TY - JOUR A1 - Göpel, Monique A1 - Hölzle, Katharina A1 - Knyphausen-Aufsess, Dodo Zu T1 - Individuals' innovation response behaviour a framework of antecedents and opportunities for future research JF - Creativity and innovation management N2 - Innovation response behaviour is defined as individuals novelty-supporting or novelty-impeding action when navigating innovation initiatives through the organization. A typology of innovation response behaviour is developed, distinguishing between active and passive modes of conduct for novelty-supporting and novelty-impeding behaviour, respectively. The antecedents of innovation response behaviour are delineated based on West and Farr's five-factor model of individual innovation. Moreover, we argue that within organizational contexts, individuals often fail to implement their ideas due to innovation barriers, perceived as factors that are beyond their control. Based on the theory of planned behaviour, we reveal how these barriers influence individuals intentional and exhibited innovation response behaviour. Propositions about proximal and distal antecedents of individuals innovation response behaviour are derived. Proposing a research framework to study the organizational process of innovation from an actor-based perspective, this paper intends to link existing research on individual innovation with the process of innovation at the organizational level, explicitly accounting for the socio-political dynamics and arising managerial problems associated with successful innovation implementation within organizational realities. Implications for research in innovation management are discussed and avenues for future research outlined. Y1 - 2012 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12000 SN - 0963-1690 VL - 21 IS - 4 SP - 412 EP - 426 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Hoboken ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hölzle, Katharina A1 - Boer, Harry A1 - Björk, Jennie T1 - Creativity in and from people, processes, objects, and war zones JF - Creativity and innovation management Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12405 SN - 0963-1690 SN - 1467-8691 VL - 29 IS - 3 SP - 377 EP - 379 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Oxford ER - TY - GEN A1 - Hölzle, Katharina A1 - Boer, Harry A1 - Björk, Jennie T1 - Crisis management through creativity and innovation BT - storytelling, moral organizational creativity, and open innovation as creative means to spark innovation T2 - Creativity and innovation management Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12385 SN - 0963-1690 SN - 1467-8691 VL - 29 IS - 2 SP - 195 EP - 197 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Oxford [u.a.] ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hölzle, Katharina A1 - Puteanus-Birkenbach, Katja T1 - Die Entrepreneurship Academy Potsdam JF - Entrepreneurship education: das Potsdamer Modell der Grüdungslehre und -beratung Y1 - 2015 SN - 978-3-7357-6095-1 SP - 53 EP - 57 PB - BoD CY - Norderstedt ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hölzle, Katharina A1 - Puteanus-Birkenbach, Katja A1 - Wagner, Dieter T1 - Das Potsdamer Modell der Entrepreneurship Education JF - Entrepreneurship education : das Potsdamer Modell der Gründungslehre und -beratung Y1 - 2015 SN - 978-3-7357-6095-1 SP - VII EP - IX PB - BoD CY - Norderstedt ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hölzle, Katharina A1 - Rhinow, Holger T1 - The Dilemmas of Design Thinking in Innovation Projects JF - Project Management Journal N2 - Organizations have discovered Design Thinking as a promising framework or language for innovation-focused project teamwork. The goal is to develop new products and services by being customer-centric and working iteratively and in an interdisciplinary way, using specific working principles and methods to create a common language among all stakeholders. The empirical results in this article show that Design Thinking teamwork is different from other forms of teamwork. The difference in Design Thinking team-based project work is that the teams go through a specific learning process that poses individual challenges but also provides the individual with experience-based learning. We show that teams going through this learning process repeatedly find themselves in seemingly insolvable conflicts-so called structural dilemmas-within the framework of project deadlines and under the influence of strategic guidelines of the organization. We explore these structural dilemmas and develop ways to overcome them. KW - Design Thinking KW - experience-based learning KW - project manager KW - project-based organization KW - innovation projects Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819853129 SN - 8756-9728 SN - 1938-9507 VL - 50 IS - 4 SP - 418 EP - 430 PB - Sage Publ. CY - Thousand Oaks ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Puteanus-Birkenbach, Katja A1 - Hölzle, Katharina T1 - Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneur oder der Begriff des unternehmerischen Denken und Handelns JF - Entrepreneurship education: das Potsdamer Modell der Gründungslehre und -beratung Y1 - 2015 SN - 978-3-7357-6095-1 SP - 85 EP - 95 PB - BoD CY - Norderstedt ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schmeiss, Jessica A1 - Hölzle, Katharina A1 - Tech, Robin P. G. T1 - Designing Governance Mechanisms in Platform Ecosystems: Addressing the Paradox of Openness through Blockchain Technology JF - California Management Review N2 - The paradox of openness is inherent to all platform ecosystems-the tension in enabling maximum openness to create joint innovation while guaranteeing value capturing for all actors. Governance mechanisms to solve this paradox are embedded into the technical architecture of the platform, addressing the dimensions of access, control, and incentives. Blockchain technology offers unique ways to design novel governance mechanisms through the standardization of interactions. However, the design of such an architecture requires careful consideration of the cost associated with it. KW - ecosystems KW - governance KW - value creation KW - platforms KW - technology management Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619883618 SN - 0008-1256 SN - 2162-8564 VL - 62 IS - 1 SP - 121 EP - 143 PB - Sage Publ. CY - Thousand Oaks ER -