TY - JOUR A1 - Fischer, Saskia M. A1 - Wachs, Sebastian A1 - Bilz, Ludwig T1 - Teachers’ empathy and likelihood of intervention in hypothetical relational and retrospectively reported bullying situations JF - European journal of developmental psychology N2 - Prior research suggests that teachers with higher levels of empathy are more willing to intervene in bullying among students. However, these findings are based on hypothetical bullying situations and teachers' self-reports. In this study with 2,071 German students and their 556 teachers, we analysed reactions to hypothetical relational bullying situations as well as retrospectively reported bullying situations both from the teachers' as well as the students' perspectives. Results showed that teachers with higher levels of empathy reported stronger intentions to intervene in hypothetical relational bullying situations but were not more likely to intervene in retrospectively reported bullying situations. From the students' perspective, teachers' empathy was neither connected to the teachers' intention to intervene nor to the likelihood of intervention in the retrospectively reported situations. These different results could be taken as an opportunity to investigate whether existing findings could be influenced by methodological aspects such as teachers' self-reports. Implications for future research are discussed. KW - Bullying KW - empathy KW - teacher KW - likelihood of intervention KW - school Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2020.1869538 SN - 1740-5629 SN - 1740-5610 VL - 18 IS - 6 SP - 896 EP - 911 PB - Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group CY - London [u.a.] ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Wilbert, Jürgen A1 - Urton, Karolina A1 - Krull, Johanna A1 - Kulawiak, Pawel R. A1 - Schwalbe, Anja A1 - Hennemann, Thomas T1 - Teachers' accuracy in estimating social inclusion of students with and without special educational needs JF - Frontiers in education N2 - It is unclear to what extent teachers can accurately assess the social inclusion of their students with and without SEN. The study aims to shed light on these desiderata. Students (N = 1.644) with SEN (learning, behavior, and language problems) and without SEN and their teachers (N = 79) participated in the study. Sociometric peer nominations, students' self-perceived social inclusion, and teachers' assessments regarding students' social inclusion and self-perceived social inclusion were administered. The results suggest that teachers are moderately accurate in identifying social acceptance and social rejection, while accuracy is low when assessing students' self-perceived social inclusion. That said, rating accuracy varied strongly between teachers, ranging from no agreement to a perfect concordance. Teachers seem to be more accurate in estimating the social acceptance of students with learning problems. The results emphasize the importance of differentiating between various social inclusion criteria (i.e., students' self-report vs. peer nominations) and accounting for inter-individual differences in teachers' rating accuracy. KW - judgement accuracy KW - social inclusion KW - special educational needs KW - teacher KW - inclusive education KW - sociometry Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.598330 SN - 2504-284X VL - 5 PB - Frontiers Media CY - Lausanne ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Wachs, Sebastian A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Niproschke, Saskia A1 - Schubarth, Wilfried T1 - Bullying Intervention in Schools BT - a Multilevel Analysis of Teachers’ Success in Handling Bullying From the Students’ Perspective JF - Journal of early adolescence N2 - To date, little has been known about teachers’ success in bullying interventions. Thus, the present study analyzes how successfully teachers intervene in real bullying situations, based on an analysis of 1,996 reports by German students aged between 12 and 15 (49.2% female) from 24 schools. Predictors of success included intervention strategy (authoritarian-punitive, supportive-individual, supportive-cooperative intervention), bullying form (physical, verbal, relational, cyber), and the student’s bullying role (bully, victim, bystander) in the particular situation. Multilevel analyses showed that supportive-cooperative intervention strategies were the most successful in dealing with bullying in both the short and long term. In the long term, students evaluated teachers as being more successful in dealing with cyberbullying compared with physical bullying. Compared with students who observed bullying, students who perpetrated it were less likely to report that teachers’ interventions were successful in the short term. Implications for bullying intervention, preservice teacher-training, and future research are discussed. KW - intervention success KW - bullying KW - teacher KW - intervention strategies KW - bullies Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431618780423 SN - 0272-4316 SN - 1552-5449 VL - 39 IS - 5 SP - 642 EP - 668 PB - Sage Publ. CY - Thousand Oaks ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Berry, Carol A1 - Kusterer, Peter T1 - Using Teachers’ TryScience to support educators and improve teaching JF - Commentarii informaticae didacticae : (CID) N2 - The challenge is providing teachers with the resources they need to strengthen their instructions and better prepare students for the jobs of the 21st Century. Technology can help meet the challenge. Teachers’ Tryscience is a noncommercial offer, developed by the New York Hall of Science, TeachEngineering, the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards and IBM Citizenship to provide teachers with such resources. The workshop provides deeper insight into this tool and discussion of how to support teaching of informatics in schools. KW - science KW - teacher KW - collaboration KW - teaching material KW - instruction KW - lesson KW - social networking Y1 - 2013 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-64665 SN - 1868-0844 SN - 2191-1940 IS - 6 SP - 161 EP - 162 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER -