Geovisualization Systems; Algorithm Engineering for Service-oriented Systems; Modeling and Verification of Self-adaptive Service-oriented Systems; Tools and Methods for Software Engineering in Service-oriented Systems; Security Engineering of Service-based IT Systems; Service-oriented Information Systems; Evolutionary Transition of Enterprise Applications to Service Orientation; Operating System Abstractions for Service-oriented Computing; and Services Specification, Composition, and Enactment. N2 - Der Entwurf und die Realisierung dienstbasierender Architekturen wirft eine Vielzahl von Forschungsfragestellungen aus den Gebieten der Softwaretechnik, der Systemmodellierung und -analyse, sowie der Adaptierbarkeit und Integration von Applikationen auf. Komponentenorientierung und WebServices sind zwei Ansätze für den effizienten Entwurf und die Realisierung komplexer Web-basierender Systeme. Sie ermöglichen die Reaktion auf wechselnde Anforderungen ebenso, wie die Integration großer komplexer Softwaresysteme. "Service-Oriented Systems Engineering" repräsentiert die Symbiose bewährter Praktiken aus den Gebieten der Objektorientierung, der Komponentenprogrammierung, des verteilten Rechnen sowie der Geschäftsprozesse und berücksichtigt auch die Integration von Geschäftsanliegen und Informationstechnologien. Die Klausurtagung des Forschungskollegs "Service-oriented Systems Engineering" findet einmal jährlich statt und bietet allen Kollegiaten die Möglichkeit den Stand ihrer aktuellen Forschung darzulegen. Bedingt durch die Querschnittstruktur des Kollegs deckt dieser Bericht ein weites Spektrum aktueller Forschungsthemen ab. Dazu zählen unter anderem Human Computer Interaction and Computer Vision as Service; Service-oriented Geovisualization Systems; Algorithm Engineering for Service-oriented Systems; Modeling and Verification of Self-adaptive Service-oriented Systems; Tools and Methods for Software Engineering in Service-oriented Systems; Security Engineering of Service-based IT Systems; Service-oriented Information Systems; Evolutionary Transition of Enterprise Applications to Service Orientation; Operating System Abstractions for Service-oriented Computing; sowie Services Specification, Composition, and Enactment. T3 - Technische Berichte des Hasso-Plattner-Instituts für Digital Engineering an der Universität Potsdam - 138 KW - Hasso Plattner Institute KW - research school KW - Ph.D. retreat KW - service-oriented systems engineering KW - Hasso-Plattner-Institut KW - Forschungskolleg KW - Klausurtagung KW - Service-oriented Systems Engineering Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-504132 SN - 978-3-86956-513-2 SN - 1613-5652 SN - 2191-1665 IS - 138 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Rose, Robert A1 - Hölzle, Katharina A1 - Björk, Jennie T1 - More than a quarter century of creativity and innovation management BT - the journal's characteristics, evolution, and a look ahead JF - Creativity and innovation management N2 - When this journal was founded in 1992 by Tudor Rickards and Susan Moger, there was no academic outlet available that addressed issues at the intersection of creativity and innovation. From zero to 1,163 records, from the new kid on the block to one of the leading journals in creativity and innovation management has been quite a journey, and we would like to reflect on the past 28 years and the intellectual and conceptual structure of Creativity and Innovation Management (CIM). Specifically, we highlight milestones and influential articles, identify how key journal characteristics evolved, outline the (co-)authorship structure, and finally, map the thematic landscape of CIM by means of a text-mining analysis. This study represents the first systematic and comprehensive assessment of the journal's published body of knowledge and helps to understand the journal's influence on the creativity and innovation management community. We conclude by discussing future topics and paths of the journal as well as limitations of our approach. KW - anniversary KW - bibliometrics KW - creativity and innovation management KW - science mapping Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12361 SN - 0963-1690 SN - 1467-8691 VL - 29 IS - 1 SP - 5 EP - 20 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Oxford ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hölzle, Katharina A1 - Björk, Jennie A1 - Boer, Harry T1 - Light at the end of the tunnel JF - Creativity and innovation management Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12427 SN - 0963-1690 SN - 1467-8691 VL - 30 IS - 1 SP - 3 EP - 5 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Oxford [u.a.] ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Göpel, Monique A1 - Hölzle, Katharina A1 - Knyphausen-Aufsess, Dodo Zu T1 - Individuals' innovation response behaviour a framework of antecedents and opportunities for future research JF - Creativity and innovation management N2 - Innovation response behaviour is defined as individuals novelty-supporting or novelty-impeding action when navigating innovation initiatives through the organization. A typology of innovation response behaviour is developed, distinguishing between active and passive modes of conduct for novelty-supporting and novelty-impeding behaviour, respectively. The antecedents of innovation response behaviour are delineated based on West and Farr's five-factor model of individual innovation. Moreover, we argue that within organizational contexts, individuals often fail to implement their ideas due to innovation barriers, perceived as factors that are beyond their control. Based on the theory of planned behaviour, we reveal how these barriers influence individuals intentional and exhibited innovation response behaviour. Propositions about proximal and distal antecedents of individuals innovation response behaviour are derived. Proposing a research framework to study the organizational process of innovation from an actor-based perspective, this paper intends to link existing research on individual innovation with the process of innovation at the organizational level, explicitly accounting for the socio-political dynamics and arising managerial problems associated with successful innovation implementation within organizational realities. Implications for research in innovation management are discussed and avenues for future research outlined. Y1 - 2012 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12000 SN - 0963-1690 VL - 21 IS - 4 SP - 412 EP - 426 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Hoboken ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Puteanus-Birkenbach, Katja A1 - Hölzle, Katharina T1 - Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneur oder der Begriff des unternehmerischen Denken und Handelns JF - Entrepreneurship education: das Potsdamer Modell der Gründungslehre und -beratung Y1 - 2015 SN - 978-3-7357-6095-1 SP - 85 EP - 95 PB - BoD CY - Norderstedt ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Henike, Tassilo A1 - Kamprath, Martin A1 - Hölzle, Katharina T1 - Effecting, but effective? BT - how business model visualisations unfold cognitive impacts JF - Long range planning : LRP ; international journal of strategic management / Strategic Planning Society N2 - Business model (BM) visualisations have become popular instruments with which to explain and manage today's complex business interactions. Using verbal and graphic elements, they provide simplified representations of reality and can support BM tasks that go beyond working memory's capacities. Visualisations thus reduce cognitive load and represent how practitioners and researchers think about BMs. However, they can also affect their thinking. This constitutes a thus far insufficiently explained tension between effectively reducing reality's complexity and the resulting cognitive biases. Building on cognitive load and framing theory, we qualitatively analysed 103 BM visualisations to explain how visual elements affect visualisations' cognitive effectiveness (helpfulness and ease of applicability) and unfold visual framing effects. By identifying five visual framing effects, we contribute to the cognitive BM perspective and explain how this set of cognitive factors affects BM management and research. We also found that most BM visualisations are not cognitively effective because they consist of unclear and non-parsimonious elements, limiting their cross-contextual application. Furthermore, the analysis revealed certain visualisations with strictly operationalised BM dimensions. These findings provide essential contributions to the literature on BM methods. We conclude by discussing how practitioners and researchers can use BM visualisations and their cognitive impacts accordingly. KW - Visualisations KW - Business models KW - Tools KW - Managerial cognition KW - Framing Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101925 SN - 0024-6301 SN - 1873-1872 VL - 53 IS - 4 PB - Elsevier CY - Oxford ER -