TY - JOUR A1 - Reibis, Rona K. A1 - Völler, Heinz T1 - Non pharmacological secondary prevention and rehabilitation T1 - Nicht pharmakologische Sekundärprävention und Rehabilitation BT - current evidence BT - aktuelle Evidenz JF - Aktuelle Kardiologie N2 - Die Sekundärprävention der koronaren Herzkrankheit umfasst einerseits eine pharmakologische, andererseits eine lebensstilbasierte Säule, die idealerweise interagieren und sich potenzieren. Neben der medikamentösen Blutdruck- und Lipideinstellung auf leitlinienorientierte Zielwerte ermöglichen moderne Antidiabetika eine Optimierung des glukometabolischen Kontinuums und eine Prognosebesserung. Die Lebensstiloptimierung setzt sich aus koronarprotektiver Ernährung, einer individualisierten Trainingstherapie, einer konsequenten Nikotinkarenz und stressreduzierenden Maßnahmen zusammen. Die kardiologische Rehabilitation (Phase II) schließt sich idealerweise unmittelbar einem stationären Aufenthalt wegen eines akuten Koronarereignisses an, kann aber auch im Rahmen einer stabilen Koronarsituation im Rahmen eines allgemeinen Antragsverfahrens durchgeführt werden. Randomisierte und prospektiv angelegte Interventionsstudien belegen die prognostische Wertigkeit der kardiologischen Rehabilitation auch im Zeitalter akuter Revaskularisationstherapie mit 24-h-PCI und moderner Pharmakotherapie. N2 - Secondary prevention of coronary artery disease includes pharmacological and lifestyle-based therapy that ideally interact and potentiate. In addition to blood pressure and lipid adjustment to guideline-oriented target values, modern antidiabetic agents enable an optimization of the glucometabolic continuum and improve prognosis. Lifestyle optimization consists of coronary protective nutrition, individualized training therapy, consistent nicotine withdrawal and stress-reducing measures. Cardiological rehabilitation (phase II) ideally immediately follows an inpatient stay due to an acute coronary event, but can also be carried out in the context of a stable coronary situation. Randomized and prospective intervention studies prove the prognostic value of cardiological rehabilitation even in the age of acute revascularization therapy with 24-hour PCI and modern pharmacotherapy. KW - cardiac rehabilitation KW - physical activity KW - nutrition KW - professional KW - reintegration KW - secondary prevention KW - Sekundärprävention KW - kardiologische Rehabilitation KW - Trainingstherapie KW - Ernährung KW - berufliche Wiedereingliederung Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1185-8460 SN - 2193-5203 SN - 2193-5211 VL - 9 IS - 03 SP - 297 EP - 302 PB - Thieme CY - Stuttgart ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schulz-Behrendt, Claudia A1 - Salzwedel, Annett A1 - Rabe, Sophie A1 - Ortmann, K. A1 - Völler, Heinz T1 - Aspekte beruflicher und sozialer Wiedereingliederung aus Sicht kardiovaskulär erkrankter Rehabilitanden in besonderen beruflichen Problemlagen T1 - Subjective Aspects of Return to Work and Social Reintegration in Patients with Extensive Work-related Problems in Cardiac Rehabilitation BT - Ergebnisse einer qualitativen Erhebung BT - Results of a Qualitative Investigation JF - Die Rehabilitation : Zeitschrift für Praxis und Forschung in der Rehabilitation N2 - Ziel: Untersucht wurden subjektive bio-psycho-soziale Auswirkungen chronischer Herz- und Gefäßerkrankungen, Bewältigungsstrategien und Formen sozialer Unterstützung bei Rehabilitanden in besonderen beruflichen Problemlagen (BBPL). Methodik: Für die qualitative Untersuchung wurden 17 Patienten (48,9±7,0 Jahre, 13 männl.) mit BBPL (SIMBO-C>30) in leitfadengestützten Interviews befragt. Die Auswertung erfolgte softwaregestützt nach dem inhaltsanalytischen Ansatz von Mayring. Ergebnisse: Im Rahmen der Krankheitsauswirkungen benannten die Patienten soziale, einschließlich beruflicher Aspekte mit 62% der Aussagen deutlich häufiger als physische oder psychische Faktoren (9 bzw. 29%). Angewandte Bewältigungsstrategien und erfahrene Unterstützungsleistungen richteten sich jedoch überwiegend auf körperliche Einschränkungen (70 bzw. 45%). Schlussfolgerung: Obgleich soziale Krankheitsauswirkungen für die befragten Rehabilitanden subjektiv bedeutsam waren, gelang die Entwicklung geeigneter Bewältigungsstrategien nur unzureichen N2 - Objective This study investigated subjective biopsychosocial effects of coronary heart disease (CHD), coping strategies and social support in patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and having extensive work-related problems. Methods A qualitative investigation was performed in 17 patients (48.9 +/- 7.0 y, 13 male) with extensive work-related problems (SIMBO-C > 30). All patients were interviewed with structured surveys. Data analysis was performed using a software that is based on the content analysis approach of Mayring. Results In regard to effects of disease, patients indicated social aspects including occupational aspects (62 %) more often than physical or mental factors (9 or 29 %). Applied coping strategies and support services are mainly focused on physical impairments (70 or 45 %). Conclusions The development of appropriate coping strategies was insufficient although social effects of disease were subjectively meaningful for patients in CR. KW - cardiac rehabilitation KW - extensive work-related problems KW - social support KW - return to work KW - kardiologische Rehabilitation KW - besondere berufliche Problemlagen KW - soziale Unterstützung KW - berufliche Wiedereingliederung Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-121379 SN - 0034-3536 SN - 1439-1309 VL - 56 IS - 3 SP - 181 EP - 188 PB - Thieme CY - Stuttgart ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Salzwedel, Annett A1 - Haubold, Kathrin A1 - Barnack, Beate A1 - Reibis, Rona Katharina A1 - Völler, Heinz T1 - Indikatoren der Ergebnisqualität kardiologischer Rehabilitation Ergebnisse einer Delphi-Befragung von Mitgliedern der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Prävention und Rehabilitation von Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen e. V. (DGPR) JF - Die Rehabilitation : Zeitschrift für Praxis und Forschung in der Rehabilitation N2 - Ziel der Studie Die vorliegende Untersuchung beinhaltete die explorative Erfassung potenzieller Indikatoren der Ergebnisqualität der kardiologischen Rehabilitation (CR) für Patienten unter 65 Jahren. Methoden In einer 4-stufigen webbasierten Delphi-Befragung (04-07/2016) von in der CR tätigen Ärzten[2] , Psychologen und Sport-/Physiotherapeuten wurden Parameter der körperlichen Leistungsfähigkeit, der Sozialmedizin, der subjektiven Gesundheit und kardiovaskuläre Risikofaktoren hinsichtlich ihrer Eignung als Qualitätsindikator bewertet. Ergebnisse Von 44 vorgegebenen wie auch von den Teilnehmern vorgeschlagenen Parametern wurden 21 Parameter (48%), die Hälfte davon psychosoziale Faktoren, als potenzielle Qualitätsindikatoren ausgewählt, wobei lediglich für das Rauchverhalten, den Blutdruck, das LDL-Cholesterin und die max. Belastbarkeit im Belastungs-EKG ein Konsens (Zustimmung>75% der Befragten) erzielt wurde. Schlussfolgerung Die Wahl der Qualitätsindikatoren durch die Experten erfolgte mehrheitlich mit nur geringer Einigkeit. Eine klinische und wissenschaftliche Evaluierung der gewählten Parameter ist daher zwingend erforderlich. N2 - Objective The present investigation aimed an explorative acquisition of potential performance measures for quantifying the quality of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for patients under 65 years of age. Methods A 4-level web based Delphi survey of physicians, psychologists, and sports or physiotherapists in CR was conducted from April to July in 2016. The experts assessed several parameters of physical performance, social medicine, subjective health and cardiovascular risk factors regarding their suitability as performance measures of CR. Results Of the 44 predetermined as well as by the participants proposed parameters, 21 parameters (48%) were selected as potential performance measures. Half of these were psychosocial factors. Merely, smoking habits, blood pressure, LDL-cholesterol and maximum capacity on exercise-ECG achieved a consensus (agreement>75% of the respondents). Conclusions The experts’ choice of performance measures was little consistent. Therefore, a clinical investigation and scientific evaluation of the predefined parameters is essential. T2 - Quality Performance Measures in Cardiac RehabilitationResults of a Delphi Survey of Members of the German Society for Prevention and Rehabilitation of Cardiovascular Diseases (DGPR) KW - cardiac rehabilitation KW - quality assurance KW - performance measures KW - outcome KW - expert survey KW - kardiologische Rehabilitation KW - Qualitätsindikatoren KW - Ergebnisqualität KW - Rehabilitationserfolg KW - Expertenbefragung Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-101048 SN - 0034-3536 SN - 1439-1309 VL - 58 IS - 1 SP - 31 EP - 38 PB - Thieme CY - Stuttgart ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Marx, R. A1 - Philips, H. A1 - Bassenge, D. A1 - Nosper, M. A1 - Roehrig, B. A1 - Linck-Eleftheriadis, S. A1 - Strandt, G. A1 - Salzwedel, Annett A1 - Pabst, F. T1 - Progress of Rehabilitation for Cardiac Patients Depending on the Degree of Self-Sufficiency at Admission JF - Die Rehabilitation : Zeitschrift für Praxis und Forschung in der Rehabilitation N2 - Zusammenfassung Ziel der Studie: Es existieren kaum Publikationen uber das Rehabilitationsergebnis kardiologischer Patienten unter Berucksichtigung eines erhohten medizinischen, pflegerischen und therapeutischen Versorgungsaufwands (Barthel-Index70). Es war Ziel der Studie, die in einem Zeitraum von 2 Jahren aufgenommen Rehabilitanden (n=387) einer gesetzlichen Krankenkasse, aufgeteilt in jeweils eine Gruppe selbstversorgender und versorgungsaufwandiger Patienten, bezuglich ihrer Unterschiede in dem Rehabilitationsergebnis zu uberprufen. Methodik: In Abhangigkeit des Versorgungsaufwandes wurde das Rehabilitationsergebnis sowie Unterschiede im Verlauf hinsichtlich der korperlichen Leistungsfahigkeit, des emotionalen Status und der Aktivitaten des taglichen Lebens, gemessen an Barthelindex, FIM-Index, HADS-Werten, Komplikationen, Funktionsuntersuchungen, Belastungstests, Rehabilitationsdauer und Entlassungsform, gepruft. Ergebnisse: Die in Hinblick auf medizinischen, pflegerischen und therapeutischen Aufwand versorgungsaufwandigen Patienten waren alter, langer im Krankenhaus und in der Rehabilitation, sie hatten mehr Komplikationen und deutlich mehr Begleiterkrankungen. Sie wurden haufiger ins Akutkrankenhaus verlegt. Sie hatten eine hohere Steigerungsrate der Selbstversorgungsindices und eine relevante Steigerung bei den Belastungstests. Schlussfolgerung: Ein hoher Versorgungsaufwand multimorbider kardiologischer Patienten ist keine Kontraindikation gegen eine Rehabilitation, da auch bei dieser Patientengruppe die tragerspezifischen Rehabilitationsziele erreicht wurden. Abstract Introduction: There are hardly any publications about the outcome of cardiac rehabilitation considering patients with an increased need for medical, nursing and therapeutic care. The aim of this study, which consecutively included n=387 statutory health insurance inpatients over a period of 2 years, was to find out differences in outcome in self-care patients (Barthel index>70) as compared to patients with a need for complex care (Barthel index70). Methods: Rehabilitation outcomes concerning physical capacity, emotional status and activities of daily living as measured by Barthel index, FIM index, HADS, clinical complications, exercise test, duration of rehabilitation and form of dismission were analyzed and compared between both groups. Results: The inpatients with a Barthel index 70 at admission were older, had a longer stay in hospital and in rehabilitation, developed more complications and more often suffered from concomitant diseases. They were readmitted to hospital more often. They showed a comparatively higher increase in indices of self-care and a significant increase in physical performance tests. Conclusion: Higher medical care expenses of multimorbid cardiac inpatients are no contraindication against rehabilitation, because even in this group the specific rehabilitation aims of the healthcare payers can be reached. KW - kardiologische Rehabilitation KW - Rehabilitationspotenzial KW - Qualitatssicherung KW - Versorgungsaufwandig KW - Multimorbiditat KW - cardiac rehabilitation KW - rehabilitation potential KW - quality assurance KW - complex care KW - multimorbidity Y1 - 2016 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-111524 SN - 0034-3536 SN - 1439-1309 VL - 55 SP - 34 EP - 39 PB - Thieme CY - Stuttgart ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Röhrig, Bernd A1 - Salzwedel, Annett A1 - Linck-Eleftheriadis, Sigrid A1 - Völler, Heinz A1 - Nosper, Manfred T1 - Outcome Based Center Comparisons in Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation Results from the EVA-Reha (R) Cardiology Project JF - Die Rehabilitation : Zeitschrift für Praxis und Forschung in der Rehabilitation N2 - Background: So far, for center comparisons in inpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR), the objective outcome quality was neglected because of challenges in quantifying the overall success of CR. In this article, a multifactorial benchmark model measuring the individual rehabilitation success is presented. Methods: In 21 rehabilitation centers, 5 123 patients were consecutively enrolled between 01/2010 and 12/2012 in the prospective multicenter registry EVA-Reha (R) Cardiology. Changes in 13 indicators in the areas cardiovascular risk factors, physical performance and subjective health during rehabilitation were evaluated according to levels of severity. Changes were only rated for patients who needed a medical intervention. Additionally, the changes had to be clinically relevant. Therefore Minimal Important Differences (MID) were predefined. Ratings were combined to a single score, the multiple outcome criterion (MEK). Results: The MEK was determined for all patients (71.7 +/- 7.4 years, 76.9 % men) and consisted of an average of 5.6 indicators. After risk adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical baseline parameters, MEK was used for center ranking. In addition, individual results of indicators were compared with means of all study sites. Conclusion: With the method presented here, the outcome quality can be quantified and outcome-based comparisons of providers can be made. KW - outcome quality KW - quality assurance KW - cardiac rehabilitation KW - benchmark KW - profiling Y1 - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1395556 SN - 0034-3536 SN - 1439-1309 VL - 54 IS - 1 SP - 45 EP - 52 PB - Thieme CY - Stuttgart ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Roehrig, B. A1 - Nosper, M. A1 - Linck-Eleftheriadis, S. A1 - Strandt, G. A1 - Salzwedel, Annett A1 - Völler, Heinz T1 - Method of the assessment of patients Outcome in cardiac rehabilitation by means of quality indicators - a description of the method JF - Die Rehabilitation : Zeitschrift für Praxis und Forschung in der Rehabilitation N2 - Introduction: Cardiac rehabilitation is designed for patients suffering from cardiovascular diseases or functional disabilities. The aim of a cardiac rehabilitation is to improve overall physical health, psychological well-being, physical function, the ability to participate in social life and help patients to change their habits. Regarding the heterogeneity of these aims measuring of the effect of cardiac rehabilitation is still a challenge. This study recommends a concept to assess the effects of cardiac rehabilitation regarding the individual change of relevant quality indicators. Methods: With EVA-Reha; cardiac rehabilitation the Medical Advisory Service of Statutory Health Insurance Funds in Rhineland-Palatinate, Alzey (MDK Rheinland-Pfalz) developed a software to collect data set including sociodemographic and diagnostic data and also the results of specific assessments. The project was funded by the Techniker Krankenkasse, Hamburg, and supported by participating rehabilitation centers. From 01. July 2010 to 30. June 2011 1309 patients (age 71.5 years, 76.1% men) from 13 rehabilitation centers were consecutively enrolled. 13 quality indicators in 3 scales were developed for evaluation of cardiac rehabilitation: 1) cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides), 2) exercise capacity (resting heart rate, maximal exercise capacity, maximal walking distance, heart failure [NYHA classification], and angina pectoris [CCS classification]) and 3) subjective health (IRES-24: pain, somatic health, psychological wellbeing and depression as well as anxiety on the HADS). The study was prospective; data of patients were assessed at entry and discharge of rehabilitation. To measure the success of rehabilitation each parameter was graded in severity classes at entry and discharge. For each of the 13 quality indicators changes of severity class were rated in a rating matrix. For indicators without a requirement for medical care neither at entry nor at discharge no rating was performed. Results: The grading into severity classes as well as the minimal important differences were given for the 13 quality indicators. The result of rehabilitation can be demonstrated in suitable form by means of rating of the 13 quality indicators according to a clinical population. The rating model differs well between clinically changed and unchanged patients for the quality indicators. Conclusion: The result of cardiac rehabilitation can be assessed with 13 quality indicators measured at entry and discharge of the rehabilitation program. If a change into a more favorable category at the end of rehabilitation could be achieved it was counted as a success. The 13 quality indicators can be used to assess the individual result as well as the result of a population - e.g. all patients of a clinic in a specific time period. In addition, the assessment and rating of relevant quality indicators can be used for comparisons of rehabilitation centers. KW - cardiac rehabilitation KW - quality indicator KW - outcome KW - success KW - quality management Y1 - 2014 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1341457 SN - 0034-3536 SN - 1439-1309 VL - 53 IS - 1 SP - 31 EP - 37 PB - Thieme CY - Stuttgart ER -