TY - CHAP A1 - Weigl, Johannes ED - Buchheim, Johannes ED - Kraetzig, Viktoria ED - Mendelsohn, Juliane K. ED - Steinrötter, Björn T1 - Margrethe, the 80, and who? BT - private Durchsetzung des Digital Markets Act (DMA) T2 - Plattformen : Grundlagen und Neuordnung des Rechts digitaler Plattformen Y1 - 2024 SN - 978-3-7560-1454-5 SN - 978-3-7089-2476-2 SN - 978-3-03891-715-1 SN - 978-3-7489-1991-9 U6 - https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748919919-97 SP - 97 EP - 124 PB - Nomos CY - Baden-Baden ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Weinbach, Christine ED - Burkart, Günter ED - Cichecki, Diana ED - Degele, Nina ED - Kahlert, Heike T1 - Eigenlogik und Druck von außen T1 - Inherent logic and outside pressure BT - systemtheoretische Perspektiven auf das Verhältnis privat/öffentlich im Familiensystem BT - a systems theoretical perspective on the relationship between the private and the public sphere of the family system T2 - Privat – öffentlich – politisch: Gesellschaftstheorien in feministischer Perspektive N2 - In weiten Teilen der Geschlechterforschung ist die Unterscheidung zwischen Privatheit und Öffentlichkeit von großer analytischer Bedeutung für das Verständnis moderner Geschlechterverhältnisse. Dennoch weisen ihre Analysen vielfach begriffliche Unschärfen im Gebrauch der Unterscheidung auf: Zum einen wird Familie mit Privatheit, Erwerbsarbeit mit Öffentlichkeit identisch gesetzt; zum anderen werden beide Unterscheidungen parallel verwendet. Der Beitrag setzt die beiden Unterscheidungen Privatheit/Öffentlichkeit und Familie/Erwerb mithilfe der Luhmann’schen Systemtheorie auf neue Weise ins Verhältnis. Dazu greift er den Forschungsansatz Doing Family auf, der Familie als Herstellungsleistung versteht. Vorgeschlagen wird, familiale Privatheit als staatlich geschützte familiale Selbststeuerungsebene zu begreifen, auf der sich die Familie gegenüber als öffentlich begriffenen Umwelterwartungen wie dem (dynamischen) Arbeitsmarkt sowohl abgrenzt als auch auf sie antwortet. Entsprechend besitzt jedes einzelne Familiensystem seine eigene Privatheit und Öffentlichkeit. Damit einhergehend, lassen sich die Individualisierung der Familienmitglieder als auch die zunehmende Irrelevanz von Gender für die familiale Binnenstruktur beobachten: Da jedes Familiensystem die Unterscheidung auf unterschiedliche Weise handhabt, findet eine Heterogenisierung von Familienformen statt. N2 - In large areas of gender studies the distinction between the private and the public spheres has been given great analytical importance for the understanding of modern gender relations. Nevertheless, their analyses often lack conceptual clarity whilst using the distinction: On the one hand, family is used equivalent to privacy, gainful employment equivalent to the public sphere; on the other hand, both distinctions are used congruently. Against this background and with reference to Luhmann’s systems theory, the present text puts the two distinctions privacy / public sphere and family/employment into a fresh relationship. For this purpose, the text makes reference to a research approach, which conceives the family as the result of Doing Family. The text suggests seeing familial privacy as a level of self-organisation protected by the state. On this basis, the family system isolates itself from what it recognizes as expectations of the public sphere and responds to them accordingly. As a consequence, every single family system keeps its own privacy and its own public sphere. Conjointly, the extensive individualisation of the family members can be observed: As every family system uses the distinction at its own discretion, a heterogenisation of family forms takes place. KW - Selbststeuerung des Familiensystems KW - Selbstbeobachtung des Familiensystems KW - wohlfahrtsstaatliche Strukturvorgaben KW - doing family KW - Systemtheorie KW - Heterogenisierung von Familienformen;Self-Steering of the Family System KW - self-observation of the family system KW - structural demands of the welfare state KW - systems theory KW - heterogenization of family forms Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-658-35400-8 SN - 978-3-658-35401-5 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35401-5_10 SP - 285 EP - 311 PB - Springer VS CY - Wiesbaden ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Weith, Thomas T1 - German-Polish border region BT - challenges for governing cross-border development T2 - Politics vs. economics : consequences and economic challenges for the East-West partnership Y1 - 2017 SN - 978-3-945878-62-0 SP - 243 EP - 249 PB - WeltTrends CY - Potsdam ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Weiß, Norman T1 - Programmes of Cooperation and Solidarity T2 - The Council of Europe : its law and policies Y1 - 2017 SN - 978-0-19-967252-3 SP - 788 EP - 798 PB - Oxford University Press CY - Oxford ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Weiß, Norman ED - Arnold, Rainer T1 - Rule of Law as a Basis for Effective Human Rights Protection BT - The German Perspective T2 - The Universalism of Human Rights (Ius Gentium : Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice ; 16) N2 - Human rights can be understood as a multi-faceted concept which needs a strong legal basis, namely, a set of legal guarantees in human rights treaties and an increasing number of monitoring mechanisms. Following the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) of December 10, 1948, various multi-lateral treaties for the protection of human rights have been negotiated and entered into force. They are not restricted to civil and political rights and take a much broader approach. All have monitoring mechanisms acting on a legal basis. The important European system with its strong, judicial monitoring mechanism is providing an effective human rights protection focused on civil and political rights. In the Görgülü case (2004), the German Federal Constitutional Court underlined the importance of the European Court’s judgments and of the ECHR as a legally binding instrument for the protection of human rights. Y1 - 2012 UR - http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-94-007-4510-0 SN - 978-94-007-4509-4 SN - 1534-6781 SN - 2214-9902 SP - 257 EP - 267 PB - Springer CY - Dodrecht ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Weiß, Norman ED - Löhr, Isabella ED - Wenzlhuemer, Roland T1 - Institutionalised Co-operation on International Communication : The International Administrative Unions as a Means of Governing Globalisation Processes T2 - The Nation State and Beyond : Governing Globalization Processes in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries (Transcultural Research - Heidelberg Studies on Asia and Europe in a Global Context) N2 - The nineteenth century witnessed restoration and reformation, the heyday of the nation state in Europe and inter-state cooperation at the same time. Driven by technical progress, communication across borders became an everyday phenomenon demanding transnational cooperation and regulation. Whereas in the political field irregular conferences turned out to be an appropriate instrument for governing transnational cooperation, a more constant and institutionalised matter proved to be adequate for technical cooperation. In 1865, the International Telegraph Convention set up a relevant administrative union which merged in 1932 with the International Radiotelegraph Union from 1906 to form the newly labelled International Telecommunication Union (ITU). The parties to the ITU met regularly in so-called plenipotentiary conferences every 3 years. Already in 1875 the International Telegraph Convention was completely redrafted and the organisation’s structure changed. The contracting parties created an instrument that paved the way for a modern form of international standard setting. The new, simplified convention contained only general provisions of a policy nature that would remain in effect for an “indeterminate length of time” (Art. 20), detailed rules of a transitory and specific nature that might be subject to frequent changes with the progress of technology were put into the “Regulations for international service” (also known as the Telegraph Regulations). The newly established “administrative conferences” attended by technical experts from the member states were responsible for revising the regulations when necessary. This was an early example of the transferral of power from sovereign nation states to an international organisation in order to govern transnational communication effectively. The administrative unions, as the first examples in modern history, show the ability of self-interested rational agents to overcome collective action dilemmas, i.e. situations where cooperation avoids sub-optimal outcomes for cooperators. The newly created institutions shaped a spirit of cooperation and the practice of standard setting proved that cooperation is effective. Furthermore, they show the spill-over effects of cooperation: increased cooperation in one area leads to increased cooperation in other areas. Y1 - 2010 SN - 978-3-642-32934-0 (online) SN - 978-3-642-32933-3 (print) U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32934-0 SN - 2191-656X SP - 65 EP - 82 PB - Springer CY - Berlin, Heidelberg ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Weiß, Norman T1 - Vorwort T2 - Die Deutsche Gesellschaft für die Vereinten Nationen (DGVN) : Geschichte, Organisation und politisches Wirken, 1952-2017 Y1 - 2017 SN - 978-3-8487-4559-3 SP - 7 EP - 7 PB - Nomos CY - Baden-Baden ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Weiß, Norman ED - Schmahl, Stefanie ED - Breuer, Marten T1 - Origin and Further Development T2 - The Council of Europe : its law and politics Y1 - 2017 SN - 978-0-19-967252-3 SP - 3 EP - 22 PB - Oxford University Press CY - Oxford ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Weiß, Norman A1 - Zimmermann, Andreas ED - Zimmermann, Andreas ED - Weiß, Norman T1 - Remarks on the relationship between international human rights law and international humanitarian law T2 - Human rights and international humanitarian law : challenges ahead N2 - Back in 1949, and thus only one year after the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the four Geneva Conventions were adopted, providing a strong signal for a new world order created after 1945 with the United Nations at their centre and combining as their goals both the maintenance of peace and security and the protection of human rights, but also recognising, realistically, that succeeding generations had so far not yet been saved from the scourge of war. Hence, the continued need for rules governing, and limiting, the means and methods of warfare once an armed conflict has erupted. At the same time, the international community has unfortunately not been able so far to fully safeguard individual human rights, its efforts to that effect and the continuous development of international human rights law over the years notwithstanding. Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-1-83910-826-6 SN - 978-1-83910-827-3 U6 - https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839108273.00006 SP - 1 EP - 10 PB - Edward Elgar Publishing CY - Cheltenham ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Wetzel, Johanna M. A1 - Reed, Kate A1 - Schenck, Marcia C. T1 - "Writing with my professors” BT - contesting the boundaries of the field in the Global History Dialogues Project T2 - Writing Together: Kollaboratives Schreiben mit Personen aus dem Feld N2 - Kollaboratives Forschen quer zu hegemonialen Wissensordnungen gilt als wichtiger Baustein dekolonialer Wissenspraxis. Gemeinsame Schreibprozesse von Wissenschaftler*innen und ihren nicht-wissenschaftlichen Forschungspartner*innen sind allerdings selten und eine methodologische und forschungspraktische Reflexion fehlt. Die Beiträger*innen widmen sich diesen Lücken, indem sie erfolgreiche, aber auch gescheiterte Projekte kollaborativer Textproduktion zwischen Universität und Feld vorstellen und auf ihr Potenzial als transformative und dekoloniale Wissenspraxis befragen. So entsteht eine praktische Orientierungshilfe, die gleichzeitig die interdisziplinäre Diskussion anregt. Y1 - 2023 SN - 978-3-8394-6399-4 U6 - https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839463994-002 VL - 45 SP - 31 EP - 53 PB - Transcript Verlag CY - Bielefeld ER -