TY  - THES
A1  - Adelt, Anne
T1  - The Relativized Minimality approach to comprehension of German relative clauses in aphasia
N2  - It is a well-attested finding in head-initial languages that individuals with aphasia (IWA) have greater difficulties in comprehending object-extracted relative clauses (ORCs) as compared to subject-extracted relative clauses (SRCs). Adopting the linguistically based approach of Relativized Minimality (RM; Rizzi, 1990, 2004), the subject-object asymmetry is attributed to the occurrence of a Minimality effect in ORCs due to reduced processing capacities in IWA (Garraffa & Grillo, 2008; Grillo, 2008, 2009). For ORCs, it is claimed that the embedded subject intervenes in the syntactic dependency between the moved object and its trace, resulting in greater processing demands. In contrast, no such intervener is present in SRCs. Based on the theoretical framework of RM and findings from language acquisition (Belletti et al., 2012; Friedmann et al., 2009), it is assumed that Minimality effects are alleviated when the moved object and the intervening subject differ in terms of relevant syntactic features. For German, the language under investigation, the RM approach predicts that number (i.e., singular vs. plural) and the lexical restriction [+NP] feature (i.e., lexically restricted determiner phrases vs. lexically unrestricted pronouns) are considered relevant in the computation of Minimality. Greater degrees of featural distinctiveness are predicted to result in more facilitated processing of ORCs, because IWA can more easily distinguish between the moved object and the intervener. 
This cumulative dissertation aims to provide empirical evidence on the validity of the RM approach in accounting for comprehension patterns during relative clause (RC) processing in German-speaking IWA. For that purpose, I conducted two studies including visual-world eye-tracking experiments embedded within an auditory referent-identification task to study the offline and online processing of German RCs. More specifically, target sentences were created to evaluate (a) whether IWA demonstrate a subject-object asymmetry, (b) whether dissimilarity in the number and/or the [+NP] features facilitates ORC processing, and (c) whether sentence processing in IWA benefits from greater degrees of featural distinctiveness. Furthermore, by comparing RCs disambiguated through case marking (at the relative pronoun or the following noun phrase) and number marking (inflection of the sentence-final verb), it was possible to consider the role of the relative position of the disambiguation point. The RM approach predicts that dissimilarity in case should not affect the occurrence of Minimality effects. However, the case cue to sentence interpretation appears earlier within RCs than the number cue, which may result in lower processing costs in case-disambiguated RCs compared to number-disambiguated RCs.
In study I, target sentences varied with respect to word order (SRC vs. ORC) and dissimilarity in the [+NP] feature (lexically restricted determiner phrase vs. pronouns as embedded element). Moreover, by comparing the impact of these manipulations in case- and number-disambiguated RCs, the effect of dissimilarity in the number feature was explored. IWA demonstrated a subject-object asymmetry, indicating the occurrence of a Minimality effect in ORCs. However, dissimilarity neither in the number feature nor in the [+NP] feature alone facilitated ORC processing. Instead, only ORCs involving distinct specifications of both the number and the [+NP] features were well comprehended by IWA. In study II, only temporarily ambiguous ORCs disambiguated through case or number marking were investigated, while controlling for varying points of disambiguation. There was a slight processing advantage of case marking as cue to sentence interpretation as compared to number marking. 
Taken together, these findings suggest that the RM approach can only partially capture empirical data from German IWA. In processing complex syntactic structures, IWA are susceptible to the occurrence of the intervening subject in ORCs. The new findings reported in the thesis show that structural dissimilarity can modulate sentence comprehension in aphasia. Interestingly, IWA can override Minimality effects in ORCs and derive correct sentence meaning if the featural specifications of the constituents are maximally different, because they can more easily distinguish the moved object and the intervening subject given their reduced processing capacities. This dissertation presents new scientific knowledge that highlights how the syntactic theory of RM helps to uncover selective effects of morpho-syntactic features on sentence comprehension in aphasia, emphasizing the close link between assumptions from theoretical syntax and empirical research.
N2  - Personen mit Aphasie (PmA) verstehen Objektrelativsätze (ORS) häufig schlechter als Subjektrelativsätze (SRS). Im linguistisch basierten Ansatz der relativierten Minimalitätstheorie (RM; Rizzi, 1990, 2004) wird diese sog. Subjekt-Objekt-Asymmetrie dadurch erklärt, dass bei PmA aufgrund reduzierter Verarbeitungskapazitäten ein sog. Minimalitätseffekt in ORS auftritt (Garraffa & Grillo, 2008; Grillo, 2008, 2009), der die Verarbeitung erschwert. Dieser entsteht dadurch, dass das eingebettete Subjekt in der syntaktischen Abhängigkeit zwischen dem bewegten Objekt und seiner Spur interveniert. Im Gegensatz dazu gibt es in SRS kein intervenierendes Element. Anhand von Ergebnissen aus psycholinguistischen Studien (Belletti et al., 2012; Friedmann et al., 2009) wird zudem angenommen, dass der Minimalitätseffekt in ORS reduziert wird, wenn sich das bewegte Objekt und das intervenierende Subjekt hinsichtlich ihrer syntaktischen Merkmale unterscheiden. Für das Deutsche wird von der RM vorhergesagt, dass die Merkmale Numerus (Singular vs. Plural) und [+NP] (volle Nominalphrasen vs. Pronomen) für das Auftreten des Minimalitätseffekts relevant sind.  Je stärker sich die Konstituenten hinsichtlich relevanter syntaktischer Merkmale unterscheiden, desto stärker wird die Verarbeitung von ORS fazilitiert, weil PmA leichter zwischen dem bewegten Objekt und dem intervenierenden Subjekt unterscheiden können.
In dieser kumulativen Dissertation wird überprüft, ob mithilfe der RM Leistungsmuster bei der Verarbeitung von Relativsätzen in deutsch-sprechenden PmA erklärt werden können. Zu diesem Zweck wurden zwei Studien durchgeführt, in denen das Visual-World-Eyetracking-Paradigma mit einer auditiven Referenten-Identifikationsaufgabe kombiniert wurde, um die Offline- und Online-Verarbeitung von Relativsätzen zu untersuchen. Dabei wurde überprüft, (a) ob bei PmA eine Subjekt-Objekt-Asymmetrie auftritt, (b) ob die Verarbeitung von ORS durch die unterschiedliche Markierung des Objekts und des Subjekts hinsichtlich der Merkmale Numerus und/oder [+NP] fazilitiert wird und (c) ob die Satzverarbeitung weiter fazilitiert wird, wenn sich die Argumente in mehreren Merkmalen unterscheiden. Darüber hinaus wurden kasus-markierte (Desambiguierung durch Kasus am Relativpronomen oder am Determinierer der nachfolgenden Nominalphrase) oder numerus-markierte Relativsätze (Desambiguierung durch Flexion des satzfinalen Verbs) verglichen. Dadurch wurde untersucht, ob der Zeitpunkt der Disambiguierung einen Einfluss auf die Verarbeitung von Relativsätzen hat. Laut der RM sollte der Minimalitätseffekt nicht durch Kasus als morpho-syntaktisches Merkmal beeinflusst werden. Dennoch werden kasus-markierte Sätze früher desambiguiert als numerus-markierte Sätze, weshalb ein Verarbeitungsvorteil für kasus-markierte Relativsätze zu erwarten ist.
In Studie I wurden die Zielsätze hinsichtlich der Wortstellung (SRS vs. ORS) und des [+NP]-Merkmals variiert (volle Nominalphrase vs. Pronomen als eingebettetes Element). Darüber hinaus wurde der Einfluss dieser Manipulationen in kasus- und numerus-markierten Relativsätzen untersucht. Dadurch wurde beeinflusst, inwiefern sich die Konstituenten in relevanten morpho-syntaktischen Merkmalen unterscheiden. Die PmA zeigten eine Subjekt-Objekt-Asymmetrie, was durch das Auftreten eines Minimalitätseffekts in ORS erklärt werden kann. Im Gegensatz zu den Vorhersagen der RM konnte in ORS kein fazilitierender Effekt festgestellt werden, wenn sich die Konstituenten nur im Merkmal Numerus oder [+NP] unterschieden. Stattdessen verbesserten sich die Verstehensleistungen für solche ORS, in denen sich das bewegte Objekt und das eingebettete Subjekt hinsichtlich beider Merkmale Numerus und [+NP] unterschieden. In Studie II wurden kasus- und numerus-markierte ORS untersucht, wobei verschiedene Zeitpunkte der Disambiguierung berücksichtigt wurden. Hierbei zeigte sich ein leichter Verarbeitungsvorteil für kasus-markierte verglichen mit numerus-markierten ORS.
Zusammenfassend können mithilfe der RM nicht alle empirischen Daten von deutschsprachigen PmA erklärt werden. Die Verarbeitung von Relativsätzen wird durch das Auftreten des intervenierenden Subjekts in ORS beeinflusst. Die in der Dissertation berichteten Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die Satzverarbeitung bei Aphasie durch strukturelle Unterschiede zwischen den Konstituenten beeinflusst werden kann. Insbesondere kann der Minimalitätseffekt in ORS überwunden werden, wenn sich die Konstituenten hinsichtlich der morpho-syntaktischen Merkmale maximal unterscheiden. In diesem Fall können PmA das bewegte Objekt und das intervenierende Subjekt trotz ihrer reduzierten Verarbeitungskapazitäten voneinander unterscheiden. Das heißt, dass mithilfe der RM aufgezeigt werden kann, wie morpho-syntaktische Merkmale die Satzverarbeitung von PmA selektiv beeinflussen können. Dies betont die enge Verknüpfung zwischen Annahmen aus der theoretischen Syntax und empirischer Forschung.
KW  - aphasia
KW  - Aphasie
KW  - relative clauses
KW  - Relativsätze
KW  - Relativized Minimality
KW  - relativierte Minimalitätstheorie
KW  - morpho-syntactic features
KW  - morpho-syntaktische Merkmale
KW  - sentence processing
KW  - Satzverarbeitung
KW  - eye tracking
KW  - Eye-tracking
KW  - case
KW  - Kasus
KW  - number
KW  - Numerus
Y1  - 2024
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-623312
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Salzmann, Martin
A1  - Wierzba, Marta
A1  - Georgi, Doreen
T1  - Condition C in German A'-movement
BT  - tackling challenges in experimental research on reconstruction
JF  - Journal of linguistics : JL
N2  - In recent experimental work, arguments for or against Condition C reconstruction in A'-movement have been based on low/high availability of coreference in sentences with and without A'-movement. We argue that this reasoning is problematic: It involves arbitrary thresholds, and the results are potentially confounded by the different surface orders of the compared structures and non-syntactic factors. We present three experiments with designs that do not require defining thresholds of 'low' or 'high' coreference values. Instead, we focus on grammatical contrasts (wh-movement vs. relativization, subject vs. object wh-movement) and aim to identify and reduce confounds. The results show that reconstruction for A'-movement of DPs is not very robust in German, contra previous findings. Our results are compatible with the view that the surface order and non-syntactic factors (e.g. plausibility, referential accessibility of an R-expression) heavily influence coreference possibilities. Thus, the data argue against a theory that includes both reconstruction and a hard Condition C constraint. There is a residual contrast between sentences with subject/object movement, which is compatible with an account without reconstruction (and an additional non-syntactic factor) or an account with reconstruction (and a soft Condition C constraint).
KW  - A'-movement
KW  - binding
KW  - Condition C
KW  - experimental syntax
KW  - German
KW  - reconstruction
KW  - relative clauses
KW  - wh-questions
Y1  - 2022
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226722000214
SN  - 0022-2267
SN  - 1469-7742
VL  - 59
IS  - 3
SP  - 577
EP  - 622
PB  - Cambridge Univ. Press
CY  - London [u.a.]
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Haendler, Yair
A1  - Adani, Flavia
T1  - Testing the effect of an arbitrary subject pronoun on relative clause comprehension
BT  - a study with Hebrew-speaking children
JF  - Journal of child language
N2  - Previous studies have found that Hebrew-speaking children accurately comprehend object relatives (OR) with an embedded non-referential arbitrary subject pronoun (ASP). The facilitation of ORs with embedded pronouns is expected both from a discourse-pragmatics perspective and within a syntax-based locality approach. However, the specific effect of ASP might also be driven by a mismatch in grammatical features between the head noun and the pronoun, or by its relatively undemanding referential properties. We tested these possibilities by comparing ORs whose embedded subject is either ASP, a referential pronoun, or a lexical noun phrase. In all conditions, grammatical features were controlled. In a referent-identification task, the matching features made ORs with embedded pronouns difficult for five-year-olds. Accuracy was particularly low when the embedded pronoun was referential. These results indicate that embedded pronouns do not facilitate ORs across the board, and that the referential properties of pronouns affect OR processing.
KW  - relative clauses
KW  - pronouns
KW  - referentiality
Y1  - 2018
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000917000599
SN  - 0305-0009
SN  - 1469-7602
VL  - 45
IS  - 4
SP  - 959
EP  - 980
PB  - Cambridge Univ. Press
CY  - New York
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Adani, Flavia
A1  - Stegenwallner-Schutz, Maja Henny Katherine
A1  - Niesel, Talea
T1  - The Peaceful Co-existence of Input Frequency and Structural Intervention Effects on the Comprehension of Complex Sentences in German-Speaking Children
JF  - Frontiers in psychology
N2  - The predictions of two contrasting approaches to the acquisition of transitive relative clauses were tested within the same groups of German-speaking participants aged from 3 to 5 years old. The input frequency approach predicts that object relative clauses with inanimate heads (e.g., the pullover that the man is scratching) are comprehended earlier and more accurately than those with an animate head (e.g., the man that the boy is scratching). In contrast, the structural intervention approach predicts that object relative clauses with two full NP arguments mismatching in number (e.g., the man that the boys are scratching) are comprehended earlier and more accurately than those with number-matching NPs (e.g., the man that the boy is scratching). These approaches were tested in two steps. First, we ran a corpus analysis to ensure that object relative clauses with number-mismatching NPs are not more frequent than object relative clauses with number-matching NPs in child directed speech. Next, the comprehension of these structures was tested experimentally in 3-, 4-, and 5-year-olds respectively by means of a color naming task. By comparing the predictions of the two approaches within the same participant groups, we were able to uncover that the effects predicted by the input frequency and by the structural intervention approaches co-exist and that they both influence the performance of children on transitive relative clauses, but in a manner that is modulated by age. These results reveal a sensitivity to animacy mismatch already being demonstrated by 3-year-olds and show that animacy is initially deployed more reliably than number to interpret relative clauses correctly. In all age groups, the animacy mismatch appears to explain the performance of children, thus, showing that the comprehension of frequent object relative clauses is enhanced compared to the other conditions. Starting with 4-year-olds but especially in 5-year-olds, the number mismatch supported comprehension-a facilitation that is unlikely to be driven by input frequency. Once children fine-tune their sensitivity to verb agreement information around the age of four, they are also able to deploy number marking to overcome the intervention effects. This study highlights the importance of testing experimentally contrasting theoretical approaches in order to characterize the multifaceted, developmental nature of language acquisition.
KW  - relative clauses
KW  - sentence comprehension
KW  - input frequency
KW  - number
KW  - animacy
KW  - language acquisition
KW  - German
Y1  - 2017
U6  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01590
SN  - 1664-1078
VL  - 8
PB  - Frontiers Research Foundation
CY  - Lausanne
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Adani, Flavia
A1  - Stegenwallner-Schütz, Maja Henny Katherine
A1  - Händler, Yair
A1  - Zukowski, Andrea
T1  - Elicited production of relative clauses in German: Evidence from typically developing children and children with specific language impairment
JF  - First language
N2  - We elicited the production of various types of relative clauses in a group of German-speaking children with specific language impairment (SLI) and typically developing controls in order to test the movement optionality account of grammatical difficulty in SLI. The results show that German-speaking children with SLI are impaired in relative clause production compared to typically developing children. The alternative structures that they produce consist of simple main clauses, as well as nominal and prepositional phrases produced in isolation, sometimes contextually appropriate, and sometimes not. Crucially for evaluating the movement optionality account, children with SLI produce very few instances of embedded clauses where the relative clause head noun is pronounced in situ; in fact, such responses are more common among the typically developing child controls. These results underscore the difficulty German-speaking children with SLI have with structures involving movement, but provide no specific support for the movement optionality account.
KW  - Elicited production
KW  - first language acquisition
KW  - German
KW  - relative clauses
KW  - specific language impairment
Y1  - 2016
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723716648842
SN  - 0142-7237
SN  - 1740-2344
VL  - 36
SP  - 203
EP  - 227
PB  - Sage Publ.
CY  - London
ER  - 
TY  - GEN
A1  - Adani, Flavia
A1  - Stegenwallner-Schütz, Maja Henny Katherine
A1  - Haendler, Yair
A1  - Zukowski, Andrea
T1  - Elicited production of relative clauses in German
BT  - evidence from typically developing children and children with specific language impairment
T2  - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe
N2  - We elicited the production of various types of relative clauses in a group of German-speaking children with specific language impairment (SLI) and typically developing controls in order to test the movement optionality account of grammatical difficulty in SLI. The results show that German-speaking children with SLI are impaired in relative clause production compared to typically developing children. The alternative structures that they produce consist of simple main clauses, as well as nominal and prepositional phrases produced in isolation, sometimes contextually appropriate, and sometimes not. Crucially for evaluating the movement optionality account, children with SLI produce very few instances of embedded clauses where the relative clause head noun is pronounced in situ; in fact, such responses are more common among the typically developing child controls. These results underscore the difficulty German-speaking children with SLI have with structures involving movement, but provide no specific support for the movement optionality account.
T3  - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe - 409 
KW  - elicited production
KW  - first language acquisition
KW  - German
KW  - relative clauses
KW  - specific  language impairment
Y1  - 2018
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-405149
IS  - 409
ER  - 
TY  - GEN
A1  - Adani, Flavia
A1  - Stegenwallner-Schütz, Maja Henny Katherine
A1  - Niesel, Talea
T1  - The Peaceful Co-existence of Input Frequency and Structural Intervention Effects on the Comprehension of Complex Sentences in German-Speaking Children
N2  - The predictions of two contrasting approaches to the acquisition of transitive relative clauses were tested within the same groups of German-speaking participants aged from 3 to 5 years old. The input frequency approach predicts that object relative clauses with inanimate heads (e.g., the pullover that the man is scratching) are comprehended earlier and more accurately than those with an animate head (e.g., the man that the boy is scratching). In contrast, the structural intervention approach predicts that object relative clauses with two full NP arguments mismatching in number (e.g., the man that the boys are scratching) are comprehended earlier and more accurately than those with number-matching NPs (e.g., the man that the boy is scratching). These approaches were tested in two steps. First, we ran a corpus analysis to ensure that object relative clauses with number-mismatching NPs are not more frequent than object relative clauses with number-matching NPs in child directed speech. Next, the comprehension of these structures was tested experimentally in 3-, 4-, and 5-year-olds respectively by means of a color naming task. By comparing the predictions of the two approaches within the same participant groups, we were able to uncover that the effects predicted by the input frequency and by the structural intervention approaches co-exist and that they both influence the performance of children on transitive relative clauses, but in a manner that is modulated by age. These results reveal a sensitivity to animacy mismatch already being demonstrated by 3-year-olds and show that animacy is initially deployed more reliably than number to interpret relative clauses correctly. In all age groups, the animacy mismatch appears to explain the performance of children, thus, showing that the comprehension of frequent object relative clauses is enhanced compared to the other conditions. Starting with 4-year-olds but especially in 5-year-olds, the number mismatch supported comprehension—a facilitation that is unlikely to be driven by input frequency. Once children fine-tune their sensitivity to verb agreement information around the age of four, they are also able to deploy number marking to overcome the intervention effects. This study highlights the importance of testing experimentally contrasting theoretical approaches in order to characterize the multifaceted, developmental nature of language acquisition.
T3  - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe - 352 
KW  - German
KW  - animacy
KW  - input frequency
KW  - language acquisition
KW  - number
KW  - relative clauses
KW  - sentence comprehension
Y1  - 2017
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-403672
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Adani, Flavia
A1  - Stegenwallner-Schütz, Maja Henny Katherine
A1  - Niesel, Talea
T1  - The Peaceful Co-existence of Input Frequency and Structural Intervention Effects on the Comprehension of Complex Sentences in German-Speaking Children
JF  - Frontiers in psychology
N2  - The predictions of two contrasting approaches to the acquisition of transitive relative clauses were tested within the same groups of German-speaking participants aged from 3 to 5 years old. The input frequency approach predicts that object relative clauses with inanimate heads (e.g., the pullover that the man is scratching) are comprehended earlier and more accurately than those with an animate head (e.g., the man that the boy is scratching). In contrast, the structural intervention approach predicts that object relative clauses with two full NP arguments mismatching in number (e.g., the man that the boys are scratching) are comprehended earlier and more accurately than those with number-matching NPs (e.g., the man that the boy is scratching). These approaches were tested in two steps. First, we ran a corpus analysis to ensure that object relative clauses with number-mismatching NPs are not more frequent than object relative clauses with number-matching NPs in child directed speech. Next, the comprehension of these structures was tested experimentally in 3-, 4-, and 5-year-olds respectively by means of a color naming task. By comparing the predictions of the two approaches within the same participant groups, we were able to uncover that the effects predicted by the input frequency and by the structural intervention approaches co-exist and that they both influence the performance of children on transitive relative clauses, but in a manner that is modulated by age. These results reveal a sensitivity to animacy mismatch already being demonstrated by 3-year-olds and show that animacy is initially deployed more reliably than number to interpret relative clauses correctly. In all age groups, the animacy mismatch appears to explain the performance of children, thus, showing that the comprehension of frequent object relative clauses is enhanced compared to the other conditions. Starting with 4-year-olds but especially in 5-year-olds, the number mismatch supported comprehension—a facilitation that is unlikely to be driven by input frequency. Once children fine-tune their sensitivity to verb agreement information around the age of four, they are also able to deploy number marking to overcome the intervention effects. This study highlights the importance of testing experimentally contrasting theoretical approaches in order to characterize the multifaceted, developmental nature of language acquisition.
KW  - relative clauses
KW  - sentence comprehension
KW  - input frequency
KW  - number
KW  - animacy
KW  - language acquisition
KW  - German
Y1  - 2017
U6  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01590
SN  - 1664-1078
VL  - 8
SP  - 1
EP  - 11
PB  - Frontiers Research Foundation
CY  - Lausanne
ER  - 
TY  - THES
A1  - Haendler, Yair
T1  - Effects of embedded pronouns on relative clause processing
T1  - Effekte eingebauter Pronomen auf Relativsatzverarbeitung
BT  - cross-linguistic evidence from children and adults
BT  - Hinweise zwischensprachlischer Daten von Kindern und Erwachsenen
N2  - Difficulties with object relative clauses (ORC), as compared to subject relative clauses (SR), are widely attested across different languages, both in adults and in children. This SR-ORC asymmetry is reduced, or even eliminated, when the embedded constituent in the ORC is a pronoun, rather than a lexical noun phrase. The studies included in this thesis were designed to explore under what circumstances the pronoun facilitation occurs; whether all pronouns have the same effect; whether SRs are also affected by embedded pronouns; whether children perform like adults on such structures; and whether performance is related to cognitive abilities such as memory or grammatical knowledge. Several theoretical approaches that explain the pronoun facilitation in relative clauses are evaluated. The experimental data have been collected in three languages–German, Italian and Hebrew–stemming from both children and adults.
In the German study (Chapter 2), ORCs with embedded 1st- or 3rd-person pronouns are compared to ORCs with an embedded lexical noun phrase. Eye-movement data from 5-year-old children show that the 1st-person pronoun facilitates processing, but not the 3rd-person pronoun. Moreover, children’s performance is modulated by additive effects of their memory and grammatical skills. In the Italian study (Chapter 3), the 1st-person pronoun advantage over the 3rd-person pronoun is tested in ORCs and SRs that display a similar word order. Eye-movement data from 5-year-olds and adult controls and reading times data from adults are pitted against the outcome of a corpus analysis, showing that the 1st-/3rd-person pronoun asymmetry emerges in the two relative clause types to an equal extent. In the Hebrew study (Chapter 4), the goal is to test the effect of a special kind of pronoun–a non-referential arbitrary subject pronoun–on ORC comprehension, in the light of potential confounds in previous studies that used this pronoun. Data from a referent-identification task with 4- to 5-year-olds indicate that, when the experimental material is controlled, the non-referential pronoun does not necessarily facilitate ORC comprehension. Importantly, however, children have even more difficulties when the embedded constituent is a referential pronoun. The non-referentiality / referentiality asymmetry is emphasized by the relation between children’s performance on the experimental task and their memory skills.
Together, the data presented in this thesis indicate that sentence processing is not only driven by structural (or syntactic) factors, but also by discourse-related ones, like pronouns’ referential properties or their discourse accessibility mechanism, which is defined as the level of ease or difficulty with which referents of pronouns are identified and retrieved from the discourse model. Although independent in essence, these structural and discourse factors can in some cases interact in a way that affects sentence processing. Moreover, both types of factors appear to be strongly related to memory. The data also support the idea that, from early on, children are sensitive to the same factors that affect adults’ sentence processing, and that the processing strategies of both populations are qualitatively similar.
In sum, this thesis suggests that a comprehensive theory of human sentence processing needs to account for effects that are due to both structural and discourse-related factors, which operate as a function of memory capacity.
N2  - Zahlreiche Studien haben gefunden, dass sowohl Erwachsene als auch Kinder über Sprachen hinweg größere Schwierigkeiten mit Objektrelativsätzen (ORS) als mit Subjektrelativsätzen (SRS) haben. Diese SRS-ORS-Asymmetrie wird reduziert oder sogar ausgelöscht, wenn das eingebaute Subjekt im ORS keine lexikalische Nominalphrase, sondern ein Pronomen ist. Die Experimente in dieser Dissertation erforschen unter welchen Umständen die Begünstigung des Pronomens geschieht; ob alle Pronomen denselben Effekt haben; ob SRS ebenso von eingebauten Pronomen beeinflusst werden; ob Erwachsene und Kinder in Bezug auf diese Strukturen eine ähnlich Leistung zeigen; und ob die Leistung von Versuchspersonen eine Verbindung mit kognitiven Fähigkeiten hat, wie zum Beispiel mit dem Arbeitsgedächtnis oder mit grammatikalischer Kenntnis. Verschiedene theoretische Rahmen, die die Pronomenvereinfachung in Relativsätzen erklären, werden evaluiert. Die Daten wurden in drei Sprachen–Deutsch, Italienisch und Hebräisch–mit Kindern und Erwachsenen erhoben.
In der Studie auf Deutsch (Kapitel 2) werden ORS mit einem eingebauten Pronomen der ersten oder der dritten Person mit ORS verglichen, die eine eingebaute lexikalische Nominalphrase haben. Blickbewegungsdaten von 5-jährigen Kindern zeigen, dass das Pronomen der ersten Person die Satzverarbeitung vereinfacht, nicht jedoch das Pronomen der dritten Person. Die Performance von Kindern wird durch zusätzliche Effekte wie Gedächtnis und grammatikalische Fähigkeiten beeinflusst. In der Studie auf Italienisch (Kapitel 3) wird der Vereinfachungsvorteil des Pronomens der ersten Person, im Vergleich mit dem der dritten Person, in ORS und SRS, die eine ähnliche Wortstellung haben, untersucht. Blickbewegungsdaten von 5-jährigen Kindern und von einer Kontrollgruppe von Erwachsenen sowie Lesezeiten von Erwachsenen, werden mit dem Ergebnis einer Korpusanalyse verglichen. Sie zeigen denselben asymmetrischen Effekt der zwei Pronomen in beiden Relativsatztypen. In der Studie auf Hebräisch (Kapitel 4) war das Ziel, den Effekt eines besonderen Pronomens, nämlich eines nicht-referentiellen beliebigen Subjektspronomens, auf das Verständnis von ORS zu untersuchen, anhand methodischer Problematiken in vergangenen Studien, die dieses Pronomen verwendet haben. Daten von 4- und 5-jährigen Kindern, die eine Referentenerkennungsaufgabe gemacht haben, zeigen, dass mit kontrolliertem Versuchsmaterial das nicht-referentielle Pronomen nicht unbedingt das Verständnis von ORS erleichtert. Jedoch hatten die Kinder aber noch mehr Schwierigkeiten, wenn das eingebaute Pronomen ein referentielles Pronomen war. Die Asymmetrie zwischen nicht-referentiellen und referentiellen Pronomen wird durch die Verbindung zwischen der Performance in der experimentellen Aufgabe und den Gedächtnisfähigkeiten der Kinder hervorgehoben.
In ihrer Gesamtheit zeigen die in dieser Arbeit präsentierten Daten, dass Sprachverarbeitung nicht nur durch strukturelle (oder syntaktische) Faktoren beeinträchtigt wird, sondern auch durch Diskurs-gebundene Faktoren, wie die referentiellen Eigenschaften von Pronomen oder den Mechanismus von Diskurszugänglichkeit (discourse accessibility). Diese wird definiert als das Leichtigkeits- oder Schwierigkeitslevel mit dem Referenten von Pronomen im Diskursmodell erkannt und abgerufen werden. Diese strukturellen und diskursgebundenen Faktoren, obwohl sie im Wesentlichen unabhängig voneinander sind, können in manchen Fällen aufeinander einwirken und zusammen die Sprachverarbeitung beeinträchtigen. Darüber hinaus scheinen beide Faktoren eine Verbindung mit dem Gedächtnis zu haben. Die Daten unterstützen auch die Idee, dass Kinder von früh an auf dieselben Faktoren empfindlich reagieren, die die Sprachverarbeitung von Erwachsenen bestimmen und dass die Sprachverarbeitungsstrategien von beiden Altersgruppen qualitativ ähnlich sind.
Zusammengefasst weist diese Dissertation darauf hin, dass eine umfassende Theorie der menschlichen Sprachverarbeitung in der Lage sein sollte, Effekte zu erklären, die sowohl durch Satzstruktur als auch durch Diskurs bedingt werden und die in Abhängigkeit von Gedächtnisfähigkeit funktionieren.
KW  - relative clauses
KW  - pronouns
KW  - discourse
KW  - sentence processing
KW  - eye-tracking
KW  - language development
KW  - Relativsätze
KW  - Pronomen
KW  - Diskurs
KW  - Sprachverarbeitung
KW  - Blickbewegungen
KW  - Sprachentwicklung
Y1  - 2016
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-396883
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Haendler, Yair
A1  - Kliegl, Reinhold
A1  - Adani, Flavia
T1  - Discourse accessibility constraints in children's processing of object relative clauses
JF  - Frontiers in psychology
N2  - Children's poor performance on object relative clauses has been explained in terms of intervention locality. This approach predicts that object relatives with a full DP head and an embedded pronominal subject are easier than object relatives in which both the head noun and the embedded subject are full DPs. This prediction is shared by other accounts formulated to explain processing mechanisms. We conducted a visual-world study designed to test the off-line comprehension and on-line processing of object relatives in German-speaking 5-year-olds. Children were tested on three types of object relatives, all having a full DP head noun and differing with respect to the type of nominal phrase that appeared in the embedded subject position: another full DP, a 1st- or a 3rd-person pronoun. Grammatical skills and memory capacity were also assessed in order to see whether and how they affect children's performance. Most accurately processed were object relatives with 1st-person pronoun, independently of children's language and memory skills. Performance on object relatives with two full DPs was overall more accurate than on object relatives with 3rd-person pronoun. In the former condition, children with stronger grammatical skills accurately processed the structure and their memory abilities determined how fast they were; in the latter condition, children only processed accurately the structure if they were strong both in their grammatical skills and in their memory capacity. The results are discussed in the light of accounts that predict different pronoun effects like the ones we find, which depend on the referential properties of the pronouns. We then discuss which role language and memory abilities might have in processing object relatives with various embedded nominal phrases.
KW  - child language
KW  - relative clauses
KW  - discourse
KW  - pronouns
KW  - intervention locality
KW  - visual-world paradigm
Y1  - 2015
U6  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00360
SN  - 1664-1078
VL  - 6
PB  - Frontiers Research Foundation
CY  - Lausanne
ER  -